1
|
Jonsson H, Andersson A, Mao Z, Nyström L. Age-specific differences in tumour characteristics between screen-detected and non-screen-detected breast cancers in women aged 40-74 at diagnosis in Sweden from 2008 to 2017. J Med Screen 2024:9691413241237616. [PMID: 38454634 DOI: 10.1177/09691413241237616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze differences between screen-detected and non-screen-detected invasive breast cancers by tumour characteristics and age at diagnosis in the nationwide population-based mammography screening program in Sweden. METHODS Data were retrieved from the National Quality Register for Breast Cancer for 2008-2017. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the likelihood for a tumour to be screen-detected by tumour characteristics and age group at diagnosis. RESULTS In total there were 51,429 invasive breast cancers in the target age group for mammography screening of 40-74 years. Likelihood of screen detection decreased with larger tumour size, lymph node metastases, higher histological grade and distant metastasis. Odds ratios (ORs) for negative oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) were 0.41 and 0.57; for positive HER2, 0.62; for Ki-67 high versus low, 0.49. Molecular sub-types had OR of 0.56, 0.40 and 0.28, respectively, for luminal B-like, HER2-positive and triple negative versus luminal A-like. Adjusting for tumour size (T), lymph node status (N), age, year and county at diagnosis slightly elevated the ORs. Statistically significant interactions between tumour characteristics and age were found (p < 0.05) except for ER and PgR. The age group 40-49 deviated most from the other age groups. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that screen-detected invasive breast cancers had more favourable tumour characteristics than non-screen-detected after adjusting for age, year and county of diagnosis, and even after adjusting for T and N. The trend towards favourable tumour characteristics was less pronounced in the 40-49 age group compared to the other age groups, except for ER and PgR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Håkan Jonsson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Anne Andersson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Zheng Mao
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Lennarth Nyström
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Senevirathna P, Pires DEV, Capurro D. Data-driven overdiagnosis definitions: A scoping review. J Biomed Inform 2023; 147:104506. [PMID: 37769829 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adequate methods to promptly translate digital health innovations for improved patient care are essential. Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have been sources of digital innovation and hold the promise to revolutionize the way we treat, manage and diagnose patients. Understanding the benefits but also the potential adverse effects of digital health innovations, particularly when these are made available or applied on healthier segments of the population is essential. One of such adverse effects is overdiagnosis. OBJECTIVE to comprehensively analyze quantification strategies and data-driven definitions for overdiagnosis reported in the literature. METHODS we conducted a scoping systematic review of manuscripts describing quantitative methods to estimate the proportion of overdiagnosed patients. RESULTS we identified 46 studies that met our inclusion criteria. They covered a variety of clinical conditions, primarily breast and prostate cancer. Methods to quantify overdiagnosis included both prospective and retrospective methods including randomized clinical trials, and simulations. CONCLUSION a variety of methods to quantify overdiagnosis have been published, producing widely diverging results. A standard method to quantify overdiagnosis is needed to allow its mitigation during the rapidly increasing development of new digital diagnostic tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prabodi Senevirathna
- School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia
| | - Douglas E V Pires
- School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Daniel Capurro
- School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia; Department of General Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang S, Sultana F, Kavanagh A, Nickson C, Karahalios A, Gurrin LC, English DR. Benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: Cohort study of breast cancer mortality and overdiagnosis. Cancer Med 2023; 12:18120-18132. [PMID: 37548277 PMCID: PMC10524083 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantifying the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening accurately is important for planning and evaluating screening programs and for enabling women to make informed decisions about participation. However, few cohort studies have attempted to estimate benefit and harm simultaneously. AIMS We aimed to quantify the impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality and overdiagnosis using a cohort of women invited to attend Australia's national screening program, BreastScreen. METHODS In a cohort of 41,330 women without prior breast cancer diagnosis, screening, or diagnostic procedures invited to attend BreastScreen Western Australia in 1994-1995, we estimated the cumulative risk of breast cancer mortality and breast cancer incidence (invasive and ductal carcinoma in situ) from age 50 to 85 years for attenders and non-attenders. Data were obtained by linking population-based state and national health registries. Breast cancer mortality risks were estimated from a survival analysis that accounted for competing risk of death from other causes. Breast cancer risk