Meeting report: the 2021 FSHD International Research Congress

Identification of disease-specific extracellular vesicle-associated plasma protein biomarkers for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy

Objective

Reliable, circulating biomarkers for Duchenne, Becker and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophies (DBMD and FSHD) remain unvalidated. Here, we investigated the plasma extracellular vesicle (EV) proteome to identify disease-specific biomarkers that could accelerate therapy approvals.

Methods

We extracted EVs from the plasma of DBMD and FSHD patients and healthy controls using size-exclusion chromatography, conducted mass spectrometry on the extracted EV proteins, and performed comparative analysis to identify disease-specific biomarkers. We correlated the levels of these biomarkers with clinical outcome measures and confounding factors.

Results

The muscle-associated proteins PYGM, MYOM3, FLNC, MYH2 and TTN were exclusively present in DBMD EVs. PYGM, MYOM3, and TTN negatively correlated with age. PYGM and MYOM3 levels were elevated in patients without cardiomyopathy, and PYGM levels were specifically elevated in ambulatory DMD patients. On the other hand, female FSHD patients displayed significantly higher MBL2 and lower GPLD1 levels. However, male FSHD patients exhibited higher C9 and lower C4BPB levels. Additionally, desmosome proteins JUP and DSP were uniquely found in FSHD males. MBL2 positively correlated with age and C4BPB negatively correlated with FSHD severity in male patients.

Interpretation

Our findings underscore the sensitivity of analyzing circulating EV content to identify disease-specific protein biomarkers for DBMD and FSHD. Our results also emphasize the potential of EV-based biomarker discovery as a promising approach to monitor disease progression as well as effectiveness of therapies in muscular dystrophy, potentially contributing to their approval. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to validate these biomarkers and explore their clinical implications.

Dominantly inherited muscle disorders: understanding their complexity and exploring therapeutic approaches

Treatments for disabling and life-threatening hereditary muscle disorders are finally close to becoming a reality. Research has thus far focused primarily on recessive forms of muscle disease. The gene replacement strategies that are commonly employed for recessive, loss-of-function disorders are not readily translatable to most dominant myopathies owing to the presence of a normal chromosome in each nucleus, hindering the development of novel treatments for these dominant disorders. This is largely due to their complex, heterogeneous disease mechanisms that require unique therapeutic approaches. However, as viral and RNA interference-based therapies enter clinical use, key tools are now in place to develop treatments for dominantly inherited disorders of muscle. This article will review what is known about dominantly inherited disorders of muscle, specifically their genetic basis, how mutations lead to disease, and the pathomechanistic implications for therapeutic approaches.

Oligonucleotide Therapies for Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy: Current Preclinical Landscape

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an inherited myopathy, characterized by progressive and asymmetric muscle atrophy, primarily affecting muscles of the face, shoulder girdle, and upper arms before affecting muscles of the lower extremities with age and greater disease severity. FSHD is a disabling condition, and patients may also present with various extramuscular symptoms. FSHD is caused by the aberrant expression of double homeobox 4 (DUX4) in skeletal muscle, arising from compromised epigenetic repression of the D4Z4 array. DUX4 encodes the DUX4 protein, a transcription factor that activates myotoxic gene programs to produce the FSHD pathology. Therefore, sequence-specific oligonucleotides aimed at reducing DUX4 levels in patients is a compelling therapeutic approach, and one that has received considerable research interest over the last decade. This review aims to describe the current preclinical landscape of oligonucleotide therapies for FSHD. This includes outlining the mechanism of action of each therapy and summarizing the preclinical results obtained regarding their efficacy in cellular and/or murine disease models. The scope of this review is limited to oligonucleotide-based therapies that inhibit the DUX4 gene, mRNA, or protein in a way that does not involve gene editing.

