1
|
Klatt T, Bauer I, Behrendt D, Berg A. [Structured case conference for sleep disturbances in nursing home residents with cognitive impairment]. Pflege 2024. [PMID: 38234247 DOI: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
Structured case conference for sleep disturbances in nursing home residents with cognitive impairment Abstract: Background: Nursing home residents living with cognitive impairment often suffer from sleep disturbances. Pharmacological interventions are not recommended to be the first-choice therapy. In general, a wide variance of non-pharmacological interventions is available, but no clearly suitable intervention can currently be specified. Aim: The case report presents the procedure of a structured analysis to support the selection of non-pharmacological interventions to promote sleep. Methods: A structured case conference was held using a developed case management template to draw up an individual intervention plan. Results: Based on the description of the situation and the determination of causes, different interventions from six main topics were planned: "offering appropriate activations during daytime", "creating bedtime routines", "checking the sleep environment", "observation of potential physical and psychological causes", "reflection on night care routines", and "use of drug therapies only in exceptional cases". Conclusions: For a successful management of sleep disturbances in nursing home residents living with cognitive impairment, it is essential that the specific sleep-related symptoms and causes are assessed systematically and interprofessionally to be able to work towards an improvement with appropriate measures. In order to obtain adequate solutions, evidence-based expertise should be taken into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Klatt
- Institut für Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaft, Medizinische Fakultät der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Deutschland
| | - Ivonne Bauer
- Altenpflegeheim "Am Georgengarten" des Städtischen Klinikums Dessau, Deutschland
| | - Daniel Behrendt
- Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus mit Hochschulklinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (MHB), Deutschland
| | - Almuth Berg
- Institut für Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaft, Medizinische Fakultät der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peryer G, Kelly S, Blake J, Burton JK, Irvine L, Cowan A, Akdur G, Killett A, Brand SL, Musa MK, Meyer J, Gordon AL, Goodman C. Contextual factors influencing complex intervention research processes in care homes: a systematic review and framework synthesis. Age Ageing 2022; 51:6540144. [PMID: 35231097 PMCID: PMC8887840 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Care homes are complex settings to undertake intervention research. Barriers to research implementation processes can threaten studies’ validity, reducing the value to residents, staff, researchers and funders. We aimed to (i) identify and categorise contextual factors that may mediate outcomes of complex intervention studies in care homes and (ii) provide recommendations to minimise the risk of expensive research implementation failures. Methods We conducted a systematic review using a framework synthesis approach viewed through a complex adaptive systems lens. We searched: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, ASSIA databases and grey literature. We sought process evaluations of care home complex interventions published in English. Narrative data were indexed under 28 context domains. We performed an inductive thematic analysis across the context domains. Results We included 33 process evaluations conducted in high-income countries, published between 2005 and 2019. Framework synthesis identified barriers to implementation that were more common at the task and organisational level. Inductive thematic analysis identified (i) avoiding procedural drift and (ii) participatory action and learning as key priorities for research teams. Research team recommendations include advice for protocol design and care home engagement. Care home team recommendations focus on internal resources and team dynamics. Collaborative recommendations apply to care homes’ individual context and the importance of maintaining positive working relationships. Discussion Researchers planning and undertaking research with care homes need a sensitive appreciation of the complex care home context. Study implementation is most effective where an intervention is co-produced, with agreed purpose and adequate resources to incorporate within existing routines and care practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy Peryer
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East of England, England, UK
| | - Sarah Kelly
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, East Forvie Site, Cambridge CB2 0SZ, UK
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0AH, UK
| | - Jessica Blake
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Jennifer K Burton
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
| | - Lisa Irvine
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Andy Cowan
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, East Forvie Site, Cambridge CB2 0SZ, UK
| | - Gizdem Akdur
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Anne Killett
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East of England, England, UK
| | - Sarah L Brand
- St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, South West Peninsula, England, UK
| | - Massirfufulay Kpehe Musa
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Julienne Meyer
- National Care Forum/Care for Older People, School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Adam L Gordon
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands (ARC-EM), Nottingham, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East of England, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Teupen S, Holle D, Roes M. Types of implementation of the dementia-specific case conference concept WELCOME-IdA in nursing homes: a qualitative process evaluation of the FallDem effectiveness trial. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:90. [PMID: 34407887 PMCID: PMC8371834 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00191-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dementia is regularly associated with behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD, also referred to as challenging behavior). Structured dementia-specific case conferences (DSCCs) enable nursing staff in nursing homes (NHs) to analyze and handle the BPSD of residents with dementia. The FallDem trial estimated the effectiveness of the structured DSCC intervention WELCOME-IdA (Wittener model of case conferences for people with dementia – the Innovative dementia-oriented Assessment tool) in NHs in Germany. No significant change in the overall prevalence of challenging behavior was found. A multipart process evaluation was conducted to explain this result. Methods This qualitative process evaluation of the response of individuals, perceived maintenance, effectiveness, and unintended consequences was part of the multipart process evaluation that followed the framework by Grant et al. (Trials 14: 15, 2013). It used the data from semi-structured telephone interviews and focus group interviews with nurses and managers as secondary data. Selected domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) were used as deductive categories for a directed content analysis. Results