1
|
Sabatini A, Leoni A, Goncalves G, Zompanti A, Marchetta MV, Cardoso P, Grasso S, Di Loreto MV, Lodato F, Cenerini C, Figuera E, Pennazza G, Ferri G, Stornelli V, Santonico M. Microsystem Nodes for Soil Monitoring via an Energy Mapping Network: A Proof-of-Concept Preliminary Study. MICROMACHINES 2022; 13:1440. [PMID: 36144063 PMCID: PMC9504616 DOI: 10.3390/mi13091440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The need for accurate information and the availability of novel tool and technological advances in agriculture have given rise to innovative autonomous systems. The aim is to monitor key parameters for optimal water and fertilizer management. A key issue in precision agriculture is the in situ monitoring of soil macronutrients. Here, a proof-of-concept study was conducted that tested two types of sensors capable of capturing both the electrochemical response of the soil and the electrical potential generated by the interaction between the soil and plants. These two sensors can be used to monitor large areas using a network approach, due to their small size and low power consumption. The voltammetric sensor (BIONOTE-L) proved to be able to characterize different soil samples. It was able, indeed, to provide a reproducible voltammetric fingerprint specific for each soil type, and to monitor the concentration of CaCl2 and NaCl in the soil. BIONOTE-L can be coupled to a device capable of capturing the energy produced by interactions between plants and soil. As a consequence, the functionality of the microsystem node when applied in a large-area monitoring network can be extended. Additional calibrations will be performed to fully characterize the instrument node, to implement the network, and to specialize it for a particular application in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Sabatini
- Unit of Computational Systems and Bioinformatics, Department of Engineering, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Alfiero Leoni
- Department of Industrial and Information Engineering, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Gil Goncalves
- Centre for Mechanical Technology and Automation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Alessandro Zompanti
- Unit of Electronics for Sensor Systems, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Marco V. Marchetta
- Unit of Electronics for Sensor Systems, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Paulo Cardoso
- Department of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Simone Grasso
- Unit of Electronics for Sensor Systems, Department of Science and Technology for Humans and the Environment, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Vittoria Di Loreto
- Unit of Electronics for Sensor Systems, Department of Science and Technology for Humans and the Environment, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Lodato
- Unit of Electronics for Sensor Systems, Department of Science and Technology for Humans and the Environment, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Costanza Cenerini
- Unit of Electronics for Sensor Systems, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Etelvina Figuera
- Department of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Giorgio Pennazza
- Unit of Electronics for Sensor Systems, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ferri
- Department of Industrial and Information Engineering, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Stornelli
- Department of Industrial and Information Engineering, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Marco Santonico
- Unit of Electronics for Sensor Systems, Department of Science and Technology for Humans and the Environment, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu L, Lu Y, Zhong W, Meng L, Deng H. On-line monitoring of repeated copper pollutions using sediment microbial fuel cell based sensors in the field environment. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2020; 748:141544. [PMID: 32798883 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Most microbial fuel cells (MFCs) based sensors rely on exoelectrogenic bacteria to sense contaminants. However, these sensors cannot monitor repeated pollutions unless the exoelectrogenic bacteria are recovered or re-inoculated. To overcome this drawback, a novel sediment microbial fuel cell (SMFC) based sensor was developed for online and in situ monitoring of repeated Cu2+ shocks to the overlaying water of paddy soil. The SMFC sensor was operated for a period of eight months in the field environment and a group of CuCl2 solutions ranging from 12.5 to 400 mg L-1 Cu2+ were repeatedly applied on sunny and rainy days in different seasons. Results show that the SMFC sensor generates one voltage peak in less than 20 s after each Cu2+ shock, regardless of the seasons and weather conditions, and the voltage increments from baseline to peak exhibit linear correlation (R2 > 0.92) with the logarithm of Cu2+ concentrations. Repeated Cu2+ pollutions do not decrease the baseline voltage, indicating that the activity of exoelectrogenic bacteria was not significantly inhibited. Soil adsorbed and inactivated approximately 99% of total Cu2+. Only 1% of total Cu2+ was the toxic exchangeable fraction, of which the concentrations were 0.73, 0.23, and 0.22 mg kg-1 in the surface (0-3 cm), middle (3-6 cm), and bottom (6-11 cm) layers, respectively. The abundance of 16S rRNA gene transcripts of exoelectrogenic bacteria-associated genera is the lowest in the surface layer (2.86 × 1011 copies g-1) and the highest in the bottom layer (7.99 × 1011 copies g-1). Geobacter, Clostridium, Anaeromyxobacter, and Bacillus are the most active exoelectrogenic bacteria-associated genera in the soil. This study suggests that the SMFC sensor could be applied in wetlands to monitor the repeated discharge of Cu2+ and other heavy metals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Liu
- School of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China; Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Materials Cycling and Pollution Control, School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.
| | - Yu Lu
- School of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China; Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Materials Cycling and Pollution Control, School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.
| | - Wenhui Zhong
- School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China; Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Materials Cycling and Pollution Control, School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China; Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China.
| | - Liang Meng
- Institute of Urban Studies, School of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China.
| | - Huan Deng
- School of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China; Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Materials Cycling and Pollution Control, School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China; Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China.
| |
Collapse
|