Esketamine-based opioid-free anaesthesia alleviates postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery: study protocol for a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre trial

Effects of esketamine on postoperative fatigue syndrome in patients after laparoscopic resection of gastric carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite the implementation of various postoperative management strategies, the prevalence of postoperative fatigue syndrome (POFS) remains considerable among individuals undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. While the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor antagonist esketamine has demonstrated efficacy in enhancing sleep quality and alleviating postoperative pain, its impact on POFS remains uncertain. Consequently, the objective of this study is to ascertain whether perioperative administration of esketamine can effectively mitigate the occurrence of POFS in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.

METHODS

A total of 133 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer were randomly assigned to two groups, namely the control group (Group C) (n = 66) and the esketamine group (Group E) (n = 67), using a double-blind method. The Group C received standardized anesthesia, while the Group E received esketamine in addition to the standardized anesthesia. The primary outcome measure assessed was the Christensen fatigue score at 3 days after the surgical procedure, while the secondary outcomes included the disparities in postoperative fatigue, postoperative pain, sleep quality, and adverse reactions between the two groups.

RESULTS

In the group receiving esketamine, the fatigue scores of Christensen on the third day after surgery were significantly lower compared to the Group C (estimated difference, -0.70; 95% CI, -1.37 to -0.03; P = 0.040). Additionally, there was a significant decrease in the occurrence of fatigue in the Group E compared to the Group C on the first and third days following surgery (P < 0.05). Also, compared to individuals who had distal gastrectomy, those who had entire gastrectomy demonstrated a higher degree of postoperative tiredness reduction with esketamine. Furthermore, the Group E exhibited reduced postoperative pain and improved sleep in comparison to the Group C. Both groups experienced similar rates of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of esketamine during the perioperative period can improve POFS after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, without adverse reactions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300072167) on 05/06 /2023.

Efficacy and safety of perioperative application of esketamine on postpartum depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Postpartum depression (PPD) seriously impairs the physical and mental health of mothers and their offspring, so how to prevent the occurrence of PPD has essential significance. Esketamine is a common general anesthetic that produces rapid and sustained antidepressant effects. However, the efficacy and safety of perioperative esketamine administration for PPD prevention remain uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the effect of perioperative intravenous esketamine on PPD. Randomized controlled trials were included. The primary outcome was the prevalence of PPD and postpartum Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores and esketamine-related adverse effects. Seven studies included 669 patients treated with esketamine and 619 comparisons. Esketamine could effectively reduce EPDS scores and the incidence of PPD after cesarean section. Even at 42 days postpartum, the incidence of PPD was still significantly lower in the esketamine group. Esketamine did not increase the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, dizziness, and drowsiness. In the esketamine low-dose subgroup, postoperative nausea and vomiting were significantly lower in the esketamine group. The two groups had no significant difference in postoperative pain scores. In conclusion, using esketamine during the perioperative period can reduce the incidence of PPD without increasing adverse effects.

Impact of Opioid-Free Anesthesia on Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Patients After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy-A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

Opioid analgesics may delay discharge and affect postoperative quality of recovery because of their significant adverse effects, such as hyperalgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), shivering and urine retention. We aimed to compare the quality of postoperative recovery (QoR) between patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgeries with opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) and those with opioid-based anesthesia (OA).

Patients and Methods

80 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to an opioid-free anesthesia group (Group OFA) or an opioid-based anesthesia group (Group OA). The primary outcome was the quality of postoperative recovery using QoR-15 scale on postoperative day 1 (POD 1) and 2 (POD 2). The secondary outcomes included the incidence of opioid-related adverse symptoms, perioperative hemodynamic data, duration of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay and duration of extubation, and the incidences of hypotension and bradycardia.

Results

A statistically significant difference in total QoR-15 was observed between the two groups on POD 1 and POD 2 (91.00 (90.00, 92.00) vs 113.00 (108.25, 115.00), 106.00 (104.00, 112.00) vs 133.00 (130.00, 135.00), P < 0.001). The incidence of opioid-related symptoms was significantly different between the two groups on POD 1 (P < 0.05). There were between-group differences in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at T3 (P < 0.001). There was also a significant difference in the incidence of hypotension between the two groups (P = 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the duration of PACU stay, duration of extubation and the incidence of bradycardia (P > 0.05). There was no difference in heart rate between the two groups at all observed time points, either (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

