Real-world corticosteroid use in severe pneumonia: a propensity-score-matched study

Real-world use of glucocorticoids and clinical outcomes in adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia on medical wards

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the real-world use of systemic glucocorticoids to treat patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) outside of the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 11,588 hospitalizations for CAP without chronic pulmonary disease at seven hospitals in Ontario, Canada. We report physician-level variation in the use of glucocorticoids and trends over time. We investigated the association between glucocorticoid prescriptions and clinical outcomes, using propensity score overlap weighting to account for confounding by indication.

RESULTS

Glucocorticoids were prescribed in 1283 (11.1%) patients, increasing over time from 10.0% in 2010 to 11.9% in 2020 (p = .008). Physician glucocorticoid prescribing ranged from 2.9% to 34.6% (median 10.0%, inter quartile range [IQR]: 6.7%-14.6%). Patients receiving glucocorticoids tended to be younger (median age 73 vs. 79), have higher Charlson comorbidity scores (score of 2 or more: 42.4% vs. 31.0%), more cancer (26.6% vs. 13.2%), more renal disease (11.5% vs. 6.6%), and less dementia (7.8% vs. 14.8%). Patients treated with glucocorticoids had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (weighted Risk Difference = 1.72, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.16-3.3, p = .033). Glucocorticoid use was not associated with ICU admission, hospital length-of-stay, or 30-day readmission.

CONCLUSION

Glucocorticoids were prescribed in 11.1% of patients hospitalized with CAP outside of ICU and one in four physicians prescribed glucocorticoids in more than 14% of patients. Glucocorticoid use was associated with greater in-hospital mortality, although these findings are limited by large selection effects. Clinicians should exercise caution in prescribing glucocorticoids for nonsevere CAP, and definitive trials are needed in this population.

Corticosteroid in non-COVID-19 induced community-acquired pneumonia, a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid treatment in non-COVID-19 induced Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains inconclusive.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the role of corticosteroid treatment in CAP.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of online databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, to identify articles published from January 1, 2000, to May 5, 2023. Double-blind RCTs were selected. Two authors screened studies and extracted data. The evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 12 RCTs, involving 2446 patients. Corticosteroids therapy may reduce short-term mortality in patients with severe CAP (sCAP) and shorten the hospital length of stay in patients with CAP. Furthermore, corticosteroids treatment can decrease the risk of requiring mechanical ventilation, developing septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). There were no significant differences between the corticosteroid and control groups concerning gastrointestinal bleeding and nosocomial infection. The use of corticosteroids could increase the risk of hyperglycemia.

CONCLUSION

Corticosteroid treatment for sCAP has the potential to provide benefits in reducing short-term mortality, but this conclusion necessitates more evidence. Besides, we found no evidence that strongly prevents us from using corticosteroids in patients with sCAP or those at risk of progressing to sCAP.

The relationship between lactate dehydrogenase and Apolipoprotein A1 levels in patients with severe pneumonia

Background

To investigate the relationship between lactate dehydrogenase and apolipoprotein A1 levels and the condition and prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia.

Methods

Data was collected from 204 patients with severe pneumonia who were hospitalized from January 1, 2019 to December 1, 2021 in Zhaotong First People's Hospital (respiratory intensive care unit (RICU)), and divided into survival group (160 patients) and death group (44 patients) according to their hospitalization outcome. The relationship between lactate dehydrogenase and apolipoprotein A1 levels and general information, disease, and treatment needs of patients with severe pneumonia was analyzed, and lactate dehydrogenase, apolipoprotein A1, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, hematocrit, C-reactive protein, calcitoninogen, D-dimer, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Status Rating System II, and Pneumonia Severity Index scores were compared between the survival and death groups. The value of these indicators in determining the prognosis of patients was analyzed using subject operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for death from severe pneumonia.

Profiling the dysregulated immune response in sepsis: overcoming challenges to achieve the goal of precision medicine

Sepsis is characterised by a dysregulated host immune response to infection. Despite recognition of its significance, immune status monitoring is not implemented in clinical practice due in part to the current absence of direct therapeutic implications. Technological advances in immunological profiling could enhance our understanding of immune dysregulation and facilitate integration into clinical practice. In this Review, we provide an overview of the current state of immune profiling in sepsis, including its use, current challenges, and opportunities for progress. We highlight the important role of immunological biomarkers in facilitating predictive enrichment in current and future treatment scenarios. We propose that multiple immune and non-immune-related parameters, including clinical and microbiological data, be integrated into diagnostic and predictive combitypes, with the aid of machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques. These combitypes could form the basis of workable algorithms to guide clinical decisions that make precision medicine in sepsis a reality and improve patient outcomes.

