Comparison of a fast track protocol and standard care after hip arthroplasty in the reduction of the length of stay and the early weight-bearing resumption: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Assessment of Fast-Track Pathway in Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery by Propensity Score Matching on Patient-Reported Outcomes

Total hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty procedures have steadily increased over the past few decades, and their use is expected to grow further, mainly due to an increasing number of elderly patients. Cost-containment strategies, supporting a rapid recovery with a positive functional outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and enhanced patient reported outcomes, are needed. A Fast Track surgical procedure (FT) is a coordinated perioperative approach aimed at expediting early mobilization and recovery following surgery and, accordingly, shortening the length of hospital stay (LOS), convalescence and costs. In this view, rapid rehabilitation surgery optimizes traditional rehabilitation methods by integrating evidence-based practices into the procedure. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of Fast Track versus Care-as-Usual surgical procedures and pathways (including rehabilitation) on a mid-term patient-reported outcome (PROs), the SF12 (with regard both to Physical and Mental Scores), 3 months after hip or knee replacement surgery, with the use of Propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis to address the issue of the comparability of the groups in a non-randomized study. We were interested in the evaluation of the entire pathways, including the postoperative rehabilitation stage, therefore, we only used early home discharge as a surrogate to differentiate between the Fast Track and Care-as-Usual rehabilitation pathways. Our study shows that the entire Fast Track pathway, which includes the post-operative rehabilitation stage, has a significantly positive impact on physical health-related status (SF12 Physical Scores), as perceived by patients 3 months after hip or knee replacement surgery, as opposed to the standardized program, both in terms of the PROs score and the relative improvements observed, as compared with the minimum clinically important difference. This result encourages additional research into the effects of Fast Track rehabilitation on the entire process of care for patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty, focusing only on patient-reported outcomes.

Fast-Track for Total Ankle Replacement: A Novel Enhanced Recovery Protocol for Select Patients

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery programs, also called fast-track protocols, were developed and successfully applied in the last decade for hip and knee reconstruction. Specific fast-track protocols have not yet been applied to ankle prostheses. The aim of the study was to develop and validate an enhanced recovery protocol for total ankle replacement (TAR) evaluating the clinical and radiographic results. We hypothesize that on the basis of well-defined pre- and postoperative characteristics, the current knowledge on ankle replacement, and referring to hip and knee reconstruction, it is possible to identify a "patient type" to be safely eligible to a Fast-Track Protocol with at least comparable results and without increasing the complications risk.

METHODS

We identified 8 predictive variables that might affect the outcome of TAR. Those variables were the body mass index, the state of anxiety or depression, the functional preoperative status, ankle equinus, the coronal malalignment, the surgical time, the surgical accessory procedures, and the bone quality. These characteristics were evaluated for each patient with almost validated outcome tools attributing a specific score. Based on the score obtained, the patients were divided into 2 groups: the Standard Protocol group (Control Group) and the Fast-Track Protocol group (Study Group). The main difference between treatment of the 2 groups relates to the use of postoperative plaster casts: in the Fast-Track group the cast was removed the first day after surgery and walking was allowed in sports shoes assisted with crutches, whereas in the Standard Protocol group, the cast was removed after 3 weeks. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed for all patients preoperatively and postoperatively every 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 163 patients received a score between 1 and 5 and were included in the control group (Standard Protocol); 47 patients received a score of 0 and were allocated to the study group (Fast-Track Protocol). Clinically, except for the preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale score, no statistically significant differences were recorded in the multiple comparisons between the 2 groups. No significant differences were found regarding complications.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients, it is possible to apply an enhanced recovery protocol of rehabilitation, focused on immediate weightbearing and mobilization without any plaster or boot.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

An Observational Prospective Clinical Study for the Evaluation of a Collagen-Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffold in Hip Revision Surgery

One of the greatest challenges of hip revision surgery is the need to restore extensive bone loss by creating a stable reconstruction with long-term durability. The present observational, investigator-initiated prospective study was carried out to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of the use of a commercial biomimetic collagen-hydroxyapatite composite biomaterial (RegenOss) applied in hip revision surgery. Thirty-three patients who underwent hip revision were included in this study, and 29 received up to 2 years of follow-up. The acetabulum was reconstructed using an uncemented hemispherical shell both with or without an iliac fixation stem. Functional recovery was assessed according to the Harris Hip Score (HHS) at the pre-hospitalisation check-up, and at 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-ups. Radiological evaluation consisting of X-ray analyses (6, 12, and 24 month follow-ups) and CT scan exams (within 10 weeks post-surgery and at 12-month follow-up) were performed to evaluate the reduction in bone defect and new bone regeneration. All the patients reported a complete recovery and a considerable improvement in functional outcome assessed by the HHS, which was significantly higher at all the follow-ups than at pre-hospitalisation. Moreover, radiological assessments revealed good scaffold integration. Overall, collected data suggest that RegenOss is a valid and safe alternative to restoring acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.

