Autoimmune thyroid disease and urticarial vasculitis: is there a significant association?

Urticarial Vasculitis Differs From Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Time to Diagnosis, Clinical Presentation, and Need for Anti-Inflammatory Treatment: An International Prospective UCARE Study

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and urticarial vasculitis (UV) share several clinical features including the occurrence of wheals. As of yet, the criteria for differentiating the 2 disorders are not clearly defined.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we aimed to identify differences, similarities, and the likelihood for specific clinical features in patients with UV versus those with CSU.

METHODS

Across 10 Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence, 106 patients with skin biopsy-confirmed UV and 126 patients with CSU were prospectively recruited to complete a questionnaire on the clinical features, course, and response to treatment of their disease.

RESULTS

As compared with CSU, patients with UV more often experienced postinflammatory skin hyperpigmentation, wheals of ≥24-hour duration, eye inflammation, and fever (6.9, 4.0, 3.6, and 2.4 times, respectively). Clinical features that increased the risk for UV diagnosis when present at the onset of disease included wheals of ≥24-hour duration (7.3-fold), pain of the skin (7.0-fold), postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (4.1-fold), and fatigue (3.1-fold). The diagnostic delay was markedly longer for normocomplementemic UV as compared with hypocomplementemic UV and CSU (21 vs 5 vs 6 months, respectively). Oral corticosteroids and omalizumab were the most effective treatments in patients with UV and CSU, respectively. Patients with UV showed a higher need for immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory therapies than patients with CSU.

CONCLUSIONS

Long wheal duration, skin pain and hyperpigmentation, and systemic symptoms point to UV rather than CSU as the underlying disease and should prompt further diagnostic workup including a skin biopsy.

Urticarial Vasculitis Associated With Levothyroxine

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a protean disorder that can be triggered by a myriad of causes although it is often idiopathic. Treatment is often successful with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive drugs. However, when a cause is found, specific treatment of the underlying problem or removal of an offending agent will resolve the symptoms. This report describes a patient with UV triggered by thyroid replacement, necessitated by Hashimoto's thyroiditis, which can itself cause UV. In this unusual presentation, rather than thyroiditis, thyroid replacement was the trigger for the vasculitis.

Dermatologic manifestations of thyroid disease: a literature review

Introduction

Thyroid hormone is considered one of the key regulatory hormones for skin homeostasis. Multiple organs are affected by the release of peripheral thyroid hormones (T4 and T3) further regulating various functions at a cellular level. Specifically, skin is considered an important target organ in which the thyroid hormone has a significant impact. Multiple skin diseases are associated with thyroid hormone dysregulation. However, other striking dermatologic manifestations are seen in nails and hair as well. Hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, and thyroid cancer can have an array of cutaneous manifestations, and we present the recent updates in this field.

Methods

A PubMed search was performed for updates in any new skin disease findings and treatments between 2010 and 2022. Research published in the past decade and previously known foundational skin findings associated with thyroid disease were presented in this review.

Conclusion

Cutaneous manifestations of thyroid disease is one of the first notable signs of thyroid hormone dysregulation. This article reviews the recent updates on the thyroid and skin interplay, and it further discusses overt visible findings and various available treatment modalities.

Hypocomplementemic Urticarial Vasculitis Associated With Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis and Hepatitis B Virus Infection: A Case Report

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is an uncommon condition characterized by recurrent episodes of urticarial lesions and angioedema and the pathological features of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. UV divides into two subgroups based on the level of serum complement. Usually, patients with hypocomplementemia experience internal organ involvement and an unfavorable prognosis. We report the case of a 33-year-old woman with a history of hepatitis B infection and autoimmune thyroiditis who developed hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis with recurrent angioedema and arthralgia. Complete remission was achieved using dapsone in monotherapy. We suggest dapsone as a potential treatment of choice for hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis. This clinical case emphasizes the need for urticarial vasculitis treatment guidelines.

Urticarial vasculitis

Urticarial vasculitis is a rare clinicopathologic entity that is characterized by chronic or recurrent episodes of urticarial lesions. Skin findings of this disease can be difficult to distinguish visually from those of chronic idiopathic urticaria but are unique in that individual lesions persist for ≥24 hours and can leave behind dusky hyperpigmentation. This disease is most often idiopathic but has been linked to certain drugs, infections, autoimmune connective disease, myelodysplastic disorders, and malignancies. More recently, some authors have reported associations between urticarial vasculitis and COVID-19, as well as influenza A/H1N1 infection. Urticarial vasculitis can extend systemically as well, most often affecting the musculoskeletal, renal, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and ocular systems. Features of leukocytoclastic vasculitis seen on histopathologic examination are diagnostic of this disease, but not always seen. In practice, antibiotics, dapsone, colchicine, and hydroxychloroquine are popular first-line therapies, especially for mild cutaneous disease. In more severe cases, immunosuppressives, including methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and cyclosporine, as well as corticosteroids, may be necessary for control. More recently, select biologic therapies, including rituximab, omalizumab, and interleukin-1 inhibitors have shown promise for the treatment of recalcitrant or refractory cases.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria and angioedema in a patient with autoimmune thyroid disease resolved after thyroidectomy

