1
|
Julian E, Solà-Morales O, Garcia MJ, Brinkhuis F, Pavlovic M, Martín-Saborido C, Doeswijk R, Giuliani R, Willemsen A, Goettsch W, Wörmann B, Dafni U, Bucher HC, Pérez-Valderrama B, Bernardini R, Gianfrate F, Uyl-de Groot CA, Ruof J. The Role of Medical Societies and the Relevance of Clinical Perspective in the Evolving EU HTA Process: Insights Generated at the 2023 Fall Convention and Survey of the European Access Academy. JOURNAL OF MARKET ACCESS & HEALTH POLICY 2024; 12:128-143. [PMID: 39072306 PMCID: PMC11270181 DOI: 10.3390/jmahp12030011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This work aimed to determine the role and action points for the involvement of medical societies in the European Health Technology Assessment (EU HTA) Methods: An online pre-convention survey was developed addressing four areas related to the EU HTA: (i) medical societies' role; (ii) role of clinical guidelines; (iii) interface with the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS); and (iv) approaching 'best-available evidence' (BAE). A descriptive analysis of questionnaire outcomes was conducted to inform the European Access Academy (EAA) Fall Convention 2023. Within the working groups (WGs), action points were identified and prioritised. RESULTS A total of 57 experts from 15 countries responded to the survey. The WGs were attended by (i) 11, (ii) 10, (iii) 12, and (iv) 12 experts, respectively, representing a variety of national backgrounds and stakeholder profiles. The most relevant action points identified were as follows: (i) incorporation of clinical context into population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) schemes, (ii) timely provision of up-to-date therapeutic guidelines, (iii) ensuring the inclusion of MCBS insights into the EU HTA process, and (iv) considering randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as the gold standard and leveraging regulatory insights if development programs only include single-arm trials. CONCLUSIONS The involvement of medical societies is a critical success factor for the EU HTA. The identified key action points foster the involvement of patient associations and medical societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Julian
- Secretariat of the European Access Academy (EAA), 4059 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Oriol Solà-Morales
- HiTT Foundation, International University of Catalonia-UIC, 08015 Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Francine Brinkhuis
- Utrecht WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
- National Health Care Institute, 1110 AH Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Mira Pavlovic
- Medicines Development and Training (MDT) Services, 75020 Paris, France
| | | | - Robin Doeswijk
- European Hematology Association (EHA), 2514 AA The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Rosa Giuliani
- Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Anne Willemsen
- National Health Care Institute, 1110 AH Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Wim Goettsch
- Utrecht WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
- National Health Care Institute, 1110 AH Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Bernhard Wörmann
- German Association of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO), 10178 Berlin, Germany
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Department of Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Urania Dafni
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, and Frontier Science Foundation Hellas, 15773 Athens, Greece
| | - Heiner C. Bucher
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Renato Bernardini
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Section of Pharmacology, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
| | | | - Carin A. Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus, University Rotterdam, 3062 Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jörg Ruof
- Medical School of Hanover, 30625 Hanover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brinkhuis F, Julian E, van den Ham H, Gianfrate F, Strammiello V, Berntgen M, Pavlovic M, Mol P, Wasem J, Van Dyck W, Cardone A, Dierks C, Schiel A, Bernardini R, Solà-Morales O, Ruof J, Goettsch W. Navigating the path towards successful implementation of the EU HTA Regulation: key takeaways from the 2023 Spring Convention of the European Access Academy. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:74. [PMID: 38956568 PMCID: PMC11218320 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01154-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Regulation on Health Technology Assessment (EU HTA R), effective since January 2022, aims to harmonize and improve the efficiency of common HTA across Member States (MS), with a phased implementation from January 2025. At "midterms" of the preparation phase for the implementation of the Regulation our aim was to identify and prioritize tangible action points to move forward. METHODS During the 2023 Spring Convention of the European Access Academy (EAA), participants from different nationalities and stakeholder backgrounds discussed readiness and remaining challenges for the Regulation's implementation and identified and prioritized action points. For this purpose, participants were assigned to four working groups: (i) Health Policy Challenges, (ii) Stakeholder Readiness, (iii) Approach to Uncertainty and (iv) Challenges regarding Methodology. Top four action points for each working group were identified and subsequently ranked by all participants during the final plenary session. RESULTS Overall "readiness" for the Regulation was perceived as neutral. Prioritized action points included the following: Health Policy, i.e. assess adjustability of MS laws and health policy processes; Stakeholders, i.e. capacity building; Uncertainty, i.e. implement HTA guidelines as living documents; Methodology, i.e. clarify the Population, Intervention, Comparator(s), Outcomes (PICO) identification process. CONCLUSIONS At "midterms" of the preparation phase, the focus for the months to come is on executing the tangible action points identified at EAA's Spring Convention. All action points centre around three overarching themes: harmonization and standardization, capacity building and collaboration, uncertainty management and robust data. These themes will ultimately determine the success of the EU HTA R in the long run.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francine Brinkhuis
- Utrecht WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Elaine Julian
- Secretariat of the European Access Academy (EAA), Hauensteinstr. 132, 4059, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Hendrika van den Ham
- Utrecht WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Mira Pavlovic
- Medicines Development and Training (MDT) Services, Paris, France
| | - Peter Mol
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jürgen Wasem
- Institute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Walter Van Dyck
- Healthcare Management Centre, Vlerick Business School, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Anja Schiel
- Norwegian Medicines Agency (NOMA), Oslo, Norway
| | - Renato Bernardini
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Section of Pharmacology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Oriol Solà-Morales