for unscreened women was estimated by survival analysis, while accounting for competing causes of death. For screened women, breast cancer risk was the sum of risk of being diagnosed at first screen, estimated using logistic regression, and risk of diagnosis following a negative first screen estimated from a survival analysis. RESULTS For every 1,000 women 50 years old at first invitation to attend BreastScreen, there were 20 (95% CI 12-30) fewer breast cancer deaths and 25 (95% CI 15-35) more breast cancers diagnosed for women who attended than for non-attendees by age 85. Of the breast cancers diagnosed in screened women, 21% (95% CI 13%-27%) could be attributed to screening. DISCUSSION The estimated ratio of benefit to harm was consistent with, but slightly less favourable to screening than most other estimates from cohort studies. CONCLUSION Women who participate in organised screening for breast cancer in Australia have substantially lower breast cancer mortality, while some screen-detected cancers may be overdiagnosed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Wang
- Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Cancer Epidemiology DivisionCancer Council VictoriaMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | | | - Anne Kavanagh
- Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Carolyn Nickson
- Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Amalia Karahalios
- Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Lyle C. Gurrin
- Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Dallas R. English
- Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Cancer Epidemiology DivisionCancer Council VictoriaMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Heggland T, Vatten LJ, Opdahl S, Weedon-Fekjær H. Non-progressive breast carcinomas detected at mammography screening: a population study. Breast Cancer Res 2023; 25:80. [PMID: 37403150 PMCID: PMC10318793 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01682-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some breast carcinomas detected at screening, especially ductal carcinoma in situ, may have limited potential for progression to symptomatic disease. To determine non-progression is a challenge, but if all screening-detected breast tumors eventually reach a clinical stage, the cumulative incidence at a reasonably high age would be similar for women with or without screening, conditional on the women being alive. METHODS Using high-quality population data with 24 years of follow-up from the gradually introduced BreastScreen Norway program, we studied whether all breast carcinomas detected at mammography screening 50-69 years of age would progress to clinical symptoms within 85 years of age. First, we estimated the incidence rates of breast carcinomas by age in scenarios with or without screening, based on an extended age-period-cohort incidence model. Next, we estimated the frequency of non-progressive tumors among screening-detected cases, by calculating the difference in the cumulative rate of breast carcinomas between the screening and non-screening scenarios at 85 years of age. RESULTS Among women who attended BreastScreen Norway from the age of 50 to 69 years, we estimated that 1.1% of the participants were diagnosed with a breast carcinoma without the potential to progress to symptomatic disease by 85 years of age. This proportion of potentially non-progressive tumors corresponded to 15.7% [95% CI 3.3, 27.1] of breast carcinomas detected at screening. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that nearly one in six breast carcinomas detected at screening may be non-progressive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torunn Heggland
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology [OCBE], Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Lars Johan Vatten
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Signe Opdahl
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Harald Weedon-Fekjær
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology [OCBE], Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dobre EG, Surcel M, Constantin C, Ilie MA, Caruntu A, Caruntu C, Neagu M. Skin Cancer Pathobiology at a Glance: A Focus on Imaging Techniques and Their Potential for Improved Diagnosis and Surveillance in Clinical Cohorts. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24021079. [PMID: 36674595 PMCID: PMC9866322 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Early diagnosis is essential for completely eradicating skin cancer and maximizing patients' clinical benefits. Emerging optical imaging modalities such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), optical coherence tomography (OCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), near-infrared (NIR) bioimaging, positron emission tomography (PET), and their combinations provide non-invasive imaging data that may help in the early detection of cutaneous tumors and surgical planning. Hence, they seem appropriate for observing dynamic processes such as blood flow, immune cell activation, and tumor energy metabolism, which may be relevant for disease evolution. This review discusses the latest technological and methodological advances in imaging techniques that may be applied for skin cancer detection and monitoring. In the first instance, we will describe the principle and prospective clinical applications of the most commonly used imaging techniques, highlighting the challenges and opportunities of their implementation in the clinical setting. We will also highlight how imaging techniques may complement the molecular and histological approaches in sharpening the non-invasive skin characterization, laying the ground for more personalized approaches in skin cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena-Georgiana Dobre
- Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 91-95, 050095 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mihaela Surcel
- Immunology Department, “Victor Babes” National Institute of Pathology, 050096 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Carolina Constantin
- Immunology Department, “Victor Babes” National Institute of Pathology, 050096 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Pathology, Colentina University Hospital, 020125 Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Ana Caruntu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, “Carol Davila” Central Military Emergency Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Titu Maiorescu” University, 031593 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Constantin Caruntu
- Department of Physiology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Dermatology, “Prof. N.C. Paulescu” National Institute of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, 011233 Bucharest, Romania
- Correspondence:
| | - Monica Neagu
- Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 91-95, 050095 Bucharest, Romania
- Immunology Department, “Victor Babes” National Institute of Pathology, 050096 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Pathology, Colentina University Hospital, 020125 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer in population-based breast cancer screening: A short- and long-term perspective. Eur J Cancer 2022; 173:1-9. [PMID: 35839596 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer (BC) is a contentious issue. OBJECTIVE The aim of this paper is to estimate the overdiagnosis rate of invasive BC in an organised BC screening program and to evaluate the impact of age and follow-up time. METHODS The micro-simulation model SiMRiSc was calibrated and validated for BC screening in Flanders, where women are screened biennially from age 50 to 69. Overdiagnosis rate was defined as the number of invasive BC that would not have been diagnosed in the absence of screening per 100,000 screened women during the screening period plus follow-up time (which was set at 5 years and varied from 2 to 15 years). Overdiagnosis rate was calculated overall and stratified by age. RESULTS The overall overdiagnosis rate for women screened biennially from 50 to 69 was 20.1 (95%CI: 16.9-23.2) per 100,000 women screened at 5-year follow-up from stopping screening. Overdiagnosis at 5-year follow-up time was 12.9 (95%CI: 4.6-21.1) and 74.2 (95%CI: 50.9-97.5) per 100,000 women screened for women who started screening at age 50 and 68, respectively. At 2- and 15-year follow-up time, overdiagnosis rate was 98.5 (95%CI: 75.8-121.3) and 13.4 (95%CI: 4.9-21.9), respectively, for women starting at age 50, and 297.0 (95%CI: 264.5-329.4) and 34.2 (95%CI: 17.5-50.8), respectively, for those starting at age 68. CONCLUSIONS Sufficient follow-up time (≥10 years) after screening stops is key to obtaining unbiased estimates of overdiagnosis. Overdiagnosis of invasive BC is a larger problem in older compared to younger women.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ding L, Greuter M, Truyen I, Goossens M, De Schutter H, de Bock G, Van Hal G. Irregular screening participation increases advanced stage breast cancer at diagnosis: A population-based study. Breast 2022; 65:61-66. [PMID: 35820298 PMCID: PMC9284440 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of irregular screening behaviour on the risk of advanced stage breast cancer at diagnosis in Flanders. METHODS All women aged 50-69 who were invited to the organized breast cancer screening and diagnosed with breast cancer before age 72 from 2001 to 2018 were included. All prevalent screen and interval cancers within 2 years of a prevalent screen were excluded. Screening behaviour was categorized based on the number of invitations and performed screenings. Four groups were defined: regular, irregular, only-once, and never attenders. Advanced stage cancer was defined as a stage III + breast cancer. The association between screening regularity and breast cancer stage at diagnosis was evaluated in multivariable logistic regression models, taking age of diagnosis and socio-economic status into account. RESULTS In total 13.5% of the 38,005 breast cancer cases were diagnosed at the advanced stage. Compared to the regular attenders, the risk of advanced stage breast cancer for the irregular attenders, women who participated only-once, and never attenders was significantly higher with ORadjusted:1.17 (95%CI:1.06-1.29) and ORadjusted:2.18 (95%CI:1.94-2.45), and ORadjusted:5.95 (95%CI:5.33-6.65), respectively. CONCLUSIONS In our study, never attenders were nearly six times more likely to be diagnosed with advanced stage breast cancer than regular attenders, which was much higher than the estimates published thus far. An explanation for this is that the ever screened women is a heterogeneous group regarding the participation profiles which also includes irregular and only-once attenders. The benefit of regular screening should be informed to all women invited for screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Ding
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands,Department of Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - M.J.W. Greuter
- Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands,Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - I. Truyen
- Belgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium
| | - M. Goossens
- Center for Cancer Detection (CvKO) in Flanders, Belgium,Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - G.H. de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands,Corresponding author.