The link between chronic urticaria and accompanying thyroid disease is still not understood, with current treatment focusing on antihistamines and levothyroxine. A 35-year-old female patient presented with chronic idiopathic urticaria and facial angioedema for 9 months prior to evaluation. Oral corticosteroid therapy, antihistamines, leukotriene-antagonists, selenium, and omalizumab were all administered, with the disease relapsing within several days, accompanied with facial angioedema of varying severity. Laboratory results were negative for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and cytoplasmic antineutrophil antibodies (ANCA). Immunoglobulins and complement levels were normal. Autologous serum testing, and skin-prick test for common inhalatory allergens were all normal. Levothyroxine was then administered with no effect on the symptoms. After considering all of the available treatment options, the patient decided to undergo total thyroidectomy. Urticaria and angioedema subsided on the third postoperative day, and she remains free of symptom recurrence during 10 months of postoperative follow-up. Her antiTPO titer decreased from > 1300 to 31.1 kIU/L and antiTG decreased from 272 to 4.9 kIU/L three months after the surgery. The most important element in this case report is an unexpected extra-thyroid presentation of an autoimmune thyroid disease, with a newly described association with facial angioedema. Additional important evidence may confirm the hypothesis that both conditions are indeed caused by a common immunological patohogenetic pathway that should be routinely evaluated in patients presenting with chronic idiopathic urticaria.

Management of urticarial vasculitis: A worldwide physician perspective

BACKGROUND

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a rare type of leukocytoclastic vasculitis characterized by long lasting urticarial skin lesions and poor response to treatment. As of yet, no clinical guidelines, diagnostic criteria, or treatment algorithms exist, and the approaches to the diagnostic workup and treatment of UV patients may differ globally. We conducted an online survey to examine how UV patients are diagnosed and treated by international specialists and to reveal the greatest challenges in managing UV patients worldwide.

METHODS

Distribution of the questionnaire included an email to individuals in the World Allergy Organization (WAO) database, with no restrictions applied to the specialty, affiliation, or nationality of the participants (November 2018). The email contained a link (Internet address) to the online questionnaire. Responses were anonymous. The link to the questionnaire was further sent to the network of Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence (UCARE) in the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA2LEN) as well as to the Turkish Dermatology Society and the Japanese Society of Allergology, who distributed the link to their members. In addition, the survey link was posted online in the group of the Russian Society of Allergologists and Immunologists.

RESULTS

We received 883 completed surveys from physicians in 92 countries. UV was reported to be rare in clinical practice, with an average of 5 patients per physician per year. More than two-thirds of physicians reported wheals, burning of the skin, and residual hyperpigmentation in 60-100% of UV patients. The most frequently reported reason for receiving referrals of patients with UV was to establish the diagnosis. The most important features for establishing the diagnosis of UV were wheals of longer than 24 hours duration (72%), the results of skin biopsy (63%), and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (46%). The most common tests ordered in UV patients were complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, complement components, antinuclear antibodies, and skin biopsy. Physicians considered UV to be of unknown cause in most patients, and drugs and systemic lupus erythematosus to be the most common identifiable causes. Two of 3 physicians reported that they use second-generation antihistamines in standard dose as the first-line therapy in patients with UV. The greatest perceived challenges in the management of UV were the limited efficacy of drugs and the absence of clinical guidelines and treatment algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

UV is a challenging disease. Skin biopsy, a gold standard for UV diagnosis, is not performed by many physicians. This may lead to misdiagnosis of UV, for example, as chronic spontaneous urticaria, and to inadequate treatment. International consensus-based recommendations for the classification of UV and the diagnostic workup and treatment, as well as prospective studies evaluating potentially safe and effective drugs for the treatment of UV, are necessary.

Omalizumab in the Treatment of Chronic Urticaria: The Effect of Drug Co-Administration and Co-Morbidities

BACKGROUND

Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) is a disease presenting typical wheals characterized by itching, angioedema or both. Although CU is, by appearance, a relatively "simple" disease, yet it has a devastating effect on those suffering due to its immense social implications.

AIMS

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of omalizumab in the treatment of CSU. In particular, gender, co-administration of drugs and comorbidities were taken into account.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

108 patients (25 Males/83 Females) admitted to our department were diagnosed with CSU and were treated for 30 months. CSU was estimated on a score basis, which was used in order to define disease severity. The mean total CSU score and the mean CSU score of the first trimester, as well as the first semester, were calculated. Patients were treated with omalizumab, and in several cases, with co-administration of dapsone, cyclosporine and anti-histamines.

RESULTS

Females manifested significantly higher scores as compared to males. Further on, patients who relapsed manifested significantly higher scores during the whole time course, as well as at the end of the first semester.

CONCLUSION

Females are more prone to CSU. Although CSU scores in patients with remission, relapse and poor response manifested no significant difference at diagnosis, relapsed patients manifested higher CSU scores in the first semester. Therefore, the first semester of treatment is probably critical for the final patient outcome. Further studies are necessary in order to understand the mechanisms of CSU for better treatment and prognosis.