1
|
Zoellner JM, Porter KJ, Reid A, Markwalter T, Kirkpatrick B, Brock DJP, You W. Comparison of Researcher-Led versus Teacher-Led effectiveness and fidelity: A Hybrid Type 1 study of Kids SIPsmartER in Appalachia middle schools. Transl Behav Med 2024; 14:578-587. [PMID: 39236080 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibae041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2024] Open
Abstract
The implementation of school-based obesity-prevention programs is understudied. Kids SIPsmartER is a 6-month, school-based, behavioral intervention for Appalachian middle school students and includes a teacher implementation strategy. Kids SIPsmartER effectively reduced students' sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) when Researcher-Led. However, Teacher-Led effectiveness and fidelity are unknown. To explore the relative SSB effects when Kids SIPsmartER was Researcher-Led versus Teacher-Led and to examine teacher fidelity. This study of secondary outcomes used a quasi-experimental analytic approach of a Hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation and cluster randomized controlled tria (RCT) of Kids SIPsmartER. Student SSB behaviors and teacher self-rated fidelity were assessed, respectively, with the validated Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEVQ-15) and lesson-specific checklists. Analyses included descriptive statistics and modified two-part models with time-fixed effects and school-year cohort cluster controls. The analytic sample included students from six control schools (n = 220), six Researcher-Led intervention schools (n = 306), and five Teacher-Led intervention schools (n = 218), as well as eight teachers. Teacher-Led intervention students decreased SSB by -14.3 ounces/day (95% confidence interval = -15.4, -13.2; P < .001). Relative to control and to Researcher-Led intervention, the Teacher-Led treatment effect among students was -11.6 ounces SSB/day (P < .001, effect size = 0.75) and -4.3 (P = .004, effect size = 0.25), respectively. Teachers returned fidelity checklists for 90% of planned lessons. Fidelity averaged 94% (SD = 4.0%) among returned forms and 85% (SD = 18.9%) when missing forms were counted as zeros. Teachers can implement Kids SIPsmartER with high fidelity and produce statistically and clinically meaningful improvements in students' SSB behaviors. Findings have implications for the sustained implementation of Kids SIPsmartER and other school-based obesity-prevention programs. Clinical Trial information: NCT03740113.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie M Zoellner
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia (UVA), UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, Christiansburg, VA, USA
| | - Kathleen J Porter
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia (UVA), UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, Christiansburg, VA, USA
| | - Annie Reid
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia (UVA), UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, Christiansburg, VA, USA
| | - Theresa Markwalter
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia (UVA), UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, Christiansburg, VA, USA
| | - Brittany Kirkpatrick
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia (UVA), UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, Christiansburg, VA, USA
| | - Donna-Jean P Brock
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia (UVA), UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, Christiansburg, VA, USA
| | - Wen You
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saeidzadeh S, Minion JT, Bryan S, Norton PG, Estabrooks CA. Evaluating Real-World Implementation of INFORM (Improving Nursing Home Care through Feedback on Performance Data): An Improvement Initiative in Canadian Nursing Homes. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2024; 50:579-590. [PMID: 38845237 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND INFORM (Improving Nursing Home Care through Feedback on Performance Data) was a research intervention that equipped nursing home managers with skills to conduct local improvement projects and supported them in improving performance through modifiable elements in their units. Prior reports have found positive and sustained outcomes from INFORM intervention. In this article, the authors report findings from a formative service evaluation of INFORM as modified for implementation in real-world settings. METHODS INFORM was transformed for real-world implementation with an initial cohort of 26 nursing homes in British Columbia, Canada (INFORM BC). Three stakeholder groups were involved: nursing home teams, an academic team that modified INFORM for implementation, and a BC team that implemented INFORM and coached participating nursing home teams in applying it locally. Service evaluation was conducted drawing on participants from all three stakeholder groups, using convenience sampling, with numbers varying by data source. Using a mixed methods design, outcome data included qualitative and quantitative assessment of surveys, discussions, observations, and a review of documents and resources. RESULTS The majority of nursing home teams reported positive outcomes relative to the usefulness and relevance of the initiative for local needs despite a number of operational challenges during implementation. A key factor in their success was combining targeted external support with the opportunity to set goals and measure success locally. Challenges included a lack of time at the nursing home level, COVID-19-related disruptions, and issues with role clarity and alignment of expectations among the academic and BC teams. CONCLUSION INFORM BC advanced the processes of change planning and transferable learning among nursing home managers and their local teams. Success was facilitated externally but defined and achieved locally. Future iterations should probe outcome sustainability and how nursing home teams adapt the INFORM approach in practice.
Collapse
|
3
|
Sousa Filho LF, Farlie MK, Haines T, Borrelli B, Carroll C, Mathews C, Ribeiro DC, Fritz JM, Underwood M, Foster NE, Lamb SE, Sanchez ZM, Malliaras P. Developing an international consensus Reporting guideline for intervention Fidelity in Non-Drug, non-surgical trials: The ReFiND protocol. Contemp Clin Trials 2024; 142:107575. [PMID: 38750951 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inadequate reporting of fidelity to interventions in trials limits the transparency and interpretation of trial findings. Despite this, most trials of non-drug, non-surgical interventions lack comprehensive reporting of fidelity. If fidelity is poorly reported, it is unclear which intervention components were tested or implemented within the trial, which also hinders research reproducibility. This protocol describes the development process of a reporting guideline for fidelity of non-drug, non-surgical interventions (ReFiND) in the context of trials. METHODS The ReFiND guideline will be developed in six stages. Stage one: a guideline development group has been formed to oversee the guideline methodology. Stage two: a scoping review will be conducted to identify and summarize existing guidance documents on the fidelity of non-drug, non-surgical interventions. Stage three: a Delphi study will be conducted to reach consensus on reporting items. Stage four: a consensus meeting will be held to consolidate the reporting items and discuss the wording and structure of the guideline. Stage five: a guidance statement, an elaboration and explanation document, and a reporting checklist will be developed. Stage six: different strategies will be used to disseminate and implement the ReFiND guideline. DISCUSSION The ReFiND guideline will provide a set of items developed through international consensus to improve the reporting of intervention fidelity in trials of non-drug, non-surgical interventions. This reporting guideline will enhance transparency and reproducibility in future non-drug, non-surgical intervention research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melanie K Farlie
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Terry Haines
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Belinda Borrelli
- Center for Behavioral Science Research, Department of Health Policy and Health Services Research, Boston University, Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | - Catherine Mathews
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa; School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Daniel C Ribeiro
- Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
| | - Julie M Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | - Martin Underwood
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.; University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
| | - Nadine E Foster
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia; School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
| | - Sarah E Lamb
- University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, UK.
