1
|
Lawrence M, Davis B, Clark NE, Booth J, Donald G, Dougall N, Grealy M, Jani B, MacDonald J, Mason H, Maxwell M, Parkinson B, Pieri M, Wang X, Mercer S. In-person and online mixed method non-randomised studies exploring feasibility and acceptability of HEADS: UP, an adapted Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction programme for stroke survivors experiencing symptoms of anxiety and depression. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2024; 10:119. [PMID: 39267177 PMCID: PMC11391595 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01545-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression and anxiety are prevalent after stroke and associated with poor outcomes. We previously co-developed a stroke-specific self-management intervention, HEADS: UP (Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression after Stroke). The two studies reported here aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of the HEADS: UP course and supporting materials, and research processes ahead of a definitive trial. METHODS We recruited community-dwelling stroke survivors (SS) ≥ 3 months post-stroke, with symptoms of mood disorder (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ≥ 8). Participants could 'enrol' a family member/ 'other' to take part with them, if desired. Study 1 tested HEADS: UP delivered in-person, and informed optimisation of research processes and intervention delivery and materials. In a pragmatic response to Covid-related socialising restrictions, HEADS: UP was then adapted for online delivery, tested in Study 2. The primary outcome (both studies) was the feasibility (acceptability, fidelity) of the intervention and of research processes. Quantitative data (including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assessing mood and quality of life) and qualitative data were collected pre-/post-intervention. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data; a thematic framework approach was used to analyse qualitative data. Both studies received ethical approval prior to commencement. RESULTS Study 1 Feasibility: 13 (59.1%) of 22 potentially eligible stroke survivors consented; aged 66 (median, interquartile range (IQR) 14); male (n = 9; 69%); 28 (IQR 34) months post-stroke. Of these, n = 10 (76.9%) completed PROMS pre-intervention; n = 6 (46.2%) post-intervention. Acceptability: Nine (69.2%) of the 13 participants attended ≥ 4 core intervention sessions. Aspects of screening and data collection were found to be burdensome. Study 2 Feasibility: SS n = 9 (41%) of 22 potentially eligible stroke survivors consented; aged 58 years (median; IQR 12); male (n = 4; 44.4%); 23 (IQR 34) months post-stroke. Of these, n = 5 (55.6%) completed PROMS pre-intervention; n = 5 (55.6%) post-intervention. Acceptability: Five (55.6%) of the 9 participants attended ≥ 4 core sessions. They found online screening and data collection processes straightforward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maggie Lawrence
- Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow Caledonian University (GCU), Glasgow, Scotland, G4 0BA, UK.
| | - Bridget Davis
- Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow Caledonian University (GCU), Glasgow, Scotland, G4 0BA, UK
| | - Naomi E Clark
- Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow Caledonian University (GCU), Glasgow, Scotland, G4 0BA, UK
| | - Jo Booth
- Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow Caledonian University (GCU), Glasgow, Scotland, G4 0BA, UK
| | - Graeme Donald
- School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, M6 6PU, UK
| | - Nadine Dougall
- Health and Social Care Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, EH11 4BN, UK
| | - Madeleine Grealy
- Psychological Services and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, UK
| | - Bhautesh Jani
- General Practice and Primary Care, School of Health and Wellbeing, MVLS, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 9LJ, UK
| | - Jennifer MacDonald
- Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow Caledonian University (GCU), Glasgow, Scotland, G4 0BA, UK
| | | | - Margaret Maxwell
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK
| | - Ben Parkinson
- Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow Caledonian University (GCU), Glasgow, Scotland, G4 0BA, UK
| | - Matilde Pieri
- Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow Caledonian University (GCU), Glasgow, Scotland, G4 0BA, UK
| | - Xu Wang
- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, PD405 Portland Building, City Campus, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK
| | - Stewart Mercer
- Primary Care and Multimorbidity, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH8 9AG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Johnson L, Burridge J, Ewings S, Demain S. A pilot cluster randomised controlled trial, of an IMPlicit learning approach versus standard care, on recovery of mobility following stroke (IMPS). Clin Rehabil 2024:2692155241267205. [PMID: 39105429 DOI: 10.1177/02692155241267205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the delivery of rehabilitation using implicit motor learning principles in an acute stroke setting. DESIGN Pilot, assessor-blind, cluster randomised controlled trial with nested qualitative evaluation. SETTING Eight inpatient stroke units, UK. PARTICIPANTS People within 14 days of stroke onset, presenting with lower limb hemiplegia. INTERVENTIONS Participants at control clusters received usual care. Participants at intervention clusters received rehabilitation using an Implicit Learning Approach (ILA); primarily consisting of reduced frequency instructions/feedback, and promotion of an external focus of attention. Video recording was used to understand the ability of intervention site therapists to adhere to the implicit learning principles, and to compare differences between groups. MEASURES Ability to recruit and retain clusters/participants; suitability and acceptability of data collection processes; appropriateness of fidelity monitoring methods; and appropriateness of chosen outcome measures. RESULTS Eight stroke units participated, with four assigned to each group (intervention/control). Fifty-one participants were enrolled (intervention group 21; control group 30). Mean time since stroke was 6 days (SD 3.42; 0-14); mean age was 73 years (SD 14, 25-94). Of those approached to take part, 72% agreed. We found clear differences between groups with respect to the frequency and type of instructional statement. The ILA was acceptable to both patients and therapists. CONCLUSION It is feasible to evaluate the application and effectiveness of motor learning principles within acute stroke rehabilitation, using a cluster randomised design. A larger study is required to evaluate the benefits of each approach; we provide a range of sample size estimates required for this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Johnson
- University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Jane Burridge
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sean Ewings
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sara Demain
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dipper L, Devane N, Barnard R, Botting N, Boyle M, Cockayne L, Hersh D, Magdalani C, Marshall J, Swinburn K, Cruice M. A feasibility randomised waitlist-controlled trial of a personalised multi-level language treatment for people with aphasia: The remote LUNA study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0304385. [PMID: 38875279 PMCID: PMC11178191 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stroke survivors with aphasia want to improve their everyday talking (discourse). In current UK practice, 90% of speech and language therapists believe discourse assessment and treatment is part of their role but are hampered by barriers in resources, time and expertise. There is a clinical need for well-articulated discourse assessment and treatments. LUNA is a multi-level treatment targeting words, sentences and discourse macrostructure in personal stories that addresses this clinical need. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of LUNA trial procedures in a randomised waitlist-controlled trial; and to evaluate preliminary efficacy. METHODS This paper reports a phase II, waitlist-controlled, proof-of-concept feasibility trial. Participants with chronic aphasia (n = 28) were recruited from the community and randomised to an Immediate (n = 14) or Delayed (n = 14) group. LUNA treatment was delivered twice weekly for 10 weeks via the videoconferencing technology, Zoom. Feasibility was assessed in terms of participant recruitment and retention, adherence, missing data, and treatment fidelity. Preliminary treatment efficacy was assessed in terms of between group differences in outcome measures relating to discourse, language, and psychosocial state. RESULTS The remote LUNA trial was feasible: 85% of those eligible consented to the trial; trial retention was 86%; 87% of treatment sessions were delivered as scheduled, and 79% of participants completed 80%+ of the treatment programme; data was missing only for participants who withdrew; treatment fidelity was high at 92% adherence; and only one clinical outcome measure demonstrated ceiling effects. ANCOVA analysis of the clinical outcome measures revealed group differences with medium and large effect sizes, indicating, improvements in the production of words, sentences, discourse macrostructure, overall language functioning (WAB-R), and psychosocial state (VAMS) following LUNA treatment. For most outcomes measured, similar treatment benefits were suggested in a secondary, non-parametric analysis. CONCLUSIONS Large-scale evaluation of the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of LUNA is warranted and supported by these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trials registration: NCT05847023 (clinical trials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Dipper
