Survival is influenced by approaches to local treatment of Ewing sarcoma within an international randomised controlled trial: analysis of EICESS-92

International benchmarking of stage at diagnosis for six childhood solid tumours (the BENCHISTA project): a population-based, retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

International variation in childhood cancer survival might be explained by differences in stage at diagnosis, among other factors. As part of the BENCHISTA project, we aimed to assess geographical variation in tumour stage at diagnosis through the application, by population-based cancer registries working with clinicians, of the international consensus Toronto Childhood Cancer Stage Guidelines.

METHODS

This population-based, retrospective cohort study involved 67 cancer registries from 23 European countries, Australia, Brazil, Japan, and Canada. Participating cancer registries applied the Toronto Guidelines to stage all incident cases of six childhood solid tumours-neuroblastoma, medulloblastoma, and Wilms tumour (age 0-14 years) and Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and osteosarcoma (age ≤19 years)-diagnosed between Jan 1, 2014, and Dec 31, 2017. Eligible cancer registries were those able to assign stage according to the Toronto Guidelines; information on the staging investigations conducted was collected where available. European countries were grouped by geographical area and non-European countries were considered individually. We used χ2 tests to compare stage distribution across these geographical areas and multivariable logistic models to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for metastatic stage at diagnosis, using central Europe (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Switzerland) as the comparison. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to overcome potential bias from non-random missing stage information for some geographical areas and cancer types.

FINDINGS

Data from 10 937 patients with cancer (6031 [55·1%] male and 4906 [44·9%] female) were analysed. Tumour staging was complete for 93·1% (10 180 of 10 937) of patients, ranging from 88·7% (1347 of 1518 patients) with medulloblastoma to 96·5% (1083 of 1122 patients) with Ewing sarcoma. Stage distribution differed statistically by geographical area for neuroblastoma, Wilms tumour, osteosarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma, but not for Ewing sarcoma or medulloblastoma. After excluding patients with missing stage information and, for the sarcomas, patients aged 18-19 years, the proportions of patients with metastases detected at diagnosis were 50·3% with neuroblastoma (1435 of 2852 patients; including 1159 [40·6%] stage M and 276 [9·7%] stage MS), 35·1% with medulloblastoma (473 of 1347 patients; stages M1-M4), 32·6% with Ewing sarcoma (335 of 1028 patients), 29·0% with rhabdomyosarcoma (368 of 1267 patients), 25·5% with osteosarcoma (345 of 1353 patients), and 18·2% with Wilms tumour (384 of 2114 patients). After adjusting by age group, significant differences in the proportions of patients with metastases detected at diagnosis were found between geographical areas for neuroblastoma, Wilms tumour, osteosarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma.

INTERPRETATION

Assessed at a population level, the stage at diagnosis shows significant variation between geographical areas for several childhood tumours. This finding highlights the need for earlier diagnosis and standardisation of investigations for distant metastases. To enable ongoing comparisons, further cooperation efforts are required between cancer registries and clinicians regarding the sustainable and standardised use of the Toronto Guidelines at diagnosis.

FUNDING

Children with Cancer UK and Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro.

Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA) clinical practice guideline on the management of primary malignant bone tumors - Secondary publication

BACKGROUND

In Japan, there are currently no general guidelines for the treatment of primary malignant bone tumors. Therefore, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association established a committee to develop guidelines for the appropriate diagnosis and treatment of primary malignant bone tumors for medical professionals in clinical practice.

METHODS

The guidelines were developed in accordance with "Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Development Handbook 2014″ and "Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual 2017". The Japanese Orthopaedic Association's Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Committee established guideline development and systematic review committees, drawing members from orthopedic specialists leading the diagnosis and treatment of bone and soft tissue tumors. Pediatricians, radiologists, and diagnostic pathologists were added to both committees because of the importance of multidisciplinary treatment. Based on the diagnosis and treatment algorithm for primary malignant bone tumors, important decision-making points were selected, and clinical questions (CQ) were determined. The strength of recommendation was rated on two levels and the strength of evidence was rated on four levels. The recommendations published were selected based on agreement by 70% or more of the voters.

RESULTS

The guideline development committee examined the important clinical issues in the clinical algorithm and selected 22 CQs. The systematic review committee reviewed the evidence concerning each CQ and a clinical value judgment was added by experts. Eventually, 25 questions were published and the text of each recommendation was determined.

CONCLUSION

Since primary malignant bone tumors are rare, there is a dearth of strong evidence based on randomized controlled trials, and recommendations cannot be applied to all the patients. In clinical practice, appropriate treatment of patients with primary malignant bone tumors should be based on the histopathological diagnosis and degree of progression of each case, using these guidelines as a reference.