| | - Zila M Sanchez
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | - Peter Malliaras
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hurtubise K, Phoenix M, Camden C, Gauthier R, Stratford P, Dostie R, Beaudoin AJ, Maltais D, Berbari J, Gaboury I. The Development and Pilot Testing of a Fidelity Checklist for a Family-Centered Telehealth Intervention for Parents of Children with Motor Delay. Int J Telerehabil 2024; 16:e6603. [PMID: 39022432 PMCID: PMC11249651 DOI: 10.5195/ijt.2024.6603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
This multi-methods study describes the development of a pediatric rehabilitation telehealth intervention fidelity checklist, estimates its inter-rater reliability, and documents raters' implementation experience. A literature scan and expert consultation identified eighteen key behaviors and categorized them into three subdomains, measured using a 5-point measurement system. To estimate the checklist's inter-rater reliability, three raters scored 33 video recordings. A Shrout and Fleiss Class 1,1 intraclass correlation (ICC)) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated ICCs = 0.5 (CI: 0, 0.9) for both the Therapist and the Parent-Therapists subdomains, and the Parent subdomain an ICC = 0.3 (CI: 0, 0.8). In the implementation surveys, raters reported high levels of satisfaction (100%), ease of use (84% to 88%), and confidence in their video ratings (87% to 100%). Changes in procedures and scoring were recommended. Capturing raters' implementation experiences is crucial in the early evaluation of the fidelity checklists for telehealth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Hurtubise
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Faculté de Médicine et Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle Phoenix
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chantal Camden
- Faculté de Médicine et Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Raphaëlle Gauthier
- Faculté de Médicine et Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Paul Stratford
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rosalie Dostie
- Faculté de Médicine et Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Audrée Jeanne Beaudoin
- Faculté de Médicine et Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Désirée Maltais
- École de sciences de réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Jade Berbari
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Gaboury
- Faculté de Médicine et Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nielsen A, Dyer NL, Lechuga C, McKee MD, Dusek JA. Fidelity to the acupuncture intervention protocol in the ACUpuncture In The EmergencY department for pain management (ACUITY) trial: Expanding the gold standard of STRICTA and CONSORT guidelines. Integr Med Res 2024; 13:101048. [PMID: 38841077 PMCID: PMC11151162 DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2024.101048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Acupuncture shows promise as an effective nonpharmacologic option for reduction of acute pain in the emergency department (ED). Following CONSORT and STRICTA guidelines, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) generally report intervention details and acupoint options, but fidelity to acupuncture interventions, critical to reliability in intervention research, is rarely reported. Methods ACUITY is an NCCIH-funded, multi-site feasibility RCT of acupuncture in 3 EDs (Cleveland, Nashville, and San Diego). ACUITY acupuncturists were trained in study design, responsive acupuncture manualization protocol, logistics and real-time recording of session details via REDCap forms created to track fidelity. Results Across 3 recruiting sites, 79 participants received acupuncture: 51 % women, 43 % Black/African American, with heterogeneous acute pain sites at baseline: 32 % low back, 22 % extremity, 20 % abdominal, 10 % head. Pragmatically, participants were treated in ED common areas (52 %), private rooms (39 %), and semi-private rooms (9 %). Objective tracking found 98 % adherence to the six components of the acupuncture manualization protocol: staging, number of insertion points (M = 13.2, range 2-22), needle retention time (M = 23.5 min, range 4-52), session length (M = 40.3 min, range 20-66), whether general recommendations were provided and completion of the session form. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first RCT to assess and report fidelity to an acupuncture protocol. Fidelity monitoring will be fundamental for ACUITY2, which would be a future definitive, multi-site RCT. Furthermore, we recommend that fidelity to acupuncture interventions be added to CONSORT and STRICTA reporting guidelines in future RCTs. Protocol registration The protocol of this study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04880733.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arya Nielsen
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Natalie L. Dyer
- Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute, University of California- Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Claudia Lechuga
- Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - M. Diane McKee
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Jeffery A. Dusek
- Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute, University of California- Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, General Internal Medicine, University of California- Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kalolo A, Kesale AM, Anasel M, Kapologwe NA, Jaribu J, Mujaya S, Kengia JT. Documenting the implementation processes and effects of the data use initiatives in primary health care settings in Tanzania: A before-after mixed methods study protocol. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0303552. [PMID: 38820383 PMCID: PMC11142556 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of data in decision making and planning in primary health care settings is critical for improving efficiency and health outcomes for patients and communities. Implementation research can be used to fully understand the effects, context, challenges, and facilitators of data use, as well as how to scale up data use interventions. However, in the context of low resource settings, little is known about how implementation research can be employed to assess the implementation and impact of data use interventions. METHODS We will conduct a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation study employing a mixed method controlled before and after design to measure the effects of data use interventions while simultaneously understanding the implementation of those initiatives. The controlled before and after entails measurement of the effects of the interventions at baseline and end line in a matched intervention and control health facilities using structured questionnaire to health workers (n = 440) and existing patients (n = 422) while also extracting selected health outcome variable from routine data in all participating health facilities (n = 80). The mixed methods component entails measuring the implementation outcomes (adoption, acceptability, fidelity and maintenance) and their moderators entails the integration of both quantitative and qualitative data collection, analysis, and interpretation (i.e. mixed methods) approach by using a structured questionnaire to implementers (health workers and managers) (n = 400). Experiential dimensions of implementation processes and moderators will be explored using qualitative interviews. Guided by implementation research theories and frameworks, a theory of change (TOC) is developed first to guide the evaluation of implementation processes and effects of the interventions. Descriptive and inferential statistics will be employed to analyze quantitative data whereas thematic analysis approach will be employed for qualitative data. DISCUSSION This study is one of the first to test the simultaneous measurement of effects and implementation processes of data use interventions in the primary health care settings. Findings will support efforts to improve quality of services by optimizing scale up and sustainability of the data use initiatives in primary health care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albino Kalolo
- Department of Public Health, St Francis University college of Health and Allied Sciences, Ifakara, Tanzania
- Centre for Reforms, Innovation, Health Policies and Implementation Research (CeRIHI), Dodoma, Tanzania
| | - Anosisye M. Kesale
- School of Public Administration and management Mzumbe University, Morogoro, Tanzania
| | - Mackfallen Anasel
- School of Public Administration and management Mzumbe University, Morogoro, Tanzania
| | - Ntuli A. Kapologwe
- Department of Health, Social welfare and Nutrition Services, President’s Office Regional Administration and Local Government (PORALG), Dodoma, Tanzania
| | | | - Stella Mujaya
- Data For Implementation (Data.FI), Palladium, Tanzania
| | - James T. Kengia
- Department of Health, Social welfare and Nutrition Services, President’s Office Regional Administration and Local Government (PORALG), Dodoma, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lopez-Alcalde J, Susan Wieland L, Barth J, Grainger R, Baxter N, Heron N, Triantafyllidis A, Carrion C, Trecca EMC, Holl F, Maria Wägner A, Edney S, Yan Y, Campos-Asensio C, Villanueva G, Ramsey RR, Witt CM. Methodological challenges in systematic reviews of mHealth interventions: Survey and consensus-based recommendations. Int J Med Inform 2024; 184:105345. [PMID: 38309237 PMCID: PMC11192046 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mobile Health (mHealth) refers to using mobile devices to support health. This study aimed to identify specific methodological challenges in systematic reviews (SRs) of mHealth interventions and to develop guidance for addressing selected challenges. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Two-phase participatory research project. First, we sent an online survey to corresponding authors of SRs of mHealth interventions. On a five-category scale, survey respondents rated how challenging they found 24 methodological aspects in SRs of mHealth interventions compared to non-mHealth intervention SRs. Second, a subset of survey respondents participated in an online workshop to discuss recommendations to address the most challenging methodological aspects identified in the survey. Finally, consensus-based recommendations were developed based on the workshop discussion and subsequent interaction via email with the workshop participants and two external mHealth SR authors. RESULTS We contacted 953 corresponding authors of mHealth intervention SRs, of whom 50 (5 %) completed the survey. All the respondents identified at least one methodological aspect as more or much more challenging in mHealth intervention SRs than in non-mHealth SRs. A median of 11 (IQR 7.25-15) out of 24 aspects (46 %) were rated as more or much more challenging. Those most frequently reported were: defining intervention intensity and components (85 %), extracting mHealth intervention details (71 %), dealing with dynamic research with evolving interventions (70 %), assessing intervention integrity (69 %), defining the intervention (66 %) and maintaining an updated review (65 %). Eleven survey respondents participated in the workshop (five had authored more than three mHealth SRs). Eighteen consensus-based recommendations were developed to address issues related to mHealth intervention integrity and to keep mHealth SRs up to date. CONCLUSION mHealth SRs present specific methodological challenges compared to non-mHealth interventions, particularly related to intervention integrity and keeping SRs current. Our recommendations for addressing these challenges can improve mHealth SRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesus Lopez-Alcalde
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (UFV), Madrid, Spain; Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Unidad de bioestadística clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
| | - L Susan Wieland
- Center for Integrative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Jürgen Barth
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rebecca Grainger
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Nancy Baxter
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Neil Heron
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, England, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Triantafyllidis
- Information Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Carme Carrion
- eHealth Lab Research Group, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Spain
| | - Eleonora M C Trecca
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, IRCCS Hospital Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo (FG), Italy; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Felix Holl
- DigiHealth Institute, Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Neu-Ulm, Germany; Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ana Maria Wägner
- Endocrinology and Nutrition Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Sarah Edney
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yuqian Yan
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Rachelle R Ramsey
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Claudia M Witt
