Comprehensive versus standard care in post-severe acute kidney injury survivors, a randomized controlled trial

Role of a Pharmacist in Postdischarge Care for Patients With Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to explore and describe the role of pharmacists in providing postdischarge care to patients with kidney disease.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (Ebscohost), Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus were searched on January 30, 2023. Publication date limits were not included. Search terms were identified based on 3 concepts: kidney disease, pharmacy services, and patient discharge. Experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, and qualitative studies, or study protocols, describing the pharmacist's role in providing postdischarge care for patients with kidney disease, excluding kidney transplant recipients, were eligible.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Six unique interventions were described in 10 studies meeting inclusion criteria.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Four interventions targeted patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) during hospitalization and 2 evaluated patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease. Pharmacists were a multidisciplinary care team (MDCT) member in 5 interventions and were the sole provider in 1. Roles commonly identified include medication review, medication reconciliation, medication action plan formation, kidney function assessment, drug dose adjustments, and disease education. Some studies showed improvements in diagnostic coding, laboratory monitoring, medication therapy problem (MTP) resolution, and patient education; prevention of hospital readmission was inconsistent. Limitations include lack of standardized reporting of kidney disease, transitions of care processes, and differences in outcomes evaluated.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review identifies potential roles of a pharmacist as part of a postdischarge MDCT for patients with varying degrees of kidney disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacist's role in providing postdischarge care to patients with kidney disease is inconsistent. Multidisciplinary care teams including a pharmacist provided consistent identification and resolution of MTPs, improved patient education, and increased self-awareness of diagnosis.

Identification and outcomes of acute kidney disease in patients presenting in Bolivia, Brazil, South Africa, and Nepal

BACKGROUND

The International Society of Nephrology proposes an acute kidney disease (AKD) management strategy that includes a risk score to aid AKD identification in low- and low-middle-income countries (LLMICs). We investigated the performance of the risk score and determined kidney and patient outcomes from AKD at multiple LLMIC sites.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Adult patients presenting to healthcare facilities in Bolivia, Brazil, South Africa, and Nepal were screened using a symptom-based risk score and clinical judgment. Those at AKD risk underwent serum creatinine testing, predominantly with a point-of-care (POC) device. Clinical data were collected prospectively between September 2018 and November 2020. We analyzed risk score performance and determined AKD outcomes at discharge and over follow-up of 90 days. A total of 4,311 patients were at increased risk of AKD, and 2,922 (67.8%) had AKD confirmed. AKD prevalence was 80.2% in patients enrolled based on the risk score and 32.5% when enrolled on clinical judgment alone (p < 0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.73 for the risk score to detect AKD. Death during admission occurred in 84 (2.9%) patients with AKD and 3 (0.2%) patients without kidney disease (p < 0.0001). Death after discharge occurred in 206 (9.7%) AKD patients, and 1865 AKD patients underwent reassessment of kidney function after discharge; 902 (48.4%) patients had persistent kidney disease including 740 (39.7%) patients reclassified with de novo or previously undiagnosed chronic kidney disease (CKD). The study was pragmatically designed to assess outcomes as part of routine healthcare, and there was heterogeneity in clinical practice and outcomes between sites, in addition to selection bias during cohort identification.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a risk score can aid AKD identification in LLMICs. High rates of persistent kidney disease and mortality after discharge highlight the importance of AKD follow-up in low-resource settings.

Advancing Community Care and Access to Follow-Up after Acute Kidney Injury Hospitalization: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Key Points

Background

AKI is associated with development and progression of CKD. Gaps in recommended care for CKD are common after AKI.

Methods

In this randomized controlled trial conducted in Alberta, Canada, we allocated adults hospitalized with Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage 2 or greater AKI to a risk-guided, transition of care intervention versus usual practices at the time of hospital discharge. For people in the intervention group, we used a validated risk index to predict risk of severe CKD after AKI. People at low risk (<1%) received patient education alone. People at medium risk received additional clinical guidance, provided to their primary care physician. People at high risk (>10%) were referred to nephrology. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), statin, and nephrology specialist follow-up within 90 days of discharge.

