1
|
Mielke MM, Fowler NR. Alzheimer disease blood biomarkers: considerations for population-level use. Nat Rev Neurol 2024; 20:495-504. [PMID: 38862788 PMCID: PMC11347965 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-024-00989-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
In the past 5 years, we have witnessed the first approved Alzheimer disease (AD) disease-modifying therapy and the development of blood-based biomarkers (BBMs) to aid the diagnosis of AD. For many reasons, including accessibility, invasiveness and cost, BBMs are more acceptable and feasible for patients than a lumbar puncture (for cerebrospinal fluid collection) or neuroimaging. However, many questions remain regarding how best to utilize BBMs at the population level. In this Review, we outline the factors that warrant consideration for the widespread implementation and interpretation of AD BBMs. To set the scene, we review the current use of biomarkers, including BBMs, in AD. We go on to describe the characteristics of typical patients with cognitive impairment in primary care, who often differ from the patient populations used in AD BBM research studies. We also consider factors that might affect the interpretation of BBM tests, such as comorbidities, sex and race or ethnicity. We conclude by discussing broader issues such as ethics, patient and provider preference, incidental findings and dealing with indeterminate results and imperfect accuracy in implementing BBMs at the population level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M Mielke
- Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| | - Nicole R Fowler
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schaeffer E, Yilmaz R, St Louis EK, Noyce AJ. Ethical Considerations for Identifying Individuals in the Prodromal/Early Phase of Parkinson's Disease: A Narrative Review. JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2024:JPD230428. [PMID: 38995800 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-230428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
The ability to identify individuals in the prodromal phase of Parkinson's disease has improved in recent years, raising the question of whether and how those affected should be informed about the risk of future disease. Several studies investigated prognostic counselling for individuals with isolated REM sleep behavior disorder and have shown that most patients want to receive information about prognosis, but autonomy and individual preferences must be respected. However, there are still many unanswered questions about risk disclosure or early diagnosis of PD, including the impact on personal circumstances, cultural preferences and specific challenges associated with different profiles of prodromal symptoms, genetic testing or biomarker assessments. This narrative review aims to summarize the current literature on prognostic counselling and risk disclosure in PD, as well as highlight future perspectives that may emerge with the development of new biomarkers and their anticipated impact on the definition of PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Schaeffer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel and Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Rezzak Yilmaz
- Department of Neurology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
- Ankara University Brain Research Center, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Erik K St Louis
- Mayo Center for Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Mayo Clinic Health System Southwest Wisconsin, La Crosse, WI, USA
| | - Alastair J Noyce
- Centre for Preventive Neurology, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leszko M, Allen DJ. Caring From a Distance: Experiences of Polish Immigrants in the United States Providing Care to Parents With Dementia Overseas. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2024; 79:gbad086. [PMID: 37288778 DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbad086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Aging populations and an increasing number of immigrants in recent years have led to numerous changes in intergenerational relationships. Although many studies have investigated the impact of providing care to a parent with dementia, little is known about the impact of caregiving activities provided from a distance, such as in the case of immigration, and over a long period of time to a person with dementia. Our understanding of how transnational caregiving for a person with dementia affects relationships is also limited. Using the Intergenerational Solidarity Theory as a theoretical framework, this paper examines the experiences of adult children and immigrant caregivers of a parent with dementia living in Poland. METHODS A qualitative, semistructured interview was conducted with 37 caregivers living in the United States while providing transnational care to a parent with Alzheimer's disease or other forms of dementia. The data analysis was based on the thematic analysis strategy. RESULTS Four themes were identified: (1) filial obligations and solidarity, (2) caregivers' contradictory emotions regarding transnational care, (3) financial and emotional exhaustion, and (4) challenges of nursing home dilemmas. DISCUSSION Transnational caregivers represent a unique group who face distinctive challenges related to competing demands and limited resources. This study contributes to a better understanding of their experiences whereas the findings highlight the importance of addressing the mental and physical well-being of immigrant caregivers of individuals with dementia and have important implications for health care professionals and immigration policies. Implications for future research were also identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Leszko
- Department of Psychology, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Dorota J Allen
- Department of Child Development and Family Studies, Purdue University, Hammond, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Darweesh SKL, Sampaio C, Bloem BR. Has the time come to redefine Parkinson's disease? Lancet Neurol 2024; 23:130-133. [PMID: 38267174 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00503-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sirwan K L Darweesh
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders, Nijmegen 6500, Netherlands
| | | | - Bastiaan R Bloem
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders, Nijmegen 6500, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bolsewig K, Blok H, Willemse EAJ, Zwaaftink RBMG, Kooistra M, Smets EMA, Teunissen CE, Visser LNC. Caregivers' attitudes toward blood-based biomarker testing for Alzheimer's disease. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2024; 16:e12549. [PMID: 38371360 PMCID: PMC10870798 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to evaluate informal caregivers' attitudes toward undergoing and future implementation of blood-based biomarkers (BBBM) testing for Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS We explored caregivers' perspectives, by combining an online survey (n = 107) with a subsequent focus group (n = 7). We used descriptive statistics and thematic content analysis to identify common themes in answers to open-ended survey questions and focus group data. RESULTS Most caregivers (72.0%) favored BBBM for AD diagnosis. Provided with hypothetical scenarios, confidence in a normal result decreased significantly if experienced symptoms were more severe (mild: 78.5% vs. severe: 48.6%). Caregivers' attitudes toward BBBM for screening purposes significantly improved with prospect of treatment (53.3% vs. 92.5%). Concerns toward BBBM testing included treatment unavailability, increased/prolonged distress, and AD-related stigma. Potential benefits were actionability, explanation for symptoms, and opportunities for better care and future treatment. DISCUSSION Emerging AD treatment and reduction of AD-related stigma could profoundly increase public interest in BBBM testing for AD. Highlights Most informal caregivers would want blood-based biomarker (BBBM) testing for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis.Perceived (dis)advantages were related to diagnosing AD early.With severe symptoms, there was less confidence in normal BBBM results.Treatment availability would significantly increase interest in BBBM testing for AD.Informal caregivers showed uncertainty regarding the meaning of the term "AD."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Bolsewig