| | - G. Van Hal
- Department of Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium,Center for Cancer Detection (CvKO) in Flanders, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Quality of Informed Consent in Mammography Screening-The Polish Experience. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19116735. [PMID: 35682316 PMCID: PMC9180228 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the leading forms of cancers in women worldwide. In Poland, it accounts for approx. 20% of all cancers diagnosed, with approximately 11,000 new cases and 5000 deaths from this disease annually. To prevent unfavourable statistics, Poland introduced free breast cancer screening programmes, available to women aged 50-69. Over a million women take advantage of this programme each year. The aim of the research was to assess the quality of consent women give prior to mammography screening and address the question of whether this quality is sufficient to make an informed choice. The study was conducted on a representative group of 600 Polish women over 50 years old (475 of them had undergone mammography screening), who agreed to take part in the study. Using the computer-assisted interview technology (CATI) method, all women were asked about their perception of breast cancer and screening and those who had undergone mammography were quizzed about the consent process. They will form the focus of this research. The validated tool contained items on both the benefits and risks of screening. The results indicate that the quality of informed consent was insufficient. A discrepancy was observed in the awareness between the benefits and risks of mammography screening. The main motivations to undergo screening were: prophylactic purposes and the free-of-charge nature of this health service. Population-based screening programmes for breast cancer should be reconsidered in terms of information policy, and the quality of informed consent should be increased.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ryser MD, Lange J, Inoue LYT, O'Meara ES, Gard C, Miglioretti DL, Bulliard JL, Brouwer AF, Hwang ES, Etzioni RB. Estimation of Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis in a U.S. Breast Screening Cohort. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175:471-478. [PMID: 35226520 PMCID: PMC9359467 DOI: 10.7326/m21-3577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mammography screening can lead to overdiagnosis-that is, screen-detected breast cancer that would not have caused symptoms or signs in the remaining lifetime. There is no consensus about the frequency of breast cancer overdiagnosis. OBJECTIVE To estimate the rate of breast cancer overdiagnosis in contemporary mammography practice accounting for the detection of nonprogressive cancer. DESIGN Bayesian inference of the natural history of breast cancer using individual screening and diagnosis records, allowing for nonprogressive preclinical cancer. Combination of fitted natural history model with life-table data to predict the rate of overdiagnosis among screen-detected cancer under biennial screening. SETTING Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) facilities. PARTICIPANTS Women aged 50 to 74 years at first mammography screen between 2000 and 2018. MEASUREMENTS Screening mammograms and screen-detected or interval breast cancer. RESULTS The cohort included 35 986 women, 82 677 mammograms, and 718 breast cancer diagnoses. Among all preclinical cancer cases, 4.5% (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 0.1% to 14.8%) were estimated to be nonprogressive. In a program of biennial screening from age 50 to 74 years, 15.4% (UI, 9.4% to 26.5%) of screen-detected cancer cases were estimated to be overdiagnosed, with 6.1% (UI, 0.2% to 20.1%) due to detecting indolent preclinical cancer and 9.3% (UI, 5.5% to 13.5%) due to detecting progressive preclinical cancer in women who would have died of an unrelated cause before clinical diagnosis. LIMITATIONS Exclusion of women with first mammography screen outside BCSC. CONCLUSION On the basis of an authoritative U.S. population data set, the analysis projected that among biennially screened women aged 50 to 74 years, about 1 in 7 cases of screen-detected cancer is overdiagnosed. This information clarifies the risk for breast cancer overdiagnosis in contemporary screening practice and should facilitate shared and informed decision making about mammography screening. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc D Ryser
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, and Department of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (M.D.R.)
| | - Jane Lange
- Center for Early Detection Advanced Research, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon (J.L.)
| | - Lurdes Y T Inoue
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (L.Y.I.)
| | - Ellen S O'Meara
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington (E.S.O.)
| | - Charlotte Gard
- Department of Economics, Applied Statistics, and International Business, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico (C.G.)
| | - Diana L Miglioretti
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, and Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington (D.L.M.)
| | - Jean-Luc Bulliard
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (J.B.)
| | - Andrew F Brouwer
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (A.F.B.)
