1
|
Pidala JA, Onstad L, Baumrin E, Carpenter PA, Cutler C, Arai S, Kitko CL, Chen GL, Lee SJ. Comparison of treatment response measures in cutaneous sclerosis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood Adv 2024; 8:4651-4657. [PMID: 38885484 PMCID: PMC11402177 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Cutaneous sclerosis, a highly morbid subtype of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), demonstrates limited treatment response under current National Institutes of Health (NIH) response measures. We explored novel sclerosis-specific response measures using Chronic GVHD Consortium data. A training cohort included patients with cutaneous sclerosis from a randomized trial of imatinib vs rituximab and a consortium observational study. The validation cohort was a different consortium observational study. Clinician-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were examined for association with 6-month clinician-reported response. Patient-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were studied for association with 6-month patient-reported response. A total of 347 patients were included (training 183 and validation 164). Although multiple skin and joint measures were associated with clinician-reported response on univariate analysis, patient range of motion (PROM) total score, PROM total score change, and NIH 0 to 3 skin change were retained in the final multivariate model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.83 training and 0.75 validation). Similarly, many patient-reported measures were associated, but final multivariate analysis retained the human activity profile adjusted activity score (AAS), 36 item short form health survey (SF36) vitality change, Lee symptom scale (LSS) skin, and LSS skin change in the model (AUC, 0.86 training and 0.75 validation). We identified which sclerosis measures have the greatest association with 6-month clinician- and patient-reported treatment responses, a previously unstudied area. However, given the observed performance in the validation cohorts, we conclude that further work is needed. Novel response measures may be needed to optimally assess treatment response in cutaneous sclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph A. Pidala
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Immunotherapy, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Lynn Onstad
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Emily Baumrin
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Paul A. Carpenter
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Corey Cutler
- Division of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Sally Arai
- Division of BMT and Cellular Therapy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Carrie L. Kitko
- Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - George L. Chen
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fujimoto Y, Yuri Y, Kato Y, Kinoshita S, Tamiya H. Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities of skin mechanical properties measured in healthy individuals using skin elasticity meter. Ann Med 2023; 55:2279747. [PMID: 37967233 PMCID: PMC10653741 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2279747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to establish a standardized measurement method and to examine the intra- and inter-reliabilities and absolute reliability of measuring skin mechanical properties using a skin elasticity meter (Cutometer®). METHODS Ten healthy participated in the study. Skin mechanical properties were measured at four sites: upper arm, lower arm, upper leg and lower leg on both sides in supine position using a non-invasive skin elasticity meter by two trained different raters. The measurements include quantitative indices of the maximal distensibility (R0), elasticity (R2, R5, R7), and viscoelasticity (R6). Intra- and inter- relative reliabilities were determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (1,1) and ICC (2,1) methods, respectively. The absolute reliability was assessed via the Bland-Altman analysis. Moreover, we evaluated the minimal detectable change at a 95% confidence level (MDC95). RESULTS At each site, the ICC (1,1) values were >0.90, and the ICC (2,1) values were >0.50. The Bland-Altman analysis did not reveal any fixed errors, and several sites and parameters have proportional errors. CONCLUSIONS In this study, intra- and inter-reliabilities were measured at "excellent" and more than "moderate" levels, respectively. However, because some proportional errors were observed, the limits of reliability agreement should be considered when using the proposed methods. We believe that the results of this study can be applied to clinical research in field of rehabilitation treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yudai Fujimoto
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Rehabilitation, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshimi Yuri
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuji Kato
- Department of Rehabilitation, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shota Kinoshita
- Department of Rehabilitation, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hironari Tamiya
- Department of Rehabilitation, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic surgery (Musculoskeletal Oncology Service), Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kalwa PL, Schäffer TE. Water flow elastography - A promising tool to measure tissue stiffness during minimally invasive surgery. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2023; 145:106004. [PMID: 37418969 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
Mechanical properties are important markers for pathological processes in tissue. Elastography techniques are therefore becoming more and more useful for diagnostics. In minimally invasive surgery (MIS), however, the probe size is limited and the handling is restricted, thereby excluding the application of most established elastography techniques. In this paper we introduce water flow elastography (WaFE) as a new technique that benefits from a small and inexpensive probe. This probe flows pressurized water against the sample surface to locally indent it. The volume of the indentation is measured with a flow meter. We use finite element simulations to find the relation between the indentation volume, the water pressure, and the Young's modulus of the sample. We used WaFE to measure the Young's modulus of silicone samples and porcine organs, finding agreement within 10% to measurements with a commercial material testing machine. Our results show that WaFE is a promising technique for providing local elastography in MIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul L Kalwa
- Institute of Applied Physics, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tilman E Schäffer
- Institute of Applied Physics, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Junker HJ, Thumm B, Halvachizadeh S, Mazza E. A quantitative comparison of devices for in vivo biomechanical characterization of human skin. MECHANICS OF SOFT MATERIALS 2023; 5:5. [PMID: 37465029 PMCID: PMC10350442 DOI: 10.1007/s42558-023-00053-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