Results

One hundred fifty-five patients were recruited; the mean (SD) age was 60 (15) years, 91 (60%) were male, and 96 (62%) had eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 or urine albumin-creatinine ratio >30 mg/g at discharge. The proportion of participants who received ACE-I/ARB, statin treatment, and nephrologist follow-up was 28% in the intervention group versus 3% in the usual care group (absolute risk difference [RD], 25%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15% to 36%). The use of ACE-I or ARB in participants with urine albumin-creatinine ratio >300 mg/g or diabetes was greater in the high-risk group with the intervention versus usual care (RD, 37%; 95% CI, 6% to 67%), as was statin use among those with CKD (RD, 30%; 95% CI, 5% to 56%) and nephrologist follow-up for those with sustained eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at discharge (RD, 78%; 95% CI, 56% to 100%). Hyperkalemia was more frequent in the intervention group (RD, 10%; 95% CI, 9% to 19%).

Conclusions

A risk-guided intervention for patients hospitalized with AKI increased recommended processes of care for CKD for high-risk patients after hospital discharge.

Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:

Improving Post Discharge Care after Acute Kidney Injury (AFTER AKI), NCT02915575.

Outcomes after acute kidney injury and critical illness

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in critical illness is common, and survivors are faced with a host of adverse outcomes. In this article, we review the current landscape of outcomes and care in survivors of AKI and critical illness.

RECENT FINDINGS

Follow-up care of survivors of AKI and critical illness is prudent to monitor for and mitigate the risk of adverse outcomes. Observational data have suggested improvement in outcomes with nephrology-based follow-up care, and recent interventional studies demonstrate similar findings. However, current post-AKI care is suboptimal with various challenges, such as breakdowns in the transition of care during hospital episodes and into the community, barriers for patients in follow-up, and lack of identification of high-risk patients for nephrology-based follow-up. Tools predictive of renal nonrecovery and long-term outcomes may help to identify high-risk patients who may benefit the most from nephrology-based care post-AKI.

SUMMARY

Follow-up care of survivors of AKI and critical illness may improve outcomes and there is a need to prioritize transitions of care into the community. Further research is needed to elucidate the best ways to risk-stratify and manage post-AKI survivors to improve outcomes.

Unveiling the enigma of acute kidney disease: predicting prognosis, exploring interventions, and embracing a multidisciplinary approach

Acute kidney disease (AKD) is a critical transitional period between acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. The incidence of AKD following acute kidney injury is approximately 33.6%, and it can occur without identifiable preceding acute kidney injury. The development of AKD is associated with increased risks of chronic kidney disease, dialysis, and mortality. Biomarkers and subphenotypes are promising tools to predict prognosis in AKD. The complex clinical situations in patients with AKD necessitate a comprehensive and structured approach, termed "KAMPS" (kidney function check, advocacy, medications, pressure, sick day protocols). We introduce "MAND-MASS," an acronym devised to summarize the reconciliation of medications during episodes of acute illness, as a critical component of the sick day protocols at AKD. A multidisciplinary team care, consisting of nephrologists, pharmacists, dietitians, health educators, and nurses, is an optimal model to achieve the care bundle in KAMPS. Although the evidence for patients with AKD is still lacking, several potential pharmacological agents may improve outcomes, including but not limited to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. In conclusion, accurate prognosis prediction and effective treatment for AKD are critical yet unmet clinical needs. Future studies are urgently needed to improve patient care in this complex and rapidly evolving field.

The effect of pharmacist-led medication therapy management in the multidisciplinary care of acute kidney injury survivors

BACKGROUND

The Acute Disease Quality Initiative advocates multidisciplinary care for the survivors of acute kidney injury (AKI). The bundled care strategy recognizes the role of pharmacists. However, their specific contributions in this context remain underexplored.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined the efficacy of pharmacist-led post-AKI pharmaceutical care in outpatient settings at a single center. Adults with recent AKI during hospitalization, maintaining an estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 postdischarge, were enrolled in a multidisciplinary team care program from March 2022 to January 2023, with a 6-month follow-up period. Pharmacist-delivered care adhered to international multidisciplinary consensus guidelines. Efficacy was evaluated by analyzing medication-related recommendations, medication adherence, nephrotoxic drug utilization, and renoprotective medication usage before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were referred to the pharmacist-managed clinic. Of these, 33 patients (mean age, 63 ± 15 years; 60.6% male) attended the clinic. Nineteen patients completed follow-up visits. The pharmacist provided 14 medication-related recommendations to relevant physicians, with 10 of these recommendations (71.4%) being accepted. There was a significant decrease in the use of modifiable nephrotoxic drugs (p = 0.03). However, no significant improvements were noted in medication adherence or the utilization of renoprotective medications.

