Studies of parenchymal texture added to mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature

Permutation Test for Image-on-Scalar Regression With an Application to Breast Cancer

Image based screening is now routinely available for early detection of cancer and other diseases. Quantitative analysis for effects of risk factors on digital images is important to extract biological insights for modifiable factors in prevention studies and understand pathways for targets in preventive drugs. However, current approaches are restricted to summary measures within the image with the assumption that all relevant features needed to characterize an image can be identified and appropriately quantified. Motivated by data challenges in breast cancer, we propose a nonparametric statistical framework for risk factor screening that uses the whole mammogram image as outcome. The proposed permutation test allows assessment of whether a set of scalar risk factors is associated with the whole image in the presence of correlated residuals across the spatial domain. We provide extensive simulation studies and illustrate an application to the Joanne Knight Breast Health Cohort using the mammogram imaging data.

Development and Validation of Dynamic 5-Year Breast Cancer Risk Model Using Repeated Mammograms

PURPOSE

Current image-based long-term risk prediction models do not fully use previous screening mammogram images. Dynamic prediction models have not been investigated for use in routine care.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospective WashU clinic-based cohort of 10,099 cancer-free women at entry (between November 3, 2008 and February 2012). Follow-up through 2020 identified 478 pathology-confirmed breast cancers (BCs). The cohort included 27% Black women. An external validation cohort (Emory) included 18,360 women screened from 2013, followed through 2020. This included 42% Black women and 332 pathology-confirmed BC excluding those diagnosed within 6 months of screening. We trained a dynamic model using repeated screening mammograms at WashU to predict 5-year risk. This opportunistic screening service presented a range of mammogram images for each woman. We applied the model to the external validation data to evaluate discrimination performance (AUC) and calibrated to US SEER.

RESULTS

Using 3 years of previous mammogram images available at the current screening visit, we obtained a 5-year AUC of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.83) in the external validation. This represents a significant improvement over the current visit mammogram AUC 0.74 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.77; P < .01) in the same women. When calibrated, a risk ratio of 21.1 was observed comparing high (>4%) to very low (<0.3%) 5-year risk. The dynamic model classified 16% of the cohort as high risk among whom 61% of all BCs were diagnosed. The dynamic model performed comparably in Black and White women.

CONCLUSION

Adding previous screening mammogram images improves 5-year BC risk prediction beyond static models. It can identify women at high risk who might benefit from supplemental screening or risk-reduction strategies.

Assessment of the Breast Density Prevalence in Swiss Women with a Deep Convolutional Neural Network: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background/Objectives: High breast density is a risk factor for breast cancer and can reduce the sensitivity of mammography. Given the influence of breast density on patient risk stratification and screening accuracy, it is crucial to monitor the prevalence of extremely dense breasts within local populations. Moreover, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding breast density prevalence in Switzerland. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of breast density in a selected Swiss population. Methods: To overcome the potential variability in breast density classifications by human readers, this study utilized commercially available deep convolutional neural network breast classification software. A retrospective analysis of mammographic images of women aged 40 years and older was performed. Results: A total of 4698 mammograms from women (58 ± 11 years) were included in this study. The highest prevalence of breast density was in category C (heterogeneously dense), which was observed in 41.5% of the cases. This was followed by category B (scattered areas of fibroglandular tissue), which accounted for 22.5%. Conclusions: Notably, extremely dense breasts (category D) were significantly more common in younger women, with a prevalence of 34%. However, this rate dropped sharply to less than 10% in women over 55 years of age.

Comparative evaluation of image-based vs. text-based vs. multimodal AI approaches for automatic breast density assessment in mammograms

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In the last decade, there has been a growing interest in applying artificial intelligence (AI) systems to breast cancer assessment, including breast density evaluation. However, few models have been developed to integrate textual mammographic reports and mammographic images. Our aims are (1) to generate a natural language processing (NLP)-based AI system, (2) to evaluate an external image-based software, and (3) to develop a multimodal system, using the late fusion approach, by integrating image and text inferences for the automatic classification of breast density according to the American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines in mammograms and radiological reports.

METHODS

We first compared different NLP models, three based on n-gram term frequency - inverse document frequency and two transformer-based architectures, using 1533 unstructured mammogram reports as a training set and 303 reports as a test set. Subsequently, we evaluated an external image-based software using 303 mammogram images. Finally, we assessed our multimodal system taking into account both text and mammogram images.

RESULTS

Our best NLP model achieved 88 % accuracy, while the external software and the multimodal system achieved 75 % and 80 % accuracy, respectively, in classifying ACR breast densities.

CONCLUSION

Although our multimodal system outperforms the image-based tool, it currently does not improve the results offered by the NLP model for ACR breast density classification. Nevertheless, the promising results observed here open the possibility to more comprehensive studies regarding the utilization of multimodal tools in the assessment of breast density.

