PAQR8 promotes breast cancer recurrence and confers resistance to multiple therapies

Postoperative tumor treatment strategies: From basic research to clinical therapy

Despite progression in advanced treatments for malignant tumors, surgery remains the primary treatment intervention, which removes a large portion of firm tumor tissues; however, the postoperative phase poses a possible risk for provincial tumor recurrence and metastasis. Consequently, the prevention of tumor recurrence and metastasis has attracted research attention. In this review, we summarized the postoperative treatment strategies for various tumors from both basic research and clinical perspectives. We delineated the underlying factors contributing to the recurrence of malignant tumors with a substantial prevalence rate, related molecular mechanisms of tumor recurrence post‐surgery, and related means of monitoring recurrence and metastasis after surgery. Furthermore, we described relevant therapeutic approaches for postoperative tumor recurrence, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and photodynamic therapy. This review focused on the emerging technologies used for postoperative tumor treatment in recent years in terms of functional classification, including the prevention of postoperative tumor recurrence, functional reconstruction, and monitoring of recurrence. Finally, we discussed the future development and deficiencies of postoperative tumor therapy. To understand postoperative treatment strategies for tumors from clinical treatment and basic research and further guide the research directions for postoperative tumors.

Rare subclonal sequencing of breast cancers indicates putative metastatic driver mutations are predominately acquired after dissemination

BACKGROUND

Evolutionary models of breast cancer progression differ on the extent to which metastatic potential is pre-encoded within primary tumors. Although metastatic recurrences often harbor putative driver mutations that are not detected in their antecedent primary tumor using standard sequencing technologies, whether these mutations were acquired before or after dissemination remains unclear.

METHODS

To ascertain whether putative metastatic driver mutations initially deemed specific to the metastasis by whole exome sequencing were, in actuality, present within rare ancestral subclones of the primary tumors from which they arose, we employed error-controlled ultra-deep sequencing (UDS-UMI) coupled with FFPE artifact mitigation by uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) to assess the presence of 132 "metastasis-specific" mutations within antecedent primary tumors from 21 patients. Maximum mutation detection sensitivity was ~1% of primary tumor cells. A conceptual framework was developed to estimate relative likelihoods of alternative models of mutation acquisition.

RESULTS

The ancestral primary tumor subclone responsible for seeding the metastasis was identified in 29% of patients, implicating several putative drivers in metastatic seeding including LRP5 A65V and PEAK1 K140Q. Despite this, 93% of metastasis-specific mutations in putative metastatic driver genes remained undetected within primary tumors, as did 96% of metastasis-specific mutations in known breast cancer drivers, including ERRB2 V777L, ESR1 D538G, and AKT1 D323H. Strikingly, even in those cases in which the rare ancestral subclone was identified, 87% of metastasis-specific putative driver mutations remained undetected. Modeling indicated that the sequential acquisition of multiple metastasis-specific driver or passenger mutations within the same rare subclonal lineage of the primary tumor was highly improbable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results strongly suggest that metastatic driver mutations are sequentially acquired and selected within the same clonal lineage both before, but more commonly after, dissemination from the primary tumor, and that these mutations are biologically consequential. Despite inherent limitations in sampling archival primary tumors, our findings indicate that tumor cells in most patients continue to undergo clinically relevant genomic evolution after their dissemination from the primary tumor. This provides further evidence that metastatic recurrence is a multi-step, mutation-driven process that extends beyond primary tumor dissemination and underscores the importance of longitudinal tumor assessment to help guide clinical decisions.

Sex-specific outcomes in cancer therapy: the central role of hormones

Sex hormones play a pivotal role in modulating various physiological processes, with emerging evidence underscoring their influence on cancer progression and treatment outcomes. This review delves into the intricate relationship between sex hormones and cancer, elucidating the underlying biological mechanisms and their clinical implications. We explore the multifaceted roles of estrogen, androgens, and progesterone, highlighting their respective influence on specific cancers such as breast, ovarian, endometrial, and prostate. Special attention is given to estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) tumors, androgen receptor signaling, and the dual role of progesterone in both promoting and inhibiting cancer progression. Clinical observations reveal varied treatment responses contingent upon hormonal levels, with certain therapies like tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, and anti-androgens demonstrating notable success. However, disparities in treatment outcomes between males and females in hormone-sensitive cancers necessitate further exploration. Therapeutically, the utilization of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) during cancer treatments presents both potential risks and benefits. The promise of personalized therapies, tailored to an individual's hormonal profile, offers a novel approach to optimizing therapeutic outcomes. Concurrently, the burgeoning exploration of new drugs and interventions targeting hormonal pathways heralds a future of more effective and precise treatments for hormone-sensitive cancers. This review underscores the pressing need for a deeper understanding of sex hormones in cancer therapy and the ensuing implications for future therapeutic innovations.

cAMP-PKA/EPAC signaling and cancer: the interplay in tumor microenvironment

Cancer is a complex disease resulting from abnormal cell growth that is induced by a number of genetic and environmental factors. The tumor microenvironment (TME), which involves extracellular matrix, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF), tumor-infiltrating immune cells and angiogenesis, plays a critical role in tumor progression. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is a second messenger that has pleiotropic effects on the TME. The downstream effectors of cAMP include cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), exchange protein activated by cAMP (EPAC) and ion channels. While cAMP can activate PKA or EPAC and promote cancer cell growth, it can also inhibit cell proliferation and survival in context- and cancer type-dependent manner. Tumor-associated stromal cells, such as CAF and immune cells, can release cytokines and growth factors that either stimulate or inhibit cAMP production within the TME. Recent studies have shown that targeting cAMP signaling in the TME has therapeutic benefits in cancer. Small-molecule agents that inhibit adenylate cyclase and PKA have been shown to inhibit tumor growth. In addition, cAMP-elevating agents, such as forskolin, can not only induce cancer cell death, but also directly inhibit cell proliferation in some cancer types. In this review, we summarize current understanding of cAMP signaling in cancer biology and immunology and discuss the basis for its context-dependent dual role in oncogenesis. Understanding the precise mechanisms by which cAMP and the TME interact in cancer will be critical for the development of effective therapies. Future studies aimed at investigating the cAMP-cancer axis and its regulation in the TME may provide new insights into the underlying mechanisms of tumorigenesis and lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Decoding TROP2 in breast cancer: significance, clinical implications, and therapeutic advancements

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease characterized by distinct molecular subtypes, varied prognoses, and differential treatment responses. Understanding the molecular landscape and identifying therapeutic targets, such as trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP2), is vital. TROP2 is notably overexpressed in breast cancer, playing a significant role in tumor growth, invasion, metastasis, and treatment resistance. While significant progress has been made in targeting TROP2 in breast cancer, several challenges and knowledge gaps remain. These challenges include the heterogeneity of TROP2 expression within breast cancer subtypes, resistance to its targeted therapies, potential off-target effects, limited therapeutic agents, and identifying optimal combination treatments. Integrating findings from clinical trials into clinical practice further complicates the landscape. This review article delves deep into TROP2 in breast cancer, highlighting its expression patterns, clinical implications, and therapeutic advancements. By understanding the role of TROP2, we can pave the way for personalized treatments, and transform the landscape of breast cancer care.