CONCLUSION

Our study underscores the potential benefits of pharmacist-led post-AKI bundled care strategy in outpatient settings. We observed a significant reduction in the utilization of modifiable nephrotoxic drugs, indicating the effectiveness of pharmacist interventions in optimizing medication regimens to mitigate renal harm.

Heterogeneity in the definition of major adverse kidney events: a scoping review

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with persistent renal dysfunction, the receipt of dialysis, dialysis dependence, and mortality. Accordingly, the concept of major adverse kidney events (MAKE) has been adopted as an endpoint for assessing the impact of AKI. However, applied criteria or observation periods for operationalizing MAKE appear to vary across studies. To evaluate this heterogeneity for MAKE evaluation, we performed a systematic scoping review of studies that employed MAKE as an AKI endpoint. Four major academic databases were searched, and we identified 122 studies with increasing numbers over time. We found marked heterogeneity in applied criteria and observation periods for MAKE across these studies, with some even lacking a description of criteria. Moreover, 13 different observation periods were employed, with 30 days and 90 days as the most common. Persistent renal dysfunction was evaluated by estimated glomerular filtration rate (34%) or serum creatinine concentration (48%); however, 37 different definitions for this component were employed in terms of parameters, cut-off criteria, and assessment periods. The definition for the dialysis component also showed significant heterogeneity regarding assessment periods and duration of dialysis requirement (chronic vs temporary). Finally, MAKE rates could vary by 7% [interquartile range: 1.7-16.7%] with different observation periods or by 36.4% with different dialysis component definitions. Our findings revealed marked heterogeneity in MAKE definitions, particularly regarding component assessment and observation periods. Dedicated discussion is needed to establish uniform and acceptable standards to operationalize MAKE in terms of selection and applied criteria of components, observation period, and reporting criteria for future trials on AKI and related conditions.

Quality of life after acute kidney injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Deciphering the effect of acute kidney injury (AKI) during critical illness on long-term quality of life versus the impact of conditions that brought on critical illness is difficult.

RECENT FINDINGS

Reports on patient-centred outcomes such as health-related quality of life (HRQOL) have provided insight into the long-lasting impact of critical illness complicated by AKI. However, these data stem from observational studies and randomized controlled trials, which have been heterogeneous in their patient population, timing, instruments used for assessment and reporting. Recent studies have corroborated these findings including lack of effect of renal replacement therapy compared to severe AKI on outcomes and worse physical compared to cognitive dysfunction.

SUMMARY

In adults, more deficits in physical than mental health domains are found in survivors of AKI in critical care, whereas memory deficits and learning impairments have been noted in children. Further study is needed to understand and develop interventions that preserve or enhance the quality of life for individual patients who survive AKI following critical illness, across all ages.

Digital health utilities in acute kidney injury management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a highly prevalent clinical syndrome that substantially impacts patient outcomes. It is accepted by the clinical communities that the management of AKI is time-sensitive. Unfortunately, despite growing proof of its preventability, AKI management remains suboptimal in community, acute care, and postacute care settings. Digital health solutions comprise various tools and models to improve care processes and patient outcomes in multiple medical fields. AKI development, progression, recovery, or lack thereof, offers tremendous opportunities for developing, validating, and implementing digital health solutions in multiple settings. This article will review the definitions and components of digital health, the characteristics of AKI that allow digital health solutions to be considered, and the opportunities and threats in implementing these solutions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past two decades, the academic output related to the use of digital health solutions in AKI has exponentially grown. While this indicates the growing interest in the topic, most topics are primarily related to clinical decision support by detecting AKI within hospitals or using artificial intelligence or machine learning technologies to predict AKI within acute care settings. However, recently, projects to assess the impact of digital health solutions in more complex scenarios, for example, managing nephrotoxins among adults of pediatric patients who already have AKI, is increasing. Depending on the type of patients, chosen digital health solution intervention, comparator groups, and selected outcomes, some of these studies showed benefits, while some did not indicate additional gain in care processes or clinical outcomes.