Safety and efficacy of losmapimod in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (ReDUX4): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial

BACKGROUND

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy is a hereditary progressive myopathy caused by aberrant expression of the transcription factor DUX4 in skeletal muscle. No approved disease-modifying treatments are available for this disorder. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of losmapimod (a small molecule that inhibits p38α MAPK, a regulator of DUX4 expression, and p38β MAPK) for the treatment of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.

METHODS

We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial at 17 neurology centres in Canada, France, Spain, and the USA. We included adults aged 18-65 years with type 1 facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (ie, with loss of repression of DUX4 expression, as ascertained by genotyping), a Ricci clinical severity score of 2-4, and at least one skeletal muscle judged using MRI to be suitable for biopsy. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to either oral losmapimod (15 mg twice a day) or matching placebo for 48 weeks, via an interactive response technology system. The investigator, study staff, participants, sponsor, primary outcome assessors, and study monitor were masked to the treatment allocation until study closure. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to either week 16 or 36 in DUX4-driven gene expression in skeletal muscle biopsy samples, as measured by quantitative RT-PCR. The primary efficacy analysis was done in all participants who were randomly assigned and who had available data for assessment, according to the modified intention-to-treat principle. Safety and tolerability were assessed as secondary endpoints. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04003974. The phase 2b trial is complete; an open-label extension is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 27, 2019, and Feb 27, 2020, 80 people were enrolled. 40 were randomly allocated to losmapimod and 40 to placebo. 54 (68%) participants were male and 26 (33%) were female, 70 (88%) were White, and mean age was 45·7 (SD 12·5) years. Least squares mean changes from baseline in DUX4-driven gene expression did not differ significantly between the losmapimod (0·83 [SE 0·61]) and placebo (0·40 [0·65]) groups (difference 0·43 [SE 0·56; 95% CI -1·04 to 1·89]; p=0·56). Losmapimod was well tolerated. 29 treatment-emergent adverse events (nine drug-related) were reported in the losmapimod group compared with 23 (two drug-related) in the placebo group. Two participants in the losmapimod group had serious adverse events that were deemed unrelated to losmapimod by the investigators (alcohol poisoning and suicide attempt; postoperative wound infection) compared with none in the placebo group. No treatment discontinuations due to adverse events occurred and no participants died during the study.

INTERPRETATION

Although losmapimod did not significantly change DUX4-driven gene expression, it was associated with potential improvements in prespecified structural outcomes (muscle fat infiltration), functional outcomes (reachable workspace, a measure of shoulder girdle function), and patient-reported global impression of change compared with placebo. These findings have informed the design and choice of efficacy endpoints for a phase 3 study of losmapimod in adults with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.

FUNDING

Fulcrum Therapeutics.

Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for neuromuscular diseases

Neuromuscular diseases encompass a heterogeneous array of disorders characterized by varying onset ages, clinical presentations, severity, and progression. While these conditions can stem from acquired or inherited causes, this review specifically focuses on disorders arising from genetic abnormalities, excluding metabolic conditions. The pathogenic defect may primarily affect the anterior horn cells, the axonal or myelin component of peripheral nerves, the neuromuscular junction, or skeletal and/or cardiac muscles. While inherited neuromuscular disorders have been historically deemed not treatable, the advent of gene-based and molecular therapies is reshaping the treatment landscape for this group of condition. With the caveat that many products still fail to translate the positive results obtained in pre-clinical models to humans, both the technological development (e.g., implementation of tissue-specific vectors) as well as advances on the knowledge of pathogenetic mechanisms form a collective foundation for potentially curative approaches to these debilitating conditions. This review delineates the current panorama of therapies targeting the most prevalent forms of inherited neuromuscular diseases, emphasizing approved treatments and those already undergoing human testing, offering insights into the state-of-the-art interventions.

