Subfamily-specific differential contribution of individual monomers and the tether sequence to mouse L1 promoter activity

LINE-1 retrotransposons contribute to mouse PV interneuron development

Retrotransposons are mobile DNA sequences duplicated via transcription and reverse transcription of an RNA intermediate. Cis-regulatory elements encoded by retrotransposons can also promote the transcription of adjacent genes. Somatic LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposon insertions have been detected in mammalian neurons. It is, however, unclear whether L1 sequences are mobile in only some neuronal lineages or therein promote neurodevelopmental gene expression. Here we report programmed L1 activation by SOX6, a transcription factor critical for parvalbumin (PV) interneuron development. Mouse PV interneurons permit L1 mobilization in vitro and in vivo, harbor unmethylated L1 promoters and express full-length L1 mRNAs and proteins. Using nanopore long-read sequencing, we identify unmethylated L1s proximal to PV interneuron genes, including a novel L1 promoter-driven Caps2 transcript isoform that enhances neuron morphological complexity in vitro. These data highlight the contribution made by L1 cis-regulatory elements to PV interneuron development and transcriptome diversity, uncovered due to L1 mobility in this milieu.

Technology to the rescue: how to uncover the role of transposable elements in preimplantation development

Transposable elements (TEs) are highly expressed in preimplantation development. Preimplantation development is the phase when the cells of the early embryo undergo the first cell fate choice and change from being totipotent to pluripotent. A range of studies have advanced our understanding of TEs in preimplantation, as well as their epigenetic regulation and functional roles. However, many questions remain about the implications of TE expression during early development. Challenges originate first due to the abundance of TEs in the genome, and second because of the limited cell numbers in preimplantation. Here we review the most recent technological advancements promising to shed light onto the role of TEs in preimplantation development. We explore novel avenues to identify genomic TE insertions and improve our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms and roles of TEs and their RNA and protein products during early development.

Mouse retrotransposons: sequence structure, evolutionary age, genomic distribution and function

Retrotransposons are transposable elements that are transposed via transcription and reverse transcription. Their copies have accumulated in the genome of mammals, occupying approximately 40% of mammalian genomic mass. These copies are often involved in numerous phenomena, such as chromatin spatial organization, gene expression, development and disease, and have been recognized as a driving force in evolution. Different organisms have gained specific retrotransposon subfamilies and retrotransposed copies, such as hundreds of Mus-specific subfamilies with diverse sequences and genomic locations. Despite this complexity, basic information is still necessary for present-day genomic and epigenomic studies. Herein, we describe the characteristics of each subfamily of Mus-specific retrotransposons in terms of sequence structure, phylogenetic relationships, evolutionary age, and preference for A or B compartments of chromatin.

YY1 is a transcriptional activator of mouse LINE-1 Tf subfamily

Long interspersed element type 1 (LINE-1, L1) is an active autonomous transposable element (TE) in the human genome. The first step of L1 replication is transcription, which is controlled by an internal RNA polymerase II promoter in the 5' untranslated region (UTR) of a full-length L1. It has been shown that transcription factor YY1 binds to a conserved sequence motif at the 5' end of the human L1 5'UTR and dictates where transcription initiates but not the level of transcription. Putative YY1-binding motifs have been predicted in the 5'UTRs of two distinct mouse L1 subfamilies, Tf and Gf. Using site-directed mutagenesis, in vitro binding, and gene knockdown assays, we experimentally tested the role of YY1 in mouse L1 transcription. Our results indicate that Tf, but not Gf subfamily, harbors functional YY1-binding sites in its 5'UTR monomers. In contrast to its role in human L1, YY1 functions as a transcriptional activator for the mouse Tf subfamily. Furthermore, YY1-binding motifs are solely responsible for the synergistic interaction between monomers, consistent with a model wherein distant monomers act as enhancers for mouse L1 transcription. The abundance of YY1-binding sites in Tf elements also raise important implications for gene regulation at the genomic level.

Locus-resolution analysis of L1 regulation and retrotransposition potential in mouse embryonic development

Mice harbor ∼2800 intact copies of the retrotransposon Long Interspersed Element 1 (L1). The in vivo retrotransposition capacity of an L1 copy is defined by both its sequence integrity and epigenetic status, including DNA methylation of the monomeric units constituting young mouse L1 promoters. Locus-specific L1 methylation dynamics during development may therefore elucidate and explain spatiotemporal niches of endogenous retrotransposition but remain unresolved. Here, we interrogate the retrotransposition efficiency and epigenetic fate of source (donor) L1s, identified as mobile in vivo. We show that promoter monomer loss consistently attenuates the relative retrotransposition potential of their offspring (daughter) L1 insertions. We also observe that most donor/daughter L1 pairs are efficiently methylated upon differentiation in vivo and in vitro. We use Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long-read sequencing to resolve L1 methylation genome-wide and at individual L1 loci, revealing a distinctive "smile" pattern in methylation levels across the L1 promoter region. Using Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) SMRT sequencing of L1 5' RACE products, we then examine DNA methylation dynamics at the mouse L1 promoter in parallel with transcription start site (TSS) distribution at locus-specific resolution. Together, our results offer a novel perspective on the interplay between epigenetic repression, L1 evolution, and genome stability.

Jack of all trades versus master of one: how generalist versus specialist strategies of transposable elements relate to their horizontal transfer between lineages

Transposable elements (TEs) are obligate genomic parasites, relying on host germline cells to ensure their replication and passage to future generations. While some TEs exhibit high fidelity to their host genome, being passed from parent to offspring through vertical transmission for millions of years, others frequently invade new and distantly related hosts through horizontal transfer. In this review, I highlight how the complexity of interactions between TE and host required for transposition may be an important determinant of horizontal transfer: with TEs with more complex regulatory requirements being less able to invade new host genomes.

Resolution of structural variation in diverse mouse genomes reveals chromatin remodeling due to transposable elements

Diverse inbred mouse strains are important biomedical research models, yet genome characterization of many strains is fundamentally lacking in comparison with humans. In particular, catalogs of structural variants (SVs) (variants ≥ 50 bp) are incomplete, limiting the discovery of causative alleles for phenotypic variation. Here, we resolve genome-wide SVs in 20 genetically distinct inbred mice with long-read sequencing. We report 413,758 site-specific SVs affecting 13% (356 Mbp) of the mouse reference assembly, including 510 previously unannotated coding variants. We substantially improve the Mus musculus transposable element (TE) callset, and we find that TEs comprise 39% of SVs and account for 75% of altered bases. We further utilize this callset to investigate how TE heterogeneity affects mouse embryonic stem cells and find multiple TE classes that influence chromatin accessibility. Our work provides a comprehensive analysis of SVs found in diverse mouse genomes and illustrates the role of TEs in epigenetic differences.