Clinical Significance of Combined Density and Deep-Learning-Based Texture Analysis for Stratifying the Risk of Short-Term and Long-Term Breast Cancer in Screening

Assessing a woman's risk of breast cancer is important for personalized screening. Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, but parenchymal texture patterns offer additional information which cannot be captured by density. We aimed to combine BI-RADS density score 4th Edition and a deep-learning-based texture score to stratify women in screening and compare rates among the combinations. This retrospective study cohort study included 216,564 women from a Danish populations-based screening program. Baseline mammograms were evaluated using BI-RADS density scores (1-4) and a deep-learning texture risk model, with scores categorized into four quartiles (1-4). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for screen-detected, interval, and long-term cancer were adjusted for age, year of screening and screening clinic. Compared with subgroup B1-T1, the highest IRR for screen-detected cancer were within the T4 category (3.44 (95% CI: 2.43-4.82)-4.57 (95% CI: 3.66-5.76)). IRR for interval cancer was highest in the BI-RADS 4 category (95% CI: 5.36 (1.77-13.45)-16.94 (95% CI: 9.93-30.15)). IRR for long-term cancer increased both with increasing BI-RADS and increasing texture reaching 5.15 (4.31-6.16) for the combination of B4-T4 compared with B1-T1. Deep-learning-based texture analysis combined with BI-RADS density categories can reveal subgroups with increased rates beyond what density alone can ascertain, suggesting the potential of combining texture and density to improve risk stratification in breast cancer screening.

Mammographic Texture versus Conventional Cumulus Measure of Density in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: A Literature Review

Mammographic textures show promise as breast cancer risk predictors, distinct from mammographic density. Yet, there is a lack of comprehensive evidence to determine the relative strengths as risk predictor of textures and density and the reliability of texture-based measures. We searched the PubMed database for research published up to November 2023, which assessed breast cancer risk associations [odds ratios (OR)] with texture-based measures and percent mammographic density (PMD), and their discrimination [area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC)], using same datasets. Of 11 publications, for textures, six found stronger associations (P < 0.05) with 11% to 508% increases on the log scale by study, and four found weaker associations (P < 0.05) with 14% to 100% decreases, compared with PMD. Risk associations remained significant when fitting textures and PMD together. Eleven of 17 publications found greater AUCs for textures than PMD (P < 0.05); increases were 0.04 to 0.25 by study. Discrimination from PMD and these textures jointly was significantly higher than from PMD alone (P < 0.05). Therefore, different textures could capture distinct breast cancer risk information, partially independent of mammographic density, suggesting their joint role in breast cancer risk prediction. Some textures could outperform mammographic density for predicting breast cancer risk. However, obtaining reliable texture-based measures necessitates addressing various issues. Collaboration of researchers from diverse fields could be beneficial for advancing this complex field.

Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment

Breast cancer risk prediction models based on common clinical risk factors are used to identify women eligible for high-risk screening and prevention. Unfortunately, these models have only modest discriminatory accuracy with disparities in performance in underrepresented race and ethnicity groups. The field of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning are rapidly advancing the field of breast cancer risk prediction with the development of mammography-based AI breast cancer risk models. Early studies suggest mammography-based AI risk models may perform better than traditional risk factor-based models with more equitable performance.

Breast Density: Where Are We Now?

Breast density refers to the amount of fibroglandular tissue relative to fat on mammography and is determined either qualitatively through visual assessment or quantitatively. It is a heritable and dynamic trait associated with age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and hormonal factors. Increased breast density has important clinical implications including the potential to mask malignancy and as an independent risk factor for the development of breast cancer. Breast density has been incorporated into breast cancer risk models. Given the impact of dense breasts on the interpretation of mammography, supplemental screening may be indicated.

The features associated with mammography-occult MRI-detected newly diagnosed breast cancer analysed by comparing machine learning models with a logistic regression model

PURPOSE

To compare machine learning (ML) models with logistic regression model in order to identify the optimal factors associated with mammography-occult (i.e. false-negative mammographic findings) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected newly diagnosed breast cancer (BC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present single-centre retrospective study included consecutive women with BC who underwent mammography and MRI (no more than 45 days apart) for breast cancer between January 2018 and May 2023. Various ML algorithms and binary logistic regression analysis were utilized to extract features linked to mammography-occult BC. These features were subsequently employed to create different models. The predictive value of these models was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

This study included 1957 malignant lesions from 1914 patients, with an average age of 51.64 ± 9.92 years and a range of 20-86 years. Among these lesions, there were 485 mammography-occult BCs. The optimal features of mammography-occult BC included calcification status, tumour size, mammographic density, age, lesion enhancement type on MRI, and histological type. Among the different ML models (ANN, L1-LR, RF, and SVM) and the LR-based combined model, the ANN model with RF features was found to be the optimal model. It demonstrated the best discriminative performance in predicting mammography false- negative findings, with an AUC of 0.912, an accuracy of 86.90%, a sensitivity of 85.85%, and a specificity of 84.18%.