Analysis of Fast-Track Surgery with Pain Care on Postoperative Pain Improvement and Complication Prevention in Perioperative Spine Surgery Patients

Objective

The study aimed to analyze the effect of fast-track surgery with pain care on the improvement of postoperative pain and the prevention of postoperative complications in perioperative spinal surgery patients.

Methods

A total of 126 patients undergoing spinal surgery from January 2021 to September 2021 were chosen as the study population, and the patients were classified into the regular group, the FTS group, and the combined group by random grouping, with 42 cases in each group. Patients in the regular group used routine perioperative care in spine surgery, patients in the FTS group used the FTS care model, and patients in the combined group combined special pain care on the basis of the FTS group. We compared the numeric rating scale (NRS) and pain severity of patients in the three groups post-op, 30 min, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, and 24 h after surgery; we compared the time to get out of bed, length of stay, and occurrence of postoperative adverse effects in the three groups, compared the incidence of complications in the three groups, and compared the satisfaction of care in the three groups.

Results

The NRS scores at 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h post-op in the combined group and FTS group were lower than those in the regular group, and the NRS scores at 12 h and 24 h post-op in the combined group were lower than those in the FTS group (all P < 0.05); the post-op bed activity time, post-op hospitalization time, post-op adverse reaction rate, and post-op complication rate in the combined group and FTS group were shorter or lower than those of the regular group. Nursing satisfaction was higher than that of the regular group, the post-op time to bed activity in the combined group was shorter than that of the FTS group, and nursing satisfaction was higher than that of the FTS group (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The use of FTS with pain care interventions helps relieve postoperative pain in perioperative patients in spine surgery, reduce the incidence of post-op adverse effects and complications in patients, accelerate their postoperative recovery, and improve nursing satisfaction.

The effect of video-assisted discharge education after total hip replacement surgery: a randomized controlled study

This study aimed to investigate the effect of a video-assisted discharge education program on activities of daily living, functionality, and patient satisfaction following total hip replacement (THR) surgery. This study included 31 patients who were randomly divided into the physiotherapy group (n = 18), and the video-assisted discharge education (VADE) group (n = 13). Both groups received a physiotherapy program. The VADE group was also received the VADE program. Face-to-face instruction was used in all of the educational programs. There was a significant difference in favor of the VADE group in Harris Hip Score, Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale's movement score, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference between groups on resting pain levels in the first week and on resting and activity pain levels in the third month in favor of the VADE group (p < 0.05). The results of this study demonstrated that VADE can be effective in improving patient satisfaction and functionality, reducing pain and kinesiophobia following THR.

Effect of Observation of Shou Hui Tong Bian Capsule (Polygonum Multiflorum and Aloe-Based Herbal Capsule for Cathartic Effect) in Rapid Rehabilitation of Joint Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To observe the effect of Shou Hui Tong Bian capsule (polygonum multiflorum and aloe-based herbal capsule for cathartic effect) in rapid rehabilitation of joint surgery.

METHODS

A total of 98 patients undergoing perioperative joint surgery in our hospital from July 2019 to March 2020 were included in the study. According to the situation of arthroscopy and joint replacement therapy, the patients were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, with 49 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional therapy. On the basis of the control group, the patients in the observation group were orally administrated with Shou Hui Tong Bian capsule, 2 capsules/time, 3 times/day. Both groups received continuous treatment for 14 days. The clinical effects, awakening time, postoperative exhaust time, and the number of patients with different degrees of abdominal distension in the four groups before and after treatment were observed and compared.

RESULTS

After treatment, the total effective rate of arthroscopy in the control group was 66.7%, which was significantly lower than 83.3% in the observation group (P < 0.05). The total effective rate of joint replacement in the control group was 64.0%, which was significantly lower than 84.0% in the observation group (P < 0.05). After arthroscopic treatment and joint replacement treatment, the recovery time and postoperative exhaust time of borborygmus in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (both P < 0.05). After the treatment, the number of patients with different degrees of abdominal distension in the arthroscopic and joint replacement treatment group and the control group was significantly improved (P < 0.05), and the observation group was significantly better than the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The curative effect of Shou Hui Tong Bian capsule on patients undergoing arthroscopic joint surgery and joint replacement during perioperative period is obviously superior to that of conventional treatment. It can effectively improve the total effective rate, shorten the first exhaust time, and increase the number of patients without abdominal distension after treatment. It was safe and effective, and worthy of clinical promotion.