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Niamh Devane
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Barnard
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Botting
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Boyle
- Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Lin Cockayne
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah Hersh
- Curtin School of Allied Health and EnAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Carla Magdalani
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Marshall
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Swinburn
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Madeline Cruice
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fakes K, Waller A, Carey M, Czerenkowski J, Nolan E, Leigh L, Pollack M, Henskens F, Sanson-Fisher R. Discharge intervention to improve outcomes and web-based portal engagement after stroke and transient ischaemic attack: A randomised controlled trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2024; 33:107771. [PMID: 38788985 DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Web-based interventions may assist in post-discharge stroke care. However, strategies for maximising uptake and engagement are needed. AIMS To determine the: (1) effectiveness of a discharge support intervention (EnableMe web-based portal and strategies to encourage use) in improving quality of life and reducing depression (primary outcome); anxiety and unmet needs of survivors of stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA); and (2) EnableMe use and acceptability. MATERIALS AND METHODS An open, parallel-group, multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the intervention compared to usual care for survivors of stroke/TIA and their support persons. Participants recruited from eight hospitals completed questionnaires at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Outcomes included quality of life, depression, anxiety and unmet needs. RESULTS 98 survivors (n=52 intervention, n=47 control) and 30 support persons (n=11 intervention, n=19 control) enrolled in the RCT. Bayesian analyses showed substantial evidence of an intervention effect on survivors' quality of life scores at 3 months. There was moderate-to-strong evidence of a treatment effect on depression scores and strong evidence that intervention participants had fewer unmet needs at 3 and 6 months. 45 % of intervention group survivors and 63 % of support persons self-reported using EnableMe. 64 % of survivors and 84 % of support persons found it helpful. CONCLUSION Substantial evidence for the discharge support intervention was found, with a difference between groups in survivor quality of life, depression, and unmet needs. Acceptability was demonstrated with largely positive attitudes towards EnableMe. Future research should explore different engagement strategies to improve uptake of online stroke resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristy Fakes
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia; Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.
| | - Amy Waller
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia; Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Mariko Carey
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia; Centre for Women's Health Research, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Erin Nolan
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia; HMRI Data Sciences, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Lucy Leigh
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia; HMRI Data Sciences, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Michael Pollack
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia; Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia
| | - Frans Henskens
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia; Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia; Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shiggins C, Ryan B, Dewan F, Bernhardt J, O'Halloran R, Power E, Lindley RI, McGurk G, Rose ML. Inclusion of People With Aphasia in Stroke Trials: A Systematic Search and Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2024; 105:580-592. [PMID: 37394026 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although people with aphasia (PwA) represent 30% of stroke survivors, they are frequently excluded from stroke research, or their inclusion is unclear. Such practice significantly limits the generalizability of stroke research, increases the need to duplicate research in aphasia-specific populations, and raises important ethical and human rights issues. OBJECTIVE To detail the extent and nature of inclusion of PwA in contemporary stroke randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS We conducted a systematic search to identify completed stroke RCTs and RCT protocols published in 2019. Web of Science was searched using terms "stroke" and "randomized controlled trial". These articles were reviewed by extracting rates of PwA inclusion/exclusion, whether "aphasia" or related terms were referred to in the article or supplemental files, eligibility criteria, consent procedures, adaptations made to support the inclusion of PwA, and attrition rates of PwA. Data were summarized, and descriptive statistics applied when appropriate. RESULTS 271 studies comprising 215 completed RCTs and 56 protocols were included. 36.2% of included studies referred to aphasia/dysphasia. Of completed RCTs, only 6.5% explicitly included PwA, 4.7% explicitly excluded PwA, and inclusion was unclear in the remaining 88.8%. Among RCT protocols, 28.6% of studies intended inclusion, 10.7% intended excluding PwA, and in 60.7%, inclusion was unclear. In 45.8% of included studies, sub-groups of PwA were excluded, either explicitly (ie, particular types/severities of aphasia, eg, global aphasia) or implicitly, by way of ambiguous eligibility criteria which could potentially relate to a sub-group of PwA. Little rationale for exclusion was provided. 71.2% of completed RCTs did not report any adaptations that could support the inclusion of PwA, and minimal information was provided about consent procedures. Where it could be determined, attrition of PwA averaged 10% (range 0%-20%). CONCLUSION This paper details the extent of inclusion of PwA in stroke research and highlights opportunities for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciara Shiggins
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Australia; School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora Campus, Melbourne, Australia; Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia; School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
| | - Brooke Ryan
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Australia; University of Technology Sydney, Graduate School of Health, Clinical Psychology, Ultimo, Australia; Speech Pathology, Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Farhana Dewan
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Australia; School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora Campus, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Julie Bernhardt
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Australia; National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery, Australia; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Robyn O'Halloran
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Australia; School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora Campus, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Emma Power
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Australia; University of Technology Sydney, Graduate School of Health, Speech Pathology, Ultimo, Australia
| | - Richard I Lindley
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Australia; Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gordon McGurk