SUMMARY

Careful needs assessment, selection of the correct digital health solution, and appropriate clinical validation of the benefits while avoiding additional health disparities are moral, professional, and ethical obligations for all individuals using these healthcare tools, including clinicians, data scientists, and administrators.

Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Post-Acute Kidney Injury Clinic on Awareness and Knowledge in Acute Kidney Injury Survivors

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) awareness and knowledge among survivors is poor, leading to suboptimal self-management and follow-up care. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary post-AKI clinic on AKI awareness and knowledge among survivors.

METHODS

We conducted a quasi-experimental study among stage 2-3 AKI survivors who were followed in the multidisciplinary post-AKI clinic, comprising nephrologists, renal nurses, pharmacists, and dietitians. Patients were evaluated before and after entering the clinic during a 3-month follow-up period, using a three-component questionnaire including the following: (1) Do you know of your AKI diagnosis during hospitalization? (yes/no), (2) how do you rate your AKI knowledge? (ranging from 1 or "very low" to 5 or "excellent"), and (3) 25-item objective AKI knowledge survey instrument that covered general knowledge of AKI, nutrition, medication, and symptoms of renal failure.

RESULTS

A total of 108 AKI survivors were enrolled, with 37.0%, 41.7%, and 21.3% being stage 2 AKI, stage 3 AKI, and stage 3-dialysis AKI, respectively. Before entering the clinic, 50% of patients were unaware of their AKI during hospitalization. After receiving education from the multidisciplinary post-AKI clinic, all patients became aware they had experienced AKI. The mean perceived knowledge and objective knowledge scores were significantly increased over the 3-month period from 1.6 (0.7) to 3.9 (0.7) out of 5 and 15.4 (3.5) to 21.4 (2.0) out of 25, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). Additionally, reverse transformation of the Likert scale to a percentage format also revealed a significant improvement in mean perceived AKI knowledge scores, transitioning from 13.8 ± 16.8 to 73.0 ± 17.6, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

The multidisciplinary post-AKI clinic effectively enhanced AKI awareness and knowledge among survivors. These findings highlight the importance of follow-up care and the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term outcomes associated with increased knowledge.

Care Bundle for Acute Kidney Injury in Cardiac Patients: A Cluster-Randomized Trial

Detection and timely intervention of acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major challenge worldwide. Electronic alerts for AKI may improve process- and patient-related endpoints. The present study evaluated the efficacy of an AKI electronic alert system and care bundle. This is a two-arm, prospective, cluster-randomized, controlled trial enrolling patients with AKI (KDIGO criteria) and cardiac diseases. Patients were randomly assigned to a routine care group or intervention group (DRKS-IDDRKS00017751). Two hundred patients (age 79 years, 46% female) were enrolled, with 100 patients in each group. The primary endpoint did not differ between patients in the routine care group 0.5 (-7.6-10.8) mL/min/1.73 m2 versus patients in the intervention group 1.0 (-13.5-15.1) mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.527. Proportions of patients in both study groups with hyperkalemia, pulmonary edema, and renal acidosis were comparable. The stop of antihypertensive medication during hypotensive periods was more frequent in patients in the intervention group compared to patients in the control group, p = 0.029. The AKI diagnosis and text module for AKI in the discharge letter were more frequently documented in patients in the intervention group (40%/48% vs. 25%/34%, p = 0.034; p = 0.044, respectively). Continued intake of RAAS inhibitors and the presence of a cardiac device were independently associated with a less pronounced decrease in eGFR from admission to the lowest value. In this RCT, electronic alerts for AKI and a care bundle improved process- but not patient-related endpoints.

