The simple observational critical care studies: estimations by students, nurses, and physicians of in-hospital and 6-month mortality

Risk factors prediction of 6-month mortality after noncardiac surgery of older patients in China: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Identifying the risk factors associated with perioperative mortality is crucial, particularly in older patients. Predicting 6-month mortality risk in older patients based on large datasets can assist patients and surgeons in perioperative clinical decision-making. This study aimed to develop a risk prediction model of mortality within 6 months after noncardiac surgery using the clinical data from 11 894 older patients in China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicentre, retrospective cohort study was conducted in 20 tertiary hospitals. The authors retrospectively included 11 894 patients (aged ≥65 years) who underwent noncardiac surgery between April 2020 and April 2022. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model based on linear regression was used to analyse and select risk factors, and various machine learning methods were used to build predictive models of 6-month mortality.

RESULTS

The authors predicted 12 preoperative risk factors associated with 6-month mortality in older patients after noncardiac surgery. Including laboratory-associated risk factors such as mononuclear cell ratio and total blood cholesterol level, etc. Also including medical history associated risk factors such as stroke, history of chronic diseases, etc. By using a random forest model, the authors constructed a predictive model with a satisfactory accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.97).

CONCLUSION

The authors identified 12 preoperative risk factors associated with 6-month mortality in noncardiac surgery older patients. These preoperative risk factors may provide evidence for a comprehensive preoperative anaesthesia assessment as well as necessary information for clinical decision-making by anaesthesiologists.

Accuracy of physician and nurse predictions for 28-day prognosis in ICU: a single center prospective study

The proportion of correctly predicted prognoses and factors associated with prediction accuracy are unknown. The objective of this study was to explore the accuracy of physician and nurse predictions of 28-day mortality in the ICU. This was a prospective observational single-center study. All medical staff in the ICU have access to patient data, can communicate with patients or clients, and can independently predict the prognosis of patients within 24 h of patient admission. The only question of the questionnaire survey was: What is the patient's outcome on day 28 (alive or death)? There were 2155 questionnaires completed by 18 physicians and 1916 submitted by 15 nurses. In the 312 patients included, the 28-day mortality rates were predicted by physicians and nurses. The overall proportion of correct prognosis prediction was 90.1% for physicians and 64.4% for nurses (P = 0.000). There was no significant difference in the overall correct proportion and average correct proportion among physicians with different seniority levels. The overall correct proportion and average correct proportion increased among nurses with seniority. Physicians in the ICU can moderately predict 28-day mortality in critically ill patients. Nurses with a seniority of less than 10 years in ICU cannot accurately predict 28-day mortality in critically ill patients. However, the accuracy of nurses' prediction of patients' 28-day prognosis increased with their seniority in the ICU.

PREDICT-TBI: Comparison of Physician Predictions with the IMPACT Model to Predict 6-Month Functional Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

Predicting functional outcome in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) strongly influences end-of-life decisions and information for surrogate decision makers. Despite well-validated prognostic models, clinicians most often rely on their subjective perception of prognosis. In this study, we aimed to compare physicians' predictions with the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (IMPACT) prognostic model for predicting an unfavorable functional outcome at 6 months after moderate or severe TBI.

METHODS

PREDICT-TBI is a prospective study of patients with moderate to severe TBI. Patients were admitted to a neurocritical care unit and were excluded if they died or had withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments within the first 24 h. In a paired study design, we compared the accuracy of physician prediction on day 1 with the prediction of the IMPACT model as two diagnostic tests in predicting unfavorable outcome 6 months after TBI. Unfavorable outcome was assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale from 1 to 3 by using a structured telephone interview. The primary end point was the difference between the discrimination ability of the physician and the IMPACT model assessed by the area under the curve.

RESULTS

Of the 93 patients with inclusion and exclusion criteria, 80 patients reached the primary end point. At 6 months, 29 patients (36%) had unfavorable outcome. A total of 31 clinicians participated in the study. Physicians' predictions showed an area under the curve of 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.68-0.89), against 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.69-0.91) for the laboratory IMPACT model, with no statistical difference (p = 0.88). Both approaches were well calibrated. Agreement between physicians was moderate (κ = 0.56). Lack of experience was not associated with prediction accuracy (p = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Predictions made by physicians for functional outcome were overall moderately accurate, and no statistical difference was found with the IMPACT models, possibly due to a lack of power. The significant variability between physician assessments suggests prediction could be improved through peer reviewing, with the support of the IMPACT models, to provide a realistic expectation of outcome to families and guide discussions about end-of-life decisions.