The interviewees in all NHs appraised WELCOME-IdA as generating positive change, although it proved important that some adjustments were made to the intervention and the organization. Thirteen CFIR constructs out of the domains intervention characteristics, inner setting, and process proved to be essential for understanding the different course that the implementation of WELCOME-IdA took in each of the four NHs. This is reflected in three types of WELCOME-IdA implementation: (1) priority on adjusting the intervention to fit the organization, (2) priority on adjusting the organization to fit the intervention, and (3) no setting of priorities in adjusting either the organization or the intervention. Conclusion The unsatisfying results of the FallDem effectiveness trial can in part be explained with regard to the interplay between the intervention and the implementation which was revealed in the processes that occurred in the organizations during the implementation of the WELCOME-IdA intervention. Future implementation of WELCOME-IdA should be tailored based on an analysis of the organization’s readiness, resources, and capacities and should also define custom-made intervention and implementation outcomes to measure success. Furthermore, our results confirm that the CFIR can be used beneficially to conduct process evaluations. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-021-00191-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Teupen
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Witten, Stockumer Straße 12, 58453, Witten, Germany. .,School of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58455, Witten, Germany.
| | - Daniela Holle
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Witten, Stockumer Straße 12, 58453, Witten, Germany.,Department of Nursing Science, University of Applied Sciences (HS Gesundheit), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801, Bochum, Germany
| | - Martina Roes
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Witten, Stockumer Straße 12, 58453, Witten, Germany.,School of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58455, Witten, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Choi H, Jung YI, Kim H. Implementation fidelity of the Systems for Person-Centered Elder Care (SPEC): a process evaluation study. Implement Sci 2021; 16:52. [PMID: 33980251 PMCID: PMC8117605 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01113-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Systems for Person-Centered Elder Care (SPEC), a complex intervention, was conducted to examine its effectiveness as a technology-enhanced, multidisciplinary, and integrated care model for frail older persons among ten nursing homes (NHs) in South Korea where formal long-term care has recently been introduced. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation fidelity of the SPEC intervention and to identify moderating factors that influence the implementation fidelity. METHODS This study was a process evaluation based on an evidence-based framework for implementation fidelity using a mixed-methods design. Quantitative data from consultant logbooks, NH documentations, an information and communications technology (ICT) system, and a standardized questionnaire were collected from April 2015 to December 2016 and analyzed by calculating the descriptive statistics. Semi-structured focus group interviews were held with multidisciplinary teams from the participating NHs. Qualitative data from a semi-structured questionnaire and the focus group interviews were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS The SPEC program demonstrated good implementation fidelity, and adherence to the SPEC program was strong in all aspects, such as content, coverage, frequency, and duration. Of the participating on-site coordinators, 60% reported that the SPEC model positively impacted needs assessment and the reporting system for resident care. The important facilitating factors were tailored facilitating strategies, assurance of the quality of delivery, and recruitment strategies. CONCLUSION The effectiveness of the SPEC program was driven by good implementation fidelity. The key factors of good implementation fidelity were tailored delivery of evidence-based interventions over process evaluation work, facilitating strategies, and ICT support. Larger implementation studies with a more user-friendly ICT system are recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN11972147 . Registered on 16 March 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyoungshim Choi
- Department of Nursing, Hansei University, 30 Hansei-ro, Gyeong-gi, South Korea
| | - Young-Il Jung
- Department of Environmental Health, Korea National Open University, 86 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hongsoo Kim
- Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Institute of Aging, Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Process evaluation of the response of nursing homes to the implementation of the dementia-specific case conference concept WELCOME-IdA: A qualitative study. BMC Nurs 2020; 19:14. [PMID: 32095116 PMCID: PMC7026945 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-020-0403-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The implementation of clearly structured dementia-specific case conferences could be an important tool to enable nursing staff to properly analyse and manage challenging behaviour in nursing home residents with dementia. A process evaluation of the responses of nursing homes to the implementation of WELCOME-IdA (Wittener model of case conferences for people with dementia - the Innovative dementia-oriented Assessment tool) was carried out to gain insight into which key elements of the intervention were adopted by the nursing homes and which elements were adapted. Methods This study was part of a larger process evaluation using a qualitative design. Thirty-four semi-structured telephone interviews and 15 focus group interviews were conducted in four nursing homes. The interviews were analysed using deductive content analysis, although inductive categories have been developed. Results Nursing home staff adopted the roles of moderator, case reporter, keeper of the minutes and reflection partner in WELCOME-IdA, but the selection of the staff members who filled these roles differed across nursing homes. The recommended group size of 5-8 participants per case conference was sometimes adopted. The key element of having core nursing teams who participated continuously in all case conferences was not adopted at all. Instead, there was a high level of rotation among staff members. The pre-defined process structure of WELCOME-IdA was adapted in such a way that the assessment of the residents' behaviour and the selection of the relevant domain for the behaviour analysis were conducted in advance of the case conference. The evaluation of the interventions was also organized differently. Conclusion The scope of the response implies that WELCOME-IdA requires further adaptation to the requirements of nursing processes in nursing homes. The results provide important information on the selection of role keepers and offer insights into a) how knowledge of the structured training was circulated and transformed into self-organized case conferences and b) how knowledge was circulated throughout the entire processing of one case. Thus, these results can be used to optimize intervention and implementation. Overall, the intervention should allow more possibilities for tailored adaptation than it currently does.
