Hyaluronic acid injections for chronic tennis elbow

Comparative Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Corticosteroid, Hyaluronic Acid, and Placebo (Saline) Injections in Patients with Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Lateral elbow tendinopathy is a common condition that significantly alters the function of the upper extremities. In case of first-line treatment failure, different local injections are usually used. Due to the lack of sufficient evidence to support it, we conducted the study to compare the outcomes of different single injections, including Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), Corticosteroids (CS), Hyaluronic Acid (HA), and placebo (saline). Methods: Sixty patients with confirmed lateral elbow tendinopathy were enrolled in the study and divided into four groups. Pain intensity (average for the current day, at rest, during provocative tests) measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold (PPT), Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Subjected Elbow Value (SEV), and strength of selected muscle groups were measured before and during follow-up visits (1, 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks after treatment). The treatment was considered successful when minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was achieved in primary outcomes (VAS, PRTEE). Results: A significant improvement was achieved in most measurements in all groups. At the final follow-up, MCID for the mean pain reduction measured with VAS and improvement in the PRTEE score were achieved in 52 and 54 patients, respectively. The complete absence of pain was achieved after 1, 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks in 2, 5, 10, 22, and 40 patients, respectively. The comparison between the groups found a significant difference in pain intensity between CS and other groups one week after injection, between the CS and PRP group in the fourth week, and between PRP and HA in the fourth week (p < 0.05). No other significant differences were found between each group at each follow-up time point. Conclusions: We conclude that each injection treatment provides good long-term clinical outcomes, but not better than placebo. A CS injection might be regarded as a more effective treatment only within the first month post-injection.

Tendon injections - upper extremity

Imaging-guided tendon procedures aim to reduce pain and increase function by controlling inflammation and stimulating healing. Ultrasound is the preferable guiding modality due to its high resolution and real-time demonstration of the tendinous anatomy and needle positioning. The technique includes appropriate patient positioning, which varies depending on the targeted tendon, as well as sterile and proper draping. For most procedures, we prefer the "in-plane" approach, which demonstrates the entire needle as it advances through different tissue layers. Upper limb injections commonly use corticosteroids and anesthetics with different reported short- and long-term results depending on the tendon treated; better results are obtained in the treatment of tenosynovitis (sliding tendons such as trigger finger and De Quervain's tenosynovitis). Shoulder and elbow tendinopathies (anchor tendons) may also benefit from injections containing irritants or healing stimulants such as dextrose (prolotherapy) and platelet-rich plasma or by the stimulation of healing via tendon perforations (fenestration). The hyaluronic acid injection has also been used in the treatment of both tenosynovitis and tendinopathies. For tendons passing through osteofibrous tunnels, an additional release may be performed, and the techniques are discussed in this review. Therefore, this article provides practicing musculoskeletal radiologists and trainees with a comprehensive review of tendon injection musculoskeletal image-guided procedures.

[Infiltration therapies for lateral epicondylopathy]

The therapy of the lateral epicondylopathy (tennis elbow) includes drug injection into the extensor tendon insertion in chronic cases. The choice of medication and the type of injection is decisive for the success of therapy. Furthermore, accurate application is indispensable for therapy success (e.g. peppering injection technique, ultrasound-supported injection technique). Corticosteroid injection is often associated with short-term success, so that other options have found their way into everyday practice. Objectification of treatment success is usually defined by Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROM). With the introduction of Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID), statistically significant results are put into perspective in terms of clinical significance. Therapy for lateral epicondylopathy was considered effective if the mean difference in score results between baseline and follow-up exceeded 1.5 points for the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), 16 points for Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH), 11 points for Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), and 15 points for Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). However, the effectiveness must still be critically questioned according to meta-analytical evaluations, in which healing within 12 months was found in 90% of the cases of untreated chronic tennis elbow in the placebo groups. The use of substances, such as Traumeel (Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH, Baden-Baden, Germany), hyaluronic acid, botulinum toxin, platelet rich plasma (PRP), autologous blood or polidocanol, are based on various mechanisms. In particular, the use of PRP or autologous blood for the treatment of musculotendinous and degenerative articular pathologies has become popular, although the studies regarding effectiveness are inconsistent. PRP can be divided into leukocyte-rich (LR-PRP) and leukocyte-poor plasma (LP-PRP) according to its preparation. In contrast to LP-PRP, LR-PRP incorporates the middle and intermediate layers, but there is no standardized preparation described in the literature. Conclusive data regarding effective efficacy are still pending.

Comparison of Hyaluronate & Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis and Evaluation of Treatment Efficacy With MRI: A Single-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Introduction: Injection therapy in refractory cases of lateral epicondylitis might relieve symptoms, although no consensus exists on which material to use. Corticosteroids are widely used but recent literature indicated possible tenotoxic effects and inefficacy in mid- and long-term follow-up (FU). Hyaluronate/hyaluronic acid (HA) might be of better clinical efficacy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) might reflect the clinical changes in the short-term FU.

Methods: A single-blind, prospective, randomized controlled study was designed. A total of 80 patients were included. A total of 40 patients received a single triamcinolone injection and 40 received a hyaluronic acid (HA) injection. Follow-up was repeated at six and 12 weeks. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (Q-DASH) score; visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at rest, and hand grip strength were collected. Dynamometer measurements were done at baseline and FU examinations. The MRI images at baseline and 12 weeks FU were evaluated.

Results: There were significant differences between the groups favoring the triamcinolone group at six weeks. At 12 weeks, no differences existed between the groups in any of the parameters. The MRI grades were nonsignificantly different between baseline and at 12 weeks.

Conclusion: Both triamcinolone and HA were shown to relieve pain and increase functional outcomes. However, the effects were short-lived. The MRI did not show significant differences at 12 weeks, although clinical improvements were substantial.