- HiTT Foundation, International University of Catalonia-UIC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jörg Ruof
- Secretariat of the European Access Academy (EAA), Hauensteinstr. 132, 4059, Basel, Switzerland
- Medical School of Hanover, Hanover, Germany
| | - Wim Goettsch
- Utrecht WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- National Health Care Institute, Diemen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Desmet T, Brijs M, Vanderdonck F, Tops S, Simoens S, Huys I. Implementing the EU HTA regulation: Insights from semi-structured interviews on patient expectations, Belgian and European institutional perspectives, and industry outlooks. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1369508. [PMID: 38659588 PMCID: PMC11039851 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1369508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The goal of the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Regulation 2021/2282 is to establish a more harmonized HTA framework, fostering member states cooperation and enabling equal patient access to innovative health technologies in Europe. This research aimed to assess the impact of the regulation on national HTAs, the strategic implications for health technology developers, and its influence on price and reimbursement negotiations. Methods: A scoping literature review encompassing peer-reviewed literature as well as grey literature was conducted. Between February and March 2023, semi-structured interviews (n = 20) were performed with stakeholders from Belgian governmental institutions, European institutions, advanced therapy medicinal product developers, academics, and sickness funds. The interviews were analyzed using the framework analysis method. Results: Numerous steps, such as the development of implementing acts and procedural guidelines remain to be taken. At member state level, national/regional HTA bodies and payers must act to adopt the new concepts of Joint Scientific Consultations (JSC) and Joint Clinical Assessments (JCA) within their national legislation, as well as revise their timelines and prepare for interactions at a European level. Compiling a harmonized PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome), adapting local procedures, and increasing capacity to actively take part in the JSC and JCA are seen as primary barriers by several stakeholders. Training and education will help HTA bodies, payers, and health technology developers to participate in the European processes. Conclusion: While practical and legal challenges were identified, recommendations (such as actively preparing for the upcoming changes and increasing capacity while providing training) were provided to adapt national and European procedures to the needs of the HTA Regulation 2021/2282. The importance of fostering collaborations and aligning local HTA procedures with the new way of working set out by the Regulation was demonstrated with this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Desmet
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Healthcare Management Centre, Vlerick Business School, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maud Brijs
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Van Haesendonck L, Ruof J, Desmet T, Van Dyck W, Simoens S, Huys I, Giuliani R, Toumi M, Dierks C, Dierks J, Cardone A, Houÿez F, Pavlovic M, Berntgen M, Mol PG, Schiel A, Goettsch W, Gianfrate F, Capri S, Ryan J, Ducournau P, Solà-Morales O, Julian E. The role of stakeholder involvement in the evolving EU HTA process: Insights generated through the European Access Academy's multi-stakeholder pre-convention questionnaire. JOURNAL OF MARKET ACCESS & HEALTH POLICY 2023; 11:2217543. [PMID: 37284060 PMCID: PMC10240997 DOI: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2217543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Involvement of all relevant stakeholders will be of utmost importance for the success of the developing EU HTA harmonization process. A multi-step procedure was applied to develop a survey across stakeholders/collaborators within the EU HTA framework to assess their current level of involvement, determine their suggested future role, identify challenges to contribution, and highlight efficient ways to fulfilling their role. The 'key' stakeholder groups identified and covered by this research included: patients', clinicians', regulatory, and Health Technology Developer representatives. The survey was circulated to a wide expert audience including all relevant stakeholder groups in order to determine self-perception by the 'key' stakeholders regarding involvement in the HTA process (self-rating), and in a second, slightly modified version of the questionnaire, to determine the perception of 'key' stakeholder involvement by HTA bodies, payers, and policymakers (external rating). Predefined analyses were conducted on the submitted responses. Fifty-four responses were received (patients 9; clinicians: 8; regulators: 4; HTDs 14; HTA bodies: 7; Payers: 5; policymakers 3; others 4). The mean self-perceived involvement score was consistently lower for each of the 'key' stakeholder groups than the respective external ratings. Based on the qualitative insights generated in the survey, a RACI Chart (Responsible/Accountable/Consulted/Informed) was developed for each of the stakeholder groups to determine their roles and involvement in the current EU HTA process. Our findings suggest extensive effort and a distinct research agenda are required to ensure adequate involvement of the key stakeholder groups in the evolving EU HTA process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jörg Ruof
- r-connect Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
- Medical School of Hanover, Hanover, Germany
| | - Thomas Desmet
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Healthcare Management Centre, Vlerick Business School, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Walter Van Dyck
- Healthcare Management Centre, Vlerick Business School, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rosa Giuliani
- Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mondher Toumi
- Faculty of Medicine, Public Health Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | - Francois Houÿez
- European Organisation for Rare Diseases (EURORDIS), Paris, France
| | - Mira Pavlovic
- Medicines Development and Training (MDT) Services, Paris, France
| | - Michael Berntgen
- Scientific Evidence Generation department, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter G.M. Mol
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anja Schiel
- Norwegian Medicines Agency (NOMA), Oslo, Norway
| | - Wim Goettsch
- National Health Care Institute, Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Fabrizio Gianfrate
- University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
- School of Economics and Management, Cattaneo-LIUC University, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Stefano Capri
- Health Economics and Payer Evidence, Astra Zeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - James Ryan
- Global Market Access & Pricing, Abbvie AG, Cham, Switzerland
| | - Pierre Ducournau
- HiTT Foundation, International University of Catalonia-UIC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oriol Solà-Morales
- Utrecht Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|