1
|
Pearson M, Jackson G, Jackson C, Boland J, Featherstone I, Huang C, Ogden M, Sartain K, Siddiqi N, Twiddy M, Johnson M. Improving the Detection, Assessment, Management and Prevention of Delirium in Hospices (the DAMPen-D study): protocol for a co-design and feasibility study of a flexible and scalable implementation strategy to deliver guideline-adherent delirium care. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060450. [PMID: 35831039 PMCID: PMC9280901 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Delirium is a complex condition in which altered mental state and cognition causes severe distress and poor clinical outcomes for patients and families, anxiety and stress for the health professionals and support staff providing care, and higher care costs. Hospice patients are at high risk of developing delirium, but there is significant variation in care delivery. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of an implementation strategy (designed to help deliver good practice delirium guidelines), participant recruitment and data collection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Three work packages in three hospices in the UK with public involvement in codesign, study management and stakeholder groups: (1) experience-based codesign to adapt an existing theoretically-informed implementation strategy (Creating Learning Environments for Compassionate Care (CLECC)) to implement delirium guidelines in hospices; (2) feasibility study to explore ability to collect demographic, diagnostic and delirium management data from clinical records (n=300), explanatory process data (number of staff engaged in CLECC activities and reasons for non-engagement) and cost data (staff and volunteer hours and pay-grades engaged in implementation activities) and (3) realist process evaluation to assess the acceptability and flexibility of the implementation strategy (preimplementation and postimplementation surveys with hospice staff and management, n=30 at each time point; interviews with hospice staff and management, n=15). Descriptive statistics, rapid thematic analysis and a realist logic of analysis will be used be used to analyse quantitative and qualitative data, as appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval obtained: Hull York Medical School Ethics Committee (Ref 21/23), Health Research Authority Research Ethics Committee Wales REC7 (Ref 21/WA/0180) and Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group (Ref 21/CAG/0071). Written informed consent will be obtained from interview participants. A results paper will be submitted to an open access peer-reviewed journal and a lay summary shared with study site staff and stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN55416525.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Pearson
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | | | | | - Jason Boland
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | | | - Chao Huang
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Margaret Ogden
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Kathryn Sartain
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
- York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Buston K, O’Brien R, Maxwell K. The Case for Targeted Parenting Interventions with Reference to Intergenerational Transmission of Parenting: Qualitative Evidence from Three Studies of Marginalised Mothers’ and Fathers’ Participation in Parenting Programmes. CHILD CARE IN PRACTICE 2022; 28:274-289. [PMID: 35663503 PMCID: PMC7612789 DOI: 10.1080/13575279.2020.1812533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The idea that how you were parented is key to how you parent your own children is widely recognisable. It is present in popular cultural references, underpins much policy on families and parenting in the UK, and is supported by a substantive body of academic literature. We explore this concept of intergenerational transmission of parenting, understanding it as the context in which parenting interventions have been implemented. We draw on interview data from three Scottish samples of marginalised parents (n = 54) to explore how participants think their own parenting behaviours have been shaped by their experience of being parented and how they talk about participation in a parenting intervention in relation to this. We find that how these parents have been parented is salient in considering their own parenting behaviour, and is a key context for their engagement with the intervention. We make the case for parenting interventions targeted at marginalised parents, arguing that they are acceptable to, and useful for, these parents and may, potentially, be effective in breaking cycles of negative parenting. Policy-makers should not shy away from implementing targeted parenting programmes as part of endeavours to address negative parenting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Buston
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Karen Maxwell
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ponting C, Urizar GG, Dunkel Schetter C. Psychological Interventions for Prenatal Anxiety in Latinas and Black Women: A Scoping Review and Recommendations. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:820343. [PMID: 35370831 PMCID: PMC8965279 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.820343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Anxiety symptoms are common among pregnant women worldwide. In the United States, prenatal anxiety symptoms tend to be elevated among Black and Latin American women as compared to non-Latina White women. Despite the high prevalence of anxiety and associations with adverse maternal and offspring outcomes, interventions have not been developed or tailored sufficiently to Black women or Latinas who need efficacious treatment. This article provides a scoping review of articles published since 2017 that test the effects of randomized and non-randomized psychological interventions designed to reduce prenatal anxiety in samples comprised primarily of ethnic/racial minority women. We also review published protocols of planned psychological interventions to reduce prenatal anxiety in order to highlight novel approaches. In addition to summarizing intervention efficacy and participant acceptability, we highlight gaps in the literature which, if addressed, could improve perinatal mental health equity. Finally, we discuss future directions in prenatal anxiety intervention science beginning preconception including intervention design and prevention models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Ponting