- Department of Laboratory MedicineNeurochemistry LaboratoryAmsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdam UMCVU UniversityAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Hester Blok
- Alzheimer NederlandAmersfoortthe Netherlands
| | - Eline A. J. Willemse
- Department of Laboratory MedicineNeurochemistry LaboratoryAmsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdam UMCVU UniversityAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Department of NeurologyMultiple Sclerosis Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience BaselDepartments of Biomedicine and Clinical ResearchUniversity Hospital Basel and University of BaselBaselSwitzerland
| | | | | | - Ellen M. A. Smets
- Department of Medical PsychologyAmsterdam Public Health Research InstituteUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E. Teunissen
- Department of Laboratory MedicineNeurochemistry LaboratoryAmsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdam UMCVU UniversityAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Leonie N. C. Visser
- Department of Medical PsychologyAmsterdam Public Health Research InstituteUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamDepartment of NeurologyAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Division of Clinical GeriatricsCenter for Alzheimer ResearchDepartment of NeurobiologyCare Sciences and SocietyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Robillard JM, Masellis M, Martin SE, Khachaturian AS, Dixon RA. The Return of Biomarker Results in Research: Balancing Complexity, Precision, and Ethical Responsibility. J Alzheimers Dis 2024; 97:1083-1090. [PMID: 38306053 PMCID: PMC10836546 DOI: 10.3233/jad-230359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Recent research aimed at the discovery, integration, and communication of health outcome measures (or "biomarkers") in Alzheimer's disease has raised challenging questions related to whether, how and when results from these investigations should be disclosed to research participants. Reflecting the apparent heterogeneity of many neurodegenerative diseases, biomarker or other risk factor results are often probabilistic, interactive, multi-modal, and selective. Such characteristics make it very complex to summarize and communicate to clinicians, researchers, and research participants. Whereas the format and content of academic literature is well-managed by the peer-review process, reporting individualized results to participants involves complex, sensitive, and ethical considerations. This paper describes three key factors to consider in decisions about the return of results to research participants: complexity, precision, and responsibility. The paper also presents six practical recommendations for implementing meaningful and ethical communication with research participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie M Robillard
- Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Children's and Women's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mario Masellis
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Susanna E Martin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Children's and Women's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ara S Khachaturian
- The Campaign to Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020, Inc. Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Roger A Dixon
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gaster B, Suchsland MZ, Fitzpatrick AL, Liao JM, Belza B, Hsu AP, McKiddy S, Park C, Olivari BS, Singh AP, Raetz J. Evaluating Cognitive Impairment in a Large Health Care System: The Cognition in Primary Care Program. J Alzheimers Dis 2024; 99:493-501. [PMID: 38701141 PMCID: PMC11331304 DOI: 10.3233/jad-231200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
Background The prevalence of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRD) is rising. Primary care providers (PCPs) will increasingly be required to play a role in its detection but lack the training to do so. Objective To develop a model for cognitive evaluation which is feasible in primary care and evaluate its implementation in a large health system. Methods The Cognition in Primary Care Program consists of web-based training together with integrated tools built into the electronic record. We implemented the program among PCPs at 14 clinics in a large health system. We (1) surveyed PCPs to assess the impact of training on their confidence to evaluate cognition, (2) measured the number of cognitive assessments they performed, and (3) tracked the number of patients diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Results Thirty-nine PCPs completed the training which covered how to evaluate cognition. Survey response rate from those PCPs was 74%. Six months after the end of the training, they reported confidence in assessing cognition (mean 4.6 on 5-point scale). Cognitive assessments documented in the health record increased from 0.8 per month before the training to 2.5 in the six months after the training. Patients who were newly diagnosed with MCI increased from 4.2 per month before the training to 6.0 per month in the six months after the training. Conclusions This model for cognitive evaluation in a large health system was shown to increase cognitive testing and increase diagnoses of MCI. Such improvements are essential for the timely detection of ADRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barak Gaster
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Joshua M. Liao
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Basia Belza
- School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Amy P. Hsu
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sarah McKiddy
- School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Christina Park
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Benjamin S. Olivari
- National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Angad P. Singh
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jaqueline Raetz
