Comparison of [18F]-FDOPA PET and [123I]-FP-CIT SPECT acquired in clinical practice for assessing nigrostriatal degeneration in patients with a clinically uncertain parkinsonian syndrome

Clinical utility of 18F-fluorodopa positron emission tomography in the movement disorder clinic: an Australian experience

BACKGROUND

Differentiating idiopathic Parkinson disease (iPD) from other causes of tremor and parkinsonism based on clinical grounds can be challenging, particularly early in the course of disease or in the case of atypical clinical presentations. 18F-fluorodopa (F-DOPA) is a positron emission tomography (PET) radioligand that can be used to demonstrate the presence and pattern of striatal presynaptic dopaminergic deficit and, thus, assist in the diagnosis of iPD and related disorders.

AIMS

To determine the clinical utility of F-DOPA PET in an Australian movement disorder clinic setting.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of movement disorder clinic patients referred for F-DOPA PET by four movement disorder neurologists over a 10-year period to a single Australian nuclear medicine centre. Results of F-DOPA PET scans were correlated with changes in provisional diagnosis and management in the short term following review of F-DOPA PET results.

RESULTS

A total of 105 F-DOPA PET scan results and patient records were examined. In this cohort, provisional clinical diagnosis was altered in 37.9% of patients, and changes to clinical management were made in 48.4% of patients in the short term following review of F-DOPA PET results. Changes in both diagnosis and management were more common following a normal F-DOPA PET scan result (42.4% and 53.0% respectively) than a scan consistent with iPD (23.5% and 32.4% respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant change in provisional clinical diagnosis and management in the short term following review of F-DOPA PET results indicating significant clinical utility of F-DOPA PET in the Australian movement disorder clinic setting.

PET, SPECT, and MRI imaging for evaluation of Parkinson's disease

This review assesses the primary neuroimaging techniques used to evaluate Parkinson's disease (PD) - a neurological condition characterized by gradual dopamine-producing nerve cell degeneration. The neuroimaging techniques explored include positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These modalities offer varying degrees of insights into PD pathophysiology, diagnostic accuracy, specificity by way of exclusion of other Parkinsonian syndromes, and monitoring of disease progression. Neuroimaging is thus crucial for diagnosing and managing PD, with integrated multimodal approaches and novel techniques further enhancing early detection and treatment evaluation.

Optimization of [18F]-FDOPA Brain PET Acquisition Times for Assessment of Parkinsonism in the Clinical Setting

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Fluorine 18-fluoro-L-dopa ([18F]-FDOPA) was approved by the FDA in 2019 and reimbursed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in 2022 for use with PET to visualize dopaminergic nerve terminals in the striatum for evaluation of parkinsonism. We sought to determine the optimal image acquisition time for [18F]-FDOPA PET by evaluating rater-estimated FDOPA positivity and image quality across 4 time points.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Brain PET/CT was acquired 90 minutes following injection of 185 megabecquerel (5 mCi) of [18F]-FDOPA. PET was acquired in list mode for 20 minutes, and data were replayed to represent 15-, 10-, and 5-minute acquisitions. By means of MIMneuro, PET/MR imaging or PET/CT was independently graded for FDOPA positivity and image quality by 2 readers, blinded to the clinical report and diagnosis. Expert neuroradiologist clinical reads were used as the criterion standard.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included, average age 65.6 years, 55% women. Image-quality ratings decreased with shorter acquisition times for both readers (reader 1, ρ = 0.23, P = .044; reader 2, ρ = 0.24, P = .036), but there was no association between abnormality confidence scores and acquisition time (reader 1, ρ = -0.13, P = .250; reader 2, ρ = -0.19, P = .100). There was a high degree of consistency in intra- and interrater agreement and agreement with the expert reads when using acquisition times of ≥10 minutes (maximal confidence score consistency [ρ = 0.92] and interrater agreement [κ = 0.90] were observed at 15 minutes), while image quality was consistently rated as low and FDOPA positivity ratings were inconsistent when using a 5-minute acquisition time.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that image-quality ratings were stable after 15 minutes and that between-subject abnormality detection rates were highly consistent between the 2 readers when acquired for at least 10 and up to 20 minutes but were inconsistent at 5 minutes. Shorter [18F]-FDOPA PET acquisition times may help maximize patient comfort while increasing throughput in the clinical setting.

Evaluation of Neurodegenerative Disorders with Amyloid-β, Tau, and Dopaminergic PET Imaging: Interpretation Pitfalls

Antiamyloid therapies for Alzheimer disease recently entered clinical practice, making imaging biomarkers for Alzheimer disease even more relevant to guiding patient management. Amyloid and tau PET are valuable tools that can provide objective evidence of Alzheimer pathophysiology in living patients and will increasingly be used to complement 18F-FDG PET in the diagnostic evaluation of cognitive impairment and dementia. Parkinsonian syndromes, also common causes of dementia, can likewise be evaluated with a PET imaging biomarker,18F-DOPA, allowing in vivo assessment of the presynaptic dopaminergic neurons. Understanding the role of these PET biomarkers will help the nuclear medicine physician contribute to the appropriate diagnosis and management of patients with cognitive impairment and dementia. To successfully evaluate brain PET examinations for neurodegenerative diseases, knowledge of the necessary protocol details for obtaining a reliable imaging study, inherent limitations for each PET radiopharmaceutical, and pitfalls in image interpretation is critical. This review will focus on underlying concepts for interpreting PET examinations, important procedural details, and guidance for avoiding potential interpretive pitfalls for amyloid, tau, and dopaminergic PET examinations.

Two distinct degenerative types of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neuron in the early stage of parkinsonian disorders

Introduction

The present study characterized the degeneration of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons in the early stages of parkinsonian disorders using integrative neuroimaging analysis with neuromelanin-sensitive MRI and 123I-FP-CIT dopamine transporter (DAT) SPECT.

Methods

Thirty-one, 30, and 29 patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal syndrome (CBS) with abnormal specific binding ratio (SBR) in either hemisphere (mean ± 2SD), and parkinsonism-predominant multiple system atrophy (MSA-P), respectively, were enrolled. Neuromelanin-related contrast (NRC) in the substantia nigra (NRCSN) and locus coeruleus (NRCLC) and the SBR of DAT SPECT were measured. All the patients underwent both examinations simultaneously within five years after symptom onset. After adjusting for interhemispheric asymmetry on neuromelanin-related MRI contrast using the Z-score, linear regression analysis of the NRCSN and SBR was performed for the most- and least-affected hemispheres, as defined by the interhemispheric differences per variable (SBR, NRCSN, standardized [SBR + NRCSN]) in each patient.

Results

Although the variables did not differ significantly between PSP and CBS, a significant correlation was found for CBS in the most-affected hemisphere for all the definitions, including the clinically defined, most-affected hemisphere. No significant correlation was found between the NRCSN and SBR for any of the definitions in either PSP or MSA-P.

Conclusion

Together with the findings of our previous study of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson's disease (PD), the present findings indicated that neural degeneration in the disorders examined may be categorized by the significance of the NRCSN-SBR correlation in PD and CBS and its non-significance in DLB, PSP, and MSA-P.