We concluded that the quality of recovery of patients receiving OFA was superior to those receiving OA after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Pain Relief After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

To compare the efficacies of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) and opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Patients and Methods

A total of 150 patients who underwent 3-port LC procedures were randomly divided into an OFA group with esketamine, dexmedetomidine and lidocaine intravenous combined with local anesthetic incision infiltration or an OBA group with remifentanil combined with local anesthetic incision infiltration. The primary outcome was the consumption of rescue analgesics within 24 hrs after surgery. Secondary outcomes included time to LMA removal, time to orientation recovery, time to unassisted walking, sleep quality on the night of surgery, time to first flatus, hemodynamics during induction of general anesthesia, postoperative pain level on the visual analog scale (VAS), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and global satisfaction score (GSS) within 24 hrs after surgery.

Results

Both the consumption of rescue analgesics and the time to first flatus in the OFA group were significantly lower than those in the OBA group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.029, respectively). However, the time to LMA removal and the time to orientation recovery were significantly longer in the OFA group than in the OBA group (P < 0.001). In addition, the VAS scores at 2 hrs and 8 hrs after surgery and HR at laryngeal mask airway insertion in the OFA group were significantly lower than those in the OBA group (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, and P =0.016, respectively).

Conclusion

OFA may be beneficial for patients undergoing LC in that it could decrease the dosage of postoperative analgesics and pain intensity and even shorten the time to first flatus after surgery.

Intraoperative Esketamine Is Effective at Reducing Acute Postoperative Pain in Bariatric Surgery Patients: a Randomized Control Trial

BACKGROUND

The analgesic effect and postoperative effects of esketamine are not yet clear in bariatric surgeries. Many bariatric surgery patients suffer from acute abdominal pain after surgery which leads to increased opioid use. This study aimed to determine whether intraoperative use of esketamine could reduce acute postoperative pain in bariatric surgery patients.

METHODS

We designed a randomized double-blinded controlled trial. Included patients between the ages of 18 and 50 years with a body mass index ≥27 kg/m2 and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status of I-III, scheduled to undergo sleeve gastrectomy. We divided them into two groups, the control group which received a placebo, and the esketamine group which received a loading dose of esketamine 0.2 mg/kg and a maintenance dose of 0.2 mg/(kg·h) along with other anesthetic drugs during the surgery. After the surgery, they were assessed for Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores and Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) scores, while other surgical data were recorded during the surgery.

RESULTS

We enrolled 68 patients, 52 females, and 16 males. The 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, and 12 h NRS scores were significantly lower in the esketamine group compared to the control group, and the extra painkillers administered were significantly lower in the esketamine group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative use of esketamine can reduce acute postoperative pain in bariatric surgery patients. Further studies should explore whether the reduced pain is due to the anti-depressive effect of esketamine or purely the analgesic effect.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100054038, https://www.chictr.org.cn/com/25/showproj.aspx?proj=142806 ).

Efficacy and safety of esketamine for sedation among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients who undergo gastrointestinal endoscopy often require propofol-based sedation combined with analgesics. At present, the efficacy and safety of esketamine as an adjunct to propofol for sedation during endoscopic procedures in patients remains controversial. Moreover, there is no universal agreement regarding the appropriate dose of esketamine supplementation. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of esketamine as an adjunct to propofol for sedation during endoscopic procedures in patients.

METHODS

Seven electronic databases and three clinical trial registry platforms were searched and the deadline was February 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of esketamine for sedation were included by two reviewers. Data from the eligible studies were combined to calculate the pooled risk ratio or standardized mean difference.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies with 1962 esketamine participants were included in the analysis. As an adjunct to propofol, the administration of esketamine reduced the recovery time compared to normal saline (NS). However, there was no significant difference between the opioids group and ketamine group. For propofol dosage, the administration of esketamine required a lower propofol dosage compared to the NS group and opioids group].For complications, the esketamine group had fewer complications compared to the NS group and opioid group in patients, but there were no significant differences between the esketamine group and ketamine group. Notably, the coadministration of esketamine was associated with a higher risk of visual disturbance compared to the NS group. In addition, we used subgroup analysis to investigate whether 0.2-0.5 mg/kg esketamine was effective and tolerable for patients.

CONCLUSION

Esketamine as an adjunct to propofol, is an appropriate effective alternative for sedation in participants undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. However, considering the possibility of its psychotomimetic effects, esketamine should be used with caution.