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van der Schaar J, Visser LNC, Ket JCF, Groot C, Pijnenburg YAL, Scheltens P, Bredenoord AL, van den Hoven MA, van der Flier WM. Impact of sharing Alzheimer's disease biomarkers with individuals without dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of empirical data. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:5773-5794. [PMID: 37496313 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of empirical evidence on expected and experienced implications of sharing Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker results with individuals without dementia. METHODS PubMed, Embase, APA PsycInfo, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results from included studies were synthesized, and quantitative data on psychosocial impact were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model. RESULTS We included 35 publications. Most personal stakeholders expressed interest in biomarker assessment. Learning negative biomarker results led to relief and sometimes frustration, while positive biomarkers induced anxiety but also clarity. Meta-analysis of five studies including 2012 participants (elevated amyloid = 1324 [66%], asymptomatic = 1855 [92%]) showed short-term psychological impact was not significant (random-effect estimate = 0.10, standard error = 0.23, P = 0.65). Most professional stakeholders valued biomarker testing, although attitudes and practices varied considerably. DISCUSSION Interest in AD biomarker testing was high and sharing their results did not cause psychological harm. HIGHLIGHTS Most personal stakeholders expressed interest in Alzheimer's disease biomarker assessment. Personal motivations included gaining insight, improving lifestyle, or preparing for the future. There was no short-term psychological impact of sharing biomarker status, implying it can be safe. Most professional stakeholders valued biomarker testing, believing the benefits outweigh the risk. Harmonized guidelines on biomarker testing and sharing results are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jetske van der Schaar
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leonie N C Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam/AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johannes C F Ket
- Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Colin Groot
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Yolande A L Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- EQT Life Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annelien L Bredenoord
- Erasmus School of Philosophy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology & Data Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bianchetti A, Ikeda M, Mateos R, Mondini S, Rabheru K, Serrati C, De Leo D. The NIA-AA revised clinical criteria for Alzheimer's disease: are they too advanced? Int Psychogeriatr 2023; 35:679-681. [PMID: 37753728 DOI: 10.1017/s1041610223000868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Bianchetti
- Department of Medicine and Rehabilitation, S. Anna Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Manubu Ikeda
- Department of Psychiatry, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Raimundo Mateos
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Sara Mondini
- Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Kiran Rabheru
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Carlo Serrati
- Department of Neurology, San Martino Hospital, Genova, Italy
| | - Diego De Leo
- Department of Psychology, Primorska University, Primorska, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hintz AM, Gomes-Filho IS, Loomer PM, de Sousa Pinho P, de Santana Passos-Soares J, Trindade SC, Cerqueira EDMM, Alves CMC, Rios YSS, Batista JET, Figueiredo ACMG, Cruz SSD. Depression and associated factors among Brazilian adults: the 2019 national healthcare population-based study. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:704. [PMID: 37770824 PMCID: PMC10537974 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05133-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental disorders represent a major public health challenge worldwide, affecting 80% of people living in low- and middle-income countries. Depression, a mental disorder, is a chronic disease of long duration that causes changes in the brain, resulting from a combination of genetic, physiologic, environmental, and behavioral factors. The aim of this study was to investigate possible factors associated with depression in Brazilian adults. METHODS A population-based, cross-sectional study was carried out using the public domain database of the 2019 National Health Survey, conducted in Brazil. Depression was considered the dependent variable, and through hierarchical analysis, predictor variables were investigated such as, at the distal level-socioeconomic variables, at the intermediate level-variables related to lifestyle behavior, health condition, and history, and at the proximal level-demographic variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to obtain the adjusted Odds Ratio and the respective 95% confidence interval to identify possible factors associated with depression. RESULTS The study included 88,531 participant records with 10.27% diagnosed with depression. The adjusted association measurements, after selecting the independent variables in the hierarchical analysis, showed the following factors associated with depression with differing magnitudes: age, brown and white race/skin color, female sex, poor, very poor, or regular self-reported health condition, diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, work-related musculoskeletal disorder, history of smoking habit, and macroeconomic region. CONCLUSIONS An effective strategy for preventing and managing depression in Brazilian adults must include the control of health status and lifestyle behavior factors, with actions and programs to reduce people's exposure to these factors, understanding that socioeconomic-demographic differences of each population can potentially reduce the disease burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Peter Michael Loomer
- School of Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Paloma de Sousa Pinho
- Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia, Santo Antonio de Jesus, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Johelle de Santana Passos-Soares
- Department of Health, Feira de Santana State University, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil
- Department of Preventive Dentistry, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Soraya Castro Trindade
- Department of Health, Feira de Santana State University, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Simone Seixas da Cruz
- Department of Health, Feira de Santana State University, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil
- Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia, Santo Antonio de Jesus, Bahia, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hendriksen HMA, van Gils AM, van Harten AC, Hartmann T, Mangialasche F, Kamondi A, Kivipelto M, Rhodius-Meester HFM, Smets EMA, van der Flier WM, Visser LNC. Communication about diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention in the memory clinic: perspectives of European memory clinic professionals. Alzheimers Res Ther 2023; 15:131. [PMID: 37543608 PMCID: PMC10404377 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-023-01276-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The paradigm shift towards earlier Alzheimer's disease (AD) stages and personalized medicine creates new challenges for clinician-patient communication. We conducted a survey among European memory clinic professionals to identify opinions on communication about (etiological) diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention, and inventory needs for augmenting communication skills. METHODS Memory clinic professionals (N = 160) from 21 European countries completed our online survey (59% female, 14 ± 10 years' experience, 73% working in an academic hospital). We inventoried (1) opinions on communication about (etiological) diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention using 11 statements; (2) current communication practices in response to five hypothetical cases (AD dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), subjective cognitive decline (SCD), with ( +) or without ( -) abnormal AD biomarkers); and (3) needs for communication support regarding ten listed communication skills. RESULTS The majority of professionals agreed that communication on diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention should be personalized to the individual patient. In response to the hypothetical patient cases, disease stage influenced the inclination to communicate an etiological AD diagnosis: 97% would explicitly mention the presence of AD to the patient with AD dementia, 68% would do so in MCI + , and 29% in SCD + . Furthermore, 58% would explicitly rule out AD in case of MCI - when talking to patients, and 69% in case of SCD - . Almost all professionals (79-99%) indicated discussing prognosis and prevention with all patients, of which a substantial part (48-86%) would personalize their communication to patients' diagnostic test results (39-68%) or patients' anamnestic information (33-82%). The majority of clinicians (79%) would like to use online tools, training, or both to support them in communicating with patients. Topics for which professionals desired support most were: stimulating patients' understanding of information, and communicating uncertainty, dementia risk, remotely/online, and with patients not (fluently) speaking the language of the country of residence. CONCLUSIONS In a survey of European memory clinic professionals, we found a strong positive attitude towards communication with patients about (etiological) diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention, and personalization of communication to characteristics and needs of individual patients. In addition, professionals expressed a need for supporting tools and skills training to further improve their communication with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen M A Hendriksen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Aniek M van Gils
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Argonde C van Harten
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tobias Hartmann
- Experimental Neurology, Saarland University, 66424, Homburg, Germany
- Deutsches Institut Für DemenzPrävention, Saarland University, 66424, Homburg, Germany
| | - Francesca Mangialasche
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska University Hospital, Medical Unit Aging, Theme Inflammation and Aging, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anita Kamondi
- Department of Neurology, Neurology and Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Miia Kivipelto
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska University Hospital, Medical Unit Aging, Theme Inflammation and Aging, Stockholm, Sweden
- Ageing and Epidemiology (AGE) Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, The Memory Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Internal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine Section, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Institute, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Personalized Medicine, , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie N C Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Personalized Medicine, , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Largent EA, Grill JD, O'Brien K, Wolk D, Harkins K, Karlawish J. Testing for Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers and Disclosing Results Across the Disease Continuum. Neurology 2023; 100:1010-1019. [PMID: 36720642 PMCID: PMC10238153 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000206891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Three pathologic processes are characteristic of Alzheimer disease (AD): β-amyloid, hyperphosphorylated tau, and neurodegeneration. Our understanding of AD is undergoing a transformation due to our ability to measure biomarkers of these processes across different stages of cognitive impairment. There is growing interest in using AD biomarker tests in care and research and, with this, a growing need for guidance on how to return these sensitive results to patients and participants. Here, we propose a 5-step approach informed by clinical and research experience designing and implementing AD biomarker disclosure processes, extant evidence describing how individuals react to AD biomarker information, ethics, law, and the literature on breaking bad news. The clinician should (1) determine the appropriateness of AD biomarker testing and return of results for the particular patient or research participant. If testing is appropriate, the next steps are to (2) provide pretest education and seek consent for testing from the individual and their support person, (3) administer testing, (4) return the results to the individual and their support person, and (5) follow-up to promote the recipient's well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Largent
- From the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy (E.A.L., J.K.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior (J.D.G.), and Department of Neurobiology and Behavior (J.D.G.), University of California, Irvine; Department of Neurology (K.O.B., D.W., J.K.), and Department of Medicine (K.H., J.K.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
| | - Joshua D Grill
- From the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy (E.A.L., J.K.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior (J.D.G.), and Department of Neurobiology and Behavior (J.D.G.), University of California, Irvine; Department of Neurology (K.O.B., D.W., J.K.), and Department of Medicine (K.H., J.K.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Kyra O'Brien
- From the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy (E.A.L., J.K.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior (J.D.G.), and Department of Neurobiology and Behavior (J.D.G.), University of California, Irvine; Department of Neurology (K.O.B., D.W., J.K.), and Department of Medicine (K.H., J.K.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - David Wolk
- From the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy (E.A.L., J.K.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior (J.D.G.), and Department of Neurobiology and Behavior (J.D.G.), University of California, Irvine; Department of Neurology (K.O.B., D.W., J.K.), and Department of Medicine (K.H., J.K.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Kristin Harkins
- From the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy (E.A.L., J.K.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior (J.D.G.), and Department of Neurobiology and Behavior (J.D.G.), University of California, Irvine; Department of Neurology (K.O.B., D.W., J.K.), and Department of Medicine (K.H., J.K.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Jason Karlawish