An up-to-date myopathologic characterisation of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1 muscle biopsies shows sarcolemmal complement membrane attack complex deposits and increased skeletal muscle regeneration

The aim of this study was to identify key routinely used myopathologic biomarkers of FSHD1. Needle muscle biopsies were taken in 34 affected muscles (m. quadriceps femoris (QF), n = 20, m. tibialis anterior (TA), n = 13, m. biceps brachii, n = 1) from 22 patients (age, 53.5 (10) years; M = 12, F = 10). Eleven patients had more than one biopsy (2xQF, n = 1; QF+TA, n = 9; 2xQF+TA, n = 1). Histochemistry, immunoperoxidase, and immunofluorescence stainings were performed and compared to age and muscle type matched muscle specimens of 11 healthy controls. Myopathologic features observed in our FSHD1 cohort were internalized nuclei, type 1 fibre hypertrophy and NADH central clearances/cores. We observed a prominent inflammatory response with MAC deposits, MHC I expression, and muscle regeneration that correlated with the inflammatory score. Our up-to-date characterization of FSHD1 points towards MHC I, MAC, and embryonic Myosin Heavy Chain/muscle regeneration as useful myopathologic readouts of FSHD1.

Post-Translational Modifications of the DUX4 Protein Impact Toxic Function in FSHD Cell Models

OBJECTIVE

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is caused by abnormal de-repression of the myotoxic transcription factor DUX4. Although the transcriptional targets of DUX4 are known, the regulation of DUX4 protein and the molecular consequences of this regulation are unclear. Here, we used in vitro models of FSHD to identify and characterize DUX4 post-translational modifications (PTMs) and their impact on the toxic function of DUX4.

METHODS

We immunoprecipitated DUX4 protein and performed mass spectrometry to identify PTMs. We then characterized DUX4 PTMs and potential enzyme modifiers using mutagenesis, proteomics, and biochemical assays in HEK293 and human myoblast cell lines.

RESULTS

We identified 17 DUX4 amino acids with PTMs, and generated 55 DUX4 mutants designed to prevent or mimic PTMs. Five mutants protected cells against DUX4-mediated toxicity and reduced the ability of DUX4 to transactivate FSHD biomarkers. These mutagenesis results suggested that DUX4 toxicity could be counteracted by serine/threonine phosphorylation and/or inhibition of arginine methylation. We therefore sought to identify modifying enzymes that could play a role in regulating DUX4 PTMs. We found several enzymes capable of modifying DUX4 protein in vitro, and confirmed that protein kinase A (PKA) and protein arginine methyltransferase (PRMT1) interact with DUX4.

INTERPRETATION

These results support that DUX4 is regulated by PTMs and set a foundation for developing FSHD drug screens based mechanistically on DUX4 PTMs and modifying enzymes. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:398-413.

Influence of DUX4 Expression in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy and Possible Treatments

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) represents the third most common form of muscular dystrophy and is characterized by muscle weakness and atrophy. FSHD is caused by the altered expression of the transcription factor double homeobox 4 (DUX4), which is involved in several significantly altered pathways required for myogenesis and muscle regeneration. While DUX4 is normally silenced in the majority of somatic tissues in healthy individuals, its epigenetic de-repression has been linked to FSHD, resulting in DUX4 aberrant expression and cytotoxicity in skeletal muscle cells. Understanding how DUX4 is regulated and functions could provide useful information not only to further understand FSHD pathogenesis, but also to develop therapeutic approaches for this disorder. Therefore, this review discusses the role of DUX4 in FSHD by examining the possible molecular mechanisms underlying the disease as well as novel pharmacological strategies targeting DUX4 aberrant expression.

[Molecular therapies: present and future in neuromuscular diseases]

BACKGROUND

The possibilities in the field of molecular therapies of neuromuscular diseases have rapidly developed in recent years. First compounds are already available in clinical practice and numerous other substances are in advanced phases of clinical trials. This article gives an exemplary overview of the current state of clinical research in molecular therapies of neuromuscular diseases. It also gives a view into the near future of the clinical application, including the challenges.

