Serum methylation of GALNT9, UPF3A, WARS, and LDB2 as noninvasive biomarkers for the early detection of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas

Utilization of molecular genetic approaches for colorectal cancer screening

The feasibility of population screening for colorectal cancer has been demonstrated in several studies. Most of these studies have considered individual characteristics, diagnostic approaches, epidemiological data, and socioeconomic factors. In this article, we comment on an editorial by Metaxas et al published in the recent issue of the journal. The authors emphasized the need to raise public awareness through health education programs and the possibility of using easily accessible non-invasive screening methods. Here, we focus on non-invasive molecular genetic approaches that can aid in colorectal cancer screening. On the one hand, we highlighted the use of tumor DNA/RNA markers directly for screening and, on the other hand, underline the use of polygenic risk assessment and hereditary predisposition to select individuals for more thorough cancer screening.

CircLPHN3 correlates with prognosis in colorectal cancer and regulates cellular processes by targeting miR-142-5p

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is often diagnosed late and has a poor prognosis. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been identified as prognostic biomarkers in various cancers, including CRC.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to elucidate the role of circLPHN3 (hsa_circ_0069865) in CRC progression and to provide a promising prognostic marker for CRC.

METHODS

CircLPHN3 was identified through bioinformatics analysis of the GSE121842 dataset. The levels of circLPHN3 in CRC samples were analyzed by real time-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Its clinical significance was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier curve and multivariate Cox regression. Downstream microRNAs of circLPHN3 were predicted with the RNAhybrid, Circular RNA Interactome, and starBase online databases. The target of miR-142-5p was predicted using miRDB, TargetScanHuman, starBase, and miRWalk databases. The relationship between circLPHN3, miR-142-5p, and LDB2 was verified by dual luciferase reporter assay. The function of circLPHN3 on CRC cell growth and metastasis was measured using Transwell and the cell counting kit-8 assay.

RESULTS

Significant downregulation of circLPHN3 was found in CRC. CircLPHN3 was closely related to higher tumor node metastasis stage, lymph node metastasis, and predicted unfavorable prognosis. miR-142-5p was highly expressed in CRC and its expression was negatively regulated by circLPHN3. Overexpression of circLPHN3 curbed CRC cell growth, migration, and invasion, mediated by miR-142-5p. Moreover, LDB2 was identified as a target of miR-142-5p.

CONCLUSION

CircLPHN3 acted as a prognostic biomarker and tumor suppressor for CRC via modulating miR-142-5p.

Serum DNA methylome of the colorectal cancer serrated pathway enables non-invasive detection

The clinical relevance of the colorectal cancer serrated pathway is evident, but the screening of serrated lesions remains challenging. We aimed to characterize the serum methylome of the serrated pathway and to evaluate circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylomes as a potential source of biomarkers for the non-invasive detection of serrated lesions. We collected serum samples from individuals with serrated adenocarcinoma (SAC), traditional serrated adenomas, sessile serrated lesions, hyperplastic polyps and individuals with no colorectal findings. First, we quantified cfDNA methylation with the MethylationEPIC array. Then, we compared the methylation profiles with tissue and serum datasets. Finally, we evaluated the utility of serum cfDNA methylation biomarkers. We identified a differential methylation profile able to distinguish high-risk serrated lesions from no serrated neoplasia, showing concordance with tissue methylation from SAC and sessile serrated lesions. Serum methylation profiles are pathway-specific, clearly separating serrated lesions from conventional adenomas. The combination of ninjurin 2 (NINJ2) and glutamate-rich 1 (ERICH1) methylation discriminated high-risk serrated lesions and SAC with 91.4% sensitivity (64.4% specificity), while zinc finger protein 718 (ZNF718) methylation reported 100% sensitivity for the detection of SAC (96% specificity). This is the first study exploring the serum methylome of serrated lesions. Differential methylation of cfDNA can be used for the non-invasive detection of colorectal serrated lesions.

Cell-free DNA methylation patterns in aging and their association with inflamm-aging

Aim: Liquid biopsies analyzing cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation in plasma offer a noninvasive diagnostic for diseases, with the potential of aging biomarkers underexplored. Methods: Utilizing enzymatic methyl-seq (EM-seq), this study assessed cfDNA methylation patterns in aging with blood from 35 healthy individuals. Results: It found aging signatures, including higher cfDNA levels and variations in fragment sizes, plus approximately 2000 age-related differentially methylated CpG sites. A biological age predictive model based on 48 CpG sites showed a strong correlation with chronological age, verified by two datasets. Age-specific epigenetic shifts linked to inflammation were revealed through differentially methylated regions profiling and Olink proteomics. Conclusion: These findings suggest cfDNA methylation as a potential aging biomarker and might exacerbate immunoinflammatory reactivity in older individuals.

Advances in blood DNA methylation-based assay for colorectal cancer early detection: a systematic updated review

Aim

A systematic review was conducted to summarize the methylated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) markers reported over the last decade for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and to identify the main technical challenges that are impeding their clinical implementation.

Background

CRC is a major cause of cancer deaths worldwide, but early detection is key for successful treatment. Non-invasive methods such as methylated ctDNA testing show promise for improving detection and monitoring of CRC.

Methods

A comprehensive search was performed using Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus up to December 30, 2023, limited to articles published in the last 10 years (after 2012), while including advanced adenoma/stage 0 or stage I/II samples in biomarker validation.

Results

After identifying 694 articles, removing duplicates and screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, a total of 62 articles were found to meet the inclusion criteria. Among the single biomarkers, MYO1-G, SEPT9, SDC2, and JAM3 revealed the highest sensitivity for polyps and stage I/II CRC. For multi-biomarkers with suitable sensitivity, combinations of SFRP1, SFRP2, SDC2, PRIMA1, or ALX4, BMP3, NPTX2, RARB, SDC2, SEPT9, VIM or ZFHX4, ZNF334, ELOVL2, UNC5C, LOC146880, SFMBT2, GFRA1 were identified for polyps and stage I/II CRC.

Conclusion

Enhancing sensitivity and specificity of molecular screening methods is crucial for improving CRC detection. Identifying a select few valuable biomarkers is key to reducing costs, despite challenges posed by low ctDNA levels in plasma, particularly in early-stage cancers.