- From the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy (E.A.L., J.K.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior (J.D.G.), and Department of Neurobiology and Behavior (J.D.G.), University of California, Irvine; Department of Neurology (K.O.B., D.W., J.K.), and Department of Medicine (K.H., J.K.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
van der Flier WM, de Vugt ME, Smets EMA, Blom M, Teunissen CE. Towards a future where Alzheimer's disease pathology is stopped before the onset of dementia. NATURE AGING 2023; 3:494-505. [PMID: 37202515 DOI: 10.1038/s43587-023-00404-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a major healthcare challenge with no curative treatment at present. To address this challenge, we need a paradigm shift, where we focus on pre-dementia stages of AD. In this Perspective, we outline a strategy to move towards a future with personalized medicine for AD by preparing for and investing in effective and patient-orchestrated diagnosis, prediction and prevention of the dementia stage. While focusing on AD, this Perspective also discusses studies that do not specify the cause of dementia. Future personalized prevention strategies encompass multiple components, including tailored combinations of disease-modifying interventions and lifestyle. By empowering the public and patients to be more actively engaged in the management of their health and disease and by developing improved strategies for diagnosis, prediction and prevention, we can pave the way for a future with personalized medicine, in which AD pathology is stopped to prevent or delay the onset of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Marjolein E de Vugt
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marco Blom
- Alzheimer Nederland, Amersfoort, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Clinical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yao KR, Luo Q, Tang X, Wang ZH, Li L, Zhao L, Zhou L, Li L, Huang L, Yin XH. Effects of traditional Chinese mind–body exercises on older adults with cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1086417. [PMID: 37077563 PMCID: PMC10106716 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1086417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of traditional Chinese mind–body exercises in improving cognition, memory, and executive function in older adults with cognitive impairment.Data sourcesRelevant English and Chinese language studies published until September 14th, 2022 were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, WAN FANG DATA, VIP Information, CNKI, and SinoMed databases.Review methodsRandomized controlled trials assessing traditional Chinese mind–body exercises (Tai Chi, Baduanjin, Qigong, Mind–Body Therapies, and Yijinjing) in older adults with cognitive impairment were included. Two researchers independently identified eligible studies and extracted data. A risk-of-bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.ResultsThis study included 15 randomized controlled trials (1,127 participants) from China, Thailand and American. Most studies had a high risk of bias in the blinding of participants and researchers, one study had a high risk of bias in the random sequence generation and two studies had a high risk of bias in the incomplete outcome data. Compared with conventional therapy alone, traditional Chinese mind–body exercises significantly improved global cognitive function (p < 0.00001), and Baduanjin could improve the global cognitive function (p < 0.00001), memory function (p < 0.0001), and executive function (p < 0.0001) outcomes after treatment, and significantly improved some dimensional scores on the auditory verbal learning test after treatment (p = 0.04).ConclusionCompared with conventional therapy, traditional Chinese mind–body exercises (Tai Chi, Baduanjin, and Qigong) significantly improved global cognitive function, and Baduanjin could improve global cognitive function, memory function, and executive function in older adults with cognitive impairment.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#searchadvanced, CRD42022327563.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke-ru Yao
- School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyan, China
| | - Qin Luo
- School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyan, China
| | - Xi Tang
- School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyan, China
| | - Zhi-han Wang
- School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyan, China
| | - Lu Li
- School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyan, China
| | - Lu Zhao
- School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyan, China
| | - Li Zhou
- Second Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Ling Li
- Second Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Li Huang
- Second Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
- *Correspondence: Li Huang,
| | - Xin-hong Yin
- School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyan, China
- Xin-hong Yin,
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dreves MAE, van Harten AC, Visser LNC, Rhodius‐Meester H, Köhler S, Kooistra M, Papma JM, Honey MIJ, Blom MM, Smets EMA, de Vugt ME, Teunissen CE, van der Flier WM. Rationale and design of the ABOARD project (A Personalized Medicine Approach for Alzheimer's Disease). ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (NEW YORK, N. Y.) 2023; 9:e12401. [PMID: 37287472 PMCID: PMC10242186 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The key to stopping Alzheimer's disease (AD) lies in the pre-dementia stages, with the goal to stop AD before dementia has started. We present the rationale and design of the ABOARD (A Personalized Medicine Approach for Alzheimer's Disease) project, which aims to invest in personalized medicine for AD. ABOARD is a Dutch public-private partnership of 32 partners, connecting stakeholders from a scientific, clinical, and societal perspective. The 5-year project is structured into five work packages on (1) diagnosis, (2) prediction, (3) prevention, (4) patient-orchestrated care, and (5) communication and dissemination. ABOARD functions as a network organization in which professionals interact cross-sectorally. ABOARD has a strong junior training program "Juniors On Board." Project results are shared with society through multiple communication resources. By including relevant partners and involving citizens at risk, patients, and their care partners, ABOARD builds toward a future with personalized medicine for AD. Highlights ABOARD (A Personalized Medicine Approach for Alzheimer's Disease) is a public-private research project executed by 32 partners that functions as a network organization.Together, the project partners build toward a future with personalized medicine for Alzheimer's disease.Although ABOARD is a Dutch consortium, it has international relevance.ABOARD improves diagnosis, prediction, prevention, and patient-orchestrated care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A. E. Dreves
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamNeurologyAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Argonde C. van Harten
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamNeurologyAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Neurochemistry LaboratoryDepartment of Clinical ChemistryVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Leonie N. C. Visser