Clinical Effectiveness of Renal Transplant Outpatient Pharmaceutical Care Services in Korea

BACKGROUND

The necessity and importance of pharmaceutical care services (PCS) are well recognized, yet the concept and scope of PCS have not yet been clearly defined in Korea, particularly in kidney transplantation outpatient clinics.

AIM

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate whether PCS is effective in the outpatient setting for kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

For three years, a clinical pharmacist provided PCS to kidney transplant patients in an outpatient setting to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of PCS.

RESULTS

A total of 302 patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio, with 151 in the PCS group and 151 in the control group. These patients were followed, and a total of 476 interventions were provided to them, including medication reconciliation (n = 113, 23.7%), medication evaluation and management (n = 186, 39.1%), and pharmaceutical care transition (n = 177, 37.2%) services. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) exhibited a notable difference between the control and PCS groups when comparing the pre- and post-study periods measurements. In the control group, there was a decline of 7.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 in eGFR. In contrast, the PCS group showed a smaller decline of 2.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.03). The adjusted odds ratio for end stage renal disease development in the PCS group was 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.26-0.96), indicating a significantly lower risk compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the promising potential of PCS implementation in kidney transplantation outpatient clinics. Further research is needed to validate and expand upon these findings, especially in diverse clinical settings.

Development and Implementation of an Acute Kidney Injury Remote Patient Monitoring Program: Research Letter

Acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors have a dynamic posthospital course which warrants close monitoring. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) could be used to improve quality and efficiency of AKI survivor care.

Objective

The objective of this report was to describe the development and preliminary feasibility of an AKI RPM program launched in October 2021.

Setting

Academic medical center.

Patients

Patients enrolled in the AKI RPM program were those who experienced AKI during a hospitalization and underwent nephrology consultation.

Measurements/Methods

At enrollment, patients were provided with home monitoring technology and underwent weekly laboratory assessments. Nurses evaluated the data daily and adhered to prespecified protocols for management and escalation of care if needed.

Results

Twenty patients were enrolled in AKI RPM in the first 5 months. Median duration of program participation was 36 (31, 40) days. Eight patients (40%) experienced an unplanned readmission, or an emergency department visit, half (N = 4) of which were attributed to AKI and related circumstances. Of the 9 postgraduation survey respondents, all were satisfied with the RPM program and 89% would recommend RPM to other patients with similar health conditions.

Limitations

Acute kidney injury RPM was made possible by the existing infrastructure in our integrated health system and the robust resources available in the Mayo Clinic Center for Digital Health. Such infrastructure may not be universally available which could limit scale and generalizability of such a program.

Conclusions

Remote patient monitoring can offer a unique opportunity to bridge the care transition from hospital to home and increase access to quality care for the AKI survivors.

Comprehensive Acute Kidney Injury Survivor Care: Protocol for the Randomized Acute Kidney Injury in Care Transitions Pilot Trial

BACKGROUND

Innovative care models are needed to address gaps in kidney care follow-up among acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors. We developed the multidisciplinary AKI in Care Transitions (ACT) program, which embeds post-AKI care in patients' primary care clinic.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this randomized pilot trial is to test the feasibility and acceptability of the ACT program and study protocol, including recruitment and retention, procedures, and outcome measures.

METHODS

The study will be conducted at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, a tertiary care center with a local primary care practice. Individuals who are included have stage 3 AKI during their hospitalization, do not require dialysis at discharge, have a local primary care provider, and are discharged to their home. Patients unable or unwilling to provide informed consent and recipients of any transplant within 100 days of enrollment are excluded. Consented patients are randomized to receive the intervention (ie, ACT program) or usual care. The ACT program intervention includes predischarge kidney health education from nurses and coordinated postdischarge laboratory monitoring (serum creatinine and urine protein assessment) and follow-up with a primary care provider and pharmacist within 14 days. The usual care group receives no specific study-related intervention, and any aspects of AKI care are at the direction of the treating team. This study will examine the feasibility of the ACT program, including recruitment, randomization and retention in a trial setting, and intervention fidelity. The feasibility and acceptability of participating in the ACT program will also be examined in qualitative interviews with patients and staff and through surveys. Qualitative interviews will be deductively and inductively coded and themes compared across data types. Observations of clinical encounters will be examined for discussion and care plans related to kidney health. Descriptive analyses will summarize quantitative measures of the feasibility and acceptability of ACT. Participants' knowledge about kidney health, quality of life, and process outcomes (eg, type and timing of laboratory assessments) will be described for both groups. Clinical outcomes (eg, unplanned rehospitalization) up to 12 months will be compared with Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