Association of medical care capacity and the patient mortality of septic shock: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Hospitals with higher septic shock case volume demonstrated lower hospital mortality. We conducted this study to investigate whether this phenomenon was only caused by the increase in the number of admissions or the need to improve the medical care capacity in septic shock at the same time.

METHODS

Seven-hundred and eighty-seven hospitals from China collected in a survey from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021. Medical care capacity for septic shock was explored by patients with septic shock in intensive care units (ICU) divided into beds, intensivists, and nurses respectively.

MAIN RESULTS

The proportion of ICU patients with septic shock was negatively associated with the patient mortality of septic shock (Estimate [95%CI], -0.2532 [-0.5038, -0.0026]) (p-value 0.048). The ratios of patients with septic shock to beds, intensivists, and nurses were negatively associated with mortality of septic shock (Estimate [95%CI], -0.370 [-0.591, -0.150], -0.136 [-0.241, -0.031], and -0.774 [-1.158, -0.389]) (p-value 0.001, 0.011 and < 0.001). Severe pneumonia, the most common infection that caused a septic shock, correlated positively with its mortality (Estimate [95%CI], 0.1002 [0.0617, 0.1387]) (p-value < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitals with higher medical care capacity for septic shock were associated with lower hospital mortality.

Characteristics and outcomes for pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients without influenza: A 3-year retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have revealed higher mortality rates in patients of severe influenza coinfected with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) than in those without the coinfection; nonetheless, the clinical outcome of IPA in critically ill patients without influenza remains unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in three institutes. From 2016-2018, all adult patients diagnosed with IPA in the intensive care units (ICUs) were identified. The logistic regression was used to identify the potential risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with non-influenza IPA. The stratified analysis of IPA patients with and without antifungal therapy was also performed. The final model was established using a forward approach, selecting variables with p-values less than 0.05.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were included during the study period, and 63 (70%) were men. The most common comorbidity was diabetes mellitus (n = 24, 27%), followed by solid cancers (n = 22, 24%). Antifungal therapy was administered to 50 (56%) patients, mostly voriconazole (n = 44). The in-hospital mortality rate was 49% (n = 44). Univariate analysis revealed that the risk factors for mortality included daily steroid dose, APACHE II score, SOFA score, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, carbapenem use, antifungal therapy, and caspofungin use. Multiple regression analysis identified four independent risk factors for mortality: age (Odds ratio [OR], 1.052, p = 0.013), daily steroid dose (OR, 1.057, p = 0.002), APACHE II score (OR, 1.094, p = 0.012), and CRP level (OR, 1.007, p = 0.008). Furthermore, the multivariable analysis identified that more physicians would initiate antifungal therapy for patients with prolonged steroid use (p = 0.001), lower white blood cell count (p = 0.021), and higher SOFA score (p = 0.048). Thus, under the selection bias, the independent risk factors for mortality in the antifungal treatment subgroup were daily steroid dose (OR, 1.046, p = 0.001) and CRP (OR, 1.006, p = 0.018), whereas the independent risk factor for mortality in the untreated group became APACHE II score (OR, 1.232, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IPA had a substantially high mortality. Overall, age, steroid use, APACHE II score, and CRP level were identified as the independent risk factors for mortality in patients in the ICU.

Biomarker-Concordant Steroid Administration in Severe Coronavirus Disease-2019

BACKGROUND

Although corticosteroids have become the standard of care for patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) on supplemental oxygen, there is growing evidence of differential treatment response. This study aimed to evaluate if there was an association between biomarker-concordant corticosteroid treatment and COVID-19 outcomes.

METHODS

This registry-based cohort study included adult COVID-19 hospitalized patients between January 2020 and December 2021 from 109 institutions. Patients with available C-reactive protein (CRP) levels within 48 h of admission were evaluated. Those on steroids before admission, stayed in the hospital for <48 h, or were not on oxygen support were excluded. Corticosteroid treatment was biomarker-concordant if given with high baseline CRP ≥150 mg/L or withheld with low CRP (<150 mg/L) and vice-versa was considered discordant (low CRP with steroids, high CRP without steroids). Hospital mortality was the primary outcome. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using varying CRP level thresholds. The model interaction was tested to determine steroid effectiveness with increasing CRP levels.