- Human Research Ethics Committee, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Human Research Ethics Committee A, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Human Research Ethics Committee, Townsville Hospital and Health Service, Townsville, Australia; OmniAdvisory Consulting
| | - Miranda L Rose
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Australia; School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora Campus, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Broderick M, Burridge J, Demain S, Johnson L, Brereton J, O'Shea R, Bentley P. Multicentre pilot randomised control trial of a self-directed exergaming intervention for poststroke upper limb rehabilitation: research protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e077121. [PMID: 38245014 PMCID: PMC10806628 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Technology-facilitated, self-directed upper limb (UL) rehabilitation, as an adjunct to conventional care, could enhance poststroke UL recovery compared with conventional care alone, without imposing additional resource burden. The proposed pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to assess whether stroke survivors will engage in self-directed UL training, explore factors associated with intervention adherence and evaluate the study design for an RCT testing the efficacy of a self-directed exer-gaming intervention for UL recovery after stroke. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a multicentre, internal pilot RCT; parallel design, with nested qualitative methods. The sample will consist of stroke survivors with UL paresis, presenting within the previous 30 days. Participants randomised to the intervention group will be trained to use an exergaming device and will be supported to adopt this as part of their self-directed rehabilitation (ie, without formal support/supervision) for a 3-month period. The primary outcome will be the Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment (FM-UE) at 6 months poststroke. Secondary outcomes are the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), the Barthel Index and the Modified Rankin Scale. Assessment time points will be prior to randomisation (0-1 month poststroke), 3 months and 6 months poststroke. A power calculation to inform sample size required for a definitive RCT will be conducted using FM-UE data from the sample across 0-6 months time points. Semistructured qualitative interviews will examine factors associated with intervention adoption. Reflexive thematic analysis will be used to code qualitative interview data and generate key themes associated with intervention adoption. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol (V.1.9) was granted ethical approval by the Health Research Authority, Health and Care Research Wales, and the London- Harrow Research Ethics Committee (ref. 21/LO/0054) on 19 May 2021. Trial results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals, presented at national and international stroke meetings and conferences and disseminated among stakeholder communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04475692.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jane Burridge
- Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sara Demain
- Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Louise Johnson
- Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK
| | - Joe Brereton
- University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK
| | | | - Paul Bentley
- Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chan BCF. The Challenges in Conducting Economic Evaluations for Rehabilitation Technologies. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2023; 29:44-52. [PMID: 38174139 PMCID: PMC10759881 DOI: 10.46292/sci23-00035s] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Background Health technology assessment (HTA) is an important evidentiary component in the decision-making process for the adoption of new healthcare technologies to the healthcare system. Economic evidence is an important consideration in HTAs. Recent systematic reviews in rehabilitation have shown a limited number of economic evaluations and high levels of uncertainty in the results. It is unclear whether there are challenges related to the field of rehabilitation and the technologies used in rehabilitation that inhibit the development of economic evidence. Methods In this study, economic evaluations in rehabilitation were reviewed. This was followed by a summary of the latest evidence on the challenges of conducting HTA for medical devices and the relationship with rehabilitation technologies. Finally, several considerations are suggested to improve the HTA of technologies that target rehabilitation. A literature review of Google Scholar and PubMed was conducted to identify reviews in economic evaluations in rehabilitation. A recent review on the barriers to HTA of medical devices in general was also examined to identify similar concerns with rehabilitation technologies. Results The challenges identified include the lack of high-quality studies, the interaction between the technology and the user, the short product life cycle, and estimation of efficacy in technologies with multiple target populations. Conclusion Overall, many of the challenges in evaluating medical devices also apply to rehabilitation interventions. Further research and discussion on these issues are necessary to increase the clinical evidence for rehabilitation technologies, strengthen the development of HTAs, and facilitate the use of technologies to improve the health of individuals requiring rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Chun-Fai Chan
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
O' Donoghue M, Boland P, Taylor S, Hennessy E, Murphy E, Leahy S, McManus J, Lisiecka D, Purtill H, Galvin R, Hayes S. OptiCogs: feasibility of a multicomponent intervention to rehabilitate people with cognitive impairment post-stroke. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:178. [PMID: 37853485 PMCID: PMC10583340 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01300-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Despite the prevalence and associated burden of cognitive impairment post-stroke, there is uncertainty regarding optimal cognitive rehabilitation for people post-stroke. This study aimed to assess whether a multicomponent intervention, called OptiCogs, is feasible, acceptable, and safe for people with cognitive impairment post-stroke. A secondary aim was to explore changes in cognitive function, fatigue, quality of life, physical function, and occupational performance, from pre-intervention to post-intervention. METHODS A feasibility study was conducted where people post-stroke with cognitive impairment enrolled in a 6-week multicomponent intervention. The primary outcomes recorded included response rate, recruitment rate, retention rate, adherence to the intervention protocol, adverse events, and acceptability of the intervention to people post-stroke. Secondary outcomes included (i) change in cognitive functioning using the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III, (ii) fatigue using the Fatigue Severity scale, (iii) quality of life using the Stroke Specific Quality of Life scale (iv) physical function using the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system, and (v) patient-reported occupational performance using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials extension reporting guidelines were followed, for pilot and feasibility studies, to standardize the conduct and reporting of this study. RESULTS The response rate was 10.9%. Nine eligible participants were enrolled during the 4-month recruitment period, with eight participants completing the entire 6-week intervention, as well as the pre- and post-intervention outcome measures. There were no reported adverse events. Participants were satisfied with the intervention and found it acceptable overall. Results of the secondary outcomes were promising for cognitive function (ACE III, pre: 63.3 ± 23.9 to post: 69 ± 24.6), fatigue (FSS, pre: 52.5 ± 7.3 to post: 45.6 ± 7.2), quality of life (SSQoL, pre: 131.0 ± 26.3 to post: 169.9 ± 15.3), physical function (PROMIS-PF, pre: 15.5 ± 6.3 to post: 15.8 ± 5.3), and occupational performance (COPM performance, pre: 9.3 ± 2.3 to post: 22.9 ± 4.2) and COPM satisfaction, pre: 9.9 ± 2.1 to post: 22.7 ± 3.5). CONCLUSION Preliminary results suggest low-modest recruitment and high retention rates for the OptiCogs intervention. Changes in cognitive function, fatigue, quality of life, and self-reported occupational performance show improvement from pre- to post-intervention. These potential benefits require further testing in a larger pilot trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05414539.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairéad O' Donoghue
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94 T9PX, Ireland.
