1
|
Wylde V, Brennan S, Johnson E, Roberts K, Beswick AD, Jameson C. Recommendations for developing accessible patient information leaflets for clinical trials to address English language literacy as a barrier to research participation. Trials 2024; 25:624. [PMID: 39334243 PMCID: PMC11430508 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08471-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low English language literacy is a common barrier to participation in clinical trials. Patient information leaflets (PILs) used in clinical trials are often lengthy, complex and have poor readability; this is a persistent and prevalent problem common to trials across the world. Simplifying the information provided in PILs can lead to improved understanding, comprehension and knowledge. The aim of this project was to develop recommendations for developing accessible PILs for clinical trials through a literature review of published and grey literature and co-working with marginalised communities, patients, and health and social care charities. METHODS A literature review of MEDLINE, Embase and online resources was conducted, and recommendations for developing accessible PILs were extracted from eligible published and grey literature. Grey literature which contained insights into more inclusive forms of communication was also identified and summarised. Meetings were held with two racially marginalised community groups, two groups involving autistic adults and/or adults with learning difficulties and a patient advisory group. Examples of accessible PILs were shared and discussions held about the content and format of the PILs and suggestions for changes/improvements. National Voices, a coalition of health and social care charities in England, held a national online workshop with charities and lived experience partners. Recommendations identified from the multiple sources were coded, collated and refined to develop an overarching framework of recommendations. RESULTS The framework consists of 74 recommendations for developing accessible PILs for clinical trials. Recommendations cover the five topics of formatting, information presentation, writing style, content and accessibility. CONCLUSIONS This project has developed a comprehensive framework of recommendations to guide researchers in the development of accessible PILs for clinical trials. Findings from previous research and from co-working with marginalised communities, patients and health and social care charities were collated to ensure that a diverse range of voices and experiences informed the framework. These recommendations aim to support researchers to develop better study information to reduce English language literacy as a barrier to participation in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikki Wylde
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | | | - Emma Johnson
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kirsty Roberts
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Andrew D Beswick
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Catherine Jameson
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Foucher J, Azizi L, Öijerstedt L, Kläppe U, Ingre C. The usage of population and disease registries as pre-screening tools for clinical trials, a systematic review. Syst Rev 2024; 13:111. [PMID: 38654383 PMCID: PMC11040983 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02533-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to outline the use of population and disease registries for clinical trial pre-screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS The search was conducted in the time period of January 2014 to December 2022 in three databases: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection. References were screened using the Rayyan software, firstly based on titles and abstracts only, and secondly through full text review. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the List of Included Studies and quality Assurance in Review tool, enabling inclusion of publications of only moderate to high quality. RESULTS The search originally identified 1430 citations, but only 24 studies were included, reporting the use of population and/or disease registries for trial pre-screening. Nine disease domains were represented, with 54% of studies using registries based in the USA, and 62.5% of the studies using national registries. Half of the studies reported usage for drug trials, and over 478,679 patients were identified through registries in this review. Main advantages of the pre-screening methodology were reduced financial burden and time reduction. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The use of registries for trial pre-screening increases reproducibility of the pre-screening process across trials and sites, allowing for implementation and improvement of a quality assurance process. Pre-screening strategies seem under-reported, and we encourage more trials to use and describe their pre-screening processes, as there is a need for standardized methodological guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Foucher
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Louisa Azizi
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Linn Öijerstedt
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulf Kläppe
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Caroline Ingre