RESULTS

Corticosteroid treatment was biomarker-concordant in 1778 (49%) patients and discordant in 1835 (51%). The concordant group consisted of higher-risk patients than the discordant group. After adjusting for covariates, the odds of in-hospital mortality were significantly lower in the concordant group than the discordant (odds ratio [95% confidence interval (C.I.)] = 0.71 [0.51, 0.98]). Similarly, adjusted mortality difference was significant at the CRP thresholds of 100 and 200 mg/L (odds ratio [95% C.I.] = 0.70 [0.52, 0.95] and 0.57 [0.38, 0.85], respectively), and concordant steroid use was associated with lower need for invasive ventilation for 200 mg/L threshold (odds ratio [95% C.I.] = 0.52 [0.30, 0.91]). In contrast, no outcome benefit was observed at CRP threshold of 50. When the model interaction was tested, steroids were more effective at reducing mortality as CRP levels increased.

CONCLUSION

Biomarker-concordant corticosteroid treatment was associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality in severe COVID-19.

Risk factors for mortality in intensive care unit patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia pneumonia in South Korea

BACKGROUND

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has been increasingly recognized as an opportunistic pathogen associated with high morbidity and mortality. Data on the prognostic factors associated with S. maltophilia pneumonia in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) are lacking.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 117 patients with S. maltophilia pneumonia admitted to the ICUs of two tertiary referral hospitals in South Korea between January 2011 and December 2022. To assess risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The median age of the study population was 71 years. Ventilator-associated pneumonia was 76.1% of cases, and the median length of ICU stay before the first isolation of S. maltophilia was 15 days. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 82.1%, and factors independently associated with mortality were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.09; P=0.046), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (OR, 1.21; 95%; CI, 1.02-1.43; P=0.025), corticosteroid use (OR, 4.19; 95% CI, 1.26-13.91; P=0.019), and polymicrobial infection (OR, 95% CI 0.07-0.69). However, the impact of appropriate antibiotic therapy on mortality was insignificant. In a subgroup of patients who received appropriate antibiotic therapy (n=58), antibiotic treatment modality-related variables, including combination or empirical therapy, also showed no significant association with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with S. maltophilia pneumonia in ICU have high mortality rates. Older age, higher SOFA score, and corticosteroid use were independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality, whereas polymicrobial infection was associated with lower mortality. The effect of appropriate antibiotic therapy on prognosis was insignificant.

The prediction of lymphocyte count and neutrophil count on the efficacy of Xuebijing adjuvant treatment for severe community-acquired pneumonia: A post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant Xuebijing therapy exhibited a protective effect on severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) in previous studies. Blood inflammatory biomarkers related to the disease subtype and severity of SCAP might be associated with the effects of Xuebijing on clinical outcomes of SCAP.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether neutrophils or lymphocytes are a useful biomarker of the therapeutic effect of Xuebijing on mortality and inflammation damage index.

STUDY DESIGN

A post hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blinded clinical trial of Xuebijing in patients with SCAP (Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR-TRC-13003534).

METHODS

We compared 28-day mortality (primary outcome) and four clinical scores (secondary outcome), including pneumonia severity index (PSI) score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score, according to the baseline strata of neutrophil count and lymphocyte count.

RESULTS

A total of 675 patients were included in the analyses, of which 334 received Xuebijing and 341 received the placebo. Xuebijing was more effective in SCAP patients with higher lymphocyte counts and lower neutrophil counts. In the lymphocyte-dominated inflammation (LDI) subgroup, defined as neutrophil count <13 × 10⁹ cells/l and lymphocyte count ≥0.65 × 10⁹ cells/l, Xuebijing reduced 28-day mortality by 15% while mortality of the neutrophil-dominated inflammation (NDI) subgroup decreased by 4.7% (p = 0.050). There was also greater improvement in the PSI, SOFA, APACHE II, and SIRS scores following Xuebijing treatment in the LDI subgroup compared with the NDI subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Xuebijing treatment shows stronger protective effects in SCAP patients with higher lymphocyte and lower neutrophil counts. Our findings may facilitate the selection of the most appropriate treatments for individual patients with SCAP, including who will receive Xuebijing injections.

Severe community-acquired pneumonia

Severe community-acquired pneumonia is the most life-threatening form of community-acquired pneumonia, characterised by intensive care unit admission and high morbidity and mortality. In this review article, we cover in depth six aspects of severe community-acquired pneumonia that are still controversial: use of PCR molecular techniques for microbial diagnosis; the role of biomarkers for initial management; duration of treatment, macrolides or quinolones in the initial empirical antibiotic therapy; the use of prediction scores for drug-resistant pathogens to modify initial empiric therapy; the use of noninvasive mechanical ventilation and high-flow nasal oxygen; and the use of corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy in severe community-acquired pneumonia.