Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis: the role of whole-body MRI

Preferential involvement of the pelvis and hips along with active sacroiliitis in chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis: MRI of 97 patients from a single tertiary referral center

OBJECTIVE

To present MRI distribution of active osteitis in a single tertiary referral center cohort of patients with chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO).

METHODS

Two musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively reviewed MRI examinations of all patients with a final clinical diagnosis of CNO over 15 years. Sites of active osteitis at any time during the course of disease were divided into seven groups: (A) mandible, sternum, clavicles, or scapulas; (B) upper extremities; (C) subchondral sacrum and ilium immediately subjacent to sacroiliac joints (active osteitis denoting "active sacroiliitis" here); (D) pelvis and proximal 1/3 of femurs (excluding group C); (E) bones surrounding knees including distal 2/3 of femurs and 1/2 of proximal tibias and fibulas; (F) distal legs (including distal 1/2 of tibias and fibulas), ankles, or feet; (G) spine (excluding group C). Temporal changes of lesions in response to treatment (or other treatment-related changes such as pamidronate lines) were not within the scope of the study.

RESULTS

Among 97 CNO patients (53 males [55%], 44 females; age at onset, mean ± SD, 8.5 ± 3.2 years; age at diagnosis, 10.3 ± 3.3 years), whole-body (WB) MRI was performed in 92%, mostly following an initial targeted MRI (94%). A total of 557 (346 targeted and 211 WB) MRIs were analyzed. Biopsy was obtained in 39 patients (40%), all consistent with CNO or featuring supporting findings. The most common locations for active osteitis were groups D (78%; 95% CI 69‒85%) and C (72%; 95% CI 62‒80%).

CONCLUSION

Pelvis and hips were preferentially involved in this cohort of CNO patients along with a marked presence of active sacroiliitis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

When suggestive findings of CNO are identified elsewhere in the body, the next targeted site of MRI should be the pelvis (entirely including sacroiliac joints) and hips, if whole-body MRI is not available or feasible.

KEY POINTS

• Heavy reliance on MRI for diagnosis of CNO underscores the importance of suggestive distribution patterns. • Pelvis and hips are the most common (78%) sites of CNO involvement along with active sacroiliitis (72%). • Pelvis including sacroiliac joints and hips should be targeted on MRI when CNO is suspected.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system in the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases in the pediatric population

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the musculoskeletal system is an examination increasingly performed for suspected juvenile idiopathic arthritis, chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, as well as other rheumatic diseases of developmental age. T1-, T2- and PD-weighted with or without fat suppression or short tau inversion recovery/turbo inversion recovery magnitude (STIR/TIRM) sequences and post-contrast sequences are evaluated to diagnose pathological changes in the synovial membrane, subchondral bone marrow and surrounding soft tissues. Magnetic resonance imaging allows detection of synovitis, tenosynovitis, bursitis, and enthesitis as well as bone marrow edema and soft tissue edema. Several pediatric-specific MRI scoring systems have been developed and validated to standardize and facilitate the assessment of the extent of the inflammatory process and disease activity in MRI. Early detection of inflammatory changes allows the inclusion of comprehensive pharmacotherapy giving the possibility of permanent remission and objective measurement of the effectiveness of treatment.

Defining the imaging diagnostic criteria for adult chronic non-bacterial osteitis

Osteitis of the sternocostoclavicular (SCC) region, referred to as sternocostoclavicular hyperostosis (SCCH), is the clinical expression of chronic non-bacterial osteitis (CNO) in adults with this rare chronic auto-inflammatory disorder of the axial skeleton. The diagnosis is based on distinctive computerized tomography (CT) features of sclerosis and hyperostosis of the SCC region, and local increases in osteoid formation visualized by high radiopharmacon uptake on skeletal scintigraphy but clear radiologic diagnostic criteria are lacking. In a cross-sectional study, CT scans and whole-body skeletal scintigraphy images obtained in 169 patients seen at the Center for Bone Quality of the Leiden University Medical Center between 2008 and 2018 with a suspected diagnosis of CNO of the SCC region were re-evaluated by 2 skeletal radiologists and 2 nuclear physicians. The diagnosis was confirmed in 118 (70%) predominantly female patients (n = 103, 89.2%); median age at first symptoms 45 years (range 20-73). The diagnosis was excluded in the remaining 51 "non-CNO" patients. Increased radiopharmacon uptake at the SCC region was observed in 82% CNO patients, with the manubrium sterni having the highest predictive ability to discriminate on both imaging modalities. The prevalence of sclerosis of the clavicles, manubrium and first ribs was significantly higher in CNO patients (P < 0.001). Hyperostosis was not observed in non-CNO patients. 46 CNO versus only 2 non-CNO patients had costoclavicular ligament calcification. Our findings identify CT scan features of sclerosis and hyperostosis of manubrium sterni, medial end of clavicles and first ribs, and calcification of costoclavicular ligaments, associated with increased tracer uptake on skeletal scintigraphy at the SCC region, specifically manubrium sterni, as well-defined imaging diagnostic criteria for adult CNO. Pitfalls encountered in the diagnosis of CNO are highlighted. These defined imaging diagnostic criteria for adult CNO should facilitate the diagnosis of this rare auto-inflammatory bone disease across the spectrum of its early to late stages.

Treatment and monitoring of SAPHO syndrome: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Synovitis acne pustulosis hyperostosis osteitis (SAPHO) is a rare heterogeneous disease of unknown aetiopathology. Externally validated and internationally agreed diagnostic criteria or outcomes and, as a result, prospective randomised controlled trials in SAPHO are absent. Consequently, there is no agreed treatment standard. This study aimed to systematically collate and discuss treatment options in SAPHO.

METHODS

Following 'Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses' guidance, a systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Prospective clinical studies and retrospective case collections discussing management and outcomes in SAPHO involving five or more participants were included. Articles not published in English, studies not reporting defined outcomes, and studies solely relying on patient-reported outcomes were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 28 studies (20 observational, 8 open-label clinical studies) reporting 796 patients of predominantly European ethnicity were included. Reported therapies varied greatly, with many centres using multiple treatments in parallel. Most patients (37.1%) received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs alone or in combination. Bisphosphonates (22.1%), conventional (21.7%) and biological (11.3%) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were the next most frequently reported treatments. Reported outcomes varied and delivered mixed results, which complicates comparisons. Bisphosphonates demonstrated the most consistent improvement of osteoarticular symptoms and were associated with transient influenza-like symptoms. Paradoxical skin reactions were reported in patients treated with TNF inhibitors, but no serious adverse events were recorded. Most treatments had limited or mixed effects on cutaneous involvement. A recent study investigating the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib delivered promising results in relation to skin and nail involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

No single currently available treatment option sufficiently addresses all SAPHO-associated symptoms. Variable, sometimes descriptive outcomes and the use of treatment combinations complicate conclusions and treatment recommendations. Randomised clinical trials are necessary to generate reliable evidence.