1
|
Lisboa RV, de Oliveira FR, Quaresma TO, de Almeida RM, Ribeiro Oliveira RD, Junior PL. The Behaviour of Serum Survivin in Patients With Lupus Nephritis. Biomark Insights 2022; 17:11772719221131470. [PMID: 36311208 PMCID: PMC9597205 DOI: 10.1177/11772719221131470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multi phenotypic, autoimmune
inflammatory disease and renal involvement significantly worsens its
prognosis. Apoptosis dysregulation plays a key pathogenic role. Survivin, a
protein from the apoptosis inhibitors family, has been considered a
promising strategy in cancer therapy and evaluated as one of the regulatory
pathways in the scenario of immune-mediated disorders. Objective: This study aims to explore survivin behaviour in SLE patients with lupus
nephritis (LN), assessing its potential as a therapeutic and prognostic
biomarker. Methods: 297 SLE patients were classified based on the American College of
Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 criteria, from 2000 to 2015. In a cross-sectional
study, the serum level of survivin was measured by an ELISA test and
compared between 200 SLE individuals and healthy controls. In a longitudinal
cohort, 97 patients with active LN had the concentration of survinin
measured, before and after treatment with cyclophosphamide pulse
therapy. Results: The serum concentration of survivin was significantly lower in the SLE group
than in healthy controls, regardless of concomitant NL or disease activity.
The longitudinal evaluation revealed a significant reduction in survivin
serum level after treatment. However, survivin rates were not able to
discriminate groups that achieved remission from those that maintained
nephritis activity. Conclusion: Our study suggests that survivin levels in SLE patients are lower than in the
general population. Even so, its use as a biomarker in SLE seems limited,
not reflecting disease activity or response to LN treatment, as in other
contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renata Valente Lisboa
- Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Ribeirão
Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil,Center of Research in Inflammatory
Diseases (CRID), Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão
Preto, São Paulo, Brazil,Renata Valente Lisboa, Division of
Rheumatology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Av.
Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo 14049-900, Brazil.
| | - Fabiola Reis de Oliveira
- Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Ribeirão
Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil,Center of Research in Inflammatory
Diseases (CRID), Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão
Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Thaise Oliveira Quaresma
- Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Ribeirão
Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil,Center of Research in Inflammatory
Diseases (CRID), Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão
Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Rene Donizeti Ribeiro Oliveira
- Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Ribeirão
Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil,Center of Research in Inflammatory
Diseases (CRID), Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão
Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Paulo Louzada Junior
- Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Ribeirão
Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil,Center of Research in Inflammatory
Diseases (CRID), Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão
Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|