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Center for Integrative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States; Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bradley JM, Hutchings M, Arden MA, O'Cathain A, Maguire C, Wildman MJ. A RCT to explore the effectiveness of supporting adherence to nebuliser medication in adults with cystic fibrosis: fidelity assessment of study interventions. BMC Pulm Med 2024; 24:148. [PMID: 38509494 PMCID: PMC10956306 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-024-02923-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A multi-component self-management intervention 'CFHealthHub' was developed to reduce pulmonary exacerbations in adults with Cystic Fibrosis (CF) by supporting adherence to nebuliser medication. It was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 19 CF centres, with 32 interventionists, 305 participants in the intervention group, and 303 participants in the standard care arm. Ensuring treatment fidelity of intervention delivery was crucial to ensure that the intervention produced the expected outcomes. METHODS Fidelity of the CFHealthHub intervention and standard care was assessed using different methods for each of the five fidelity domains defined by the Borrelli framework: study design, training, treatment delivery, receipt, and enactment. Study design ensured that the groups received the intended intervention or standard care. Interventionists underwent training and competency assessments to be deemed certified to deliver the intervention. Audio-recorded intervention sessions were assessed for fidelity drift. Receipt was assessed by identifying whether participants set Action and Coping Plans, while enactment was assessed using click analytics on the CFHealthHub digital platform. RESULTS Design: There was reasonable agreement (74%, 226/305) between the expected versus actual intervention dose received by participants in the CFHealthHub intervention group. The standard care group did not include focused adherence support for most centres and participants. Training: All interventionists were trained. Treatment delivery: The trial demonstrated good fidelity (overall fidelity by centre ranged from 79 to 97%), with only one centre falling below the mean threshold (> 80%) on fidelity drift assessments. Receipt: Among participants who completed the 12-month intervention, 77% (205/265) completed at least one action plan, and 60% (160/265) completed at least one coping plan. Enactment: 88% (268/305) of participants used web/app click analytics outside the intervention sessions. The mean (SD) number of web/app click analytics per participant was 31.2 (58.9). Additionally, 64% (195/305) of participants agreed to receive notifications via the mobile application, with an average of 53.6 (14.9) notifications per participant. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrates high fidelity throughout the RCT, and the CFHealthHub intervention was delivered as intended. This provides confidence that the results of the RCT are a valid reflection of the effectiveness of the CFHealthHub intervention compared to standard care. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN55504164 (date of registration: 12/10/2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Bradley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
| | - M Hutchings
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK
| | - M A Arden
- Centre for Behavioural Science and Applied Psychology, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2BQ, UK
| | - A O'Cathain
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - C Maguire
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - M J Wildman
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sandi F, Mercer G, Geneau R, Bassett K, Bintabara D, Kalolo A. Alternative community-led intervention to improve uptake of cataract surgery services in rural Tanzania-The Dodoma Community Cataract Acceptance Trial (DoCCAT): a protocol for intervention co-designing and implementation in a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Biol Methods Protoc 2024; 9:bpae016. [PMID: 38566775 PMCID: PMC10987207 DOI: 10.1093/biomethods/bpae016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Age-related lens opacification (cataract) remains the leading cause of visual impairment and blindness worldwide. In low- and middle-income countries, utilization of cataract surgical services is often limited despite community-based outreach programmes. Community-led research, whereby researchers and community members collaboratively co-design intervention is an approach that ensures the interventions are locally relevant and that their implementation is feasible and socially accepted in the targeted contexts. Community-led interventions have the potential to increase cataract surgery uptake if done appropriately. In this study, once the intervention is co-designed it will be implemented through a cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) with ward as a unit of randomization. This study will utilise both the qualitative methods for co-designing the intervention and the quantitative methods for effective assessment of the developed community-led intervention through a cRCT in 80 rural wards of Dodoma region, Tanzania (40 Intervention). The 'intervention package' will be developed through participatory community meetings and ongoing evaluation and modification of the intervention based on its impact on service utilization. Leask's four stages of intervention co-creation will guide the development within Rifkin's CHOICE framework. The primary outcomes are two: the number of patients attending eye disease screening camps, and the number of patients accepting cataract surgery. NVivo version 12 will be used for qualitative data analysis and Stata version 12 for quantitative data. Independent and paired t-tests will be performed to make comparisons between and within groups. P-values less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Sandi
- Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Dodoma Medical School, Dodoma, Tanzania
| | - Gareth Mercer
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robert Geneau
- Division of Ophthalmology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Kenneth Bassett
- Department of Ophthalmology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Deogratius Bintabara
- Department of Community Medicine, The University of Dodoma Medical School, Dodoma, Tanzania
| | - Albino Kalolo
- Department of Public Health, St Francis University College of Health and Allied Sciences, Morogoro, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pinto R, Canário C, Leijten P, Rodrigo MJ, Cruz O. Implementation of Parenting Programs in Real-World Community Settings: A Scoping Review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2024; 27:74-90. [PMID: 38062309 PMCID: PMC10920434 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-023-00465-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
Implementing parenting programs in real-world community settings is fundamental to making effective programs widely available and consequently improving the lives of children and their families. Despite the literature acknowledging that the high-quality implementation of parenting programs is particularly challenging in real-world community settings, little is known about how the programs are implemented in these settings. This scoping review followed the methodological framework described by the Joanna Briggs Institute to map evidence on how evidence-based parenting programs have been implemented under real-world conditions. A systematic search of 12 scientific databases, gray literature, and the reference lists of the included studies identified 1918 records, of which 145 were included in the review. Fifty-three parenting programs were identified in studies documenting implementation in real-world community settings worldwide. Most studies included families in psychosocial risk engaged with family-support agencies. The qualitative synthesis identified several implementation outcomes, adaptations, barriers, and facilitators. Most studies reported a maximum of two implementation outcomes, mainly fidelity and acceptability. Providers frequently made adaptations, mainly to bring down barriers and to tailor the program to improve its fit. Findings highlight the need for a more detailed description of the implementation of programs, with greater consistency in terminology, operationalization, and measurement of implementation outcomes across studies. This will promote a more transparent, consistent, and accurate evaluation and reporting of implementation and increase the public health impact of parenting programs. Future studies should also assess the impact of adaptations and the cost-effectiveness and sustainability of programs in real-world community settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Pinto
- Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Catarina Canário
- Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Patty Leijten
- Research Institute for Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria José Rodrigo
- Department of Developmental Psychology and Education, Faculty of Psychology, University of La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Orlanda Cruz
- Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ribeiro LP, Curiel-Montero F, Rodrigues-de-Souza DP, Camargo PR, Alburquerque-Sendín F. Assessment of description and implementation fidelity of clinical trials involving exercise-based treatment in individuals with rotator cuff tears: a scoping review. Braz J Phys Ther 2024; 28:101062. [PMID: 38640642 PMCID: PMC11039315 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For evidence-based practice, clinicians and researchers can rely on well-conducted randomized clinical trials that exhibit good methodological quality, provide adequate intervention descriptions, and implementation fidelity. OBJECTIVE To assess the description and implementation fidelity of exercise-based interventions in clinical trials for individuals with rotator cuff tears. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SCOPUS and SciELO. Randomized clinical trials that assessed individuals with rotator cuff tears confirmed by imaging exam were included. All individuals must have received an exercise-based treatment. The methodological quality was scored with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and the National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium (NIHBCC) were used to assess intervention description and implementation fidelity, respectively. RESULTS A total of 13 studies were included. Despite their adequate methodological quality, the description of the intervention was poor with TIDieR scores ranging from 6 to 15 out of 24 total points. The TIDieR highest-scoring item was item 1 (brief name) that was reported in all studies. Considering fidelity, only one of the five domains of NIHBCC (i.e., treatment design) reached just over 50%. CONCLUSION Exercise-based interventions used in studies for individuals with rotator cuff tears are poorly reported. The description and fidelity of the intervention need to be better reported to assist clinical decision-making and support evidence-based practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa Pechincha Ribeiro
- Laboratory of Analysis and Intervention of the Shoulder Complex, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil
| | - Francisca Curiel-Montero
- Department of Nursing, Pharmacology and Physical Therapy, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Daiana Priscila Rodrigues-de-Souza
- Department of Nursing, Pharmacology and Physical Therapy, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain; Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Paula Rezende Camargo
- Laboratory of Analysis and Intervention of the Shoulder Complex, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
| | - Francisco Alburquerque-Sendín
- Department of Nursing, Pharmacology and Physical Therapy, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain; Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
De Santis M, Filugelli L, Mair A, Normando S, Mutinelli F, Contalbrigo L. How to Measure Human-Dog Interaction in Dog Assisted Interventions? A Scoping Review. Animals (Basel) 2024; 14:410. [PMID: 38338052 PMCID: PMC10854530 DOI: 10.3390/ani14030410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Human-dog interaction is the working tool through which the therapeutic, educational and recreational goals of dog-assisted interventions (DAIs) are achieved. A better understanding of the characteristics of this interaction could improve the effectiveness of DAIs. This scoping review addresses the question: how has the human-dog connection been measured in the context of DAIs? After searching the Web of Science and Scopus platforms, only peer-reviewed, primary research studies reporting measures of therapy dog-human interaction, relationship and bond were included. A total of 70 included articles provided information on what was measured (interaction, relationship or bond) and how, as well as the general context (DAIs or experimental situations with therapy dogs). While the majority of the articles identified use behavioural analysis methods to analyse the interaction between the participant/recipient and the therapy dog during DAIs, it was possible to identify some more structured tools that assess the participant/recipient's interaction, relationship or bond with the therapy dog, as well as tools that consider the animal's perspective or focus on the dog-handler dyad, indicating growing areas of research. The tools and methods identified can be used by both practitioners and researchers to further explore aspects of human-dog interaction in the field of DAIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta De Santis
- National Reference Centre for Animal Assisted Interventions, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell’Università 10, 35020 Legnaro, Italy; (M.D.S.); (L.F.); (F.M.); (L.C.)
