1
|
Frenzel L, Decaux O, Macro M, Belhadj-Merzoug K, Manier S, Touzeau C, Leleu X, Frère C, Lecompte T, Perrot A, Avet-Loiseau H, Moreau P, Chalayer E. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and multiple myeloma patients in real-life: Results of a large survey and clinical guidance recommendations from the IFM group. Thromb Res 2024; 233:153-164. [PMID: 38064842 DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/01/2024]
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a critical issue in the management of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), particularly when immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) combined with dexamethasone therapy are being prescribed as first-line and relapse therapy. One possible explanation for the persistent high rates of VTE, is the use of inappropriate thromboprophylaxis strategies for patients starting antimyeloma treatment. To tackle the issue, the Intergroupe francophone du myélome (IFM) offered convenient guidance for VTE thromboprophylaxis in MM patients initiating systemic therapy. This guidance is mainly supported by the results of a large survey on the clinical habits regarding VTE of physicians who are substantially involved in daily care of MM patients. VTE prophylaxis should be considered for all patients treated with IMiDs in combination with dexamethasone, in the absence of significant comorbidities, such as renal failure or bleeding risk. Anticoagulant should be preferred to antiplatelet agents for thromboprophylaxis. Despite the absence of large randomized controlled trials comparing those attitudes/options, available data on direct oral anticoagulants, which are already used in daily management of MM patients, are consistent with their potential usefulness for VTE prophylaxis in such patients. However, in order to implement a personalized continuous improvement strategy, clinicians must to be organized to collect all the data regarding this management. In other situations, thromboprophylaxis should be evaluated by using risk models and after careful evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Frenzel
- Service d'Hématologie Adulte et unité d'hémostase clinique, Hôpital Necker, Institut IMAGINE - INSERM U 1163/CNRS ERL 8254, Paris, France.
| | | | - Margaret Macro
- Institut d'Hématologie de Basse Normandie (IHBN), CHU Côte de Nacre, Caen, France
| | | | - Salomon Manier
- Hematology department, CHU Lille, Lille University, INSERM UMR-S1277, Lille, France
| | - Cyrille Touzeau
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, 44093 Nantes, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie et Immunologie Intégrée Nantes Angers, INSERM UMR 1307, CNRS UMR 6075, Nantes, France
| | - Xavier Leleu
- Hématologie Biologique, Hôpital Pontchaillou University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Corinne Frère
- Service d'Hématologie Biologique, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | | | - Aurore Perrot
- Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole and Centre de Recherches en Cancerologie de Toulouse Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale, Toulouse, France
| | - Hervé Avet-Loiseau
- Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole and Centre de Recherches en Cancerologie de Toulouse Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale, Toulouse, France
| | - Philippe Moreau
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, 44093 Nantes, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie et Immunologie Intégrée Nantes Angers, INSERM UMR 1307, CNRS UMR 6075, Nantes, France
| | - Emilie Chalayer
- Hématologie clinique, Institut de Cancérologie Hématologie Universitaire, CHU St Etienne Unité INSERM SAINBIOSE, U1059, Université Jean Monnet, St-Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|