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina (E.S.H.)
| | - Ruth B Etzioni
- Program in Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (R.B.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hooshmand S, Reed WM, Suleiman ME, Brennan PC. SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY: DIAGNOSTIC EFFICACY-ISSUES AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE 2020S. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2021; 197:54-62. [PMID: 34729603 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncab160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Diagnostic efficacy in medical imaging is ultimately a reflection of radiologist performance. This can be influenced by numerous factors, some of which are patient related, such as the physical size and density of the breast, and machine related, where some lesions are difficult to visualise on traditional imaging techniques. Other factors are human reader errors that occur during the diagnostic process, which relate to reader experience and their perceptual and cognitive oversights. Given the large-scale nature of breast cancer screening, even small increases in diagnostic performance equate to large numbers of women saved. It is important to identify the causes of diagnostic errors and how detection efficacy can be improved. This narrative review will therefore explore the various factors that influence mammographic performance and the potential solutions used in an attempt to ameliorate the errors made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahand Hooshmand
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The Discipline of Medical Imaging Sciences, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building (D18), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Warren M Reed
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The Discipline of Medical Imaging Sciences, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building (D18), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Mo'ayyad E Suleiman
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The Discipline of Medical Imaging Sciences, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building (D18), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Patrick C Brennan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The Discipline of Medical Imaging Sciences, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building (D18), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
A Multi-million Mammography Image Dataset and Population-Based Screening Cohort for the Training and Evaluation of Deep Neural Networks-the Cohort of Screen-Aged Women (CSAW). J Digit Imaging 2021; 33:408-413. [PMID: 31520277 PMCID: PMC7165146 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-019-00278-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
For AI researchers, access to a large and well-curated dataset is crucial. Working in the field of breast radiology, our aim was to develop a high-quality platform that can be used for evaluation of networks aiming to predict breast cancer risk, estimate mammographic sensitivity, and detect tumors. Our dataset, Cohort of Screen-Aged Women (CSAW), is a population-based cohort of all women 40 to 74 years of age invited to screening in the Stockholm region, Sweden, between 2008 and 2015. All women were invited to mammography screening every 18 to 24 months free of charge. Images were collected from the PACS of the three breast centers that completely cover the region. DICOM metadata were collected together with the images. Screening decisions and clinical outcome data were collected by linkage to the regional cancer center registers. Incident cancer cases, from one center, were pixel-level annotated by a radiologist. A separate subset for efficient evaluation of external networks was defined for the uptake area of one center. The collection and use of the dataset for the purpose of AI research has been approved by the Ethical Review Board. CSAW included 499,807 women invited to screening between 2008 and 2015 with a total of 1,182,733 completed screening examinations. Around 2 million mammography images have currently been collected, including all images for women who developed breast cancer. There were 10,582 women diagnosed with breast cancer; for 8463, it was their first breast cancer. Clinical data include biopsy-verified breast cancer diagnoses, histological origin, tumor size, lymph node status, Elston grade, and receptor status. One thousand eight hundred ninety-one images of 898 women had tumors pixel level annotated including any tumor signs in the prior negative screening mammogram. Our dataset has already been used for evaluation by several research groups. We have defined a high-volume platform for training and evaluation of deep neural networks in the domain of mammographic imaging.
Collapse
|
12
|
Johansson A, Christakou AE, Iftimi A, Eriksson M, Tapia J, Skoog L, Benz CC, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Hall P, Czene K, Lindström LS. Characterization of Benign Breast Diseases and Association With Age, Hormonal Factors, and Family History of Breast Cancer Among Women in Sweden. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2114716. [PMID: 34170304 PMCID: PMC8233703 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Benign breast diseases (BBDs) are common and associated with breast cancer risk, yet the etiology and risk of BBDs have not been extensively studied. OBJECTIVE To investigate the risk of BBDs by age, hormonal factors, and family history of breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study assessed 70 877 women from the population-based Karolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (KARMA) who attended mammographic screening or underwent clinical mammography from January 1, 2011, to March 31, 2013, at 4 Swedish hospitals. Participants took part in a comprehensive questionnaire on recruitment. All participants had complete follow-up through high-quality Swedish national registers until December 31, 2015. Pathology medical records on breast biopsies were obtained for the participants, and BBD subtypes were classified according to the latest European guidelines. Analyses were conducted from January 1 to July 31, 2020. EXPOSURES Hormonal risk factors and family history of breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES For each BBD subtype, incidence rates (events per 