| | - Lorena Filugelli
- National Reference Centre for Animal Assisted Interventions, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell’Università 10, 35020 Legnaro, Italy; (M.D.S.); (L.F.); (F.M.); (L.C.)
| | - Alberto Mair
- National Reference Centre for Animal Assisted Interventions, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell’Università 10, 35020 Legnaro, Italy; (M.D.S.); (L.F.); (F.M.); (L.C.)
| | - Simona Normando
- Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell’Università, 14, 35020 Legnaro, Italy;
| | - Franco Mutinelli
- National Reference Centre for Animal Assisted Interventions, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell’Università 10, 35020 Legnaro, Italy; (M.D.S.); (L.F.); (F.M.); (L.C.)
| | - Laura Contalbrigo
- National Reference Centre for Animal Assisted Interventions, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell’Università 10, 35020 Legnaro, Italy; (M.D.S.); (L.F.); (F.M.); (L.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ginsburg L, Hoben M, Berta W, Doupe M, Estabrooks CA, Norton PG, Reid C, Geerts A, Wagg A. Development and validation of the Overall Fidelity Enactment Scale for Complex Interventions (OFES-CI). BMJ Qual Saf 2024; 33:98-108. [PMID: 37648435 PMCID: PMC10850642 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In many quality improvement (QI) and other complex interventions, assessing the fidelity with which participants 'enact' intervention activities (ie, implement them as intended) is underexplored. Adapting the evaluative approach used in objective structured clinical examinations, we aimed to develop and validate a practical approach to assessing fidelity enactment-the Overall Fidelity Enactment Scale for Complex Interventions (OFES-CI). METHODS We developed the OFES-CI to evaluate enactment of the SCOPE QI intervention, which teaches nursing home teams to use plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. The OFES-CI was piloted and revised early in SCOPE with good inter-rater reliability, so we proceeded with a single rater. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess inter-rater reliability. For 27 SCOPE teams, we used ICC to compare two methods for assessing fidelity enactment: (1) OFES-CI ratings provided by one of five trained experts who observed structured 6 min PDSA progress presentations made at the end of SCOPE, (2) average rating of two coders' deductive content analysis of qualitative process evaluation data collected during the final 3 months of SCOPE (our gold standard). RESULTS Using Cicchetti's classification, inter-rater reliability between two coders who derived the gold standard enactment score was 'excellent' (ICC=0.93, 95% CI=0.85 to 0.97). Inter-rater reliability between the OFES-CI and the gold standard was good (ICC=0.71, 95% CI=0.46 to 0.86), after removing one team where open-text comments were discrepant with the rating. Rater feedback suggests the OFES-CI has strong face validity and positive implementation qualities (acceptability, easy to use, low training requirements). CONCLUSIONS The OFES-CI provides a promising novel approach for assessing fidelity enactment in QI and other complex interventions. It demonstrates good reliability against our gold standard assessment approach and addresses the practicality problem in fidelity assessment by virtue of its suitable implementation qualities. Steps for adapting the OFES-CI to other complex interventions are offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liane Ginsburg
- School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthias Hoben
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Whitney Berta
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Malcolm Doupe
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Centre for Care Research, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Peter G Norton
- Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Colin Reid
- School of Health and Exercise Science, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ariane Geerts
- School of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adrian Wagg
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kopelovich SL, Buck BE, Tauscher J, Lyon AR, Ben-Zeev D. Developing the Workforce of the Digital Future: mHealth Competency and Fidelity Measurement in Community-Based Care. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE 2024; 9:35-45. [PMID: 38571682 PMCID: PMC10984896 DOI: 10.1007/s41347-024-00385-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
Integrating mobile health (mHealth) interventions into settings that serve diverse patient populations requires that prerequisite professional competencies are delineated and that standards for clinical quality assurance can be pragmatically assessed. Heretofore, proposed mHealth competencies have been broad and have lacked a framework to support specific applications. We outline the meta-competencies identified in the literature relevant to mHealth interventions and demonstrate how these meta-competencies can be integrated with population- and intervention-related competencies to help guide a pragmatic approach to competency assessment. We present a use case based on FOCUS-an evidence-based mHealth intervention designed for individuals with serious mental illness and currently being implemented in geographically and demographically diverse community behavioral health settings. Subsequent to identifying the cross-cutting competencies relevant to the target population (outpatients experiencing psychotic symptoms), substratal intervention (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for psychosis), and treatment modality (mHealth), we detail the development process of an mHealth fidelity monitoring system (mHealth-FMS). We adhered to a published sequential 5-step process to design a fidelity monitoring system that aligns with our integrated mHealth competency framework and that was guided by best practices prescribed by the Treatment Fidelity Workgroup of the National Institutes of Health Behavior Change Consortium. The mHealth-FMS is intended to enhance both clinical and implementation outcomes by grounding the mHealth interventionist and the system of care in which they operate in the core functions, tasks, knowledge, and competencies associated with system-integrated mHealth delivery. Future research will explore acceptability and feasibility of the mHealth-FMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah L. Kopelovich
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356560, Seattle, WA 98195-6560 USA
| | - Benjamin E. Buck
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356560, Seattle, WA 98195-6560 USA
| | - Justin Tauscher
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356560, Seattle, WA 98195-6560 USA
| | - Aaron R. Lyon
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356560, Seattle, WA 98195-6560 USA
| | - Dror Ben-Zeev
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356560, Seattle, WA 98195-6560 USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cook CE, O’Halloran B, Karas S, Klopper M, Young JL. Treatment fidelity in clinical trials. Arch Physiother 2024; 14:65-69. [PMID: 39308755 PMCID: PMC11413885 DOI: 10.33393/aop.2024.3128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
In the context of clinical trials, treatment fidelity (TF) has traditionally referred to the extent to which an intervention or treatment is implemented by the clinicians as intended by the researchers who designed the trial. Updated definitions of TF have included an appropriate design of the intervention that was performed in a way that is known to be therapeutically beneficial. This requires careful attention to three key components: (1) protocol and dosage adherence, (2) quality of delivery, and (3) participant adherence. In this viewpoint, we describe several cases in which TF was lacking in clinical trials and give opportunities to improve the deficits encountered in those trials. We feel that along with quality, risk of bias, and certainty of evidence, TF should be considered an essential element of the veracity of clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad E. Cook
- Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina - USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina - USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina - USA
| | - Bryan O’Halloran
- Division of Physical Therapy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina - USA
| | - Steve Karas
- Department of Physical Therapy, Chatham University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania - USA
| | - Mareli Klopper
- Department of Physical Therapy, Graceland University, Independence, MO - USA
| | - Jodi L. Young
- Department of Physical Therapy, Bellin College, Green Bay, Wisconsin - USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Keene S, Allen S, McCormick AKHG, Trottier C, Bull Shows B, Hallett J, Deernose R, Held S. Developing and Implementing a Culturally Consonant Treatment Fidelity Support Plan with the Apsáalooke Nation. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6989. [PMID: 37947547 PMCID: PMC10647712 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20216989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Treatment fidelity remains underreported in health intervention research, particularly among Indigenous communities. One explanation for this gap is the lack of culturally consonant strategies listed in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Behavior Change Consortium (BCC) treatment fidelity framework, the gold standard for understanding and measuring fidelity. This paper focuses on the development and implementation of a culturally consonant treatment fidelity support plan across two of the five BCC fidelity areas, provider training and treatment delivery, within a chronic illness self-management program for the Apsáalooke (Crow) Nation. Our team selected and adapted strategies from, and added strategies to, the BCC framework, that centered on relational accountability and the Apsáalooke culture. To be culturally consonant, we approached treatment fidelity as supporting Aakbaabaaniilea (Apsáalooke program facilitators) rather than monitoring them. This resulted in the development of a fifth treatment fidelity area: building and fostering relationships. We propose that fidelity to relational accountability is the foundation of successful programs in Indigenous communities. This suggests an important shift from tracking what was conducted in an intervention to prioritizing how things were conducted. We encourage others to view the BCC framework as a starting point in developing fidelity strategies that are consonant with local cultures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannen Keene
- Department of Human Development & Community Health, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA; (C.T.); (B.B.S.); (S.H.)