| | - Pauline Boland
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94 T9PX, Ireland
| | - Sinead Taylor
- Acute Stroke and Neurology Services, UL Hospitals Group, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Edel Hennessy
- Early Supported Discharge, UL Hospitals Group, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Eva Murphy
- Early Supported Discharge, UL Hospitals Group, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Siobhan Leahy
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition, School of Science and Computing, Mayo Institute of Technology, Dublin Road, GalwayGalway, Ireland
| | - John McManus
- Acute Stroke and Neurology Services, UL Hospitals Group, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Dominika Lisiecka
- Department of Nursing and Healthcare Sciences, School of Health and Social Sciences, Munster Technological University Kerry Campus, Kerry, Ireland
| | - Helen Purtill
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Rose Galvin
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94 T9PX, Ireland
| | - Sara Hayes
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94 T9PX, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Langerak AJ, Regterschot GRH, Evers M, van Beijnum BJF, Meskers CGM, Selles RW, Ribbers GM, Bussmann JBJ. A Sensor-Based Feedback Device Stimulating Daily Life Upper Extremity Activity in Stroke Patients: A Feasibility Study. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:5868. [PMID: 37447718 DOI: 10.3390/s23135868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and explore the efficacy of the Arm Activity Tracker (AAT). The AAT is a device based on wrist-worn accelerometers that provides visual and tactile feedback to stimulate daily life upper extremity (UE) activity in stroke patients. METHODS A randomised, crossover within-subject study was conducted in sub-acute stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation centre. Feasibility encompassed (1) adherence: the dropout rate and the number of participants with insufficient AAT data collection; (2) acceptance: the technology acceptance model (range: 7-112) and (3) usability: the system usability scale (range: 0-100). A two-way ANOVA was used to estimate the difference between the baseline, intervention and control conditions for (1) paretic UE activity and (2) UE activity ratio. RESULTS Seventeen stroke patients were included. A 29% dropout rate was observed, and two participants had insufficient data collection. Participants who adhered to the study reported good acceptance (median (IQR): 94 (77-111)) and usability (median (IQR): 77.5 (75-78.5)-). We found small to medium effect sizes favouring the intervention condition for paretic UE activity (η2G = 0.07, p = 0.04) and ratio (η2G = 0.11, p = 0.22). CONCLUSION Participants who adhered to the study showed good acceptance and usability of the AAT and increased paretic UE activity. Dropouts should be further evaluated, and a sufficiently powered trial should be performed to analyse efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthonia J Langerak
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marc Evers
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, 3015 LJ Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert-Jan F van Beijnum
- Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Carel G M Meskers
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience and Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud W Selles
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard M Ribbers
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes B J Bussmann
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cronin E, Monaghan K. Online neuropilates classes in chronic stroke patients: Protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2023; 32:101068. [PMID: 36747990 PMCID: PMC9898606 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Stroke survivors often demonstrate low physical activity levels and experience barriers to physical exercise including embarrassment, low self-efficacy and a shortage of tailored community exercise programmes. Access to physical activity programmes for stroke survivors could be improved by providing tailored, online programmes, although little is known about the safety and feasibility of online exercise classes for stroke survivors. One such programme of exercise which has received little attention in the literature is neuropilates. Neuropilates is the practice of a modified pilates programme in those with neurological conditions and is theorised to have beneficial effects on strength, balance and proprioception in stroke survivors. No previous study has been conducted to investigate online, remotely supervised neuropilates exercise classes in the stroke survivors. Method and Analysis This single assessor blinded randomised controlled feasibility study will compare a 6-week online, remotely instructed neuropilates programme to a 6-week online, remotely instructed generalised exercise programme and a 6-week unsupervised generalised home exercise programme in chronic stroke patients. Twenty adults, at least 6 months post stroke, and finished their formal rehabilitation will be recruited to the study. Primary feasibility outcome measures will include patient tolerance of the programme, adherence rates, adverse events, recruitment and retention. Secondary clinical outcomes will include; balance, gait, tone and quality of life. Assessments will be completed at baseline, on programme completion and 3 months post completion by a Physiotherapist blinded to the group allocation. Ethics and dissemination This study has received ethical approval from the Sligo University Hospital Ethics committee and ATU ethics board. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.The trial has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04491279).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eimear Cronin
- Neuroplasticity Research Group, ATU Sligo, Ash Lane, Ballytivnan, Sligo, Ireland
- Physiotherapy Department, St. John's Hospital, Sligo, Ireland
| | - Kenneth Monaghan
- Neuroplasticity Research Group, ATU Sligo, Ash Lane, Ballytivnan, Sligo, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Forster A, Ozer S, Brindle R, Barnard L, Hardicre N, Crocker TF, Chenery M, Moreau L, Wright A, Burton LJ, Hartley S, Hulme C, Dawkins B, Holloway I, House A, Hewison J, Farrin A. An intervention to support stroke survivors and their carers in the longer term: results of a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial (LoTS2Care). Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:40. [PMID: 36922866 PMCID: PMC10015731 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01258-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To address the limited provision of longer-term stroke care, we conducted a programme of research (LoTS2Care) to develop and test an intervention to form part of a replicable longer-term care strategy. New Start, a programme of facilitated self-management, was developed to be delivered at 6 months post-stroke by trained facilitators. Here, we report the findings from the final workstream of this programme, which aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a future definitive cluster randomised controlled trial of the developed intervention (New Start) to support stroke survivors and their carers in the longer term. METHODS A feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in English and Welsh NHS stroke services. Stroke services (clusters) were randomised on a 1:1 basis to implement New Start or continue with usual care only. Community-dwelling stroke survivors between 4 and 6 months post-stroke were invited to participate in the trial by post. Outcome measures were collected via post at 3, 6 and 9 months after recruitment. Recruitment and follow-up rates, delivery and uptake of the intervention, data collection feasibility (including postal outcome measures of health and disability, mental well-being at 3, 6, and 9 months post-recruitment) and safety were assessed. RESULTS Ten stroke services were recruited. A total of 1127 stroke survivors were screened for participation, and 269 were registered (New Start, n = 145; usual care, n = 124). Retention was high with 239 (89%) stroke survivors being available for follow-up at 9 months, and high return rates of postal questionnaires were achieved (80.3% at 9 months). Intervention training was successfully delivered, and New Start was offered to 95.2% of trial participants in the intervention arm. Uptake was variable, however, ranging from 11.8 to 75.0%. There were no safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS Stroke service recruitment and longer-term stroke survivor postal recruitment and outcome data collection are feasible; however, refinement of intervention targeting and delivery is required prior to undertaking a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN38920246. Registered 22 June 2016 ( http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN38920246 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Forster
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Seline Ozer
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
| | - Richard Brindle
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Lorna Barnard
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Natasha Hardicre
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Thomas F Crocker
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Marie Chenery
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Lauren Moreau
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Alan Wright
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Louisa-Jane Burton
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Suzanne Hartley
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Claire Hulme
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Bryony Dawkins
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ivana Holloway