UK guidelines for the management of bone sarcomas

This document is an update of the British Sarcoma Group guidelines (2016) and provides a reference standard for the clinical care of UK patients with primary malignant bone tumours (PMBT) and giant cell tumours (GCTB) of bone. The guidelines recommend treatments that are effective and should be available in the UK, and support decisions about management and service delivery. The document represents a consensus amongst British Sarcoma Group members in 2024. Key recommendations are that bone pain, or a palpable mass should always lead to further investigation and that patients with clinical or radiological findings suggestive of a primary bone tumour at any anatomic site should be referred to a specialist centre and managed by an accredited bone sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Treatment recommendations are provided for the major tumour types and for localised, metastatic and recurrent disease. Follow-up schedules are suggested.

[Analysis of 41 cases of non-metastatic Ewing's sarcoma in children]

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors of children with non-metastatic Ewing's sarcoma (ES).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 41 children with non-metastatic ES diagnosed and treated at the Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January 2010 to December 2018. All patients underwent chemotherapy based on the RMS-2009 protocol of the center, and local treatment such as surgery and/or radiotherapy was performed according to risk grouping. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates. Univariate prognostic analysis was performed using the log-rank test, and multivariate analysis was conducted with Cox regression.

RESULTS

Of the 41 children, 21 were male and 20 were female. The median age at diagnosis was 7.7 years (range: 1.2-14.6 years). The median follow-up time for patients with event-free survival was 68.1 months (range: 8.1-151.7 months). As of the last follow-up, 33 patients were in complete remission, and the overall 5-year EFS and OS rates were (78±6)% and (82±6)%, respectively. Univariate analysis by the log-rank test showed that a tumor diameter ≥8 cm, time from diagnosis to start of local treatment ≥16 weeks, and incomplete surgical resection were associated with poor prognosis (P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that incomplete surgical resection (HR=8.381, 95%CI: 1.681-41.801, P=0.010) was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in children with ES. Secondary tumors occurred in 2 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive treatment strategy incorporating chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy can improve the prognosis of children with ES. Poor prognosis is associated with an initial tumor diameter ≥8 cm, while complete surgical resection and early initiation of local treatment can improve outcomes.

Factors Influencing the Outcome of Patients with Primary Ewing Sarcoma of the Sacrum

Background

Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is a rare and highly malignant bone tumor primarily affecting children, adolescents, and young adults. The pelvis, trunk, and lower extremities are the most common sites, while EwS of the sacrum as a primary site is very rare, and only few studies focusing on this location are published. Due to the anatomical condition, local treatment is challenging in sacral malignancies. We analyzed factors that might influence the outcome of patients suffering from sacral EwS.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data of the GPOH EURO-E.W.I.N.G 99 trial and the EWING 2008 trial, with a cohort of 124 patients with localized or metastatic sacral EwS. The study endpoints were overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). OS and EFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate comparisons were estimated using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) with respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated in a multivariable Cox regression model.

Results

The presence of metastases (3y-EFS: 0.33 vs. 0.68; P < 0.001; HR = 3.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 6.6; 3y-OS: 0.48 vs. 0.85; P < 0.001; HR = 4.23, 95% CI 1.8 to 9.7), large tumor volume (≥200 ml) (3y-EFS: 0.36 vs. 0.69; P=0.02; HR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.0; 3y-OS: 0.42 vs. 0.73; P=0.04; HR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.5), and age ≥18 years (3y-EFS: 0.41 vs. 0.60; P=0.02; HR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.2; 3y-OS: 0.294 vs. 0.59; P=0.01; HR = 2.92, 95% CI 1.29 to 6.6) were revealed as adverse prognostic factors.

Conclusion

Young age seems to positively influence patients` survival, especially in patients with primary metastatic disease. In this context, our results support other studies, stating that older age has a negative impact on survival. Tumor volume, metastases, and the type of local therapy modality have an impact on the outcome of sacral EwS. Level of evidence: Level 2. This trial is registered with NCT00020566 and NCT00987636.

Association between local treatment modalities and event-free survival, overall survival, and local recurrence in patients with localised Ewing Sarcoma. Report from the Ewing 2008 trial

BACKGROUND

Local treatment is a crucial element in the standard of care for Ewing sarcoma (EWS). While systemic treatment is improved in randomised clinical trials, local treatment modalities are discussed controversially. We analysed the association between local therapy and event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and local recurrence (LR) in prospectively collected data of patients with localised EWS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analysed data from the international Ewing 2008 study registered between 2009 and 2019 in 117 centres. After induction chemotherapy, patients received surgery, radiotherapy, or a combination thereof. We performed Cox regression, conducted propensity score-weighted sensitivity analysis, and performed subgroup analyses. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals are reported.

