Comparing the antidepressant-like effects of electroconvulsive seizures in adolescent and adult female rats: an intensity dose-response study

Novel rapid treatment options for adolescent depression

There is an urgent need for novel fast-acting antidepressants for adolescent treatment-resistant depression and/or suicidal risk, since the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors that are clinically approved for that age (i.e., fluoxetine or escitalopram) take weeks to work. In this context, one of the main research lines of our group is to characterize at the preclinical level novel approaches for rapid-acting antidepressants for adolescence. The present review summarizes the potential use in adolescence of non-pharmacological options, such as neuromodulators (electroconvulsive therapy and other innovative types of brain stimulation), as well as pharmacological options, including consciousness-altering drugs (mainly ketamine but also classical psychedelics) and cannabinoids (i.e., cannabidiol), with promising fast-acting responses. Following a brief analytical explanation of adolescent depression, we present a general introduction for each therapeutical approach together with the clinical evidence supporting its potential beneficial use in adolescence (mainly extrapolated from prior successful examples for adults), to then report recent and/or ongoing preclinical studies that will aid in improving the inclusion of these therapies in the clinic, by considering potential sex-, age-, and dose-related differences, and/or other factors that might affect efficacy or long-term safety. Finally, we conclude the review by providing future avenues to maximize treatment response, including the need for more clinical studies and the importance of designing and/or testing novel treatment options that are safe and fast-acting for adolescent depression.

Electroconvulsive seizures regulate various stages of hippocampal cell genesis and mBDNF at different times after treatment in adolescent and adult rats of both sexes

Electroconvulsive therapy, a fast-acting option for treatment-resistant depression, is modeled at the preclinical level through the induction of electroconvulsive seizures (ECS) in rodents. Recent studies from our group proved sex- and age-differences in the antidepressant-like response elicited by ECS in rats; while an antidepressant-like response was observed in male adolescent and adult rats (although with greater efficacy in adulthood), the same parameters rendered inefficacious in females of any age. To better understand the potential sex differences taking place at the molecular level that might be mediating these behavioral disparities, we evaluated the impact of a repeated treatment with ECS (95 mA for 0.6 s, 100 Hz, 0.6 ms) in adolescent and adult rats of both sexes. Several hippocampal markers of neuroplasticity, commonly regulated by most antidepressants, such as those of neurogenesis (cell proliferation, neurogenic differentiation, long-term cell survival) or mBDNF and associated signaling (e.g., mTOR and ERK1/2) were evaluated at different time-points after treatment (1-, 8-, 15- and up to 30-days post-treatment). The main results demonstrated that ECS improved the survival rate of new cells born in the dentate gryus before treatment. Moreover, ECS increased cell proliferation and neurogenic differentiation at different times post-treatment, paired with persistent increases in mBDNF, observed long after treatment. In general, effects were different for each sex and varied with the age of the animal (adolescent vs. adulthood). The present study is the first-one to demonstrate that such persistent molecular changes induced by ECS in hippocampus, some of them observed up to 30-days post-treatment, also occurred in female rats and adolescence. Although these molecular changes could not justify the lack of ECS efficacy described by these same parameters of ECS in female rats (vs. male rats), they proposed certain beneficial effects common to both sexes, and age periods studied, opening the avenue for further studies. Based on these neurochemical effects, ECS should have displayed similar efficacies for both biological sexes. Therefore, the reason behind these disparities should be further explored to better translate efficacious treatments specific and/or personalized for each sex to the clinic.