Proton pump inhibitors and 180-day mortality in the elderly after Clostridium difficile treatment

Proton pump inhibitors associated with an increased risk of mortality in elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The increased use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the elderly has raised concerns about potential severe adverse effects. Our systematic review investigated the mortality associated with PPI use in elderly populations.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for relevant publications until August 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and observational studies on the association between proton pump inhibitors and mortality in the elderly. To estimate the pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), the inverse-variance random effect model was used. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Subgroup analyses were performed by follow-up period, population, and study design.

RESULTS

A total of 4 RCTs and 36 cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. Four RCTs showed that there was no significant association between PPIs and the risk of death. From 23 observational studies (26 cohorts), the use of proton pump inhibitors was not significantly associated with increased mortality in the elderly (RR 1.14; 95% CI, 0.90-1.45). However, when controlling for covariates from 33 observational studies (41 cohorts), proton pump inhibitors in older adults aged 50 years or more were significantly associated with a 15% higher risk of mortality compared to nonusers (RR 1.15; 95% CI, 1.10-1.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis of RCTs found that PPIs did not show a significant association with increased mortality risk in older adults. However, the meta-analysis of cohort studies and long-term follow-up studies showed a higher increased risk of death with PPI use in older adults. The prescription of PPIs in patients aged 50 years or older should be carefully considered.

A Systematic Literature Review on Risk Factors for and Timing of Clostridioides difficile Infection in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major public health threat. Up to 40% of patients with CDI experience recurrent CDI (rCDI), which is associated with increased morbidity. This study aimed to define an at-risk population by obtaining a detailed understanding of the different factors leading to CDI, rCDI, and CDI-related morbidity and of time to CDI.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) of MEDLINE (using PubMed) and EMBASE for relevant articles published between January 1, 2016, and November 11, 2022, covering the US population.

RESULTS

Of the 1324 articles identified, 151 met prespecified inclusion criteria. Advanced patient age was a likely risk factor for primary CDI within a general population, with significant risk estimates identified in nine of 10 studies. Older age was less important in specific populations with comorbidities usually diagnosed at earlier age, such as bowel disease and cancer. In terms of comorbidities, the established factors of infection, kidney disease, liver disease, cardiovascular disease, and bowel disease along with several new factors (including anemia, fluid and electrolyte disorders, and coagulation disorders) were likely risk factors for primary CDI. Data on diabetes, cancer, and obesity were mixed. Other primary CDI risk factors were antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, female sex, prior hospitalization, and the length of stay in hospital. Similar factors were identified for rCDI, but evidence was limited. Older age was a likely risk factor for mortality. Timing of primary CDI varied depending on the population: 2-3 weeks in patients receiving stem cell transplants, within 3 weeks for patients undergoing surgery, and generally more than 3 weeks following solid organ transplant.

CONCLUSION

This SLR uses recent evidence to define the most important factors associated with CDI, confirming those that are well established and highlighting new ones that could help to identify patient populations at high risk.

Proton pump inhibitors: misconceptions and proper prescribing practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current review summarizes and attempts to place in proper perspective the past year's literature regarding purported adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

RECENT FINDINGS

Although generally considered safe, physicians are inundated with retrospective database-driven epidemiologic studies, and meta-analyses on the same studies, claiming a panoply of serious adverse effects associated with long-term use of PPIs. The quality of the evidence underlying most of these associations is very low and cannot ascribe cause and effect. Nonetheless, these reports have stoked fears, in both prescribers and patients. As a result, patients are being harmed. Physicians are not prescribing PPIs when medically indicated and patients are stopping PPIs without consulting their caregivers. It is reassuring that a cross-sectional analysis of data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey as well as a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial report no safety concerns with PPIs, other than a possible small association with enteric infection.

SUMMARY

Most of the publicized serious putative adverse effects attributed to PPIs have been debunked in more recent and properly designed studies. Nevertheless, PPIs should be prescribed for valid indications and, when prescribed long-term, they should be used at the lowest effective dose and their ongoing need periodically assessed.