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Weiss EM, Guttmann KF, Olszewski AE, Magnus BE, Li S, Kim SYH, Shah AR, Juul SE, Wu YW, Ahmad KA, Bendel-Stenzel E, Isaza NA, Lampland AL, Mathur AM, Rao R, Riley D, Russell DG, Salih ZNI, Torr CB, Weitkamp JH, Anani UE, Chang T, Dudley J, Flibotte J, Havrilla EM, O’Kane AC, Perez K, Stanley BJ, Shah SK, Wilfond BS. Parental Enrollment Decision-Making for a Neonatal Clinical Trial. J Pediatr 2021; 239:143-149.e3. [PMID: 34400207 PMCID: PMC8610170 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the parental experience of recruitment and assess differences between parents who participated and those who declined to enroll in a neonatal clinical trial. STUDY DESIGN This was a survey conducted at 12 US neonatal intensive care units of parents of infants who enrolled in the High-dose Erythropoietin for Asphyxia and encephaLopathy (HEAL) trial or who were eligible but declined enrollment. Questions assessed 6 factors of the parental experience of recruitment: (1) interactions with research staff; (2) the consent experience; (3) perceptions of the study; (4) decisional conflict; (5) reasons for/against participation; and (6) timing of making the enrollment decision. RESULTS In total, 269 of 387 eligible parents, including 183 of 242 (75.6%) of those who enrolled their children in HEAL and 86 of 145 (59.3%) parents who declined to enroll their children in HEAL, were included in analysis. Parents who declined to enroll more preferred to be approached by clinical team members rather than by research team members (72.9% vs 49.2%, P = .005). Enrolled parents more frequently reported positive initial impressions (54.9% vs 10.5%, P < .001). Many parents in both groups made their decision early in the recruitment process. Considerations of reasons for/against participation differed by enrollment status. CONCLUSIONS Understanding how parents experience recruitment, and how this differs by enrollment status, may help researchers improve recruitment processes for families and increase enrollment. The parental experience of recruitment varied by enrollment status. These findings can guide future work aiming to inform optimal recruitment strategies for neonatal clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliott Mark Weiss
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
| | - Katherine F Guttmann
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Aleksandra E Olszewski
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington,Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Brooke E Magnus
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
| | - Sijia Li
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington
| | - Scott YH Kim
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda Maryland
| | - Anita R Shah
- Division of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital of Orange County, Orange, California
| | - Sandra E Juul
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Yvonne W Wu
- Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California
| | - Kaashif A Ahmad
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | - Natalia A Isaza
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s National Hospital, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Andrea L Lampland
- Department of Neonatology, Children’s Minnesota Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Amit M Mathur
- Department of Pediatrics, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Rakesh Rao
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - David Riley
- Department of Pediatrics, Cook Children’s Medical Center, Texas Christian University and University of North Texas Health Science Center School of Medicine, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - David G Russell
- Division of Neonatology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Zeynep N I Salih
- Department of Pediatrics, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Carrie B Torr
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Uchenna E Anani
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Taeun Chang
- Department of Neurology, Children’s National Hospital, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Juanita Dudley
- Division of Neonatology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - John Flibotte
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Erin M Havrilla
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Alexandra C O’Kane
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Krystle Perez
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Seema K Shah
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington,Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gamboa CJ, Julion WA, Fogg L, Bounds DT. Using Vignette-Based Methodology to Examine Study Recruitment in Older African American Adults: A Methods Paper. J Urban Health 2021; 98:103-114. [PMID: 34322834 PMCID: PMC8501170 DOI: 10.1007/s11524-021-00567-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
This study's objective was to assess which caring recruitment behaviors correlate with the successful recruitment of older African-American adults-a two-step cross-sectional design employing a vignette-based survey methodology. Kristen Swanson's middle-range theory of caring was used to guide the examination of African-American adults' (65 years of age and older) perceptions of research-study-recruiter recruitment behaviors. This study's main findings are twofold: Step 1: Seven of ten invited experts identified major revisions of the two core vignettes, written at an eighth-grade reading level and high school comprehension. Step 2: A 51% response rate yielded findings that this methodology successfully captured older African-American adults' perception of research study recruiters' behavioral characteristics during the recruitment process. Older African-Americans who received the hypothetical caring vignette were twice as likely to indicate their willingness to enroll in a research study with a high commitment (i.e., brain donation) compared to their counterparts who received the hypothetical uncaring recruitment scenario. Vignette-based survey methodology holds promise as a tool for informing the recruitment of older African-American adults and other minorities into federally funded health-related research studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlene J Gamboa
- College of Nursing, Rush University Medical Center, 600 S. Paulina Street | Suite 1080, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, USA.
| | - Wrenetha A Julion
- College of Nursing, Rush University Medical Center, 600 S. Paulina Street | Suite 1080, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, USA
| | - Louis Fogg
- College of Nursing, Rush University Medical Center, 600 S. Paulina Street | Suite 1080, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, USA
| | - Dawn T Bounds
- University of California, Irvine, Sue & Bill Gross School of Nursing, California, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|