The development of a provincial multidisciplinary framework of consensus-based standards for Point of Care Ultrasound at the University of Saskatchewan

Utilisation and barriers of PoCUS in a rural emergency department - A quality improvement project

Introduction

Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) has been recognised as a tool that leads to more definitive diagnoses and enhances clinical decision-making in rural emergency departments (EDs) where diagnostic imaging is limited. We aimed to determine the current utilisation, barriers and solutions to using PoCUS in this rural Saskatchewan ED.

Methods

Physicians working in the ED participated in a semi-structured interview. An online survey, administered via SurveyMonkey post-interview to provide further context, was used to support qualitative approaches. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and then analysed using inductive interpretation.

Results

Seven physicians completed the quantitative survey with a response rate of 70%. Ten physicians were interviewed with a response rate of 100%. Themes identified were that physicians in this community's ED perceived their skill level as determining whether a scan was diagnostic or not, rather than the specific PoCUS application itself. In addition, they performed scans primarily for the purpose of triage. Inadequate training, Core IP certification certification requirement and intradepartmental logistics were barriers to PoCUS utilisation.

Conclusion

This study showed that ED physicians in this community perceived PoCUS as a clinical adjunct and as a tool to triage patients for further imaging. Results highlight the need to have accessible training for rural physicians to increase PoCUS utilisation, awareness of current Saskatchewan PoCUS guidelines and education on diagnostic applications of PoCUS. Increased use of PoCUS for specific scans could decrease the need for formal imaging and the associated healthcare system resources.

Quantifying Clinically Meaningful Point-of-Care Ultrasound Interpretation Discrepancies Using an Emergency Department Quality Assurance Program

OBJECTIVES

Emergency medicine professional associations recommend that quality assurance (QA) programs be implemented wherever emergency department (ED) point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is in use. The purpose of this study is to identify the rate of clinically meaningful interpretation discrepancies between initial ED POCUS interpretation and a gold standard using a QA program in a Canadian academic ED.

METHODS

All POCUS examinations completed in our ED are subject to a QA process. The results of all POCUS examinations undergoing this process from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2015, were retrospectively reviewed. Four blinded abstractors collected data with a standardized tool after a training session. Information regarding patient demographics, POCUS indication, emergency physician initial POCUS interpretation, physician POCUS expertise, the presence of an interpretation discrepancy, and whether the discrepancy was clinically meaningful was abstracted. The proportion of interpretation discrepancies, clinically meaningful discrepancies, discrepancies requiring remedial action, and differences in discrepancy rates between non-expert and expert sonographers were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 2,869 POCUS studies were included for review, with 2,668 in the final data set after exclusions. In total, only 1.4% of all scans contained an interpretation discrepancy. The rate of clinically meaningful discrepancies was 0.5%, and the rate of scans requiring remedial action was 0.1%. Overall, 85.5% of all scans were performed by four POCUS expert physicians, with the remainder by a non-expert. Scans performed by non-expert sonographers were significantly more prone to discrepancies than those performed by experts. No single scan indication was more prone to discrepancy.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall ED POCUS interpretation discrepancy rate and clinically meaningful discrepancy rate identified using our QA process were very low. The findings are limited by the small group of expert sonographers completing most scans.

A proposed framework for point of care lung ultrasound by respiratory physiotherapists: scope of practice, education and governance

Background

Point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) has the potential to provide a step change in the management of patients across a range of healthcare settings. Increasingly, healthcare practitioners who are not medical doctors are incorporating PoCUS into their clinical practice. However, the professional, educational and regulatory environment in which this occurs is poorly developed, leaving clinicians, managers and patients at risk.

Main body

Drawing upon existing medical and non-medical literature, the authors present a proposed framework for the use of PoCUS. Throughout, mechanisms for applying the principles to other professionals and healthcare settings are signposted. Application of the framework is illustrated via one such group of healthcare practitioners and in a particular healthcare setting: respiratory physiotherapists in the UK.

In defining the point of care LUS scope of practice we detail what structures are imaged, differentials reported upon and clinical decisions informed by their imaging. This is used to outline the educational and competency requirements for respiratory physiotherapists to safely and effectively use the modality. Together, these are aligned with the regulatory (professional, legal and insurance) arrangements for this professional group in the UK.

In so doing, a comprehensive approach for respiratory physiotherapists to consolidate and expand their use of point of care LUS is presented. This provides clarity for clinicians as to the boundaries of their practice and how to train in the modality; it supports educators with the design of courses and alignment of competency assessments; it supports managers with the staffing of existing and new care pathways. Ultimately it provides greater accessibility for patients to safe and effective point of care lung ultrasound.

For clinicians who are not respiratory physiotherapists and/or are not based in the UK, the framework can be adapted to other professional groups using point of care LUS as well as other point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) applications, thereby providing a comprehensive and sustainable foundation for PoCUS consolidation and expansion.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive framework to support the use of point of care LUS by respiratory physiotherapists in the UK. Mechanisms to adapt the model to support a wide range of other PoCUS users are outlined.

Towards quality assurance: implementation of a POCUS image archiving system in a high-volume community emergency department

BACKGROUND

Quality assurance review is an integral part of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) programs but may not be routine practice in community hospitals. Lack of image acquisition and documentation can result in suboptimal patient care. In cases with an adverse outcome and no record of images, there is no mechanism for quality improvement.

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to implement a system of POCUS image archiving in a community hospital. Our SMART (Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Realistic, Timely) aim was to have > 50% of emergency department (ED) POCUS users archiving scans, and > 80% of all billed POCUS scans archived, measuring improvements bi-weekly over a period of 9 months.

METHODS

The study was conducted at a single-community ED between August 2020 and April 2021. The POCUS archiving workflow was developed and refined through multiple plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. Surveys, stakeholder meetings, audits, and feedback were used to generate and re-evaluate the interventions. These included introduction of QPathE© software, streamlining of the workflow process, strategic machine placement, POCUS rounds, use of a website for POCUS workflow instructions, and dissemination of audit results. Scans were tracked biweekly, and indexed by the number of scans billed. The primary outcome measure was the number of POCUS scans archived per 100 scans billed.

RESULTS

Over a 9-month period, spanning 72,986 ED visits, 550 scans were archived. The percentage of POCUS users who changed practice to consistently archiving scans was 51%. The rate of POCUS scans archived per 100 scans billed was > 80%, compared to no archiving at baseline.

CONCLUSION

We were able to transition from a system with entirely unarchived POCUS scanning, to one with > 80% of scans archived over a period of 9 months. This is the first published paper documenting implementation of a POCUS image archiving system in a Canadian Community ED.