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Guido G Urizar
- Department of Psychology, California State University, Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marchal B, Abejirinde IOO, Sulaberidze L, Chikovani I, Uchaneishvili M, Shengelia N, Diaconu K, Vassall A, Zoidze A, Giralt AN, Witter S. How do participatory methods shape policy? Applying a realist approach to the formulation of a new tuberculosis policy in Georgia. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e047948. [PMID: 34187826 PMCID: PMC8245474 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This paper presents the iterative process of participatory multistakeholder engagement that informed the development of a new national tuberculosis (TB) policy in Georgia, and the lessons learnt. METHODS Guided by realist evaluation methods, a multistakeholder dialogue was organised to elicit stakeholders' assumptions on challenges and possible solutions for better TB control. Two participatory workshops were conducted with key actors, interspersed by reflection meetings within the research team and discussions with policymakers. Using concept mapping and causal mapping techniques, and drawing causal loop diagrams, we visualised how actors understood TB service provision challenges and the potential means by which a results-based financing (RBF) policy could address these. SETTING The study was conducted in Tbilisi, Georgia. PARTICIPANTS A total of 64 key actors from the Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs, staff of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria Georgia Project, the National Centre for Disease Control and Public Health, the National TB programme, TB service providers and members of the research team were involved in the workshops. RESULTS Findings showed that beyond provider incentives, additional policy components were necessary. These included broadening the incentive package to include institutional and organisational incentives, retraining service providers, clear redistribution of roles to support an integrated care model, and refinement of monitoring tools. Health system elements, such as effective referral systems and health information systems were highlighted as necessary for service improvement. CONCLUSIONS Developing policies that address complex issues requires methods that facilitate linkages between multiple stakeholders and between theory and practice. Such participatory approaches can be informed by realist evaluation principles and visually facilitated by causal loop diagrams. This approach allowed us leverage stakeholders' knowledge and expertise on TB service delivery and RBF to codesign a new policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Marchal
- Health Systems and Health Policy Research Group, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde
- Health Systems and Health Policy Research Group, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Lela Sulaberidze
- Research Unit, Curatio International Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Ivdity Chikovani
- Research Unit, Curatio International Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | | | - Natia Shengelia
- Research Unit, Curatio International Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Karin Diaconu
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Musselburgh, UK
| | - Anna Vassall
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Akaki Zoidze
- Research Unit, Curatio International Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Ariadna Nebot Giralt
- Health Systems and Health Policy Research Group, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Sophie Witter
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Musselburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hickey G, McGilloway S, Leckey Y, Stokes A, Bywater T, Donnelly M. "Putting Meat on the Bones": Understanding the Implementation of a Community-Based Early Intervention and Prevention Programme-Contextual, Person, and Programme Influences. PREVENTION SCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH 2020; 22:113-129. [PMID: 33057874 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-020-01170-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The adoption and effective delivery of evidence-based interventions within "real-world" community-based, primary health care service settings are of crucial importance. In this paper, we explore the successes and challenges of implementing a new complex, group-based, early parenting intervention called the Parent and Infant (PIN) programme. This study involved a systematic analysis of the processes and factors that influence the implementation of the PIN programme; the analysis was guided and informed by the Implementation Outcome Framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A documentary review, alongside a series of one-to-one interviews and small group discussions with a range of stakeholders (n = 44), and 7 focus groups (n = 24) were used as data sources. Factors that promoted programme adoption, acceptability, and implementation feasibility included programme characteristics and stakeholder attitudes, as well as organisational and systems factors (e.g. leadership and collaboration). Key challenges to implementation success included engagement and adoption barriers. This research provides a useful and important example of real-world, theory-driven implementation research which helped to identify interrelated processes, factors, and contexts which shape and influence the implementation of early intervention and prevention programmes, removed for blind review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gráinne Hickey
- Department of Psychology, Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University, John Hume Building, Co. Kildare, Maynooth, W23 F2H6, Ireland.