RESULTS

We included 863 patients with localised EWS (surgery alone: 331, combination therapy: 358, definitive radiotherapy: 174). In patients treated with combination therapy compared to surgery alone, EFS HR was 0.84 (0.57-1.24; p = 0.38), OS HR was 0.84 (0.57-1.23; p = 0.41), and LR HR was 0.58 (0.26-1.31; p = 0.19). Hazards of any event were increased in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy compared to surgery only, HR 1.53 (1.02-2.31; p = 0.04). Patients with poor responses to chemotherapy benefitted from combination therapy over definitive surgery with an EFS HR 0.49 (0.27-0.89; p = 0.02). Patients with pelvic tumours benefitted from combination therapy over surgery only regarding LR, HR 0.12 (0.02-0.72; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Patients with poor responses to chemotherapy benefitted from radiotherapy added to surgery. In the whole group, radiotherapy alone as opposed to surgery alone increased the hazards of any event.

Secondary Malignancies after Ewing Sarcoma-Epidemiological and Clinical Analysis of an International Trial Registry

Ewing sarcoma (EwS) represents highly aggressive bone and soft tissue tumors that require intensive treatment by multi-chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiotherapy. While therapeutic regimens have increased survival rates, EwS survivors face long-term sequelae that include secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs). Consequently, more knowledge about EwS patients who develop SMNs is needed to identify high-risk patients and adjust follow-up strategies. We retrospectively analyzed data from 4518 EwS patients treated in five consecutive EwS trials from the Cooperative Ewing Sarcoma Study (CESS) group. Ninety-six patients developed SMNs after primary EwS, including 53 (55.2%) with solid tumors. The latency period between EwS and the first SMN was significantly longer for the development of solid SMNs (median: 8.4 years) than for hematologic SMNs (median: 2.4 years) (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence (CI) of SMNs in general increased over time from 0.04 at 10 years to 0.14 at 30 years; notably, the specific CI for hematologic SMNs remained stable over the different decades, whereas for solid SMNs it gradually increased over time and was higher for metastatic patients than in localized EwS patients (20 years: 0.14 vs. 0.06; p < 0.01). The clinical characteristics of primary EwS did not differ between patients with or without SMNs. All EwS patients received multi-chemotherapy with adjuvant radiotherapy in 77 of 96 (80.2%) patients, and the use of radiation doses ≥ 60 Gy correlated with the occurrence of SMNs. The survival rate after SMNs was 0.49, with a significantly better outcome for solid SMNs compared with hematologic SMNs (3 years: 0.70 vs. 0.24, respectively; p < 0.001). The occurrence of SMNs after EwS remains a rare event but requires a structured follow-up system because it is associated with high morbidity and mortality.

International benchmarking of childhood cancer survival by stage at diagnosis: The BENCHISTA project protocol

Background

Several studies have shown significant variation in overall survival rates from childhood cancer between countries, using population-based cancer registry (PBCR) data for all cancers combined and for many individual tumour types among children. Without accurate and comparable data on Tumour stage at diagnosis, it is difficult to define the reasons for these survival differences. This is because measurement systems designed for adult cancers do not apply to children’s cancers and cancer registries often hold limited information on paediatric tumour stage and the data sources used to define it.

Aims

The BENCHISTA project aims to test the application of the international consensus “Toronto Staging Guidelines” (TG) for paediatric tumours by European and non-European PBCRs for six common paediatric solid tumours so that reliable comparisons of stage at diagnosis and survival rates by stage can be made to understand any differences. A secondary aim is to test the data availability and completeness of collection of several ‘Toronto’ consensus non-stage prognostic factors, treatment types given, occurrence of relapse/progression and cause of death as a descriptive feasibility study.

Methods

PBCRs will use their permitted data access channels to apply the Toronto staging guidelines to all incident cases of six solid childhood cancers (medulloblastoma, osteosarcoma, Ewings sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma and Wilms tumour) diagnosed in a consecutive three-year period within 2014–2017 in their population. Each registry will provide a de-identified patient-level dataset including tumour stage at diagnosis, with only the contributing registry holding the information that would be needed to re-identify the patients. Where available to the registry, patient-level data on ‘Toronto’ non-stage prognostic factors, treatments given and clinical outcomes (relapse/progression/cause of death) will be included. More than 60 PBCRs have been involved in defining the patient-level dataset items and intend to participate by contributing their population-level data. Tumour-specific on-line training workshops with clinical experts are available to cancer registry staff to assist them in applying the Toronto staging guidelines in a consistent manner. There is also a project-specific help desk for discussion of difficult cases and promotion of the CanStaging online tools, developed through the International Association of Cancer Registries, to further ensure standardisation of data collection. Country-specific stage distribution and observed survival by stage at diagnosis will be calculated for each tumour type to compare survival between countries or large geographical regions.