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Allan House
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jenny Hewison
- Division of Health Services Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Amanda Farrin
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Self-management to promote physical activity after discharge from in-patient stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study. Top Stroke Rehabil 2023; 30:32-42. [PMID: 34581249 DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2021.1978630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the feasibility of a self-management program aimed at increasing physical activity in community-dwelling ambulators after stroke in a middle-income country with high income inequality. METHODS A Phase 1, pre-post intervention study was conducted with 20 sub-acute stroke participants. The self-management program was delivered in six home-based sessions over 3 months. Feasibility of recruitment, intervention, and measurement was determined. Physical activity, cardiovascular risk, depression, walking speed, self-efficacy for exercise, participation, and quality of life were measured at baseline, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS 16% of eligible participants were recruited. 90% completed the program and were measured at 3 months, and 65% at 6 months. The most common reasons for withdrawal were return to work, lack of interest/motivation and surgery. 92% of the sessions were delivered for 59 (SD 23) minutes per session. Participants did not increase physical activity at 3 months (MD 364 steps/day, 95% CI -282 to 1010) or 6 months (MD 312 steps/day, 95% CI -881 to 1504). Post-hoc analysis showed that sedentary participants increased their step count at 3 months by 1,300 (95% CI 152 to 2447) and at 6 months by 1,701 (95% CI -556 to 3959) more steps than non-sedentary participants. CONCLUSIONS A Phase 2 study of the self-management program appears to be feasible in a middle-income country with high income inequality and has the potential to increase physical activity levels in sedentary individuals with mild disability after stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION RBR-6bdmsk.
Collapse
|
13
|
Freene N, Wallett H, Flynn A, Preston E, Cowans S, Lueck C, Niyonsenga T, Mohanty I, Davey R. Cardiovascular Rehabilitation for transient ischaemic Attack and Mild Stroke: the CRAMS effectiveness-implementation hybrid study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1391. [PMID: 36419153 PMCID: PMC9682670 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08797-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internationally, stroke and cardiac rehabilitation clinicians agree that current cardiac rehabilitation models are a suitable secondary prevention program for people following a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or mild stroke. There is strong evidence for exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in people with heart disease, however, the evidence for cardiac rehabilitation post-TIA or stroke is limited. Here we will explore the effectiveness and implementation of an integrated (TIA, mild stroke, heart disease) traditional exercise-based cardiovascular rehabilitation (CVR) program for people with TIA or mild stroke over 6-months. METHODS This type 1 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study will use a 2-arm single-centre assessor-blind randomised controlled trial design, recruiting 140 participants. Adults who have had a TIA or mild stroke in the last 12-months will be recruited by health professionals from hospital and primary healthcare services. Participants will be assessed and randomly allocated (1:1) to the 6-week CVR program or the usual care 6-month wait-list control group. Distance completed in the 6-min walk test will be the primary effectiveness outcome, with outcomes collected at baseline, 6-weeks (complete CVR) and 6-months in both groups. Other effectiveness outcome measures include unplanned cardiovascular disease-related emergency department and hospital admissions, daily minutes of accelerometer moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, quality of life, anxiety and depression. Implementation outcomes will be assessed using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, including a cost-effectiveness analysis. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with participants and CVR program health professionals, investigating the acceptability, value, and impact of the CVR program. Qualitative analyses will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. DISCUSSION Few studies have assessed the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation for people with TIA and mild stroke, and no studies appear to have investigated the cost-effectiveness or implementation determinants of such programs. If successful, the CVR program will improve health outcomes and quality of life of people who have had a TIA or mild stroke, guiding future research, policy, and clinical practice, reducing the risk of repeat heart attacks and strokes for this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12621001586808 , Registered 19 November 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Freene
- grid.1039.b0000 0004 0385 7472Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT Australia ,grid.1039.b0000 0004 0385 7472Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT Australia
| | - Hannah Wallett
- grid.1039.b0000 0004 0385 7472Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT Australia
| | - Allyson Flynn
- grid.1039.b0000 0004 0385 7472Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT Australia
| | - Elisabeth Preston
- grid.1039.b0000 0004 0385 7472Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT Australia
| | - Shahla Cowans
- Neurology, Canberra Health Services, Garran, ACT Australia
| | | | - Theophile Niyonsenga
- grid.1039.b0000 0004 0385 7472Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT Australia
| | - Itismita Mohanty
- grid.1039.b0000 0004 0385 7472Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT Australia
| | - Rachel Davey
- grid.1039.b0000 0004 0385 7472Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Parkinson B, Lawrence M, McElhinney E, Booth J. Online Mindfulness with Care Partnerships Experiencing Anxiety and Depression Symptoms after Stroke: Mixed Methods Case Study Research. J Holist Nurs 2022; 41:185-199. [DOI: 10.1177/08980101221135723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the experience and outcomes for care partnerships (e.g., spouses, caregivers) who have post-stroke anxiety and/or depression symptoms and used an online mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) together. Design: Explanatory sequential mixed methods case study research. Methods: 5 care partnerships (10 participants) received online MBI, and data was collected in weeks 0, 4, and 8. Data collection involved the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, the Mutuality Scale, the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, and post-intervention interviews. Clinical effectiveness was evaluated using minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Findings: Participants improved mindfulness (80%) and mutuality (30%). MCID was achieved for anxiety symptoms (50%) and depression symptoms (20%). IPA found evidence of conflicting and contradictory experiences so dialectical tension was used to articulate the continuum of perspectives and themes produced in the analysis. Conclusion: Care partnerships using online MBIs can experience improvements in mindfulness, mutuality, anxiety symptoms, and depression symptoms. The findings are complex but show the potential value of online MBI for some care partnerships living with stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jo Booth
- Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
A Comprehensive Appraisal of Meta-Analyses of Exercise-Based Stroke Rehabilitation with Trial Sequential Analysis. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10101984. [PMID: 36292431 PMCID: PMC9602124 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10101984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Meta-analysis is a common technique used to synthesise the results of multiple studies through the combination of effect size estimates and testing statistics. Numerous meta-analyses have investigated the efficacy of exercise programmes for stroke rehabilitation. However, meta-analyses may also report false-positive results because of insufficient information or random errors. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) is an advanced technique for calculating the required information size (RIS) and more restrictive statistical significance levels for the precise assessment of any specific treatment. This study used TSA to examine whether published meta-analyses in the field of stroke rehabilitation reached the RIS and whether their overall effect sizes were sufficient. A comprehensive search of six electronic databases for articles published before May 2022 was conducted. The intervention methods were divided into four primary groups, namely aerobic or resistance exercise, machine-assisted exercise, task-oriented exercise, and theory-based exercise. The primary outcome measure was gait speed and the secondary outcome measure was balance function. The data were obtained either from the meta-analyses or as raw data from the original cited texts. All data analysis was performed in TSA software. In total, 38 articles with 46 analysable results were included in the TSA. Only 17 results (37.0%) reached the RIS. In conclusion, meta-analysis interpretation is challenging. Clinicians must consider the RIS of meta-analyses before applying the results in real-world situations. TSA can provide accurate evaluations of treatment effects, which is crucial to the development of evidence-based medicine.