100 000 person-years) and multivariable Cox proportional hazards ratios (HRs) with time-varying covariates were estimated between the ages of 25 and 69 years. RESULTS A total of 61 617 women within the mammographic screening age of 40 to 69 years (median age, 53 years) at recruitment with available questionnaire data were included in the study. Incidence rates and risk estimates varied by age and BBD subtype. At premenopausal ages, nulliparity (compared with parity ≥3) was associated with reduced risk of epithelial proliferation without atypia (EP; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46-0.85) but increased risk of cysts (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.03-1.85). Current and long (≥8 years) oral contraceptive use was associated with reduced premenopausal risk of fibroadenoma (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.90), whereas hormone replacement therapy was associated with increased postmenopausal risks of epithelial proliferation with atypia (EPA; HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.07-3.07), fibrocystic changes (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.03-2.48), and cysts (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.40-2.81). Furthermore, predominantly at premenopausal ages, obesity was associated with reduced risk of several BBDs (eg, EPA: HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17-0.56), whereas family history of breast cancer was associated with increased risk (eg, EPA: HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.48-3.00). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These results suggest that the risk of BBDs varies by subtype, hormonal factors, and family history of breast cancer and is influenced by age. Better understanding of BBDs is important to improve the understanding of benign and malignant breast diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelie Johansson
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Athanasia E. Christakou
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Adina Iftimi
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jose Tapia
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lambert Skoog
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christopher C. Benz
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
- Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California
| | - Kenny A. Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Linda S. Lindström
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bhatt R, van den Hout A, Pashayan N. A multistate survival model of the natural history of cancer using data from screened and unscreened population. Stat Med 2021; 40:3791-3807. [PMID: 33951215 DOI: 10.1002/sim.8998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
One of the main aims of models using cancer screening data is to determine the time between the onset of preclinical screen-detectable cancer and the onset of the clinical state of the cancer. This time is called the sojourn time. One problem in using screening data is that an individual can be observed in preclinical phase or clinically diagnosed but not both. Multistate survival models provide a method of modeling the natural history of cancer. The natural history model allows for the calculation of the sojourn time. We developed a continuous-time Markov model and the corresponding likelihood function. The model allows for the use of interval-censored, left-truncated and right-censored data. The model uses data of clinically diagnosed cancers from both screened and nonscreened individuals. Parameters of age-varying hazards and age-varying misclassification are estimated simultaneously. The mean sojourn time is calculated from a micro-simulation using model parameters. The model is applied to data from a prostate screening trial. The simulation study showed that the model parameters could be estimated accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rikesh Bhatt
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ardo van den Hout
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bulliard JL, Beau AB, Njor S, Wu WYY, Procopio P, Nickson C, Lynge E. Breast cancer screening and overdiagnosis. Int J Cancer 2021; 149:846-853. [PMID: 33872390 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Overdiagnosis is a harmful consequence of screening which is particularly challenging to estimate. An unbiased setting to measure overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening requires comparative data from a screened and an unscreened cohort for at least 30 years. Such randomised data will not become available, leaving us with observational data over shorter time periods and outcomes of modelling. This collaborative effort of the International Cancer Screening Network quantified the variation in estimated breast cancer overdiagnosis in organised programmes with evaluation of both observed and simulated data, and presented examples of how modelling can provide additional insights. Reliable observational data, analysed with study design accounting for methodological pitfalls, and modelling studies with different approaches, indicate that overdiagnosis accounts for less than 10% of invasive breast cancer cases in a screening target population of women aged 50 to 69. Estimates above this level are likely to derive from inaccuracies in study design. The widely discrepant estimates of overdiagnosis reported from observational data could substantially be reduced by use of a cohort study design with at least 10 years of follow-up after screening stops. In contexts where concomitant opportunistic screening or gradual implementation of screening occurs, and data on valid comparison groups are not readily available, modelling of screening intervention becomes an advantageous option to obtain reliable estimates of breast cancer overdiagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Luc Bulliard
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Anna-Belle Beau
- Pharmacologie Médicale, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paul-Sabatier III, CHU Toulouse, UMR INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Sisse Njor
- Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Wendy Yi-Ying Wu
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Pietro Procopio
- Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
| | - Carolyn Nickson
- Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