CONCLUSION

Mammography-occult MRI-detected breast cancers have features that should be considered when performing breast MRI to improve the detection rate for breast cancer and aid in clinician management.

Modeling correlated pairs of mammogram images

Mammography remains the primary screening strategy for breast cancer, which continues to be the most prevalent cancer diagnosis among women globally. Because screening mammograms capture both the left and right breast, there is a nonnegligible correlation between the pair of images. Previous studies have explored the concept of averaging between the pair of images after proper image registration; however, no comparison has been made in directly utilizing the paired images. In this paper, we extend the bivariate functional principal component analysis over triangulations to jointly characterize the pair of imaging data bounded in an irregular domain and then nest the extracted features within the survival model to predict the onset of breast cancer. The method is applied to our motivating data from the Joanne Knight Breast Health Cohort at Siteman Cancer Center. Our findings indicate that there was no statistically significant difference in model discrimination performance between averaging the pair of images and jointly modeling the two images. Although the breast cancer study did not reveal any significant difference, it is worth noting that the methods proposed here can be readily extended to other studies involving paired or multivariate imaging data.

Causal mediation analysis using high-dimensional image mediator bounded in irregular domain with an application to breast cancer

Mammography is the primary breast cancer screening strategy. Recent methods have been developed using the mammogram image to improve breast cancer risk prediction. However, it is unclear on the extent to which the effect of risk factors on breast cancer risk is mediated through tissue features summarized in mammogram images and the extent to which it is through other pathways. While mediation analysis has been conducted using mammographic density (a summary measure within the image), the mammogram image is not necessarily well described by a single summary measure and, in addition, such a measure provides no spatial information about the relationship between the exposure risk factor and the risk of breast cancer. Thus, to better understand the role of the mammogram images that provide spatial information about the state of the breast tissue that is causally predictive of the future occurrence of breast cancer, we propose a novel method of causal mediation analysis using mammogram image mediator while accommodating the irregular shape of the breast. We apply the proposed method to data from the Joanne Knight Breast Health Cohort and leverage new insights on the decomposition of the total association between risk factor and breast cancer risk that was mediated by the texture of the underlying breast tissue summarized in the mammogram image.

Repeated measures of mammographic density and texture to evaluate prediction and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature

PURPOSE

It may be important for women to have mammograms at different points in time to track changes in breast density, as fluctuations in breast density can affect breast cancer risk. This systematic review aimed to assess methods used to relate repeated mammographic images to breast cancer risk.

METHODS

The databases including Medline (Ovid) 1946-, Embase.com 1947-, CINAHL Plus 1937-, Scopus 1823-, Cochrane Library (including CENTRAL), and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched through October 2021. Eligibility criteria included published articles in English describing the relationship of change in mammographic features with risk of breast cancer. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool.

RESULTS

Twenty articles were included. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System and Cumulus were most commonly used for classifying mammographic density and automated assessment was used on more recent digital mammograms. Time between mammograms varied from 1 year to a median of 4.1, and only nine of the studies used more than two mammograms. Several studies showed that adding change of density or mammographic features improved model performance. Variation in risk of bias of studies was highest in prognostic factor measurement and study confounding.

CONCLUSION

This review provided an updated overview and revealed research gaps in assessment of the use of texture features, risk prediction, and AUC. We provide recommendations for future studies using repeated measure methods for mammogram images to improve risk classification and risk prediction for women to tailor screening and prevention strategies to level of risk.

MiR-191-5p inhibits KLF6 to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) exert certain functions in the development of several cancers and can be a potential hallmark for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. MiR-191-5p has been proven to have high expression in breast cancer (BC), while its biological role and potential regulatory mechanisms in BC remain an open issue.

OBJECTIVE

Bioinformatics was utilized to assay miR-191-5p level in BC tissues and predict its downstream target gene as well as the enriched signaling pathways of the target gene.

METHODS

qRT-PCR was carried out to assay miR-191-5p and KLF6 levels in BC cells as well as miR-191-5p level in blood-derived exosomes from BC patients. Western blot was to examine the expression of proteins linked with cell adhesion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and exosome markers. A dual luciferase reporter assay was utilized to verify the interaction between miR-191-5p and KLF6. Abilities of cell phenotypes of BC cells were detected by CCK8, Transwell, and cell adhesion assay, separately.

RESULTS

Upregulated miR-191-5p expression and downregulated KLF6 expression were observed in BC cells. There was a targeting relationship between miR-191-5p and KLF6. MiR-191-5p negatively regulated KLF6 to promote EMT and malignant progression of BC cells. Additionally, we described a dramatically high level of miR-191-5p in the blood exosomes of BC patients.

CONCLUSION

MiR-191-5p advances the EMT of BC by targeting KLF6, indicating that miR-191-5p and KLF6 may be new biomarkers for BC.