Essential functions linked with structural disorder in organisms of minimal genome

Phase separation by ssDNA binding protein controlled via protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions

Cells must rapidly and efficiently react to DNA damage to avoid its harmful consequences. Here we report a molecular mechanism that gives rise to a model of how bacterial cells mobilize DNA repair proteins for timely response to genomic stress and initiation of DNA repair upon exposure of single-stranded DNA. We found that bacterial single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB), a central player in genome metabolism, can undergo dynamic phase separation under physiological conditions. SSB condensates can store a wide array of DNA repair proteins that specifically interact with SSB. However, elevated levels of single-stranded DNA during genomic stress can dissolve SSB condensates, enabling rapid mobilization of SSB and SSB-interacting proteins to sites of DNA damage.

Bacterial single-stranded (ss)DNA-binding proteins (SSB) are essential for the replication and maintenance of the genome. SSBs share a conserved ssDNA-binding domain, a less conserved intrinsically disordered linker (IDL), and a highly conserved C-terminal peptide (CTP) motif that mediates a wide array of protein−protein interactions with DNA-metabolizing proteins. Here we show that the Escherichia coli SSB protein forms liquid−liquid phase-separated condensates in cellular-like conditions through multifaceted interactions involving all structural regions of the protein. SSB, ssDNA, and SSB-interacting molecules are highly concentrated within the condensates, whereas phase separation is overall regulated by the stoichiometry of SSB and ssDNA. Together with recent results on subcellular SSB localization patterns, our results point to a conserved mechanism by which bacterial cells store a pool of SSB and SSB-interacting proteins. Dynamic phase separation enables rapid mobilization of this protein pool to protect exposed ssDNA and repair genomic loci affected by DNA damage.

Misprediction of Structural Disorder in Halophiles

Whereas the concept of intrinsic disorder derives from biophysical observations of the lack of structure of proteins or protein regions under native conditions, many of our respective concepts rest on proteome-scale bioinformatics predictions. It is established that most predictors work reliably on proteins commonly encountered, but it is often neglected that we know very little about their performance on proteins of microorganisms that thrive in environments of extreme temperature, pH, or salt concentration, which may cause adaptive sequence composition bias. To address this issue, we predicted structural disorder for the complete proteomes of different extremophile groups by popular prediction methods and compared them to those of the reference mesophilic group. While significant deviations from mesophiles could be explained by a lack or gain of disordered regions in hyperthermophiles and radiotolerants, respectively, we found systematic overprediction in the case of halophiles. Additionally, examples were collected from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) to demonstrate misprediction and to help understand the underlying biophysical principles, i.e., halophilic proteins maintain a highly acidic and hydrophilic surface to avoid aggregation in high salt conditions. Although sparseness of data on disordered proteins from extremophiles precludes the development of dedicated general predictors, we do formulate recommendations for how to address their disorder with current bioinformatics tools.