Non-invasive skin characterization devices are emerging as a valuable tool in clinical skin research. In recent years, the range of available experimental techniques and methods used to determine the biomechanical properties of skin has increased considerably. Although a substantial amount of work has been devoted to assessing the working principle of macroscopic skin characterization devices individually, a rationalization and comparison between them is still lacking. This motivated the present study, which aimed to characterize and compare three commonly used working principles: suction, dynamic shear loading, and indentation. A synthetic model system with tunable mechanical properties was used to assess the three devices, and the results rationalized based on corresponding finite element models. In vivo measurements were performed on healthy volunteers to investigate the capability of differentiating the biomechanical properties of skin at different body locations, and to assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability of each device. The present comparative analysis indicates that the analyzed functional principles perceive the stiffness of human skin differently, with relevant implications for the interpretation of the respective measurement results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Håvar J. Junker
- Present address: Institute for Mechanical Systems, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Leonhardstrasse 21, Zurich, 8092 Switzerland
| | - Bettina Thumm
- Present address: Institute for Mechanical Systems, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Leonhardstrasse 21, Zurich, 8092 Switzerland
| | - Sascha Halvachizadeh
- Department of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich, 8091 Switzerland
| | - Edoardo Mazza
- Present address: Institute for Mechanical Systems, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Leonhardstrasse 21, Zurich, 8092 Switzerland
- Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 129, Dübendorf, 8600 Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abbas DB, Lavin CV, Fahy EJ, Griffin M, Guardino N, King M, Chen K, Lorenz PH, Gurtner GC, Longaker MT, Momeni A, Wan DC. Standardizing Dimensionless Cutometer Parameters to Determine In Vivo Elasticity of Human Skin. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2022; 11:297-310. [PMID: 34470542 DOI: 10.1089/wound.2021.0082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Skin fibrosis places an enormous burden on patients and society, but disagreement exists over methods to quantify severity of skin scarring. A suction cutometer measures skin elasticity in vivo, but it has not been widely adopted because of inconsistency in data produced. We investigated variability of several dimensionless parameters generated by the cutometer to improve their precision and accuracy. Approach: Twenty adult human subjects underwent suction cutometer measurement of normal skin (NS) and fibrotic scars (FS). Using Mode 1, each subject underwent five trials with each trial containing four curves. R0/2/5/6/7 and Q1/2/3 data were collected. Analyses were performed on these calculated parameters. Results: R0/2/5/6/7 and Q1/2 parameters from curves 1 to 4 demonstrated significant differences, whereas these same parameters were not significantly different when only using curves 2-4. Individual analysis of all parameters between curve 1 and every subsequent curve was statistically significant for R0, R2, R5, R6, R7, Q1, and Q2. No differences were appreciated for parameter Q3. Comparison between NS and FS were significantly different for parameters R5, Q1, and Q3. Innovation: Our study is the first demonstration of accurate comparison between NS and FS using the dimensionless parameters of a suction cutometer. Conclusions: Measured parameters from the first curve of each trial were significantly different from subsequent curves for both NS and FS. Precision and reproducibility of data from dimensionless parameters can therefore be improved by removing the first curve. R5, Q1, and Q3 parameters differentiated NS as more elastic than FS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren B. Abbas
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Christopher V. Lavin
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Evan J. Fahy
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Michelle Griffin
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Nicholas Guardino
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Megan King
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Kellen Chen
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - P. Hermann Lorenz
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Geoffrey C. Gurtner
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Michael T. Longaker
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Arash Momeni
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Derrick C. Wan
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Müller B, Mazza E, Schiestl C, Elrod J. Longitudinal monitoring and prediction of long-term outcome of scar stiffness on pediatric patients. BURNS & TRAUMA 2021; 9:tkab028. [PMID: 34604394 PMCID: PMC8484205 DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Hypertrophic scarring after burn injury is one of the greatest unmet challenges in patients with burn injuries. A better understanding of the characteristics of scar maturation and early prediction of the long-term outcome of scarring are prerequisites for improving targeted therapies and pivotal for patient counselling. Methods Repeated measurements of scar stiffness in 11 pediatric patients were performed over the course of 1 year using 2 suction devices, the Cutometer and the Nimble. In addition, the observer pliability score of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale was applied. This longitudinal study allowed quantification of the ability of each of the measured parameters to reflect scar maturation, as indicated by change in skin pliability/stiffness, over time (using linear regression); the ability to distinguish individual patients (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)); the correlation of the devices (Spearman correlation coefficient); and the ability to predict long-term scar maturation based on early scar assessment (using receiver operating characteristic). Results All the tools used showed significant longitudinal decrease of scar stiffness from 3 months until 12 months after the injury. The Nimble (ICCpatient Nimble = 0.99) and the Cutometer (ICCpatient Cuto = 0.97) demonstrated an excellent ability to distinguish between individual patients. The Nimble seemed to be able to predict the 12-month pliability of scars based on early (3-month) measurements (area under the curve (AUC)12m POSAS = 0.67; AUC12m C = 0.46; AUC12m N = 0.79). Conclusions The results of this preliminary study suggest that all 3 tools provide suitable means to quantify alterations in scar stiffness over time. Initial evidence suggests the Nimble is most favorable for predicting changes in stiffness associated with long-term scar maturation. Further studies with a larger sample size are required to validate tissue suction as a clinical tool for analysis of changes of scar stiffness over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Müller
- Institute for Mechanical Systems, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Leonhardstrasse 21, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Edoardo Mazza
- Institute for Mechanical Systems, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Leonhardstrasse 21, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Clemens Schiestl
- Burn Center, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Julia Elrod
- Burn Center, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|