Developing a core outcome set for chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review of outcomes utilised in the current literature

Development of a mobile app for the evaluation of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

OBJECTIVE

To develop a mobile application with a standardized routine, to be used by general otolaryngologists for evaluating patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

METHODS

A systematic review was made to identify outcomes, recommendations and what tests that would be used in the routine evaluation of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis; establish an expert consensus on items to be included in this routine evaluation of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis using the Delphi method; development of an application for use on a mobile device, with the routine evaluation of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

RESULTS

Based on the systematic review, the outcomes used in studies about chronic rhinosinusitis were identified, as well as guidelines recommendations, which showed discrepancies between them. These recommendations and outcomes were presented to specialists in chronic rhinosinusitis, until a consensus was reached. As a result of the Delphi method, the flowchart of the routine evaluation of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis was defined, and then was used for the development of the mobile application.

CONCLUSION

The creation of the mobile application for evaluating patients with chronic rhinosinusitis followed an adequate methodology of elaboration made by specialists in the field of chronic rhinosinusitis, standardizing the investigation of these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 5.

Core Outcome Measures in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: In Practice and Research

Heterogeneity in outcomes used in clinical trials prevents meta-analysis and contributes to research waste. Core outcome sets aim to address this by defining a small number of essential outcomes that should be measured in all effectiveness trials. Adoption in routine clinical practice can further improve outcomes for patients.There has been a rapid growth in therapeutic options available for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, but difficulty comparing results leads to uncertainty into optimum management, and there is a need to define a core outcome set. We consider whether work already undertaken needs to be modified for patients with nasal polyps.We recommend that a core outcome set should include assessment of disease specific quality of life, nasal polyp score, evaluation of sense of smell, alongside need for OCS and surgical treatment and complications from the disease or treatment. Further work is required to achieve international consensus regarding the choice of nasal polyp scoring system.

Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis in Rhinosinusitis: a Critical Review of the Reviews

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There has been an explosion in the number of published systematic reviews on chronic rhinosinusitis in the last decade.

RECENT FINDINGS

While the aim of these reviews in facilitating evidence-based practice is laudable, poor quality reviews may contain significant bias that can mislead a non-discerning reader. Attention therefore must be given to review methodology before implanting findings. Organisations such as the Cochrane Collaboration promote high-quality reviews, but are limited in chronic sinus disease by heterogeneous outcomes and a paucity of randomised trials.