1
|
Jäckel D, Leopold K, Bechdolf A. [Individual placement and support in mental health services: evaluation of routine clinical data using a retrospective chart review]. DER NERVENARZT 2024:10.1007/s00115-024-01706-5. [PMID: 39023549 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-024-01706-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illnesses are often excluded from working life and would like support to (re)enter the general labor market as part of the psychiatric treatment. Individual placement and support (IPS) is an effective method of finding and retaining work in the general labor market. The aim of the study was to determine the integration rates of IPS into the general labor market in acute and postacute psychiatric settings, identifying patient, setting and program characteristics associated with (re)entering work. METHOD A retrospective chart review (RCR) of routine clinical data between 2016 and 2021 was carried out. The IPS program adherence was rated using the IPS fidelity scale. RESULTS A total of 375 patients participated in the IPS with at least 4 appointments. The (re)integration rate into the general labor market was 51.7%. A shorter time period to the last working day, diagnosis of F1, F2, F3 (vs. F4), change of treatment setting and IPS in the psychiatric institute outpatient department (PIA), IPS fidelity and the number of IPS coaching sessions were positively correlated with (re)integration into work. CONCLUSION The implementation of IPS in clinical mental healthcare is possible and leads to high integration rates in the open labor market. An early start of IPS during the clinical treatment can promote social inclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothea Jäckel
- Kliniken für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik mit FRITZ am Urban und soulspace, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban und Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Dieffenbachstr. 1, 10967, Berlin, Deutschland.
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, CCM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - Karolina Leopold
- Kliniken für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik mit FRITZ am Urban und soulspace, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban und Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Dieffenbachstr. 1, 10967, Berlin, Deutschland
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Bechdolf
- Kliniken für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik mit FRITZ am Urban und soulspace, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban und Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Dieffenbachstr. 1, 10967, Berlin, Deutschland
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, CCM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
- Deutsches Zentrum für psychische Gesundheit (DZPG) Standort Berlin-Potsdam, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nischk D, Herwig U, Senner S, Rockstroh B. [Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Individual Placement and Support (Ips) in Germany - A Controlled Trials with Individuals with Psychosis]. PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS 2024; 51:84-91. [PMID: 37813364 DOI: 10.1055/a-2165-8728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish the effectiveness of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) to integrate people with mental illness into the general labor market, controlled comparisons with usual rehabilitative practice in terms of employment rates and cost-effectiveness are needed. METHODS 20 IPS participants with psychoses (primarily schizophrenia spectrum disorders) were compared with 20 controls who were offered usual rehabilitative practices in adjacent counties (rehabilitation as usual, RAU) over 18 months. RESULTS IPS was significantly superior to RAU on all job-related criteria with moderate to high effect sizes, with no differences in absenteeism, hospital days, or dropout rates. IPS was significantly superior to RAU on cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION This study provides evidence that IPS is an effective and cost-efficient addition to existing vocational rehabilitation services for people with psychoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Nischk
- Sozialpsychiatrie, Zentrum für Psychiatrie Reichenau
| | - Uwe Herwig
- Ärztliche Direktion, Zentrum für Psychiatrie Reichenau
| | - Simon Senner
- Sozialpsychiatrie, Zentrum für Psychiatrie Reichenau
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rohenkohl AC, Sowada P, Lambert M, Gallinat J, Karow A, Lüdecke D, Rühl F, Schöttle D. Service users' perceptions of relevant and helpful components of an integrated care concept (ACCESS) for psychosis. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1285575. [PMID: 38192398 PMCID: PMC10773616 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1285575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Psychotic disorders have a significant impact on patients' lives and their families, and long-term treatment with individually tailored multimodal combinations of therapies is often required. Integrated care (IC) concepts such as the "Hamburg Model (ACCESS)" with a focus on psychotic disorders, includes different (therapeutic) components with pharmaco- and psychotherapy, family involvement, home treatment and the option of using a 24/7 crisis hotline. All components are offered by a therapeutically-oriented assertive community treatment (TACT) team in a need-adapted manner. So far, however, little is known about which specific components are regarded as especially relevant and helpful by the users of IC. Methods Patients currently participating in IC completed a questionnaire as part of the continuous quality assurance study (ACCESS II) in which they were asked to rate the different components of treatment according to their relevance and helpfulness, considering the individual's unique experiences with IC and needs in mental health care. Furthermore, they were asked to make suggestions regarding additional helpful components of treatment. Results Fifty patients participated in this survey (23% of the patients currently participating in the IC concept). For participants, the most helpful and important factors were having the same therapist in the long-term and the 24/7 crisis telephone. Additional components suggested by patients included more addiction-specific therapies and increased focus on vocational rehabilitation and integration. Conclusion From the perspective of the users of IC, long-term care from a trusted therapist with whom there is a therapeutic relationship and the possibility to reach someone they already know from the TACT team 24/7 serves as the best basis for effective care, fostering trust, understanding, and open communication. In contrast, home treatment remains a relevant aspect of evidence-based care for people with severe mental illness, but perhaps surprisingly, is not viewed as the most important issue.
Collapse
|
4
|
Jäckel D, Willert A, Brose A, Leopold K, Nischk D, Senner S, Pogarell O, Sachenbacher S, Lambert M, Rohenkohl A, Kling-Lourenco P, Rüsch N, Bermpohl F, Schouler-Ocak M, Disselhof V, Skorupa U, Bechdolf A. Correction: Enhancing educational and vocational recovery in adolescents and young adults with early psychosis through Supported Employment and Education (SEEearly): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:476. [PMID: 37491354 PMCID: PMC10369747 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07524-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- D Jäckel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité UniversitätsmedizinBerlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban and Vivantes Klinikum Im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Willert
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité UniversitätsmedizinBerlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban and Vivantes Klinikum Im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.
| | - A Brose
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban and Vivantes Klinikum Im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
| | - K Leopold
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban and Vivantes Klinikum Im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - D Nischk
- Department of Social Psychiatry, Zentrum Für Psychiatrie, Reichenau, Germany
| | - S Senner
- Department of Social Psychiatry, Zentrum Für Psychiatrie, Reichenau, Germany
| | - O Pogarell
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychother- Apy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S Sachenbacher
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychother- Apy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Lambert
- Department of Psy- Chiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Rohenkohl
- Department of Psy- Chiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - P Kling-Lourenco
- Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Günzburg, Ulm, Germany
| | - N Rüsch
- Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Günzburg, Ulm, Germany
| | - F Bermpohl
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité UniversitätsmedizinBerlin, Berlin, Germany
- Psychiatric University Clinic of Charité at St. Hedwig Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Schouler-Ocak
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité UniversitätsmedizinBerlin, Berlin, Germany
- Psychiatric University Clinic of Charité at St. Hedwig Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - V Disselhof
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban and Vivantes Klinikum Im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
| | - U Skorupa
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban and Vivantes Klinikum Im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Bechdolf
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité UniversitätsmedizinBerlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban and Vivantes Klinikum Im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|