Dione: An OWL representation of ICD-10-CM for classifying patients' diseases

Improving the Quality and Utility of Electronic Health Record Data through Ontologies

The translational research community, in general, and the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) community, in particular, share the vision of repurposing EHRs for research that will improve the quality of clinical practice. Many members of these communities are also aware that electronic health records (EHRs) suffer limitations of data becoming poorly structured, biased, and unusable out of original context. This creates obstacles to the continuity of care, utility, quality improvement, and translational research. Analogous limitations to sharing objective data in other areas of the natural sciences have been successfully overcome by developing and using common ontologies. This White Paper presents the authors' rationale for the use of ontologies with computable semantics for the improvement of clinical data quality and EHR usability formulated for researchers with a stake in clinical and translational science and who are advocates for the use of information technology in medicine but at the same time are concerned by current major shortfalls. This White Paper outlines pitfalls, opportunities, and solutions and recommends increased investment in research and development of ontologies with computable semantics for a new generation of EHRs.

The use of SNOMED CT, 2013-2020: a literature review

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews recent literature on the use of SNOMED CT as an extension of Lee et al's 2014 review on the same topic. The Lee et al's article covered literature published from 2001-2012, and the scope of this review was 2013-2020.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In line with Lee et al's methods, we searched the PubMed and Embase databases and identified 1002 articles for review, including studies from January 2013 to September 2020. The retrieved articles were categorized and analyzed according to SNOMED CT focus categories (ie, indeterminate, theoretical, pre-development, implementation, and evaluation/commodity), usage categories (eg, illustrate terminology systems theory, prospective content coverage, used to classify or code in a study, retrieve or analyze patient data, etc.), medical domains, and countries.

RESULTS

After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 622 articles were selected for final review. Compared to the papers published between 2001 and 2012, papers published between 2013 and 2020 revealed an increase in more mature usage of SNOMED CT, and the number of papers classified in the "implementation" and "evaluation/commodity" focus categories expanded. When analyzed by decade, papers in the "pre-development," "implementation," and "evaluation/commodity" categories were much more numerous in 2011-2020 than in 2001-2010, increasing from 169 to 293, 30 to 138, and 3 to 65, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Published papers in more mature usage categories have substantially increased since 2012. From 2013 to present, SNOMED CT has been increasingly implemented in more practical settings. Future research should concentrate on addressing whether SNOMED CT influences improvement in patient care.

Coronary Artery Disease Phenotype Detection in an Academic Hospital System Setting

BACKGROUND

The United States, and especially West Virginia, have a tremendous burden of coronary artery disease (CAD). Undiagnosed familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an important factor for CAD in the U.S. Identification of a CAD phenotype is an initial step to find families with FH.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that a CAD phenotype detection algorithm that uses discrete data elements from electronic health records (EHRs) can be validated from EHR information housed in a data repository.

METHODS

We developed an algorithm to detect a CAD phenotype which searched through discrete data elements, such as diagnosis, problem lists, medical history, billing, and procedure (International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-9/10 and Current Procedural Terminology [CPT]) codes. The algorithm was applied to two cohorts of 500 patients, each with varying characteristics. The second (younger) cohort consisted of parents from a school child screening program. We then determined which patients had CAD by systematic, blinded review of EHRs. Following this, we revised the algorithm by refining the acceptable diagnoses and procedures. We ran the second algorithm on the same cohorts and determined the accuracy of the modification.

RESULTS

CAD phenotype Algorithm I was 89.6% accurate, 94.6% sensitive, and 85.6% specific for group 1. After revising the algorithm (denoted CAD Algorithm II) and applying it to the same groups 1 and 2, sensitivity 98.2%, specificity 87.8%, and accuracy 92.4; accuracy 93% for group 2. Group 1 F1 score was 92.4%. Specific ICD-10 and CPT codes such as "coronary angiography through a vein graft" were more useful than generic terms.

CONCLUSION

We have created an algorithm, CAD Algorithm II, that detects CAD on a large scale with high accuracy and sensitivity (recall). It has proven useful among varied patient populations. Use of this algorithm can extend to monitor a registry of patients in an EHR and/or to identify a group such as those with likely FH.

Construction of a semi-automatic ICD-10 coding system

Background

The International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) has been widely used to describe the diagnosis information of patients. Automatic ICD-10 coding is important because manually assigning codes is expensive, time consuming and error prone. Although numerous approaches have been developed to explore automatic coding, few of them have been applied in practice. Our aim is to construct a practical, automatic ICD-10 coding machine to improve coding efficiency and quality in daily work.

Methods

In this study, we propose the use of regular expressions (regexps) to establish a correspondence between diagnosis codes and diagnosis descriptions in outpatient settings and at admission and discharge. The description models of the regexps were embedded in our upgraded coding system, which queries a diagnosis description and assigns a unique diagnosis code. Like most studies, the precision (P), recall (R), F-measure (F) and overall accuracy (A) were used to evaluate the system performance. Our study had two stages. The datasets were obtained from the diagnosis information on the homepage of the discharge medical record. The testing sets were from October 1, 2017 to April 30, 2018 and from July 1, 2018 to January 31, 2019.