DISCUSSION

Using Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and myotubular myopathy as examples, the principles of gene addition in monogenetic skeletal muscle diseases, which are already manifested in childhood are described. In addition to initial successes, the challenges and setbacks hindering the approval and regular clinical application of further compounds are demonstrated. Furthermore, the state of current clinical research in Becker-Kiener muscular dystrophy (BMD) and the numerous forms of limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) are summarized. Numerous new therapeutic approaches and a corresponding outlook are also shown for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), Pompe disease, and myotonic dystrophy.

CONCLUSION

Clinical research in the field of molecular therapy of neuromuscular diseases is one of the pacesetters of modern precision medicine; however, challenges need to be seen, jointly addressed and overcome in the future.

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: the road to targeted therapies

Advances in the molecular understanding of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) have revealed that FSHD results from epigenetic de-repression of the DUX4 gene in skeletal muscle, which encodes a transcription factor that is active in early embryonic development but is normally silenced in almost all somatic tissues. These advances also led to the identification of targets for disease-altering therapies for FSHD, as well as an improved understanding of the molecular mechanism of the disease and factors that influence its progression. Together, these developments led the FSHD research community to shift its focus towards the development of disease-modifying treatments for FSHD. This Review presents advances in the molecular and clinical understanding of FSHD, discusses the potential targeted therapies that are currently being explored, some of which are already in clinical trials, and describes progress in the development of FSHD-specific outcome measures and assessment tools for use in future clinical trials.

Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the current knowledge on the clinical characteristics and disease mechanism of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), as well as advances in targeted therapy development.

RECENT FINDINGS

FSHD has a wide range of severity, yet a distinct phenotype characterized by weakness of the facial, shoulder, and upper arm muscles, followed by weakness of the trunk and leg muscles. It can be caused by two genetic mechanisms that share a common downstream pathway, namely, the epigenetic derepression and subsequent misexpression of the myotoxic DUX4 transcription factor. Treatment is currently supportive and outlined in evidence-based guidelines. Advances in the understanding of the pathogenic mechanism of FSHD are paving the way for targeted therapy development. Approaches for targeted therapies to reduce DUX4 expression that are currently being explored include small molecules, antisense oligonucleotides, vector-based RNA interference, and gene therapy. In anticipation of more clinical trials, "clinical trial preparedness," including the development of sensitive biomarkers and clinical outcome measures, are needed.

SUMMARY

The cornerstones of the diagnosis of FSHD are clinical observation and genetic testing. Management is currently supportive, but progress in the understanding of the disease mechanism has shifted the field of FSHD toward targeted therapy development.

Long-Term Systemic Treatment of a Mouse Model Displaying Chronic FSHD-like Pathology with Antisense Therapeutics That Inhibit DUX4 Expression

Silencing the expression of the double homeobox 4 (DUX4) gene offers great potential for the treatment of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). Several research groups have recently reported promising results using systemic antisense therapy in a transgenic small animal model of FSHD, the ACTA1-MCM/FLExDUX4 mouse model. However, the treatment was applied in non-DUX4-induced mice or shortly after DUX4 activation, which resulted in conditions that do not correctly represent the situation in a clinic. Here, we generated progressive FSHD-like pathology in ACTA1-MCM/FLExDUX4 mice and then treated the animals with vivoPMO-PACS4, an antisense compound that efficiently downregulates DUX4. To best mimic the translation of this treatment in clinical settings, the systemic antisense oligonucleotide administration was delayed to 3 weeks after the DUX4 activation so that the pathology was established at the time of the treatment. The chronic administration of vivoPMO-PACS4 for 8 weeks downregulated the DUX4 expression by 60%. Consequently, the treated mice showed an increase by 18% in body-wide muscle mass and 32% in muscle strength, and a reduction in both myofiber central nucleation and muscle fibrosis by up to 29% and 37%, respectively. Our results in a more suitable model of FSHD pathology confirm the efficacy of vivoPMO-PACS4 administration, and highlight the significant benefit provided by the long-term treatment of the disease.