1
|
Luo X, Maciaszek JL, Thompson BA, Leong HS, Dixon K, Sousa S, Anderson M, Roberts ME, Lee K, Spurdle AB, Mensenkamp AR, Brannan T, Pardo C, Zhang L, Pesaran T, Wei S, Fasaye GA, Kesserwan C, Shirts BH, Davis JL, Oliveira C, Plon SE, Schrader KA, Karam R. Optimising clinical care through CDH1-specific germline variant curation: improvement of clinical assertions and updated curation guidelines. J Med Genet 2022; 60:568-575. [PMID: 36600593 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline pathogenic variants in CDH1 are associated with increased risk of diffuse gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer. Risk reduction strategies include consideration of prophylactic surgery, thereby making accurate interpretation of germline CDH1 variants critical for physicians deciding on these procedures. The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (VCEP) developed specifications for CDH1 variant curation with a goal to resolve variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and with ClinVar conflicting interpretations and continues to update these specifications. METHODS CDH1 variant classification specifications were modified based on updated genetic testing clinical criteria, new recommendations from ClinGen and expert knowledge from ongoing CDH1 variant curations. The CDH1 VCEP reviewed 273 variants using updated CDH1 specifications and incorporated published and unpublished data provided by diagnostic laboratories. RESULTS Updated CDH1-specific interpretation guidelines include 11 major modifications since the initial specifications from 2018. Using the refined guidelines, 97% (36 of 37) of variants with ClinVar conflicting interpretations were resolved to benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic or pathogenic, and 35% (15 of 43) of VUS were resolved to benign or likely benign. Overall, 88% (239 of 273) of curated variants had non-VUS classifications. To date, variants classified as pathogenic are either nonsense, frameshift, splicing, or affecting the translation initiation codon, and the only missense variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic have been shown to affect splicing. CONCLUSIONS The development and evolution of CDH1-specific criteria by the expert panel resulted in decreased uncertain and conflicting interpretations of variants in this clinically actionable gene, which can ultimately lead to more effective clinical management recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Luo
- Department of Pediatrics/Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jamie L Maciaszek
- Department of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Bryony A Thompson
- Department of Pathology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Huei San Leong
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Katherine Dixon
- Department of Medical Genetics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sónia Sousa
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde - (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology - (IPATIMUP), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Kristy Lee
- Department of Genetics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Arjen R Mensenkamp
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Liying Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Sainan Wei
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Grace-Ann Fasaye
- Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Brian H Shirts
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jeremy L Davis
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Carla Oliveira
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde - (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology - (IPATIMUP), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Department of Pathology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sharon E Plon
- Department of Pediatrics/Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kasmintan A Schrader
- Department of Medical Genetics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Queensland Genomics: an adaptive approach for integrating genomics into a public healthcare system. NPJ Genom Med 2021; 6:71. [PMID: 34408148 PMCID: PMC8373904 DOI: 10.1038/s41525-021-00234-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The establishment of genomics in health care systems has been occurring for the past decade. It is recognised that implementing genomics within a health service is challenging without a system-wide approach. Globally, as clinical genomics implementation programs have matured there is a growing body of information around program design and outcomes. Program structures vary depending on local ecosystems including the health system, politics and funding availability, however, lessons from other programs are important to the design of programs in different jurisdictions. Here we describe an adaptive approach to the implementation of genomics into a publicly funded health care system servicing a population of 5.1 million people. The adaptive approach enabled flexibility to facilitate substantial changes during the program in response to learnings and external factors. We report the benefits and challenges experienced by the program, particularly in relation to the engagement of people and services, and the design of both individual projects and the program as a whole.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ritter DI, Rao S, Kulkarni S, Madhavan S, Offit K, Plon SE. A case for expert curation: an overview of cancer curation in the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud 2019; 5:mcs.a004739. [PMID: 31645350 PMCID: PMC6824250 DOI: 10.1101/mcs.a004739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
We describe the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) cancer-related curation activities and the importance of curation to the evolving state of variant interpretation in a clinical context for both pediatric and adult cancer patients. We highlight specific examples from the CDH1 and PTEN Variant Curation Expert Panels (VCEPs) of the FDA-recognized process by which ClinGen VCEPs specify the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association of Molecular Pathology evidence code to develop variant classifications. We also review gene curations performed within the Hereditary Cancer Clinical Domain. We describe the parallel efforts for curation of somatic cancer variants from the Somatic Cancer Working Group. The ClinGen Germline/Somatic Committee is working to improve incorporation of both hereditary and somatic variant data to aid clinical interpretation. These ClinGen efforts rely on broad data sharing and detailed phenotypic and molecular information from published case studies to provide expert-curated variant interpretation to the cancer community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah I Ritter
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.,Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Shruti Rao
- Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 20007, USA
| | - Shashikant Kulkarni
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.,Baylor Genetics, Houston, Texas 77021, USA
| | - Subha Madhavan
- Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 20007, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.,Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York 10065, USA
| | - Sharon E Plon
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.,Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|