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamNeurologyAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Department of Medical PsychologyAmsterdam UMC location AMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteQuality of CareAmsterdam UMC location AMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Division of Clinical GeriatricsCenter for Alzheimer ResearchDepartment of NeurobiologyCare Sciences and SocietyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Hanneke Rhodius‐Meester
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamNeurologyAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Department of Internal MedicineGeriatric Medicine sectionVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Department of Geriatric MedicineThe Memory ClinicOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Sebastian Köhler
- Department of Psychiatry and NeuropsychologySchool for Mental Health and NeuroscienceMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtthe Netherlands
| | | | - Janne M. Papma
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center Erasmus MCErasmus MC University Medical CenterRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Madison I. J. Honey
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Neurochemistry LaboratoryDepartment of Clinical ChemistryVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | | | - Ellen M. A. Smets
- Department of Medical PsychologyAmsterdam UMC location AMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteQuality of CareAmsterdam UMC location AMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Marjolein E. de Vugt
- Department of Psychiatry and NeuropsychologySchool for Mental Health and NeuroscienceMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtthe Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E. Teunissen
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Neurochemistry LaboratoryDepartment of Clinical ChemistryVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M. van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamNeurologyAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data ScienceAmsterdam UMC location VUmc, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - the ABOARD Consortium
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamNeurologyAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Saposnik G, Sánchez-Benavidez G, García-Arcelay E, Franco-Macías E, Bensi C, Carmelingo S, Allegri RF, Pérez-Martínez DA, Maurino J. Design of a Non-Interventional Study to Assess Neurologists' Perspectives and Pharmacological Treatment Decisions in Early Alzheimer's Disease. Neurol Ther 2023; 12:995-1006. [PMID: 36952172 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00466-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The current therapeutic landscape of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is evolving rapidly. Our treatment options include new anti-amyloid-β protein disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) that decrease cognitive decline in patients with early AD (prodromal and mild AD dementia). Despite these advances, we have limited information on how neurologists would apply the results of recent DMT trials to make treatment decisions. Our goal is to identify factors associated with the use of new AD DMTs among neurologists applying concepts from behavioral economics. METHODS This non-interventional, cross-sectional, web-based study will assess 400 neurologists with expertise in AD from across Spain. Participants will start by completing demographic information, practice settings, and a behavioral battery to address their tolerance to uncertainty and risk preferences. Participants will then be presented with 10 simulated case scenarios or vignettes of common encounters in patients with early AD to evaluate treatment initiation with anti-amyloid-β DMTs (e.g., aducanumab, lecanemab, etc.). The primary outcomes will be therapeutic inertia and suboptimal decisions. Discrete choice experiments will be used to determine the weight of factors influencing treatment choices. RESULTS The results of this study will provide new insights into a better understanding of the most relevant factors associated with therapeutic decisions on the use of DMTs, assessing how neurologists handle uncertainty when making treatment choices, and identifying the prevalence of therapeutic inertia in the management of early AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Saposnik
- Clinical Outcomes and Decision Neuroscience Unit, Li Ka Shing Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 55 Queen St E, Toronto, ON, M5C 1R6, Canada.
| | - Gonzalo Sánchez-Benavidez
- BarcelonaBeta Brain Research Center, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Emilio Franco-Macías
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Seville, Spain
| | - Catalina Bensi
- Medical Department, Roche Farma, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Ricardo F Allegri
- Department of Cognitive Neurology, Neuropsychology and Neuropsychiatry, Fleni, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - David A Pérez-Martínez
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Hospital Universitario La Luz, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Penke B, Szűcs M, Bogár F. New Pathways Identify Novel Drug Targets for the Prevention and Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24065383. [PMID: 36982456 PMCID: PMC10049476 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is an incurable, progressive neurodegenerative disorder. AD is a complex and multifactorial disease that is responsible for 60–80% of dementia cases. Aging, genetic factors, and epigenetic changes are the main risk factors for AD. Two aggregation-prone proteins play a decisive role in AD pathogenesis: β-amyloid (Aβ) and hyperphosphorylated tau (pTau). Both of them form deposits and diffusible toxic aggregates in the brain. These proteins are the biomarkers of AD. Different hypotheses have tried to explain AD pathogenesis and served as platforms for AD drug research. Experiments demonstrated that both Aβ and pTau might start neurodegenerative processes and are necessary for cognitive decline. The two pathologies act in synergy. Inhibition of the formation of toxic Aβ and pTau aggregates has been an old drug target. Recently, successful Aβ clearance by monoclonal antibodies has raised new hopes for AD treatments if the disease is detected at early stages. More recently, novel targets, e.g., improvements in amyloid clearance from the brain, application of small heat shock proteins (Hsps), modulation of chronic neuroinflammation by different receptor ligands, modulation of microglial phagocytosis, and increase in myelination have been revealed in AD research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Botond Penke
- Department of Medical Chemistry, University of Szeged, Dóm Square 8, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary
- Correspondence:
| | - Mária Szűcs
- Department of Medical Chemistry, University of Szeged, Dóm Square 8, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ferenc Bogár
