Non-invasive programmed stimulation to identify high-risk patients with implanted cardioverter defibrillator (the NIPS-ICD study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Prognostic value of noninvasive programmed stimulation in primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients

Background

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) offers an opportunity to study inducibility of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) by performing noninvasive programmed ventricular stimulation (NIPS). Whether NIPS can predict future arrhythmic events or mortality in patients with primary prevention ICD, has not yet been examined.

Methods

From the NIPS-ICD study (ClinicalTrials ID: NCT02373306) 41 consecutive patients (34 males, age 64 ± 11 years, 76% ischemic cardiomyopathy [ICM]) had ICD for primary prevention indication. Patients underwent NIPS using a standardized protocol of up to three premature extrastimuli at 600, 500 and 400 ms drive cycle lengths. NIPS was classified as positive if sustained VT or VF was induced. The study endpoint was occurrence of sustained VT/VF during the follow-up.

Results

At baseline NIPS, VT/VF was induced in 8 (20%) ICM patients. During the 5-year follow-up, the VT/VF occurred in 7 (17%) patients, all with ICM. The difference between NIPS-inducible versus NIPS-noninducible patients regarding VT/VF occurrence did not meet statistical significance (38% vs. 12%, log rank test p = .11). After a 5-year follow-up, the mortality rate was significantly higher in patients who had VT/VF induced at NIPS versus no VT/VF at NIPS (38% vs. 12%, p = .043). The occurrence of a composite endpoint consisting of VT/VF recurrence or death in patients with ICM was also most frequent in the NIPS-inducible group (75% vs. 35%, p = .037).

Conclusions

Inducibility of VT/VF during NIPS in ICM patients with primary prevention ICD is associated with higher mortality and higher incidence of composite endpoint consisting of death or VT/VF during a long-term observation.

Prognostic value of noninvasive programmed stimulation in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) offers an opportunity to examine vulnerability to ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) by performing noninvasive programmed ventricular stimulation (NIPS). Whether NIPS can predict VT/VF recurrences has not yet been established.

PURPOSE

To examine the predictive value of NIPS for identification of patients with VT/VF recurrences.

METHODS

The study group consisted of consecutive 105 ICD recipients included in the prospective NIPS-ICD study (ClinicalTrials ID: NCT02373306) (88 males, age 65 ± 11 years). The patients underwent NIPS using the protocol up to three premature extrastimuli at 600-500- and 400-ms drive cycle lengths. The endpoint of NIPS was induction of sustained VT or VF or completion of the protocol.

RESULTS

VT/VF was induced in 29 (27.6%) patients. During a 12-month follow-up NIPS-inducible patients had significantly more frequently appropriate ICD therapy than noninducible patients (17% vs 4%, P = 0.023). NIPS-induced VT/VF had a sensitivity of 63%, specificity of 75%, positive predictive value of 17%, and negative predictive value of 96% for identification of patients with future VT/VF. Apart from NIPS, age ≥ 65 years, QRS duration, treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme, history of coronary artery bypass grafting, history of VT/VF prior to NIPS, and prior appropriate ICD therapy were also associated with VT/VF recurrences. Multivariate analysis showed that, together with QRS duration, NIPS result was an independent predictor of future VT/VF. Predictive value of NIPS was significantly higher in ischemic than nonischemic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

NIPS result is associated with future VT/VF. Noninducibility at NIPS identifies those patients with high accuracy who will have uneventful follow-up.