| | - Sinead McGilloway
- Department of Psychology, Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University, John Hume Building, Co. Kildare, Maynooth, W23 F2H6, Ireland
| | - Yvonne Leckey
- Department of Psychology, Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University, John Hume Building, Co. Kildare, Maynooth, W23 F2H6, Ireland
| | - Ann Stokes
- Department of Psychology, Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University, John Hume Building, Co. Kildare, Maynooth, W23 F2H6, Ireland
| | | | - Michael Donnelly
- Health Services Research Group, Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Allan S, Mcleod H, Bradstreet S, Beedie S, Moir B, Gleeson J, Farhall J, Morton E, Gumley A. Understanding Implementation of a Digital Self-Monitoring Intervention for Relapse Prevention in Psychosis: Protocol for a Mixed Method Process Evaluation. JMIR Res Protoc 2019; 8:e15634. [PMID: 31821154 PMCID: PMC6930509 DOI: 10.2196/15634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Relapse is common in people who experience psychosis and is associated with many negative consequences, both societal and personal. People who relapse often exhibit changes (early warning signs [EWS]) in the period before relapse. Successful identification of EWS offers an opportunity for relapse prevention. However, several known barriers impede the use of EWS monitoring approaches. Early signs Monitoring to Prevent relapse in psychosis and prOmote Well-being, Engagement, and Recovery (EMPOWER) is a complex digital intervention that uses a mobile app to enhance the detection and management of self-reported changes in well-being. This is currently being tested in a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial. As digital interventions have not been widely used in relapse prevention, little is known about their implementation. Process evaluation studies run in parallel to clinical trials can provide valuable data on intervention feasibility. Objective This study aims to transparently describe the protocol for the process evaluation element of the EMPOWER trial. We will focus on the development of a process evaluation framework sensitive to the worldview of service users, mental health staff, and carers; the aims of the process evaluation itself; the proposed studies to address these aims; and a plan for integration of results from separate process evaluation studies into one overall report. Methods The overall process evaluation will utilize mixed methods across 6 substudies. Among them, 4 will use qualitative methodologies, 1 will use a mixed methods approach, and 1 will use quantitative methodologies. Results The results of all studies will be triangulated into an overall analysis and interpretation of key implementation lessons. EMPOWER was funded in 2016, recruitment finished in January 2018. Data analysis is currently under way and the first results are expected to be submitted for publication in December 2019. Conclusions The findings from this study will help identify implementation facilitators and barriers to EMPOWER. These insights will inform both upscaling decisions and optimization of a definitive trial. Trial Registration ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN99559262; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN99559262 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/15634
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Allan
- Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Hamish Mcleod
- Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Bradstreet
- Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Beedie
- Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Bethany Moir
- Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - John Gleeson
- School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - John Farhall
- Department of Psychology and Counselling, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Emma Morton
- School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Andrew Gumley
- Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Henderson M, Wittkowski A, McIntosh E, McConnachie A, Buston K, Wilson P, Calam R, Minnis H, Thompson L, O'Dowd J, Law J, McGee E, Wight D. Trial of healthy relationship initiatives for the very early years (THRIVE), evaluating Enhanced Triple P for Baby and Mellow Bumps additional social and care needs during pregnancy and their infants who are at higher risk of maltreatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2019; 20:499. [PMID: 31412902 PMCID: PMC6694522 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3571-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Growing evidence suggests that experiences in the early years play a major role in children’s development in terms of health, wellbeing and educational attainment. The Trial of healthy relationship initiatives for the very early years (THRIVE) aims to evaluate two antenatal group interventions, Enhanced Triple P for Baby and Mellow Bumps, designed for those with additional health or social care needs in pregnancy. As both interventions aim to improve maternal mental health and parenting skills, we hypothesise that in the longer term, participation may lead to an improvement in children’s life trajectories. Methods THRIVE is a three-arm, longitudinal, randomised controlled trial aiming to recruit 500 pregnant women with additional health or social care needs. Participants will be referred by health and social care professionals, predominately midwives. Consenting participants will be block randomised to one of the three arms: Enhanced Triple P for Baby plus care as usual, Mellow Bumps plus care as usual or care as usual. Groups will commence when participants are between 20 and 34 weeks pregnant. Discussion The population we aim to recruit are traditionally referred to as “hard to reach”, therefore we will monitor referrals received from maternity and social care pathways and will be open to innovation to boost referral rates. We will set geographically acceptable group locations for participants, to limit challenges we foresee for group participation and retention. We anticipate the results of the trial will help inform policy and practice in supporting women with additional health and social care needs during antenatal and early postnatal periods. This is currently a high priority for the Scottish and UK Governments. Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number (ISRCTN) Registry, ISRCTN:21656568. Registered on 28 February 2014 (registered retrospectively (by 3 months)). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3571-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Henderson
- Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Top Floor 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX, Scotland.
| | - Anja Wittkowski
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, 2nd Floor Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Emma McIntosh
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland
| | - Alex McConnachie
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Boyd Orr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland
| | - Katie Buston
- Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Top Floor 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX, Scotland
| | - Philip Wilson
- Centre for Rural Health, University of Aberdeen, The Centre for Health Science, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, Scotland
| | - Rachel Calam
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, 2nd Floor Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Helen Minnis
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Caledonia House, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Yorkhill, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, Scotland
| | - Lucy Thompson
- Centre for Rural Health, University of Aberdeen, The Centre for Health Science, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, Scotland.,Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Caledonia House, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Yorkhill, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, Scotland
| | - John O'Dowd
- NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Afton House, Ailsa Hospital Campus, Dalmellington Road, Ayr, KA6 6AB, Scotland
| | - James Law
- Institute of Health and Society, School of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 7RU, England
| | - Elizabeth McGee
- Parenting and Family Support Research Programme, Department of Psychology and Allied Health Sciences, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, Scotland
| | - Daniel Wight
- Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Top Floor 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX, Scotland
| | | |
Collapse
|