Effects of free range-of-motion upper limb exercise based on mirror therapy on shoulder function in patients after breast cancer surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Does a Resistance Training Program Affect Between-arms Volume Difference and Shoulder-arm Disabilities in Female Breast Cancer Survivors? The Role of Surgery Type and Treatments. Secondary Outcomes of the EFICAN Trial

OBJECTIVE

The aims were (i) to assess the effects of a 12-week resistance training program on between-arms volume difference and shoulder-arm disabilities in breast cancer survivors and (ii) to evaluate whether the main risk factors for developing cancer-related lymphedema and shoulder-arm disabilities were associated with the effects of the training program.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

University facilities.

PARTICIPANTS

60 female breast cancer survivors participated.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

to be a breast cancer survivor, and to have completed surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy up to 10 years before recruitment.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

metastatic breast cancer, a breast reconstruction intervention planned within 6 months, any absolute contraindication for exercise, to perform more than 300 minutes/week of structured exercise.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to an exercise group (12-week resistance training program) or a control group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Between-arms volume difference, shoulder-arm disabilities, and upper-limb muscular strength were evaluated at baseline and at week 12. Treatment-related information was registered from medical history.

RESULTS

No between-group differences were observed on between-arms volume difference (1.207; 95% CI -0.964, 3.377; P=.270) or shoulder-arm disabilities (2.070; 95% CI -4.362, 8.501; P=.521) after the training program. Likewise, there was no association of surgery type, presence of lymph node resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy with the changes in between-arms volume and perceived shoulder-arm disabilities after the intervention. However, a higher increase in upper limb muscular strength was associated with a reduced shoulder-arm disabilities (-0.429; P=.020) in the exercise group.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that resistance training does not affect between-arms volume difference and shoulder-arm disabilities in female breast cancer survivors. The main risk factors for developing lymphedema were not associated with the effects of the intervention, although a higher increase in upper-limb muscular strength was associated with reduced shoulder-arm disabilities.

The effects of the mirror therapy on shoulder function in patients with breast cancer following surgery: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Shoulder dysfunction is one of the most bothersome questions for breast cancer survivors. Studies show that mirror therapy can improve shoulder function in patients with a limited shoulder range of motion and shoulder pain. Here, this article reports the results of a randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of the mirror therapy on shoulder function in patients with breast cancer following surgical treatments.

METHODS

Totally, 79 participants were divided to two groups receiving active range-of-motion upper limb exercise based on the mirror therapy or active range-of-motion upper limb exercise respectively for 8 weeks. Shoulder range of motion, Constant-Murley Score, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Visual analog scale, and grip strength were measured at baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T1), 4 weeks (T2), and 8 weeks (T3). The effects of the intervention on shoulder function were analyzed in generalized estimation equation, from group, time, and the interactions between group and time based on the data from participants who completed at least one post-baseline observation RESULTS: At least one post-baseline observation was performed by 69 participants (n=34 mirror group, n=35 control group). 28(82.35%) participants in the mirror group adhered to the exercise compared to 30(85.71%) in the control group. Generalized estimation equation model showed group had main effects on forward flexion (Waldχ²=6.476, P=0.011), with the Cohen's d=0.54. The effects of the group on abduction, Constant-Murley Score, and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire were significant when fix the effects of the time. At 8 weeks, participants in the mirror group showed an improvement in abduction compared to the control group (P=0.005), the Cohen's d was 0.70. At 8 weeks, participants in the mirror group had a higher Constant-Murley Score than control group (P=0.009), with Cohen's effect size value of d=0.64. The mirror group showed a greater improvement on the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire than control group at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks (P≤0.032), but with a weak effect size value of all (r≤0.32). Group had main effects on Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (Waldχ²=6.631, P=0.010), with the Cohen's effect size value of d=0.56.

CONCLUSIONS

Mirror therapy improved shoulder flexion, abduction, shoulder function in daily life, and arm function and symptom of the affected shoulder in patients with breast cancer following surgical treatment, while decreasing fear of movement/(re)injury. Mirror configuration needs to be improved in further research to increase its feasibility.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Breast cancer survivors can try mirror therapy as a practical and effective method in shoulder rehabilitation for a promotion on effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: ChiCTR2000033080.

Effectiveness of an expert assessment and individualised treatment compared with a minimal home-based exercise program in women with late-term shoulder impairments after primary breast cancer surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background

In breast cancer patients, late-term upper limb sequelae, such as shoulder pain and impaired shoulder function, remain common after primary breast cancer surgery. The aim of this trial is to evaluate whether an expert assessment of shoulder impairments, followed by an individualised treatment plan, is superior to a minimal physiotherapeutic rehabilitation program in reducing shoulder symptoms, among women with late-term shoulder impairments after primary breast cancer.

Methods/design

The study is designed as a stratified, parallel-group, assessor-blinded, randomised, controlled trial conducted in Denmark; 130 participants with late-term shoulder impairments 3–7 years after primary surgery for breast cancer will be recruited. Participants will be randomised (allocation 1:1) to either an expert assessment of shoulder impairments followed by an individualised treatment plan or to follow a minimal physiotherapeutic rehabilitation program delivered in a pamphlet. The primary outcome will be a change in shoulder pain and function from baseline to 12 weeks after initiating the treatment, as measured by the patient-reported outcome Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) questionnaire.

Discussion

There has been an insufficient focus in research and clinical practice on late-term shoulder impairment in women following surgery for breast cancer. This trial will focus on interventions towards late-term shoulder impairments and is expected to provide evidence-based knowledge to physiotherapists and women about the management of shoulder pain and impaired shoulder function.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05277909. Registered on 11 March 2022.

Efficacy of Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Comminuted Proximal Humeral Fractures and Its Influence on Shoulder Joint Function Recovery

In this paper, we have aimed to elucidate the therapeutic effect of intramedullary nailing (IMN) in treating comminuted proximal humeral fractures (CPHFs) and its influence on the recovery of shoulder joint function. For this purpose, 60 cases with CPHFs were selected, particularly from January 2020 to October 2021. In these cases, 28 cases were treated with a locking proximal humeral plate (LPHP) and assigned to the control (Con) group and the remaining 32 patients were treated with IMN and included in the research (Res) group. The therapeutic effect, surgical indicators, total complications, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and postoperative shoulder joint function score were compared between the two arms. We observed that compared with the Con group, the effective rate in the Res group was higher while the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and fracture healing time were shorter, the overall complication rate and VAS score were lower, and the postoperative shoulder joint function score was higher, all with statistical significance. The above results indicate that IMN is effective and safe in the treatment of CPHFs, which can validly reduce the discomfort of patients and facilitate the recovery of shoulder joint function.