- ELKH-SZTE Biomimetic Systems Research Group, Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), Dóm Square 8, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Galluzzi S, Pievani M, Zanetti O, Benussi L, Frisoni GB, Di Maria E. Disclosure of Genetic Risk Factors for Alzheimer's Disease to Cognitively Healthy Individuals-From Current Practice towards a Personalised Medicine Scenario. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123177. [PMID: 36551936 PMCID: PMC9775740 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a genetically complex disorder. In addition to the relatively small number of pathogenic variants causing autosomal dominant AD, many others have been associated with the much more common sporadic form. The E4 allele of the Apolipoprotein E (APOE) is the first discovered genetic risk factor for AD. In addition, more than 70 genetic risk loci contributing to AD have been identified. Current guidelines do not recommend AD susceptibility genetic testing in cognitively healthy adults because the implications for clinical care are limited. However, secondary prevention clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies enrol individuals based on genetic criteria, and participants are often informed of APOE testing results. Moreover, the availability of direct-to-consumer genetic testing allows individuals to learn their own AD genetic risk profile without medical supervision. A number of research protocols for AD susceptibility genetic testing have been proposed. In Italy, disclosure processes and protocols beyond those developed for inherited dementia have not been established yet. We reviewed the literature on the current practice and clinical issues related to disclosing AD genetic risk to cognitively healthy individuals and provide suggestions that may help to develop specific guidelines at the national level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Galluzzi
- Laboratory Alzheimer’s Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, 25125 Brescia, Italy
| | - Michela Pievani
- Laboratory Alzheimer’s Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, 25125 Brescia, Italy
| | - Orazio Zanetti
- Memory Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, 25125 Brescia, Italy
| | - Luisa Benussi
- Molecular Markers Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, 25125 Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni B. Frisoni
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
- Geneva Memory Center, Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Emilio Di Maria
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
- University Unit of Medical Genetics, Galliera Hospital, 16128 Genoa, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
van der Flier WM, Scheltens P. The ATN Framework—Moving Preclinical Alzheimer Disease to Clinical Relevance. JAMA Neurol 2022; 79:968-970. [DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wiesje M. van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- EQT Life Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Calderón-Garcidueñas L. Common Fatal Neurodegenerative Diseases Revisited: Beyond Age, Comorbidities, and Devastating Terminal Neuropathology There Is Hope With Prevention. Front Neurol 2022; 13:901447. [PMID: 35645968 PMCID: PMC9130656 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.901447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lilian Calderón-Garcidueñas
- The University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United States
- Universidad del Valle de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico
- *Correspondence: Lilian Calderón-Garcidueñas
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Varesi A, Carrara A, Pires VG, Floris V, Pierella E, Savioli G, Prasad S, Esposito C, Ricevuti G, Chirumbolo S, Pascale A. Blood-Based Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis and Progression: An Overview. Cells 2022; 11:1367. [PMID: 35456047 PMCID: PMC9044750 DOI: 10.3390/cells11081367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by amyloid-β (Aβ) plaque deposition and neurofibrillary tangle accumulation in the brain. Although several studies have been conducted to unravel the complex and interconnected pathophysiology of AD, clinical trial failure rates have been high, and no disease-modifying therapies are presently available. Fluid biomarker discovery for AD is a rapidly expanding field of research aimed at anticipating disease diagnosis and following disease progression over time. Currently, Aβ1-42, phosphorylated tau, and total tau levels in the cerebrospinal fluid are the best-studied fluid biomarkers for AD, but the need for novel, cheap, less-invasive, easily detectable, and more-accessible markers has recently led to the search for new blood-based molecules. However, despite considerable research activity, a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the main blood-based biomarker candidates is still lacking. In this narrative review, we discuss the role of proteins, lipids, metabolites, oxidative-stress-related molecules, and cytokines as possible disease biomarkers. Furthermore, we highlight the potential of the emerging miRNAs and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) as diagnostic tools, and we briefly present the role of vitamins and gut-microbiome-related molecules as novel candidates for AD detection and monitoring, thus offering new insights into the diagnosis and progression of this devastating disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelica Varesi
- Department of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Almo Collegio Borromeo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Adelaide Carrara
- Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (A.C.); (V.F.)
| | - Vitor Gomes Pires
- Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA;
| | - Valentina Floris
- Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (A.C.); (V.F.)
| | - Elisa Pierella
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK;
| | - Gabriele Savioli
- Emergency Department, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Sakshi Prasad
- Faculty of Medicine, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, 21018 Vinnytsya, Ukraine;
| | - Ciro Esposito
- Unit of Nephrology and Dialysis, ICS Maugeri, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Ricevuti
- Department of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Salvatore Chirumbolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy;
| | - Alessia Pascale
- Department of Drug Sciences, Section of Pharmacology, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rosen AC, Arias JJ, Ashford JW, Blacker D, Chhatwal JP, Chin NA, Clark L, Denny SS, Goldman JS, Gleason CE, Grill JD, Heidebrink JL, Henderson VW, Lavacot JA, Lingler JH, Menon M, Nosheny RL, Oliveira FF, Parker MW, Rahman-Filipiak A, Revoori A, Rumbaugh MC, Sanchez DL, Schindler SE, Schwarz CG, Toy L, Tyrone J, Walter S, Wang LS, Wijsman EM, Zallen DT, Aggarwal NT. The Advisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia: Multidisciplinary and Open to All. J Alzheimers Dis 2022; 90:953-962. [PMID: 35938255 PMCID: PMC9901285 DOI: 10.3233/jad-220458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The brain changes of Alzheimer's disease and other degenerative dementias begin long before cognitive dysfunction develops, and in people with subtle cognitive complaints, clinicians often struggle to predict who will develop dementia. The public increasingly sees benefits to accessing dementia risk evidence (DRE) such as biomarkers, predictive algorithms, and genetic information, particularly as this information moves from research to demonstrated usefulness in guiding diagnosis and clinical management. For example, the knowledge that one has high levels of amyloid in the brain may lead one to seek amyloid reducing medications, plan for disability, or engage in health promoting behaviors to fight cognitive decline. Researchers often hesitate to share DRE data, either because they are insufficiently validated or reliable for use in individuals, or there are concerns about assuring responsible use and ensuring adequate understanding of potential problems when one's biomarker status is known. Concerns include warning people receiving DRE about situations in which they might be compelled to disclose their risk status potentially leading to discrimination or stigma. The Advisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia (AGREEDementia) welcomes all concerned with how best to share and use DRE. Supporting understanding in clinicians, stakeholders, and people with or at risk for dementia and clearly delineating risks, benefits, and gaps in knowledge is vital. This brief overview describes elements that made this group effective as a model for other health conditions where there is interest in unfettered collaboration to discuss diagnostic uncertainty and the appropriate use and communication of health-related risk information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyson C. Rosen