Results

The values of P were 89.27 and 88.38% in the first testing phase and the second testing phase, respectively, which demonstrate high precision. The automatic ICD-10 coding system completed more than 160,000 codes in 16 months, which reduced the workload of the coders. In addition, a comparison between the amount of time needed for manual coding and automatic coding indicated the effectiveness of the system-the time needed for automatic coding takes nearly 100 times less than manual coding.

Conclusions

Our automatic coding system is well suited for the coding task. Further studies are warranted to perfect the description models of the regexps and to develop synthetic approaches to improve system performance.

Ontological and Non-Ontological Resources for Associating Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Terms to SNOMED Clinical Terms With Semantic Properties

Background: Formal definitions allow selecting terms (e.g., identifying all terms related to “Infectious disease” using the query “has causative agent organism”) and terminological reasoning (e.g., “hepatitis B” is a “hepatitis” and is an “infectious disease”). However, the standard international terminology Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) used for coding adverse drug reactions in pharmacovigilance databases does not beneficiate from such formal definitions. Our objective was to evaluate the potential of reuse of ontological and non-ontological resources for generating such definitions for MedDRA.

Methods: We developed several methods that collectively allow a semiautomatic semantic enrichment of MedDRA: 1) using MedDRA-to-SNOMED Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) mappings (available in the Unified Medical Language System metathesaurus or other mapping resources, e.g., the MedDRA preferred term “hepatitis B” is associated to the SNOMED CT concept “type B viral hepatitis”) to extract term definitions (e.g., “hepatitis B” is associated with the following properties: has finding site liver structure, has associated morphology inflammation morphology, and has causative agent hepatitis B virus); 2) using MedDRA labels and lexical/syntactic methods for automatic decomposition of complex MedDRA terms (e.g., the MedDRA systems organ class “blood and lymphatic system disorders” is decomposed in blood system disorders and lymphatic system disorders) or automatic suggestions of properties (e.g., the string “cyclic” in preferred term “cyclic neutropenia” leads to the property has clinical course cyclic).

Results: The Unified Medical Language System metathesaurus was the main ontological resource reusable for generating formal definitions for MedDRA terms. The non-ontological resources (another mapping resource provided by Nadkarni and Darer in 2010 and MedDRA labels) allowed defining few additional preferred terms. While the Ci4SeR tool helped the curator to define 1,935 terms by suggesting potential supplemental relations based on the parents’ and siblings’ semantic definition, defining manually all MedDRA terms remains expensive in time.

Discussion: Several ontological and non-ontological resources are available for associating MedDRA terms to SNOMED CT concepts with semantic properties, but providing manual definitions is still necessary. The ontology of adverse events is a possible alternative but does not cover all MedDRA terms either. Perspectives are to implement more efficient techniques to find more logical relations between SNOMED CT and MedDRA in an automated way.

[Infectious diseases and their ICD coding : What could be improved by the introduction of ICD-11?]

Die Revision der Internationalen statistischen Klassifikation der Krankheiten und verwandter Gesundheitsprobleme (International Classification of Diseases – ICD) geht mit grundlegenden Änderungen der Morbiditäts- und Mortalitätsstatistik einher, die auch den Bereich der Infektionskrankheiten betreffen. Die Zuordnung der einzelnen Infektionskrankheiten zu den Kapiteln in der aktuellen ICD-10 erfolgt aufgrund unterschiedlicher Konzepte, teilweise nach auslösendem Agens, nach betroffenem Organsystem oder nach Lebensperiode. Besondere Herausforderungen der Klassifizierung der Infektionskrankheiten bestehen u. a. darin, dass regelmäßig ein Anpassungsbedarf durch neu auftretende Erreger entstehen kann. Außerdem reichen die Angaben hinsichtlich Umfang und Tiefe in der ICD-10 teilweise nicht aus, um epidemiologische Auswertungen der Daten durchzuführen.

Die ICD ermöglicht den weltweiten Vergleich von Statistiken zu Infektionskrankheiten. Zunehmend wird die ICD jedoch auch für die Erhebung von Surveillance- und Forschungsdaten eingesetzt, z. B. im Rahmen des Meldewesens (Identifizierung von Meldetatbeständen), aber auch in der syndromischen Surveillance akuter Atemwegsinfektionen und für den Aufbau neuer Surveillance-Systeme sowie der Evaluation der Datenqualität durch Abgleich mit Sekundärdaten.

Die Chancen der ICD-11 liegen vor allem darin, dass Infektionskrankheiten eindeutiger codiert werden können und ihre Codierung mehr relevante Informationen für die epidemiologische Bewertung enthält. Durch die hohe Komplexität können jedoch Verzerrungen in den Daten entstehen, die die Fortschreibung der Morbiditäts- und Mortalitätsstatistiken erschweren.