Collapse
|
16
|
Gauthier LV, Nichols-Larsen DS, Uswatte G, Strahl N, Simeo M, Proffitt R, Kelly K, Crawfis R, Taub E, Morris D, Lowes LP, Mark V, Borstad A. Video game rehabilitation for outpatient stroke (VIGoROUS): A multi-site randomized controlled trial of in-home, self-managed, upper-extremity therapy. EClinicalMedicine 2022; 43:101239. [PMID: 34977516 PMCID: PMC8688168 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integrating behavioral intervention into motor rehabilitation is essential for improving paretic arm use in daily life. Demands on therapist time limit adoption of behavioral programs like Constraint-Induced Movement (CI) therapy, however. Self-managed motor practice could free therapist time for behavioral intervention, but there remains insufficient evidence of efficacy for a self-management approach. METHODS This completed, parallel, five-site, pragmatic, single-blind trial established the comparative effectiveness of using in-home gaming self-management as a vehicle to redirect valuable therapist time towards behavioral intervention. Community-dwelling adults with post-stroke (>6 months) mild/moderate upper extremity hemiparesis were randomized to receive one of 4 different interventions over a 3-week period: 5 h of behaviorally-focused intervention plus gaming self-management (Self-Gaming), the same with additional behaviorally-focused telerehabilitation (Tele-Gaming), 5 h of Traditional motor-focused rehabilitation, or 35 h of CI therapy. Primary outcomes assessed everyday arm use (Motor Activity Log Quality of Movement, MAL) and motor speed/function (Wolf Motor Function Test, WMFT) immediately before treatment, immediately after treatment, and 6 months later. Intent-to-treat analyses were implemented with linear mixed-effects models on data gathered from March 15, 2016 to November 21, 2019. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02631850. RESULTS Of 193 enrolled participants, 167 began treatment and were analyzed, 150 (90%) completed treatment, and 115 (69%) completed follow-up. Tele-Gaming and Self-Gaming produced clinically meaningful MAL gains that were 1·0 points (95% CI 0·8 to 1·3) and 0·8 points (95% CI 0·5 to 1·0) larger than Traditional care, respectively. Self-Gaming was less effective than CI therapy (-0·4 points, 95% CI -0·6 to -0·2), whereas Tele-Gaming was not (-0·2 points, 95% CI -0·4 to 0·1). Six-month retention of MAL gains across all groups was 57%. All had similar clinically-meaningful WMFT gains; six-month retention of WMFT gains was 92%. INTERPRETATION Self-managed motor-gaming with behavioral telehealth visits has outcomes similar to in-clinic CI therapy. It addresses most access barriers, requiring just one-fifth as much therapist time that is redirected towards behavioral interventions that enhance the paretic arm's involvement in daily life. FUNDING PCORI, NIH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynne V. Gauthier
- University of Massachusetts Lowell, Dept. Physical Therapy and Kinesiology
- Corresponding author at: University of Massachusetts Lowell, Dept. Physical Therapy and Kinesiology, HSSB 391, 113 Wilder St., Lowell, MA 01854
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Edward Taub
- University of Alabama Birmingham, Dept. of Psychology
| | - David Morris
- University of Alabama Birmingham, Dept. of Physical Therapy
| | | | - Victor Mark
- University of Alabama Birmingham, Dept. of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
McGill K, Sackley C, Godwin J, Gavaghan D, Ali M, Ballester BR, Brady MC. Using the Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale as Outcome Measures for Stroke Rehabilitation Trials; A Comparison of Minimum Sample Size Requirements. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021; 31:106229. [PMID: 34871903 DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Underpowered trials risk inaccurate results. Recruitment to stroke rehabilitation randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is often a challenge. Statistical simulations offer an important opportunity to explore the adequacy of sample sizes in the context of specific outcome measures. We aimed to examine and compare the adequacy of stroke rehabilitation RCT sample sizes using the Barthel Index (BI) or modified Rankin Scale (mRS) as primary outcomes. METHODS We conducted computer simulations using typical experimental event rates (EER) and control event rates (CER) based on individual participant data (IPD) from stroke rehabilitation RCTs. Event rates are the proportion of participants who experienced clinically relevant improvements in the RCT experimental and control groups. We examined minimum sample size requirements and estimated the number of participants required to achieve a number needed to treat within clinically acceptable boundaries for the BI and mRS. RESULTS We secured 2350 IPD (18 RCTs). For a 90% chance of statistical accuracy on the BI a rehabilitation RCT would require 273 participants per randomised group. Accurate interpretation of effect sizes would require 1000s of participants per group. Simulations for the mRS were not possible as a clinically relevant improvement was not detected when using this outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS Stroke rehabilitation RCTs with large sample sizes are required for accurate interpretation of effect sizes based on the BI. The mRS lacked sensitivity to detect change and thus may be unsuitable as a primary outcome in stroke rehabilitation trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kris McGill
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Rd, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
| | - Catherine Sackley
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jon Godwin
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | - David Gavaghan
- Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Myzoon Ali
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Rd, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - Belen Rubio Ballester
- Laboratory of Synthetic Perceptive, Emotive and Cognitive Systems, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marian C Brady
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Rd, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bernhardt J, Hayward KS. What Is Next After This Well-Conducted, but Neutral, Multisite Trial Testing Self-Rehabilitation Approaches? Stroke 2021; 52:1948-1950. [PMID: 33910368 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.121.034533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Bernhardt
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health and NHMRC CRE in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia (J.B., K.S.H.)