- VA Medical Center-Palo Alto, Palo Alto, CA, USA,Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA,Correspondence to: Allyson C. Rosen, PhD, ABPP-CN, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto VA Medical Center, 3801 Miranda Ave (151Y), Palo Alto, CA 94304-1207, USA. Tel.: +1 650 279 3949;
| | - Jalayne J. Arias
- School of Public Health Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - J. Wesson Ashford
- VA Medical Center-Palo Alto, Palo Alto, CA, USA,Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Deborah Blacker
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Nathan A. Chin
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Lindsay Clark
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sharon S. Denny
- The Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration, King of Prussia, PA, USA
| | - Jill S. Goldman
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carey E. Gleason
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Judith L. Heidebrink
- Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Victor W. Henderson
- Departments of Epidemiology & Population Health and of Neurology & Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Rachel L. Nosheny
- Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Monica W. Parker
- Emory Goizueta Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Suzanne E. Schindler
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Leslie Toy
- VA Medical Center-Palo Alto, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Jamie Tyrone
- Beating Alzheimer’s by Embracing Science, Ramona, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Walter
- Alzheimer’s Therapeutic Research Institute/USC, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Li-san Wang
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wu X, Peng C, Nelson PT, Cheng Q. Machine Learning Approach Predicts Probability of Time to Stage-Specific Conversion of Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2022; 90:891-903. [PMID: 36189595 PMCID: PMC9840816 DOI: 10.3233/jad-220590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) varies in different patients at different stages, which makes predicting the time of disease conversions challenging. OBJECTIVE We established an algorithm by leveraging machine learning techniques to predict the probability of the conversion time to next stage for different subjects during a given period. METHODS Firstly, we used Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimation to get the transition curves of different AD stages, and calculated Log-rank statistics to test whether the progression rate between different stages was identical. This quantitatively confirmed the progression rates known in the literature. Then, we developed an approach based on deep learning model, DeepSurv, to predict the probabilities of time-to-conversion. Finally, to help interpret the deep learning model in our approach, we identified important variables contributing the most to the DeepSurv prediction, whose significance were validated with the analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS Our machine learning approach predicted the time to conversion with a high accuracy. For each of the different stages, the concordance index (CI) of our approach was at least 86%, and the integrated Brier score (IBS) was less than 0.1. To facilitate interpretability of the prediction results, our approach identified the top 10 variables for each disease conversion scenario, which were clinicopathologically meaningful, and most of them were also statistically significant. CONCLUSION Our study has the potential to provide individualized prediction for future time course of AD conversions years before their actual occurrence, thus facilitating personalized prevention and intervention strategies to slow down the progression of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinxing Wu
- Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Chong Peng
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Qingdao University, Shandong, China
| | - Peter T. Nelson
- Department of Pathology, Sanders Brown Center for Dementia, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Qiang Cheng
- Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA,Correspondence to: Qiang Cheng, Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. Tel.: +1 859 323 3162; Fax: +1 859 257 0483;
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Advances in biomarkers, genetics, and other data used as dementia risk evidence (DRE) are increasingly informing clinical diagnosis and management. The purpose of this Mini-Forum is to provide a solutions-based discussion of the ethical and legal gaps and practical questions about how to use and communicate these data. Investigators often use DRE in research. When participants ask for their personal results, investigators have concerns. Will data that was intended to study groups be valid for individuals? Will sharing data cause distress? Debates around sharing DRE became heated when blood-based amyloid tests and amyloid reducing drugs appeared poised to enable clinicians easily to identify people with elevated brain amyloid and reduce it with a drug. Such an approach would transform the traditional role of DRE from investigational to foundational; however, then the high costs, uncertain clinical benefits and risks of the therapy led to an urgent need for education to support clinical decision making. Further complicating DRE use are direct to consumer genetic testing and increasingly available biomarker testing. Withholding DRE becomes less feasible and public education around responsible use and understanding become vital. A critical answer to these legal and ethical issues is supporting education that clearly delineates known risks, benefits, and gaps in knowledge, and communication to promote understanding among researchers, clinicians, patients, and all stakeholders. This paper provides an overview and identifies general concepts and resource documents that support more informed discussions for individuals and interdisciplinary groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyson C. Rosen
- VA Medical Center-Palo Alto, Palo Alto, CA, USA,Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA,Correspondence to: Allyson Rosen, PhD, ABPP-CN, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto VA Medical Center, 3801 Miranda Ave (151Y), Palo Alto, CA 94304-1207, USA.
| |
Collapse
|