Simplifying [18F]GE-179 PET: are both arterial blood sampling and 90-min acquisitions essential?

Non-invasive kinetic modelling approaches for quantitative analysis of brain PET studies

Pharmacokinetic modelling with arterial sampling is the gold standard for analysing dynamic PET data of the brain. However, the invasive character of arterial sampling prevents its widespread clinical application. Several methods have been developed to avoid arterial sampling, in particular reference region methods. Unfortunately, for some tracers or diseases, no suitable reference region can be defined. For these cases, other potentially non-invasive approaches have been proposed: (1) a population based input function (PBIF), (2) an image derived input function (IDIF), or (3) simultaneous estimation of the input function (SIME). This systematic review aims to assess the correspondence of these non-invasive methods with the gold standard. Studies comparing non-invasive pharmacokinetic modelling methods with the current gold standard methods using an input function derived from arterial blood samples were retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE (until December 2021). Correlation measurements were extracted from the studies. The search yielded 30 studies that correlated outcome parameters (V_T, DVR, or BP_ND for reversible tracers; K_i or CMR_glu for irreversible tracers) from a potentially non-invasive method with those obtained from modelling using an arterial input function. Some studies provided similar results for PBIF, IDIF, and SIME-based methods as for modelling with an arterial input function (R² = 0.59-1.00, R² = 0.71-1.00, R² = 0.56-0.96, respectively), if the non-invasive input curve was calibrated with arterial blood samples. Even when the non-invasive input curve was calibrated with venous blood samples or when no calibration was applied, moderate to good correlations were reported, especially for the IDIF and SIME (R² = 0.71-1.00 and R² = 0.36-0.96, respectively). Overall, this systematic review illustrates that non-invasive methods to generate an input function are still in their infancy. Yet, IDIF and SIME performed well, not only with arterial blood calibration, but also with venous or no blood calibration, especially for some tracers without plasma metabolites, which would potentially make these methods better suited for clinical application. However, these methods should still be properly validated for each individual tracer and application before implementation.

Validation of a combined image derived input function and venous sampling approach for the quantification of [18F]GE-179 PET binding in the brain

Blood-based kinetic analysis of PET data relies on an accurate estimate of the arterial plasma input function (PIF). An alternative to invasive measurements from arterial sampling is an image-derived input function (IDIF). However, an IDIF provides the whole blood radioactivity concentration, rather than the required free tracer radioactivity concentration in plasma. To estimate the tracer PIF, we corrected an IDIF from the carotid artery with estimates of plasma parent fraction (PF) and plasma-to-whole blood (PWB) ratio obtained from five venous samples. We compared the combined IDIF+venous approach to gold standard data from arterial sampling in 10 healthy volunteers undergoing [¹⁸F]GE-179 brain PET imaging of the NMDA receptor. Arterial and venous PF and PWB ratio estimates determined from 7 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) were also compared to assess the potential effect of medication. There was high agreement between areas under the curves of the estimates of PF (r = 0.99, p<0.001), PWB ratio (r = 0.93, p<0.001), and the PIF (r = 0.92, p<0.001) as well as total distribution volume (V_T) in 11 regions across the brain (r = 0.95, p<0.001). IDIF+venous V_T had a mean bias of -1.7% and a comparable regional coefficient of variation (arterial: 21.3 ± 2.5%, IDIF+venous: 21.5 ± 2.0%). Simplification of the IDIF+venous method to use only one venous sample provided less accurate V_T estimates (mean bias 9.9%; r = 0.71, p<0.001). A version of the method that avoids the need for blood sampling by combining the IDIF with population-based PF and PWB ratio estimates systematically underestimated V_T (mean bias -20.9%), and produced V_T estimates with a poor correlation to those obtained using arterial data (r = 0.45, p<0.001). Arterial and venous blood data from 7 TBI patients showed high correlations for PF (r = 0.92, p = 0.003) and PWB ratio (r = 0.93, p = 0.003). In conclusion, the IDIF+venous method with five venous samples provides a viable alternative to arterial sampling for quantification of [¹⁸F]GE-179 V_T.

Automated production of a N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor radioligand [18F]GE179 for clinical use

N-Methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are ligand and voltage-gated heteromeric ion channel receptors. Excessive activation of NMDA receptors is implicated in many neurological and psychiatric disorders, including ischemic stroke, neuropathic pain, epilepsy, drug addition, Alzheimer's disease, and schizophrenia. [¹⁸F]GE179 is a promising PET probe for imaging functional NMDA receptor alterations (activated or 'open' channel) with a high binding affinity (K_d = 2.4 nM). Here, we report the production of the NMDA receptor radioligand [¹⁸F]GE179 in a current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) facility through a one-pot two-step strategy. [¹⁸F]GE179 was produced in approximately 110 min with a radiochemical yield of 12 ± 6% (n = 4, decay corrected), radiochemical purity >95%, molar activity of 146 ± 32 GBq/μmol (at the end of synthesis), an average mass of GE179 at 2.2 μg/batch, and total impurities less than 0.5 μg/batch (n = 4). The radiopharmaceutical dose meets all quality control (QC) criteria for human use, and is suitable for clinical PET studies of activated NMDA receptor ion channels.