Continuous wireless postoperative monitoring using wearable devices: further device innovation is needed

Feasibility and Accuracy of Wrist-Worn Sensors for Perioperative Monitoring During and After Major Abdominal Surgery: An Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Continuous, ambulatory perioperative monitoring using wearable devices has shown promise for earlier detection of physiological deterioration and postoperative complications, preventing 'failure-to-rescue'. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of vital signs measured by wrist-based wearables with gold standard measurements from vital signs monitors or nurse assessments in major abdominal surgery.

METHODS

Adult patients were eligible for inclusion in this prospective observational study validating the Empatica E4 wrist sensor intraoperatively and postoperatively. The primary outcomes were the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) between manual and device recordings of heart rate (HR) and temperature evaluated via Bland-Altman analysis. Secondary analysis was conducted using Clarke-Error grid analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 31 patients were recruited, and 27 patients completed the study. The median duration of recording per patient was 70.3 h, and a total of 2112 h of data recording were completed. Wrist-based HR measurement was accurate and moderately precise (bias: 0.3 bpm; 95% LoA -15.5 to 17.1), but temperature measurement was neither accurate nor precise (bias -2.2°C; 95% LoA -6.0 to 1.6). On Clarke-Error grid analysis, 74.5% and 29.6% of HR and temperature measurements, respectively, fell within the acceptable range of reference standards.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous perioperative monitoring of HR and temperature after major abdominal surgery using wrist-based sensors is feasible but was limited in this study by low precision. While wrist-based devices offer promise for the continuous monitoring of high-risk surgical patients, current technology is inadequate. Ongoing device hardware and software innovation with robust validation is required before such technologies can be routinely adopted in clinical practice.

Artificial intelligence in surgery

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly emerging in healthcare, yet applications in surgery remain relatively nascent. Here we review the integration of AI in the field of surgery, centering our discussion on multifaceted improvements in surgical care in the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative space. The emergence of foundation model architectures, wearable technologies and improving surgical data infrastructures is enabling rapid advances in AI interventions and utility. We discuss how maturing AI methods hold the potential to improve patient outcomes, facilitate surgical education and optimize surgical care. We review the current applications of deep learning approaches and outline a vision for future advances through multimodal foundation models.

The impact of continuous wireless monitoring on adverse device effects in medical and surgical wards: a review of current evidence

Novel technologies allow continuous wireless monitoring systems (CWMS) to measure vital signs and these systems might be favorable compared to intermittent monitoring regarding improving outcomes. However, device safety needs to be validated because uncertain evidence challenges the clinical implementation of CWMS. This review investigates the frequency of device-related adverse events in patients monitored with CWMS in general hospital wards. Systematic literature searches were conducted in PubMed and Embase. We included trials of adult patients in general hospital wards monitored with CWMS. Our primary outcome was the frequency of unanticipated serious adverse device effects (USADEs). Secondary outcomes were adverse device effects (ADEs) and serious adverse device effects (SADE). Data were extracted from eligible studies and descriptive statistics were applied to analyze the data. Seven studies were eligible for inclusion with a total of 1485 patients monitored by CWMS. Of these patients, 54 patients experienced ADEs (3.6%, 95% CI 2.8-4.7%) and no USADEs or SADEs were reported (0%, 95% CI 0-0.31%). The studies of the SensiumVitals® patch, the iThermonitor, and the ViSi Mobile® device reported 28 (9%), 25 (5%), and 1 (3%) ADEs, respectively. No ADEs were reported using the HealthPatch, WARD 24/7 system, or Coviden Alarm Management. Current evidence suggests that CWMS are safe to use but systematic reporting of all adverse device effects is warranted.

Wearable devices to monitor recovery after abdominal surgery: scoping review

BACKGROUND

Wearable devices have been proposed as a novel method for monitoring patients after surgery to track recovery, identify complications early, and improve surgical safety. Previous studies have used a heterogeneous range of devices, methods, and analyses. This review aimed to examine current methods and wearable devices used for monitoring after abdominal surgery and identify knowledge gaps requiring further investigation.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted given the heterogeneous nature of the evidence. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Studies of wearable devices for monitoring of adult patients within 30 days after abdominal surgery were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

A total of 78 articles from 65 study cohorts, with 5153 patients were included. Thirty-one different wearable devices were used to measure vital signs, physiological measurements, or physical activity. The duration of postoperative wearable device use ranged from 15 h to 3 months after surgery. Studies mostly focused on physical activity metrics (71.8 per cent). Continuous vital sign measurement and physical activity tracking both showed promise for detecting postoperative complications earlier than usual care, but conclusions were limited by poor device precision, adherence, occurrence of false alarms, data transmission problems, and retrospective data analysis. Devices were generally well accepted by patients, with high levels of acceptance, comfort, and safety.

CONCLUSION

Wearable technology has not yet realized its potential to improve postoperative monitoring. Further work is needed to overcome technical limitations, improve precision, and reduce false alarms. Prospective assessment of efficacy, using an intention-to-treat approach should be the focus of further studies.