Intravenous iron isomaltoside versus oral iron supplementation for treatment of iron deficiency in pregnancy: protocol for a randomised, comparative, open-label trial

Intravenous ferric derisomaltose versus oral iron for persistent iron deficient pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of intravenous (IV) iron (ferric derisomaltose) with oral iron (ferrous fumarate) in women 14-21 weeks pregnant with persistent iron deficiency (ferritin < 30 µg/L).

METHODS

In a single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial at a Danish hospital, women with persistent iron deficiency after routine oral iron treatment were allocated to receive 1000 mg IV iron (single-dose) or 100 mg elemental oral iron daily. Outcomes were assessed during an 18-week follow-up period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of non-anaemic (haemoglobin [Hb] ≥ 11 g/dL) women throughout follow-up. Other outcomes included changes in haematological parameters, patient-reported fatigue, and quality of life (QoL). Safety was assessed by recording adverse events.

RESULTS

From July 2017 to February 2020, 100 women were randomised to IV iron and 101 to oral iron. Throughout follow-up, 91% of women were non-anaemic in the IV iron group compared with 73% in the oral iron group (18% difference [95% confidence interval 0.10-0.25]; p < 0.001). The mean Hb increase was significantly greater with IV iron versus oral iron at Weeks 6 (0.4 versus - 0.2 g/dL; p < 0.001), 12 (0.5 versus 0.1 g/dL; p < 0.001), and 18 (0.8 versus 0.5 g/dL; p = 0.01). Improvements in fatigue and QoL were greater with IV iron versus oral iron at Weeks 3 and 6. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was comparable between treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

IV iron was superior in preventing anaemia compared with oral iron in pregnant women with persistent iron deficiency; biochemical superiority was accompanied by improved fatigue and QoL.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

European Clinical Trials Database: EudraCT no.: 2017-000776-29 (3 May 2017); ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03188445 (13 June 2017). The trial protocol has been published: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2Fs13063-020-04637-z .

Iron deficiency and iron overload in men and woman of reproductive age, and pregnant women

Iron is an essential micronutrient for human biology and health, but high iron levels can be dangerous. Both iron deficiency and iron overload have been linked to reproductive health. This review summarizes the effects of iron deficiency and iron overload on men of reproductive age, women of reproductive age, and pregnant women. In addition, appropriate iron levels and the need for iron and nutritional supplements at different stages of life and pregnancy are discussed. In general, men should be aware of the risk of iron overload at any stage of life; women should take appropriate iron supplements before menopause; postmenopausal women should pay attention to the risk of iron overload; and pregnant women should receive reasonable iron supplementation in middle and late pregnancy. By summarizing evidence on the relationship between iron and reproductive health, this review aims to promote the development of strategies to optimize reproductive capacity from the perspective of nutrition. However, additional detailed experimental investigations and clinical studies are needed to assess the underlying causes and mechanisms of the observed associations between iron and reproductive health.

Nano-formulations in treatment of iron deficiency anaemia: An overview

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is a significant challenge to global health. The absorption and bioavailability depend on the delivery vehicle being used. Ferrous sulphate is a drug of choice for IDA but leads to frequent gastrointestinal tract side effects that force the patient to discontinue the treatment. Gastrointestinal side effects result from converting bivalent iron into trivalent iron accompanied by reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation. Due to lower absorption, oral preparations of trivalent iron are recommended in patients with intolerance to ferrous sulphate. Nanosized iron preparation can resolved these concerns. The particle size of iron salts has been observed to have a significant impact on iron absorption. The surface area of iron compounds is increased by reducing their particle size, which improves their solubility in gastric juice and boosts their absorption. Sucrosomial iron, ferric citrate complexes, and ferric maltol are some of the novel iron preparations that ensure high bioavailability and good tolerance in chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, and inflammatory bowel disease. However, the parenteral route of administration of iron is unacceptable to most patients. Moreover, it leads to high free iron levels in circulation, resulting in ROS generation.

CONCLUSION

This article provides an informative summary of iron deficiency anaemia causes and treatment through nanoformulations and literature and in-depth patent analysis.

Iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Anemia in pregnancy is associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity. There is increasing awareness amongst obstetricians about the need to screen for iron deficiency anemia (IDA), as well as growing literature on diagnosis and treatment. This review aims to summarize causes, consequences, treatment, and evaluation of IDA in pregnancy.

RECENT FINDINGS

National guidelines provide varying guidance on diagnosis and treatment of IDA in pregnancy. Serum ferritin is a helpful adjunct for the diagnosis of IDA. Oral iron remains an option for treatment; absorption is improved with every other day dosing and is effective for patients able to tolerate. Emerging studies on modern generations of intravenous (IV) iron demonstrate shorter infusion times and improved safety profiles. Notably, recent UK guidelines provide consideration for universal IV iron supplementation for treatment of anemia beyond 34 weeks of pregnancy.

SUMMARY

Iron, in dietary, oral, and IV forms, has been found effective in resolving anemia in pregnancy. Pregnant people with IDA in the third trimester are more likely to benefit from IV iron. Future studies designed and powered to assess maternal and perinatal morbidity indicators and blood transfusion rates can strengthen recommendations.

Maternal first trimester iron status and its association with obstetric and perinatal outcomes

PURPOSE

To assess the following in singleton pregnant women: (1) associations between first trimester iron deficiency and obstetric and perinatal outcomes, (2) overall first trimester iron status and (3) post-treatment iron status after intensified iron supplementation.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted with linkage of first trimester hemoglobin and plasma ferritin with obstetric and perinatal data from a hospital database. Blood sample data were obtained from a Danish University Hospital. The cohort was divided into groups according to ferritin and hemoglobin: (1) iron-deficient anemic (ferritin < 30 ng/mL and Hb < 110 g/L), (2) iron-deficient non-anemic (ferritin < 30 ng/mL and Hb ≥ 110 g/L), and (3) iron-replete non-anemic (ferritin 30-200 ng/mL and Hb ≥ 110 g/L). Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in each iron-deficient group were compared to the iron-replete non-anemic group using multivariable logistic regression. The effect of 4 weeks intensified iron supplementation on hemoglobin and ferritin was assessed by groupwise comparisons.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 5763 singleton pregnant women, of which 14.2% had non-anemic iron deficiency, and 1.2% had iron-deficiency anemia. Compared to iron-replete non-anemic women, iron-deficient anemic women had a higher risk of gestational diabetes (aOR 3.8, 95% CI 1.4-9.0), and iron-deficient non-anemic women had a higher risk of stillbirth (aOR 4.0, 95% CI 1.0-14.3). In group 1 and 2, 81.5% and 67.7% remained iron-deficient after intensified iron supplementation.

CONCLUSION

Iron-deficiency anemia was associated with gestational diabetes, and non-anemic iron deficiency with stillbirth, although risk estimates were imprecise due to few events. Iron deficiency was present in 15.4% and often persisted despite 4 weeks intensified iron supplementation.