This study received funding from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality on April 21, 2021, and was approved by the Institutional Review Board on December 14, 2021. As of March 14, 2023, seventeen participants each have been enrolled in the intervention and usual care groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Feasible and generalizable AKI survivor care delivery models are needed to improve care processes and health outcomes. This pilot trial will test the ACT program, which uses a multidisciplinary model focused on primary care to address this gap.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05184894; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05184894.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/48109.

Pharmacist-provider collaborative visits after hospital discharge in a comprehensive acute kidney injury survivor model

BACKGROUND

Postdischarge follow-up in primary care is an opportunity for pharmacists to re-evaluate medication use in acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors. Of the emerging AKI survivor care models described in literature, only one involved a pharmacist with limited detail about the direct impact.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe pharmacist contributions to a comprehensive postdischarge AKI survivorship program in primary care (the AKI in Care Transitions [ACT] program).

METHODS

The ACT program was piloted from May to December of 2021 at Mayo Clinic as a bundled care strategy for patients who survived an episode of AKI and were discharged home without the need for hemodialysis. Patients received education and care coordination from nurses before discharge and later completed postdischarge laboratory assessment and clinician follow-up in primary care. During the follow-up encounter, patients completed a 30-minute comprehensive medication management visit with a pharmacist focusing on AKI survivorship considerations. Medication therapy recommendations were communicated to a collaborating primary care provider (PCP) before a separate 30-minute visit with the patient. PCPs had access to clinical decision support with evidence-based post-AKI care recommendations. Medication-related issues were summarized descriptively.

RESULTS

Pharmacists made 28 medication therapy recommendations (median 3 per patient, interquartile range 2-3) and identified 14 medication discrepancies for the 11 patients who completed the pilot program, and 86% of the medication therapy recommendations were acted on by the PCP within 7 days. Six recommendations were made to initiate renoprotective medications, and 5 were acted on (83%).

CONCLUSION

During the pilot phase of a multifaceted transitional care program for AKI survivors, pharmacists' successfully identified and addressed multiple medication therapy problems, including for renally active drugs. These results demonstrate the potential for pharmacist-provider collaborative visits in primary care to improve safe and effective medication use in AKI survivors.

Impact of cardiac surgery associated acute kidney injury on 1-year major adverse kidney events

Background

The incidence of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery (CSA-AKI) is up to 30%, and the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been found to be higher in these patients compared to the AKI-free population. The aim of our study was to assess the risk of major adverse kidney events (MAKE) [25% or greater decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), new hemodialysis, and death] after cardiac surgery in a Spanish cohort and to evaluate the utility of the score developed by Legouis D et al. (CSA-CKD score) in predicting the occurrence of MAKE.

Methods

This was a single-center retrospective study of patients who required cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during 2015, with a 1-year follow-up after the intervention. The inclusion criteria were patients over 18 years old who had undergone cardiac surgery [i.e., valve substitution (VS), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), or a combination of both procedures].

Results

The number of patients with CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min) increased from 74 (18.3%) to 97 (24%) within 1 year after surgery. The median eGFR declined from 85 to 82 mL/min in the non-CSA-AKI patient group and from 73 to 65 mL/min in those with CSA-AKI (p = 0.024). Fifty-eight patients (1.4%) presented with MAKE at the 1-year follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the only variable associated with MAKE was CSA-AKI [odds ratio (OR) 2.386 (1.31-4.35), p = 0.004]. The median CSA-CKD score was higher in the MAKE cohort [3 (2-4) vs. 2 (1-3), p < 0.001], but discrimination was poor, with a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.682 (0.611-0.754).