| | - Elsebeth Lynge
- Nykøbing Falster Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Nykøbing Falster, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
The "Sweet Spot" Revisited: Optimal Recall Rates for Cancer Detection With 2D and 3D Digital Screening Mammography in the Metro Chicago Breast Cancer Registry. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 216:894-902. [PMID: 33566635 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.22429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. One central question pertaining to mammography quality relates to discerning the optimal recall rate to maximize cancer detection while minimizing unnecessary downstream diagnostic imaging and breast biopsies. We examined the trade-offs for higher recall rates in terms of biopsy recommendations and cancer detection in a single large health care organization. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We included 2D analog, 2D digital, and 3D digital (tomosynthesis) screening mammography examinations among women 40-79 years old performed between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017, with cancer follow-up through 2018. There were 36, 67, and 38 radiologists who read at least 1000 2D analog examinations, 2D digital examinations, and 3D tomosynthesis examinations, respectively, who were included in these analyses. Using logistic regression with marginal standardization, we estimated radiologist-specific mean recall (abnormal interpretations/1000 mammograms), biopsy recommendation, cancer detection (screening-detected in situ and invasive cancers/1000 mammograms), and minimally invasive cancer detection rates while adjusting for differences in patient characteristics. RESULTS. Among 1,060,655 screening mammograms, the mean recall rate was 10.7%, the cancer detection rate was 4.0/1000 mammograms, and the biopsy recommendation rate was 1.60%. Recall rates between 7% and 9% appeared to maximize cancer detection while minimizing unnecessary biopsies. CONCLUSION. The results of this investigation are in contrast to those of a recent study suggesting appropriateness of higher recall rates. The "sweet spot" for optimal cancer detection appears to be in the recall rate range of 7-9% for both 2D digital mammography and 3D tomosynthesis. Too many women are being called back for diagnostic imaging, and new benchmarks could be set to reduce this burden.
Collapse
|
16
|
Shetaban S, Seyyed Esfahani MM, Saghaei A, Ahmadi A. An integrated methodology to control the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with hypertension and type 1 diabetes. Comput Intell 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/coin.12418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Samar Shetaban
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Science and Research Branch Islamic Azad University Tehran Iran
| | | | - Abbas Saghaei
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Science and Research Branch Islamic Azad University Tehran Iran
| | - Abbas Ahmadi
- Department of Industrial Engineering Amirkabir University of Technology Tehran Iran
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chen Z, Xu L, Shi W, Zeng F, Zhuo R, Hao X, Fan P. Trends of female and male breast cancer incidence at the global, regional, and national levels, 1990-2017. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 180:481-490. [PMID: 32056055 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05561-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer is a major public health concern worldwide and shows significant heterogeneity between male and female. Knowing the global incidence landscape in both sexes is critical for the breast cancer prevention and the reduction in disease burden. METHODS We retrieved the incidence data of breast cancer in both sexes from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 database. Average annual percentage change was used to quantify the temporal trends of breast cancer incidence. RESULTS Between 1990 and 2017, the number of newly diagnosed female breast cancer (FBC) cases increased from 870.2 thousand to 1937.6 thousand, with the age-standardized incidence rate (ASR) significantly increased from 39.2/100,000 to 45.9/100,000. A total of 166 countries experienced a significant increase in FBC-ASR. The most pronounced increase was mainly found in developing countries. The decrease was mostly detected in several developed countries, such as the USA and the UK. Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare carcinoma and has no evident cluster across the world. Worldwide, the number of newly diagnosed MBC cases increased from 8.5 thousand in 1990 to 23.1 thousand in 2017, with the ASR significantly increased from 0.46/100,000 to 0.61/100,000. A total of 123 countries showed a significant increasing trend in MBC-ASR. CONCLUSIONS Breast cancer incidence rates are increasing in most countries in both sexes, although the epidemiological features were not completely shared between FBC and MBC. More emphases should be placed on breast cancer primary prevention and the prevention strategies might need to be tailored for both FBC and MBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhilin Chen
- Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncological Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, 31, Longhua RD, Haikou, 570102, Hainan, China
| | - Lu Xu
- Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, Jiangsu, China.,Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570102, Hainan, China
| | - Wenjie Shi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Pius Hospital of Oldenburg, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Fanyu Zeng
- Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, 541000, Guangxi, China
| | - Rui Zhuo
- Department of Breast Surgery, Pius Hospital of Oldenburg, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Xinbao Hao
- Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, Jiangsu, China. .,Department of Hematology, Center for Translational Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of HMC Cancer Institute and Academician Research Workstation of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570102, Hainan, China.
| | - Pingming Fan
- Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncological Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, 31, Longhua RD, Haikou, 570102, Hainan, China.
| |
Collapse
|