| | - Sarah Allen
- Department of Family Life & Human Development, Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT 84720, USA;
| | | | - Coleen Trottier
- Department of Human Development & Community Health, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA; (C.T.); (B.B.S.); (S.H.)
| | - Brianna Bull Shows
- Department of Human Development & Community Health, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA; (C.T.); (B.B.S.); (S.H.)
| | - John Hallett
- Petaluma Health Center, Petaluma, CA 94954, USA;
| | - Rae Deernose
- Department of Human Development & Community Health, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA; (C.T.); (B.B.S.); (S.H.)
| | - Suzanne Held
- Department of Human Development & Community Health, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA; (C.T.); (B.B.S.); (S.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stewart T, Dionne É, Urquhart R, Oelke ND, Mcisaac JL, Scott CM, Haggerty J. Lack of Publicly Available Documentation Limits Spread of Integrated Care Innovations in Canada. Healthc Policy 2023; 19:88-98. [PMID: 37850708 PMCID: PMC10594947 DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2023.27176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
As healthcare in Canada is provincially operated, the program innovations in one jurisdiction may not be readily known in other jurisdictions. We examine the availability of implementation-specific data for 30 innovative Canadian programs designed to integrate health and social services for patients with complex needs. Using publicly available data and key informant interviews, we were able to populate only ∼50% of our data collection tool (on average). Formal program evaluations were available for only ∼30% of programs. Multiple barriers exist to the compilation and verification of healthcare programs' implementation data across Canada, limiting cross-jurisdictional learning and making a comparison of programs challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Stewart
- Assistant Professor, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba Researcher/Evaluator, George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, Manitoba SPOR SUPPORT Unit, Winnipeg, MB
| | - Émilie Dionne
- Researcher and Adjunct Professor, VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Laval University, Quebec City, QC
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Endowed Chair in Population Cancer Research, Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
| | - Nelly D Oelke
- Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia-Okanagan, Kelowna, BC
| | - Jessie Lee Mcisaac
- Research Chair in Early Childhood: Diversity and Transitions, Faculty of Education, Department of Child and Youth Study, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS
| | - Catherine M Scott
- Adjunct Professor, University of Calgary and University of British Columbia-Okanagan, Executive Coach and Knowledge Mobilisation Consultant, K2A Consulting, Calgary, AB
| | - Jeannie Haggerty
- McGill Research Chair in Family and Community Medicine, McGill University and St. Mary's Hospital Research Centre, Montréal, QC
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Johnson L, Mardo J, Demain S. Understanding implementation of a complex intervention in a stroke rehabilitation research trial: A qualitative evaluation using Normalisation Process Theory. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282612. [PMID: 37682841 PMCID: PMC10490858 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Implicit Learning in Stroke study was a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial, investigating the use of different motor learning strategies in acute stroke rehabilitation. Participating Stroke Units (n = 8) were from the South East/West regions of the UK, with the experimental intervention (implicit learning) being delivered by clinical teams. It required therapists to change how they gave instructions and feedback to patients during rehabilitation. This paper reports the processes underpinning implementation of the implicit learning intervention. The evaluation aimed to i) understand how therapists made sense of, engaged with and interpreted the effects of the intervention; ii) compare this to the experience reported by patients; iii) extrapolate learning of broader relevance to the design and conduct of research involving complex interventions in stroke rehabilitation. METHODS Qualitative evaluation, with data collected through focus groups with clinical staff (n = 20) and semi structured interviews with people with stroke (n = 19). Mixed inductive and theory driven analysis, underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory. RESULTS How therapists made sense of and experienced the intervention impacted how it was implemented. The intervention was delivered by individual therapists, and was influenced by their individual values, beliefs and concerns. However, how teams worked together to build a shared (team) understanding, also played a key role. Teams with a more "flexible" interpretation, reported the view that the intervention could have benefits in a wide range of scenarios. Those with a more fixed, "rule based" interpretation, found it harder to implement, and perceived the benefits to be more limited. Therapists' concerns that the intervention may impair therapeutic relationships and patient learning were not reflected in how patients experienced it. CONCLUSIONS Changing practice, whether in a research study or in the "real world", is complex. Understanding the process of implementation is crucial to effective research delivery. Implementation frameworks facilitate understanding, and subsequently the systematic and iterative development of strategies for this to be addressed. How teams (rather than individuals) work together is central to how complex interventions are understood and implemented. It is possible that new complex interventions work best in contexts where there are 'flexible' cultures. Researchers should consider, and potentially measure this, before they can effectively implement and evaluate an intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials - NCT03792126.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Johnson
- University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Castle Lane East, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Mardo
- Dorset Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Yeatman Hospital, Hospital Lane, Sherborne, Dorset, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Demain
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Oesch S, Verweij L, Clack L, Finch T, Riguzzi M, Naef R. Implementation of a multicomponent family support intervention in adult intensive care units: study protocol for an embedded mixed-methods multiple case study (FICUS implementation study). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e074142. [PMID: 37553195 PMCID: PMC10414125 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implementation of complex interventions is considered challenging, particularly in multi-site clinical trials and dynamic clinical settings. This study protocol is part of the family intensive care units (FICUS) hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. It aims to understand the integration of a multicomponent family support intervention in the real-world context of adult intensive care units (ICUs). Specifically, the study will assess implementation processes and outcomes of the study intervention, including fidelity, and will enable explanation of the clinical effectiveness outcomes of the trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This mixed-methods multiple case study is guided by two implementation theories, the Normalisation Process Theory and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Participants are key clinical partners and healthcare professionals of eight ICUs allocated to the intervention group of the FICUS trial in the German-speaking part of Switzerland. Data will be collected at four timepoints over the 18-month active implementation and delivery phase using qualitative (small group interviews, observation, focus group interviews) and quantitative data collection methods (surveys, logs). Descriptive statistics and parametric and non-parametric tests will be used according to data distribution to analyse within and between cluster differences, similarities and factors associated with fidelity and the level of integration over time. Qualitative data will be analysed using a pragmatic rapid analysis approach and content analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was obtained from the Cantonal Ethics Committee of Zurich BASEC ID 2021-02300 (8 February 2022). Study findings will provide insights into implementation and its contribution to intervention outcomes, enabling understanding of the usefulness of applied implementation strategies and highlighting main barriers that need to be addressed for scaling the intervention to other healthcare contexts. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER Open science framework (OSF) https://osf.io/8t2ud Registered on 21 December 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia Oesch
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich Faculty of Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland
- Center of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lotte Verweij
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich Faculty of Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland
- Center of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lauren Clack
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich Faculty of Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tracy Finch
- Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Marco Riguzzi
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich Faculty of Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland
- Center of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rahel Naef
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich Faculty of Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland
- Center of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pettman D, O'Mahen H, Blomberg O, Svanberg AS, von Essen L, Woodford J. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy-based interventions for maternal perinatal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:208. [PMID: 36991389 PMCID: PMC10052839 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04547-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression during the perinatal period (during pregnancy and the year after childbirth) is common and associated with a range of negative effects for mothers, infants, family members, and wider society. Although existing evidence suggests cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) based interventions are effective for perinatal depression, less is known about the effect of CBT-based interventions on important secondary outcomes, and a number of potential clinical and methodological moderators have not been examined. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis primarily examined the effectiveness of CBT-based interventions for perinatal depression on symptoms of depression. Secondary aims examined the effectiveness of CBT-based interventions for perinatal depression on symptoms of anxiety, stress, parenting, perceived social support, and perceived parental competence; and explored clinical and methodological moderators potentially associated with effectiveness. A systematic search of electronic databases and other sources was performed up to November 2021. We included randomized controlled trials comparing CBT-based interventions for perinatal depression with control conditions allowing for the isolation of the effects of CBT. RESULTS In total, 31 studies (5291 participants) were included in the systematic review and 26 studies (4658 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall effect size was medium (hedges g = - 0.53 [95% CI - 0.65 to - 0.40]); with high heterogeneity. Significant effects were also found for anxiety, individual stress, and perceived social support, however few studies examined secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis identified type of control, type of CBT, and type of health professional as significant moderators of the main effect (symptoms of depression). Some concerns of risk of bias were present in the majority of studies and one study had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS CBT-based interventions for depression during the perinatal period appear effective, however results should be interpreted with caution given high levels of heterogeneity and low quality of included studies. There is a need to further investigate possibly important clinical moderators of effect, including the type of health professional delivering interventions. Further, results indicate a need to establish a minimum core data set to improve the consistency of secondary outcome collection across trials and to design and conduct trials with longer-term follow-up periods. TRIAL REGISTRATION CRD42020152254 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danelle Pettman
- Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Heather O'Mahen
- Mood Disorders Centre, Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Oscar Blomberg
- Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Agneta Skoog Svanberg
- Reproductive Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Louise von Essen
- Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Joanne Woodford
- Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fritz JM, Greene T, Brennan GP, Minick K, Lane E, Wegener ST, Skolasky RL. Characterizing modifications to a comparative effectiveness research study: the OPTIMIZE trial-using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Interventions (FRAME). Trials 2023; 24:137. [PMID: 36823645 PMCID: PMC9947905 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07150-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The OPTIMIZE trial is a multi-site, comparative effectiveness research (CER) study that uses a Sequential Multiple Assessment Randomized Trial (SMART) designed to examine the effectiveness of complex health interventions (cognitive behavioral therapy, physical therapy, and mindfulness) for adults with chronic low back pain. Modifications are anticipated when implementing complex interventions in CER. Disruptions due to COVID have created unanticipated challenges also requiring modifications. Recent methodologic standards for CER studies emphasize that fully characterizing modifications made is necessary to interpret and implement trial results. The purpose of this paper is to outline the modifications made to the OPTIMIZE trial using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-Based Interventions (FRAME) to characterize modifications to the OPTIMIZE trial in response to the COVID pandemic and other challenges encountered. METHODS The FRAME outlines a strategy to identify and report modifications to evidence-based interventions or implementation strategies, whether planned or unplanned. We use the FRAME to characterize the process used to modify the aspects of the OPTIMIZE trial. Modifications were made to improve lower-than-anticipated rates of treatment initiation and COVID-related restrictions. Contextual modifications were made to permit telehealth delivery of treatments originally designed for in-person delivery. Training modifications were made with study personnel to provide more detailed information to potential participants, use motivational interviewing communication techniques to clarify potential participants' motivation and possible barriers to initiating treatment, and provide greater assistance with scheduling of assigned treatments. RESULTS Modifications were developed with input from the trial's patient and stakeholder advisory panels. The goals of the modifications were to improve trial feasibility without compromising the interventions' core functions. Modifications were approved by the study funder and the trial steering committee. CONCLUSIONS Full and transparent reporting of modifications to clinical trials, whether planned or unplanned, is critical for interpreting the trial's eventual results and considering future implementation efforts. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03859713. Registered on March 1, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie M. Fritz
- grid.223827.e0000 0001 2193 0096Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Drive, Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
| | - Tom Greene
- grid.223827.e0000 0001 2193 0096Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Gerard P. Brennan
- grid.420884.20000 0004 0460 774XRehabilitation Services, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Kate Minick
- grid.420884.20000 0004 0460 774XRehabilitation Services, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Elizabeth Lane
- grid.223827.e0000 0001 2193 0096Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Drive, Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
| | - Stephen T. Wegener
- grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Richard L. Skolasky
- grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA ,grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Guerbaai RA, DeGeest S, Popejoy LL, Simon M, Wellens NIH, Denhaerynck K, Zúñiga F. Evaluating the implementation fidelity to a successful nurse-led model (INTERCARE) which reduced nursing home unplanned hospitalisations. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:138. [PMID: 36759902 PMCID: PMC9910256 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09146-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation fidelity assesses the degree to which an intervention is delivered as it should be. Fidelity helps to determine if the outcome(s) of an intervention are attributed to the intervention itself or to a failure of its implementation. Little is known about how fidelity impacts the intended outcome(s) and what elements or moderators can affect the fidelity trajectory over time. We exemplify the meaning of implementation fidelity with INTERCARE, a nurse-led care model that was implemented in eleven Swiss nursing homes (NHs) and showed effectiveness in reducing unplanned hospital transfers. INTERCARE comprises six core elements, including advance care planning and tools to support inter- and interprofessional communication, which were introduced with carefully developed implementation strategies. METHODS A mixed-methods convergent/triangulation design was used to investigate the influence of implementation fidelity on unplanned transfers. A fidelity questionnaire measuring the degree of fidelity to INTERCARE's core components was fielded at four time points in the participating NHs. Two-monthly meetings were conducted with NHs (September 2018-January 2020) and structured notes were used to determine moderators affecting fidelity (e.g., participant responsiveness). We used the fidelity scores and generalized linear mixed models to analyze the quantitative data. The Framework method was used for the qualitative analysis. The quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated using triangulation. RESULTS A higher overall fidelity score showed a decreasing rate of unplanned hospital transfers post-intervention (OR: 0.65 (CI = 0.43-0.99), p = 0.047). A higher fidelity score to advance care planning was associated with lower unplanned transfers (OR = 0.24 (CI 0.13-0.44), p = < 0.001) and a lower fidelity score for communication tools (e.g., ISBAR) to higher rates in unplanned transfers (OR = 1.69 (CI 1.30-2.19), p = < 0.003). In-house physicians with a collaborative approach and staff's perceived need for nurses working in extended roles, were important moderators to achieve and sustain high fidelity. CONCLUSION Implementation fidelity is challenging to measure and report, especially in complex interventions, yet is crucial to better understand how such interventions may be tailored for scale-up. This study provides both a detailed description of how fidelity can be measured and which ingredients highly contributed to reducing unplanned NH transfers. TRIAL REGISTRATION The INTERCARE study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov Protocol Record NCT03590470.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaëlle A. Guerbaai
- grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sabina DeGeest
- grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland ,grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lori L. Popejoy
- grid.134936.a0000 0001 2162 3504Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, United States of America
| | - Michael Simon
- grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nathalie I. H. Wellens
- grid.5681.a0000 0001 0943 1999La Source School of Nursing, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Kris Denhaerynck
- grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Franziska Zúñiga
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wen Y, Xing Y, Ding Y, Xu W, Wang X. Challenges of conducting of online educational programs for family caregivers of people with dementia living at home: An integrative review. Int J Nurs Sci 2022; 10:121-128. [PMID: 36860711 PMCID: PMC9969171 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This integrative review aimed to understand the challenges of conducting online educational programs for family caregivers of people with dementia by focusing on the components and design of them. Methods Following Whittemore & Knafl's five-step method, seven databases were systematically searched. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Results Of the 25,256 articles identified, 49 studies were included. Limitations in components (including useless or repetitive information, incomplete access to dementia-related information, the impact of components related to culture or ethnicity or gender) and in the format of delivered information (including less interaction, time schedule limitations and preference for traditional forms of delivery of information) make it more challenging to conduct online educational programs. Additionally, implementation constraints such as technical problems, poor computer literacy, and fidelity assessment are challenges that cannot be ignored. Conclusions Insight into the challenges of online educational programs for family caregivers of people with dementia can help guide researchers in constructing the optimal online educational program. Incorporating cultural specificity, considering structured construction strategies, optimizing interaction design, and increasing fidelity assessment may contribute to the conduct of online educational programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuting Wen
- The School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- The School of Nursing, Pingxiang Health Vocational College, Pingxiang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yurong Xing
- The School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yaping Ding
- The School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Corresponding author.