Conclusion

Any-stage CSA-AKI is associated with a risk of MAKE after 1 year. Further research into new measures that identify at-risk patients is needed so that appropriate patient follow-up can be carried out.

Harm! foul! How acute kidney injury SHReDDs patient futures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Transition from acute kidney injury (AKI) to chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasingly accepted. Less well recognized, but supported by very similar data, is development of disease of other organ systems after AKI. Awareness of other-organ sequelae of AKI may inform efforts to improve the care of patients after AKI.

RECENT FINDINGS

Stroke, hypertension, reproductive risk, dementia, and death (SHReDD) are sequelae, which occur with increased risk relative to that of non-AKI within 6 months-3 years after AKI diagnosis, and which are supported by preclinical/mechanistic study. Adjusted hazard ratios for these sequelae are strikingly similar to that of AKI-CKD, ranging from 1.2 to 3.0. Mechanistic studies suggest kidney-centric mechanisms including sodium regulation, volume status regulation, and the renin-angiotensin system are drivers of long-term, extra-renal, change.

SUMMARY

Further clinical characterization and mechanistic insight is necessary, and may have considerable translational impact. Programs which screen or follow post-AKI patients may increase clinical utility if focus is expanded to include the SHReDD complications.

The epidemiology and long-term outcomes of acute kidney disease in a resource-limited setting

BACKGROUND

The concept of acute kidney disease (AKD) implies kidney damage that results in a significant decrease in glomerular filtration rate, including acute kidney injury (AKI), but that is not persistent enough to meet the criteria of chronic kidney disease (CKD). While a few studies have shown associations between AKD and the risk of adverse outcomes, there is still a lack of evidence from resource-limited settings.

METHODS

All hospitalized patients at the study hospital during 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Diagnosis of AKI, AKD, and CKD was based on the diagnostic algorithm proposed by KDIGO. Patients were followed up for 2 years to determine their risks of mortality, development of CKD, and progression of pre-existing CKD.

RESULTS

A total of 9800 patients were included in the analysis, 26.1% of whom had pre-existing CKD, while AKD without AKI was found in 8% and 7% of individuals with and without pre-existing CKD, respectively. Patients with AKD without AKI were associated with higher in-hospital mortality than those without pre-existing CKD [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 2.50; 95% CI 1.43, 4.37] and with pre-existing CKD (aHR 1.79; 95% CI 1.16, 2.76). The incidence of new CKD was higher in the group of AKD without AKI than in the AKI group (34.8 vs. 14.7%).

CONCLUSION

In a resource-limited setting, AKD is associated with short- and long-term mortality and CKD progression, especially in individuals with pre-existing CKD.

Long-term outcomes in patients who received veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and renal replacement therapy: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in patients with severe respiratory failure receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, little is known of long-term kidney function in ECMO survivors. We aimed to assess the long-term mortality and kidney outcomes in adult patients treated with veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO).

Methods

This was a single-centre retrospective study of adult patients (≥ 18 years old) who were treated with VV-ECMO at a commissioned ECMO centre in the UK between 1st September 2010, and 30th November 2016. AKI was defined and staged using the serum creatinine and urine output criteria of the Kidney Diseases: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classification. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. Secondary outcomes were long-term mortality (up to March 2020), 1-year incidence of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) among AKI patients who received renal replacement therapy (AKI-RRT), AKI patients who did not receive RRT (AKI-no RRT) and patients without AKI (non-AKI).

Results

A total of 300 patients [57% male; median age 44.5; interquartile range (IQR) 34–54] were included in the final analysis. Past medical histories included diabetes (12%), hypertension (17%), and CKD (2.3%). The main cause of severe respiratory failure was pulmonary infection (72%). AKI occurred in 230 patients (76.7%) and 59.3% received renal replacement therapy (RRT). One-year mortality was 32% in AKI-RRT patients vs. 21.4% in non-AKI patients (p = 0.014). The median follow-up time was 4.35 years. Patients who received RRT had a higher risk of 1-year mortality than those who did not receive RRT (adjusted HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.06, 3.06; p = 0.029). ESKD occurred in 3 patients, all of whom were in the AKI-RRT group. At 1-year, 41.2% of survivors had serum creatinine results available. Among these, CKD was prevalent in 33.3% of AKI-RRT patients vs. 4.3% in non-AKI patients (p = 0.004).

