SONOlysis in prevention of Brain InfaRctions During Internal carotid Endarterectomy (SONOBIRDIE) trial - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

New ischemic lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging in patients with blunt traumatic cerebrovascular injury

BACKGROUND

Patients with blunt cerebrovascular injuries are at risk of thromboembolic stroke. Although primary prevention with antithrombotic therapy is widely used in this setting, its effectiveness is not well defined and requires further investigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected ischemic brain lesions as a possible future outcome for randomized clinical trials in this patient population.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included 20 adult blunt trauma patients admitted to a level I trauma center with a screening neck CTA showing extracranial carotid or vertebral artery injury. All subjects lacked initial evidence of an ischemic stroke and were managed with antithrombotic therapy and observation and then underwent brain MRI within 30 days of the injury to assess for ischemic lesions. The MRI scans included diffusion, susceptibility, and Fluid-attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) sequences, and were reviewed by two neuroradiologists blinded to the computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings.

RESULTS

Eleven CTAs were done in the emergency department upon admission. There were 12 carotid artery dissections and 11 unilateral or bilateral vertebral artery injuries. Median interval between injury and MRI scan was 4 days (range, 0.1-14; interquartile range, 3-7 days). Diffusion-weighted imaging evidence of new ischemic lesions was present in 10 (43%) of 23 of the injured artery territories. In those injuries with ischemic lesions, the median number was 8 (range, 2-25; interquartile range, 5-8). None of the lesions were symptomatic. Blunt cerebrovascular injury was associated with a higher mean ischemic lesion count (mean count of 3.17 vs. 0.14, p < 0.0001), with the association remaining after adjusting for injury severity score (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In asymptomatic blunt trauma patients with CTA evidence of extracranial cerebrovascular injury and treated with antithrombotic therapy, nearly half of arterial injuries are associated with ischemic lesions on MRI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

Anesthesia type determines risk of cerebral infarction after carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

Silent and symptomatic cerebral infarctions occur in up to 34% of patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This prospective study compared the risk of new brain infarctions detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis undergoing CEA with local anesthesia (LA) vs general anesthesia (GA).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with internal carotid artery stenosis indicated for CEA were screened at two centers. Patients without contraindication to LA or GA were randomly allocated to the LA or GA group by ZIP code randomization. Brain MRI was performed before and 24 hours after CEA. Neurologic examination was performed before and 24 hours and 30 days after surgery. The occurrence of new infarctions on the control magnetic resonance images, stroke, transient ischemic attack, and other complications was statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 210 randomized patients, 105 underwent CEA with LA (67 men; mean age, 68.3 ± 8.1 years) and 105 with GA (70 men; mean age, 63.4 ± 7.5 years). New infarctions were more frequently detected on control magnetic resonance images in patients after CEA under GA compared with LA (17.1% vs 6.7%; P = .031). Stroke or transient ischemic attack occurred within 30 days of CEA in three patients under GA and in two under LA (P = 1.000). There were no significant differences between the two types of anesthesia in terms of the occurrence of other complications (14.3% for GA and 21.0% for LA; P = .277).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of silent brain infarction after CEA as detected by MRI is higher under GA than under LA.

Sonolysis in risk reduction of symptomatic and silent brain infarctions during coronary stenting (SONOREDUCE): Randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Silent brain infarcts can be detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in ~22% of patients after coronary angioplasty and stenting (CS). The effect of periprocedural sonolysis on the risk of new brain infarcts during CS was examined.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective CS were allocated randomly to a bilateral sonolysis group (70 patients, 58 men; mean age, 59.9 years) or a control group (74 patients, 45 men; mean age, 65.5 years). Neurologic examination, cognitive function tests, and brain MRI were performed prior to intervention and at 24 h after CS. Neurologic examination and cognitive function tests were repeated at 30 days after CS.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the number of patients with new infarcts (25.7 vs. 18.9%, P = 0.423), the number of lesions (1.3 ± 1.0 vs. 2.9 ± 5.3, P = 0.493), lesion volume (0.16 ± 0.34 vs. 0.28 ± 0.60 mL, P = 0.143), and the number of patients with new ischemic lesions in the insonated MCA territories (18.6vs. 17.6%, P = 0.958) between the sonolysis group and the control group. There were no cases of stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, or death in the two groups. Intracranial bleeding was reported only in 1 patient in the control group (0 vs. 1.4%, P = 0.888). Clock-drawing test scores at 30 days were significantly higher in the sonolysis group than in the control group (median 3.0 vs. 2.5, P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Sonolysis does not reduce the risk of new brain infarcts after CS. The effect of sonolysis on number and volume of ischemic lesions and cognitive function should be assessed in further studies.