| | - Kathryn S Hayward
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health and NHMRC CRE in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia (J.B., K.S.H.).,Melbourne School of Health Sciences & Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (K.S.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hilari K, Behn N, James K, Northcott S, Marshall J, Thomas S, Simpson A, Moss B, Flood C, McVicker S, Goldsmith K. Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2021; 35:1151-1163. [PMID: 33624514 PMCID: PMC8273536 DOI: 10.1177/0269215521995671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of peer-befriending, for people with aphasia. Design: Single-blind, parallel-group feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing usual care to usual care + peer-befriending. Participants and setting: People with aphasia post-stroke and low levels of distress, recruited from 5 NHS Hospitals and linked community services; their significant others; and 10 befrienders recruited from community. Intervention: Six 1-hour peer-befriending visits over three months. Main measures: Feasibility parameters included proportion eligible of those screened; proportion consented; missing data; consent and attrition rates. Acceptability was explored through qualitative interviews. Outcomes for participants and significant others were measured at baseline, 4- and 10-months; for peer-befrienders before training and after one/two cycles of befriending. Results: Of 738 patients identified, 75 were eligible of 89 fully screened (84%), 62 consented (83% of eligible) and 56 randomised. Attrition was 16%. Adherence was high (93% attended ⩾2 sessions, 81% all six). The difference at 10 months on the GHQ-12 was 1.23 points on average lower/better in the intervention arm (95% CI 0.17, −2.63). There was an 88% decrease in the odds of GHQ-12 caseness (95% CI 0.01, 1.01). Fourty-eight significant others and 10 peer-befrienders took part. Procedures and outcome measures were acceptable. Serious adverse events were few (n = 10, none for significant others and peer-befrienders) and unrelated. Conclusions: SUPERB peer-befriending for people with aphasia post-stroke experiencing low levels of distress was feasible. There was preliminary evidence of benefit in terms of depression. Peer-befriending is a suitable intervention to explore further in a definitive trial. Clinical trial registration-URL:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT02947776 Subject terms: Translational research, mental health, rehabilitation, quality and outcomes, stroke
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina Hilari
- Centre for Language and Communication Science Research, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Behn
- Centre for Language and Communication Science Research, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Kirsty James
- King's Clinical Trials Unit, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Northcott
- Centre for Language and Communication Science Research, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Jane Marshall
- Centre for Language and Communication Science Research, City, University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Alan Simpson
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Becky Moss
- Centre for Language and Communication Science Research, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Chris Flood
- School of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - Sally McVicker
- Centre for Language and Communication Science Research, City, University of London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Morton A, Myers M, Whitaker AA, Kempf KS, Eickmeyer S, Abraham M, Rippee M, Billinger SA. Optimizing Recruitment Strategies and Physician Engagement for Stroke Recovery Research. J Neurol Phys Ther 2021; 45:41-45. [PMID: 32969840 PMCID: PMC7895449 DOI: 10.1097/npt.0000000000000334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A major challenge for stroke rehabilitation and recovery research is the recruitment and retention of participants. Our prior challenges and successes have influenced our team to rethink our approach and the potential for large-scale stroke recruitment. SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS In this special interest article, we highlight how the adoption and implementation of recruitment strategies such as physician engagement and a streamlined "customer service" approach helped us improve our enrollment and maximize efficiency. Another positive outcome of enrollment was increased representation of those who identify as underrepresented minority or live in rural areas. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE Rethinking our recruitment processes and infrastructure allowed for greater interprofessional interactions, minimal burden for our stroke physician team members, and maximized enrollment into our stroke studies.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A324).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allegra Morton
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Moira Myers
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Alicen A. Whitaker
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Katie S. Kempf
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Sarah Eickmeyer
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Michael Abraham
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Michael Rippee
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Sandra A. Billinger
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
- Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pilot randomised clinical trial of an eHealth, self-management support intervention (iVERVE) for stroke: feasibility assessment in survivors 12-24 months post-event. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2020; 6:172. [PMID: 33292693 PMCID: PMC7648386 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00706-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic communication is used in various populations to achieve health goals, but evidence in stroke is lacking. We pilot tested the feasibility and potential effectiveness of a novel personalised electronic self-management intervention to support person-centred goal attainment and secondary prevention after stroke. METHODS A phase I, prospective, randomised controlled pilot trial (1:1 allocation) with assessor blinding, intention-to-treat analysis, and a process evaluation. Community-based survivors of stroke were recruited from participants in the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (AuSCR) who had indicated their willingness to be contacted for research studies. Inclusion criteria include 1-2 years following hospital admission for stroke and living within 50 km of Monash University (Melbourne). Person-centred goals were set with facilitation by a clinician using a standardised template. The intervention group received electronic support messages aligned to their goals over 4 weeks. The control group received only 2-3 electronic administrative messages. Primary outcomes were study retention, goal attainment (assessed using Goal Attainment Scaling method) and satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were self-management (Health Education Impact Questionnaire: 8 domains), quality of life, mood and acceptability. RESULTS Of 340 invitations sent from AuSCR, 73 responded, 68 were eligible and 57 (84%) completed the baseline assessment. At the goal-setting stage, 54/68 (79%) were randomised (median 16 months after stroke): 25 to intervention (median age 69 years; 40% female) and 29 to control (median age 68 years; 38% female). Forty-five (83%) participants completed the outcome follow-up assessment. At follow-up, goal attainment (mean GAS-T score ≥ 50) in the intervention group was achieved for goals related to function, participation and environment (control: environment only). Most intervention participants provided positive feedback and reported that the iVERVE messages were easy to understand (92%) and assisted them in achieving their goals (77%). We found preliminary evidence of non-significant improvements between the groups for most self-management domains (e.g. social integration and support: β coefficient 0.34; 95% CI - 0.14 to 0.83) and several quality-of-life domains in favour of the intervention group. CONCLUSION These findings support the need for further randomised effectiveness trials of the iVERVE program to be tested in people with new stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION ANZCTR, ACTRN12618001519246 . Registered on 11 September 2018-retrospectively registered.