| | - Wenhui Xu
- The School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiaoxiao Wang
- The School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Carpenter CR, Southerland LT, Lucey BP, Prusaczyk B. Around the EQUATOR with clinician-scientists transdisciplinary aging research (Clin-STAR) principles: Implementation science challenges and opportunities. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:3620-3630. [PMID: 36005482 PMCID: PMC10538952 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The Institute of Medicine and the National Institute on Aging increasingly understand that knowledge alone is necessary but insufficient to improve healthcare outcomes. Adapting the behaviors of clinicians, patients, and stakeholders to new standards of evidence-based clinical practice is often significantly delayed. In response, over the past twenty years, Implementation Science has developed as the study of methods and strategies that facilitate the uptake of evidence-based practice into regular use by practitioners and policymakers. One important advance in Implementation Science research was the development of Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI), which provided a 27-item checklist for researchers to consistently report essential elements of the implementation and intervention strategies. Using StaRI as a framework, this review discusses specific Implementation Science challenges for research with older adults, provides solutions for those obstacles, and opportunities to improve the value of this evolving approach to reduce the knowledge translation losses that exist between published research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Carpenter
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Emergency Care Research Core, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Lauren T Southerland
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Brendan P Lucey
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Beth Prusaczyk
- Department of Medicine Institute for Informatics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bond L, Simmons E, Sabbath EL. Measurement and assessment of fidelity and competence in nonspecialist-delivered, evidence-based behavioral and mental health interventions: A systematic review. SSM Popul Health 2022; 19:101249. [PMID: 36246092 PMCID: PMC9563630 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Nonspecialists have increasingly been used to deliver evidence-based, mental health and behavioral interventions in lower resource settings where there is a dearth of specialized providers and a corresponding gap in service delivery. Recent literature acknowledges that nonspecialist-delivered interventions are shown to be effective. However, few studies report on the fidelity (the degree to which an intervention was implemented as intended) and/or competence (general skills of nonspecialists), key concepts that measure quality of evidence-based intervention delivery. This study seeks to understand how both fidelity and competence have been assessed in nonspecialist-delivered, evidence-based interventions with an intended social or psychological behavior-change outcome. Our search results originally yielded 2317 studies, and ultimately, 16 were included in our final analysis. Generally, results from a narrative synthesis indicated that tools used in the studies demonstrated sufficient inter-rater reliability and intra-class correlation components. Included studies used and described a range of fidelity and competence tools. However, the ENhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors tool was the most commonly used tool that measures competence of nonspecialists, and has been adapted to several other settings. The roles of supervisors in mentoring, monitoring, and supervising nonspecialists emerged as a key ingredient for ensuring fidelity. Most studies assessing fidelity were limited by small sample sizes due to low numbers of nonspecialists implementing interventions, however, more advanced statistical methods may not be needed and may actually impede community-based organizations from assessing fidelity data. Our results suggest interventions can share resources, tools, and compare findings regardless with proper supervision. While the two terms "fidelity" and "competence" are often used interchangeably, their differences are noteworthy. Ultimately, both competency and fidelity are critical for delivering evidence-based interventions, and nonspecialists are most effective when they can be evaluated and mentored on both throughout the course of the intervention.
Collapse
|
26
|
Soepnel LM, Draper CE, Mabetha K, Dennis CL, Prioreschi A, Lye S, Norris SA. A protocol for monitoring fidelity of a preconception-life course intervention in a middle-income setting: the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative (HeLTI), South Africa. Trials 2022; 23:758. [PMID: 36068565 PMCID: PMC9449293 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06696-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the importance of intervention fidelity in interpreting the outcomes of complex public health interventions, there is a lack of both reporting fidelity trial protocols and uniformity. In evaluating complex, adaptable/pragmatic interventions in resource-strapped settings with systemic issues, unique challenges to intervention adherence and monitoring are introduced, increasing the importance of a fidelity protocol. We aim to describe the intervention fidelity and monitoring protocol for the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative (HeLTI) South Africa, a complex four-phase intervention set in urban Soweto, starting preconceptionally and continuing through to pregnancy, infancy, and early childhood to improve the health of young women and reduce the intergenerational risk of obesity. METHODS The HeLTI SA fidelity protocol was based on the NIH Behaviour Change Consortium (NIH BCC) Treatment Fidelity Framework, outlining the following components of intervention fidelity: study design, provider training, intervention delivery, intervention receipt, and intervention enactment. Context-specific fidelity challenges were identified. The intervention fidelity components and associated monitoring strategies were developed to align with HeLTI SA. Strategies for fidelity monitoring include, amongst others, qualitative process evaluation methods, reviewing observed and recorded intervention sessions, monitoring of activity logs, standardized training, and intervention session checklists. Possible challenges to fidelity and fidelity monitoring include high provider turnover, lack of qualification amongst providers, difficulty tracing participants for follow-up sessions, participant health literacy levels, and the need to prioritize participants' non-health-related challenges. Solutions proposed include adapting intervention delivery methods, recruitment methods, and provider training methods. DISCUSSION The NIH BCC Treatment Fidelity Framework provided a solid foundation for reporting intervention fidelity across settings to improve intervention validity, ability to assess intervention effectiveness, and transparency. However, context-specific challenges to fidelity (monitoring) were identified, and transparency around such challenges and possible solutions in low- and middle-income settings could help foster solutions to improve adherence, reporting, and monitoring of intervention fidelity in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR201903750173871 . Registered on 27 March 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larske M Soepnel
- SAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits, Johannesburg, 2050, South Africa.
- Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Catherine E Draper
- SAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits, Johannesburg, 2050, South Africa
| | - Khuthala Mabetha
- SAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits, Johannesburg, 2050, South Africa
| | - Cindy-Lee Dennis
- Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alessandra Prioreschi
- SAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits, Johannesburg, 2050, South Africa
| | - Stephen Lye
- SAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits, Johannesburg, 2050, South Africa
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Physiology and Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shane A Norris
- SAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits, Johannesburg, 2050, South Africa
- School of Human Development and Health, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kutz A, Koch D, Haubitz S, Conca A, Baechli C, Regez K, Gregoriano C, Ebrahimi F, Bassetti S, Eckstein J, Beer J, Egloff M, Kaeppeli A, Ehmann T, Hoess C, Schaad H, Wharam JF, Lieberherr A, Wagner U, de Geest S, Schuetz P, Mueller B. Association of Interprofessional Discharge Planning Using an Electronic Health Record Tool With Hospital Length of Stay Among Patients with Multimorbidity: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2233667. [PMID: 36169957 PMCID: PMC9520366 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Whether interprofessional collaboration is effective and safe in decreasing hospital length of stay remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the outcomes and safety associated with an electronic interprofessional-led discharge planning tool vs standard discharge planning to safely reduce length of stay among medical inpatients with multimorbidity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multicenter prospective nonrandomized controlled trial used interrupted time series analysis to examine medical acute hospitalizations at 82 hospitals in Switzerland. It was conducted from February 2017 through January 2019. Data analysis was conducted from March 2021 to July 2022. INTERVENTION After a 12-month preintervention phase (February 2017 through January 2018), an electronic interprofessional-led discharge planning tool was implemented in February 2018 in 7 intervention hospitals in addition to standard discharge planning. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Mixed-effects segmented regression analyses were used to compare monthly changes in trends of length of stay, hospital readmission, in-hospital mortality, and facility discharge after the implementation of the tool with changes in trends among control hospitals. RESULTS There were 54 695 hospitalizations at intervention hospitals, with 27 219 in the preintervention period (median [IQR] age, 72 [59-82] years; 14 400 [52.9%] men) and 27 476 in the intervention phase (median [IQR] age, 72 [59-82] years; 14 448 [52.6%] men) and 438 791 at control hospitals, with 216 261 in the preintervention period (median [IQR] age, 74 [60-83] years; 109 770 [50.8%] men) and 222 530 in the intervention phase (median [IQR] age, 74 [60-83] years; 113 053 [50.8%] men). The mean (SD) length of stay in the preintervention phase was 7.6 (7.1) days for intervention hospitals and 7.5 (7.4) days for control hospitals. During the preintervention phase, population-averaged length of stay decreased by -0.344 hr/mo (95% CI, -0.599 to -0.090 hr/mo) in control hospitals; however, no change in trend was observed among intervention hospitals (-0.034 hr/mo; 95% CI, -0.646 to 0.714 hr/mo; difference in slopes, P = .09). Over the intervention phase (February 2018 through January 2019), length of stay remained unchanged in control hospitals (slope, -0.011 hr/mo; 95% CI, -0.281 to 0.260 hr/mo; change in slope, P = .03), but decreased steadily among intervention hospitals by -0.879 hr/mo (95% CI, -1.607 to -0.150 hr/mo; change in slope, P = .04, difference in slopes, P = .03). Safety analyses showed no change in trends of hospital readmission, in-hospital mortality, or facility discharge over the whole study time. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this nonrandomized controlled trial, the implementation of an electronic interprofessional-led discharge planning tool was associated with a decline in length of stay without an increase in hospital readmission, in-hospital mortality, or facility discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN83274049.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Kutz
- Medical University Department, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel Koch
- Medical University Department, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Haubitz
- Medical University Department, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Antoinette Conca
- Medical University Department, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Ciril Baechli
- Medical University Department, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Katharina Regez
- Medical University Department, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Gregoriano
- Medical University Department, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Fahim Ebrahimi
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St Clara Hospital and University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Bassetti
- Division of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jens Eckstein
- Division of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Juerg Beer
- Department of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Michael Egloff
- Department of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | | | - Tobias Ehmann
- Department of Medicine, Hospital Zofingen, Zofingen, Switzerland
| | - Claus Hoess
- Department of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Muensterlingen, Muensterlingen, Switzerland
| | - Heinz Schaad
- Department of Medicine, Hospital Interlaken, Hospitals Frutigen Meiringen Interlaken, Interlaken, Switzerland
| | - James Frank Wharam
- Department of Medicine, Duke University and Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Ulrich Wagner
- National Institute for Cancer Epidemiology and Registration, National Agency for Cancer Registration, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sabina de Geest
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Schuetz
- Medical University Department, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Beat Mueller
- Medical University Department, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cross R, Greaves CJ, Withall J, Rejeski WJ, Stathi A. Delivery fidelity of the REACT (REtirement in ACTion) physical activity and behaviour maintenance intervention for community dwelling older people with mobility limitations. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1112. [PMID: 35658857 PMCID: PMC9166457 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13496-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fidelity assessment of behaviour change interventions is vital to understanding trial outcomes. This study assesses the delivery fidelity of behaviour change techniques used in the Retirement in ACTion (REACT) randomised controlled trial. REACT is a community-based physical activity (PA) and behaviour maintenance intervention to prevent decline of physical functioning in older adults (≥ 65 years) at high risk of mobility-related disability in the UK. METHODS The delivery fidelity of intervention behaviour change techniques and delivery processes were assessed using multi-observer coding of purposively sampled in-vivo audio recordings (n = 25) of health behaviour maintenance sessions over 12-months. Delivery fidelity was scored using a modified Dreyfus scale (scores 0-5) to assess competence and completeness of delivery for each technique and delivery process. "Competent delivery" was defined as a score of 3 points or more for each item. Examples of competent intervention delivery were identified to inform recommendations for future programme delivery and training. RESULTS The mean intervention fidelity score was 2.5 (SD 0.45) with delivery fidelity varying between techniques/processes and intervention groups. Person-centred delivery, Facilitating Enjoyment and Promoting Autonomy were delivered competently (scoring 3.0 or more). There was scope for improvement (score 2.0-2.9) in Monitoring Progress (Acknowledging and Reviewing), Self-Monitoring, Monitoring Progress (Eliciting Benefits of Physical Activity), Goal Setting and Action Planning, Modelling, Supporting Self-Efficacy for Physical Activity and Supporting Relatedness. Managing Setbacks and Problem Solving was delivered with low fidelity. Numerous examples of both good and sub-optimal practice were identified. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights successes and improvements needed to enhance delivery fidelity in future implementation of the behavioural maintenance programme of the REACT intervention. Future training of REACT session leaders and assessment of delivery fidelity needs to focus on the delivery of Goal setting and Action Planning, Modelling, Supporting Relatedness, Supporting Self-Efficacy for Physical Activity, and Managing Setbacks/ Problem Solving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosina Cross
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
| | - Colin J. Greaves
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Sciences, University of Birmingham, Egbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| | - Janet Withall
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Sciences, University of Birmingham, Egbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| | - W. Jack. Rejeski
- grid.241167.70000 0001 2185 3318Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Worrell Professional Centre, 2164B, PO Box 7868, Winston-Salem, NC 27109 USA
| | - Afroditi Stathi
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Sciences, University of Birmingham, Egbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Doupe M, Brunkert T, Wagg A, Ginsburg L, Norton P, Berta W, Knopp-Sihota J, Estabrooks C. SCOPE: safer care for older persons (in residential) environments-a pilot study to enhance care aide-led quality improvement in nursing homes. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:26. [PMID: 35115053 PMCID: PMC8812152 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-00975-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nursing home residents require daily support. While care aides provide most of this support they are rarely empowered to lead quality improvement (QI) initiatives. Researchers have shown that care aide-led teams can successfully participate in a QI intervention called Safer Care for Older Persons in Residential Care Environments (SCOPE). In preparation for a large-scale study, we conducted a 1-year pilot to evaluate how well coaching strategies helped teams to enact this intervention. Secondarily, we measured if improvements in team cohesion and communication, and resident quality of care, occurred. Methods This study was conducted using a prospective single-arm study design, on 7 nursing homes in Winnipeg Manitoba belonging to the Translating Research in Elder Care research program. One QI team was selected per site, led by care aides who partnered with other front-line staff. Each team received facilitated coaching to enact SCOPE during three learning sessions, and additional support from quality advisors between these sessions. Researchers developed a rubric to evaluate how well teams enacted their interventions (i.e., created actionable aim statements, implemented interventions using plan-do-study-act cycles, and used measurement to guide decision-making). Team cohesion and communication were measured using surveys, and changes in unit-level quality indicators were measured using Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set data. Results Most teams successfully enacted their interventions. Five of 7 teams created adequate-to-excellent aim statements. While 6 of 7 teams successfully implemented plan-do-study-act cycles, only 2 reported spreading their change ideas to other residents and staff on their unit. Three of 7 teams explicitly stated how measurement was used to guide intervention decisions. Teams scored high in cohesion and communication at baseline, and hence improved minimally. Indicators of resident quality care improved in 4 nursing home units; teams at 3 of these sites were scored as ‘excellent’ in two or more enactment areas, versus 1 of the 3 remaining teams. Conclusions Our coaching strategies helped most care aide-led teams to enact SCOPE. Coaching modifications are needed to help teams more effectively use measurement. Refinements to our evaluation rubric are also recommended. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-022-00975-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm Doupe
- Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
| | - Thekla Brunkert
- University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, Basel, Switzerland.,Nursing Science (INS), Department Public Health (DPH), Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Adrian Wagg
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Liane Ginsburg
- School of Health Policy & Management, York University, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter Norton
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Whitney Berta
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Carole Estabrooks
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|