Collapse
|
6
|
Halek M, Reuther S, Müller-Widmer R, Trutschel D, Holle D. Dealing with the behaviour of residents with dementia that challenges: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial of two types of dementia-specific case conferences in nursing homes (FallDem). Int J Nurs Stud 2019; 104:103435. [PMID: 32062052 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Revised: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The negative effects of behavioural changes among dementia residents and the consequences for caregivers are a major problem in the care of people with dementia. Case conferences (CC) are recommended as a useful method to understand the underlying causes of the behaviour and to plan tailored interventions OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to describe the effects of two dementia-specific CC models on the prevalence of behaviour that challenges and other secondary outcomes. DESIGN Stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. SETTING Nursing homes: The inclusion criterion was the participation of at least two units with a minimum of 30 residents who were mainly cared for in the study units. PARTICIPANTS A total of 224 residents and 189 staff from six nursing homes in the IdA (Innovative dementia-orientated Assessment system) cohort and 241 residents and 284 staff from six nursing homes in the Neo (Narrative Approach) cohort were included in the study. The inclusion criteria were the following: medical diagnosis of dementia from nursing charts, FAST (Functional Assessment Staging) score > 1, living at least 15 days in the unit, and informed consent. METHODS The nursing homes were randomized to the type of intervention and time point of intervention delivery. The two interventions in the form of the case conference models (Welcome-IdA and -Neo) differed in the type of behaviour analysis method. The intervention duration was seven months. The primary outcome was the change in the prevalence of behaviour that challenges. Secondary outcomes were residents' quality of life, prescription of psychotropic medications, formal caregiver burnout, dementia-related stress, and vocational action competence. The outcomes were measured on seven data points every three months. Linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze intervention effects between the control, intervention and follow-up periods. RESULTS No differences were found concerning the primary outcome between the control and intervention cohorts for both CC models. Further exploratory data analyses showed a reduction in behaviours such as apathy (18%) and eating disturbances (29%) for the IdA cohort and hallucination (27%) and delusion (28%) in the NEO cohort. Only staff in the IdA cohort demonstrated a reduction in work-related burnout from the control phase to the intervention phase. CONCLUSION Specific CC for behaviour that challenges do not decrease the overall prevalence of residents showing changes in behaviour. However, there are indications that the case conferences influence some types of behaviour and reduce the risk factors for work-related burnout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margareta Halek
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Stockumer Str. 12, 58453 Witten, Germany; School of Nursing Science, Witten/Herdecke University, Stockumer Str. 12, 58453 Witten, Germany.
| | - Sven Reuther
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Stockumer Str. 12, 58453 Witten, Germany; School of Nursing Science, Witten/Herdecke University, Stockumer Str. 12, 58453 Witten, Germany.
| | - René Müller-Widmer
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Stockumer Str. 12, 58453 Witten, Germany; School of Nursing Science, Witten/Herdecke University, Stockumer Str. 12, 58453 Witten, Germany
| | - Diana Trutschel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Stockumer Str. 12, 58453 Witten, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle/Wittenberg, Weinberg 3, 06120 Halle/Saale, Germany.
| | - Daniela Holle
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Stockumer Str. 12, 58453 Witten, Germany; School of Nursing Science, Witten/Herdecke University, Stockumer Str. 12, 58453 Witten, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|