Collapse
|
22
|
Walker MF, Birchall S, Cobley C, Condon L, Fisher R, Fletcher-Smith J, Golding-Day MR, Greensmith C, Kontou E, Matias O, Sprigg N, Thomas SA, Whitehead PJ. Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study. Clin Rehabil 2020; 34:1268-1281. [PMID: 32567356 PMCID: PMC7469713 DOI: 10.1177/0269215520937039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility of recruiting to and delivering a biopsychosocial intervention for carers of stroke survivors. DESIGN Feasibility randomised controlled study with nested qualitative interview study. SETTING The intervention was delivered in the community in either a group or one-to-one format. SUBJECTS Carers and stroke survivors within one year of stroke onset. INTERVENTIONS A carer targeted intervention delivered by a research psychologist in six structured two-hour sessions or usual care control. The intervention combined education about the biological, psychological and social effects of stroke with strategies and techniques focussing on adjustment to stroke and caregiving. Stroke survivors in both groups received baseline and follow-up assessment but no intervention. MAIN OUTCOME Recruitment rate, study attrition, fidelity of intervention delivery, acceptability and sensitivity of outcome measures used (health related quality of life, anxiety and depression and carer burden six months after randomisation). RESULTS Of the 257 carers approached, 41 consented. Six withdrew before randomisation. Eighteen participants were randomised to receive the intervention and 17 to usual care. Attendance at sessions was greater when treated one-to-one. Feedback interviews suggested that participants found the intervention acceptable and peer support particularly helpful in normalising their feelings. Thirty participants were assessed at follow-up with improvements from baseline on all health measures for both groups. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that a biopsychosocial intervention was acceptable to carers and can be delivered in group and one-to-one formats. Timing of approach and mode of intervention delivery is critical and requires tailoring to the carers individual needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion F Walker
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sheila Birchall
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Christine Cobley
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Laura Condon
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rebecca Fisher
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Joanna Fletcher-Smith
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Miriam R Golding-Day
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Eirini Kontou
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Oliver Matias
- Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Nikola Sprigg
- Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Shirley A Thomas
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Phillip J Whitehead
- Department of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Merriman NA, Gillan D, Pender N, Williams DJ, Horgan F, Sexton E, Johnston M, Bennett KE, Donnelly NA, Wren MA, Hickey A. The StrokeCog study: development and description of a cognition-focused psychological intervention to address cognitive impairment following stroke. Psychol Health 2020; 36:792-809. [PMID: 32924891 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2020.1820009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the process of developing a cognitive rehabilitation intervention for patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) and to describe the intervention prior to evaluation in a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT). Method: The Medical Research Council framework, 'Developing and evaluating complex interventions', was used to develop the cognitive rehabilitation intervention. We conducted a combined analysis of the existing evidence base for PSCI rehabilitation alongside qualitative exploration of the perspectives of stroke survivors, their families, and healthcare professionals providing stroke care, on the necessary components for a cognitive rehabilitation intervention for PSCI. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist was used as a structural framework for the description of the intervention. Results: The intervention comprises a five-week intervention integrating group-based activities, supported by a clinical neuropsychologist, with home-based activities to encourage self-efficacy through the practice of adjustment and compensatory strategies learned in the group format to achieve the patients' identified goals in managing their PSCI. Conclusion: A cognitive rehabilitation intervention for patients with PSCI has been developed and described. We are in the process of developing a structured intervention manual to standardise the content and delivery of the intervention for further testing in a pilot RCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh A Merriman
- Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Diane Gillan
- Department of Psychology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Niall Pender
- Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Psychology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David J Williams
- Department of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Frances Horgan
- School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Eithne Sexton
- Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Marie Johnston
- Aberdeen Health Psychology Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Kathleen E Bennett
- Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nora-Ann Donnelly
- Social Research Division, Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maev-Ann Wren
- Social Research Division, Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anne Hickey
- Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
McGill K, McGarry J, Sackley C, Godwin J, Nicoll A, Brady MC. Recruitment challenges in stroke rehabilitation randomized controlled trials: a qualitative exploration of trialists' perspectives using Framework analysis. Clin Rehabil 2020; 34:1122-1133. [PMID: 32493125 DOI: 10.1177/0269215520930796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the underlying reasons for recruitment difficulties to stroke rehabilitation randomized controlled trials from the perspective of trialists. DESIGN A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and Framework analysis. PARTICIPANTS Twenty multidisciplinary stroke rehabilitation trialists across 13 countries with a range of clinical and research experience. METHODS Twenty semi-structured telephone interviews were carried out. Purposeful sampling ensured a range of opinions were gathered from across the international stroke rehabilitation research community. Using Framework analysis, the analytical framework was formed by three researchers and tested before being applied to the total dataset. RESULTS Three themes described the trialists' perception of the underlying reasons for recruitment difficulties: (i) decision making, (ii) importance of recruiters and (iii) a broken system. Trialists described frequently disregarding evidence in favour of prior research experiences when planning randomized controlled trial recruitment. All felt that the relationship between the research and clinical teams was vital to ensure recruiters prioritized and found value in recruitment to the trial. Experienced trialists were frustrated by the lack of reporting of the reality of running trials, research governance demands and the feeling that they had to deliberately underestimate recruitment timeframes to secure funding. CONCLUSION Stroke rehabilitation trialists described recruitment difficulties which may be related to their experiential based recruitment decision making, a lack of understanding of how best to incentivize and maintain relationships with recruiters and unrealistic bureaucratic expectations both in terms of gaining funding and research governance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kris McGill
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.,Facility of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jodie McGarry
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Catherine Sackley
- Facility of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jon Godwin
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Avril Nicoll
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.,Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen
| | - Marian C Brady
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|