Conclusions

VV-EMCO patients with AKI-RRT had high long-term mortality. Monitoring of kidney function after hospital discharge was poor. In patients with follow-up creatinine results available, the CKD prevalence was high at 1 year, especially in AKI-RRT patients. More awareness about this serious long-term complication and appropriate follow-up interventions are required.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-022-01046-0.

The Effectiveness of Pharmacist Interventions in the Management of Patient with Renal Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The existing trials have focused on a variety of interventions to improve outcomes in renal failure; however, quantitative evidence comparing the effect of performing multidimensional interventions is scarce. The present paper reviews data from previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs), examining interventions performed for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and transplants by multidisciplinary teams, including pharmacists. Methods: A systematic search with quality assessment was performed using the revised Cochrane Collaboration's 'Risk of Bias' tool. Results and Conclusion: Thirty-three RCTs were included in the review, and the data from nineteen protocols were included in further quantitative analyses. A wide range of outcomes was considered, including those associated with progression of CKD, cardiovascular risk factors, patient adherence, quality of life, prescription of relevant medications, drug-related problems (DRPs), rate of hospitalizations, and death. The heterogeneity between studies was high. Despite low-to-moderate quality of evidence and relatively short follow-up, the findings suggest that multidimensional interventions, taken by pharmacists within multidisciplinary teams, are important for improving some clinical outcomes, such as blood pressure, risk of cardiovascular diseases and renal progression, and they improve non-adherence to medication among individuals with renal failure.

Pharmacy Practice Standards for Outpatient Nephrology Settings

Patients with kidney disease represent a medically complex group of patients with high medication burdens that could benefit from clinical pharmacy services as part of the interdisciplinary care team to optimize medication use. The "Advancing American Kidney Health" executive order includes new value-based reimbursement models to be tested by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation beginning January 2021 and January 2022. Advancing American Kidney Health executive order poses opportunities for the inclusion of comprehensive medication management. Following an iterative process integrating input from a diverse expert panel, published standards, clinical practice guidelines, peer review, and stakeholder feedback, our group developed practice standards for pharmacists caring for patients with kidney disease in health care settings. The standards focus on activities that are part of direct patient care and also include activities related to public health and advocacy, population health, leadership and management, and teaching, education and dissemination of knowledge. These standards are intended to be used by a variety of professionals, from pharmacists starting new practices to practice managers looking to add a pharmacist to the clinical team, to create standardization in services provided.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting acute kidney injury after orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

We aim to develop and validate a nomogram model for predicting severe acute kidney injury (AKI) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

METHODS

A total of 576 patients who received OLT in our center were enrolled. They were assigned to the development and validation cohort according to the time of inclusion. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression using the forward variable selection routine were applied to find risk factors for post-OLT severe AKI. Based on the results of multivariable analysis, a nomogram was developed and validated. Patients were followed up to assess the long-term mortality and development of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

RESULTS

Overall, 35.9% of patients were diagnosed with severe AKI. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that recipients' BMI (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17, p = 0.012), hypertension (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.22-4.45, p = 0.010), preoperative serum creatine (sCr) (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.95-0.97, p < 0.001), and intraoperative fresh frozen plasm (FFP) transfusion (OR for each 1000 ml increase 1.34, 95% CI 1.03-1.75, p = 0.031) were independent risk factors for post-OLT severe AKI. They were all incorporated into the nomogram. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.73 (p < 0.05) and 0.81 (p < 0.05) in the development and validation cohort. The calibration curve demonstrated the predicted probabilities of severe AKI agreed with the observed probabilities (p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients in the high-risk group stratified by the nomogram suffered significantly poorer long-term survival than the low-risk group (HR 1.92, p < 0.01). The cumulative risk of CKD was higher in the severe AKI group than no severe AKI group after competitive risk analysis (HR 1.48, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

With excellent predictive abilities, the nomogram may be a simple and reliable tool to identify patients at high risk for severe AKI and poor long-term prognosis after OLT.