Discussion

This study will be promote and enhance the collection of standardized staging data for childhood cancer by European and non-European population-based cancer registries. Therefore, this project can be seen as a feasibility project of widespread use of Toronto Staging at a population-level by cancer registries, specifying the data sources used and testing how well standardized the processes can be. Variation in tumour stage distribution could be due to real differences, to different diagnostic practices between countries and/or to variability in how cancer registries assign Toronto stage. This work also aims to strengthen working relationships between cancer registries, clinical services and cancer-specific clinical study groups, which is important for improving patient outcomes and stimulating research.

New Approaches Promise to Improve Local Ewing Sarcoma Results

The study by Whelan and colleagues showed that addition of busulfan and melphalan conditioning and autologous stem cell rescue to conventional EURO-E.W.I.N.G STUDY chemotherapy in local nonmetastatic Ewing sarcoma improves prognosis. However, almost 30% of these study patients will have relapsed before this stage of therapy is reached, and 78% of his patients were at high risk because of inadequate response to the initial chemotherapy given. Further improvement could be achieved by the integration of other novel advances with this approach. Ash and colleagues have shown that the separation of such cases into high- and low-risk groups by using CD56 negativity of the tumor cells is an improvement over current methods with a 100% 10-year progression-free survival in CD56- nonpelvic local isolated Ewing sarcoma patients. Their patients were treated on the SCMCIE 94 protocol, associated with no relapses before 30 months in 24 consecutive patients independent of the CD status. Integration of these novel approaches in diagnosis and treatment would allow truly high-risk patients, who would benefit from the procedure, to reach the busulfan and melphalan stage of therapy and delineate those patients who can be cured without such therapy. Details of the SCMCIE 94 protocol are given and the possible reasons for the different relapse patterns are discussed.

Bone sarcoma: success through interdisciplinary collaboration

PURPOSE

Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma are the most frequent malignant bone tumours of childhood and adolescence. This review summarizes the oncologist's view of these diseases and their treatment.

METHODS

A non-systematic literature review was performed, the personal impressions and experience of the authors is described.

RESULTS

Local therapy and chemotherapy, each on their own, will not cure patients with malignant bone sarcomas. Together, they present a highly efficacious combination. While the most effective drugs were defined decades ago, progress since then has been limited. It is hoped that substances shown to be active in relapsed disease will be forwarded into even more efficacious frontline treatments. Good palliative therapy is necessary when cure is no longer an option.

CONCLUSION

Close interdisciplinary collaboration is the key to successful treatment of bone sarcomas in paediatric patients.

Current Status of Management and Outcome for Patients with Ewing Sarcoma

Ewing sarcoma is the second most common bone sarcoma in children after osteosarcoma. It is a very aggressive malignancy for which systemic treatment has greatly improved outcome for patients with localized disease, who now see survival rates of over 70%. However, for the quarter of patients presenting with metastatic disease, survival is still dismal with less than 30% of patients surviving past 5 years. Patients with disease relapse, local or distant, face an even poorer prognosis with an event-free 5-year survival rate of only 10%. Unfortunately, Ewing sarcoma patients have not yet seen the benefit of recent years' technical achievements such as next-generation sequencing, which have enabled researchers to study biological systems at a level never seen before. In spite of large multinational studies, treatment of Ewing sarcoma relies entirely on chemotherapeutic agents that have been largely unchanged for decades. As many promising modern therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, and immunotherapy, have been disappointing to date, there is no clear candidate as to which drug should be investigated in the next large-scale clinical trial. However, the mechanisms driving tumor development in Ewing sarcoma are slowly unfolding. New entities of Ewing-like tumors, with fusion transcripts that are related to the oncogenic EWSR1-FLI1 fusion seen in the majority of Ewing tumors, are being mapped. These tumors, although sharing much of the same morphologic features as classic Ewing sarcoma, behave differently and may require a different treatment. There are also controversies regarding local treatment of Ewing sarcoma. The radiosensitive nature of the disease and the tendency for Ewing sarcoma to arise in the axial skeleton make local treatment very challenging. Surgical treatment and radiotherapy have their pros and cons, which may give rise to different treatment strategies in different centers around the world. This review article discusses some of these controversies and reproduces the highlights from recent publications with regard to diagnostics, systemic treatment, and surgical treatment of Ewing sarcoma.

Imaging features and clinical course of undifferentiated round cell sarcomas with CIC-DUX4 and BCOR-CCNB3 translocations

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pre-treatment imaging features and clinical course of undifferentiated round cell sarcomas with CIC-DUX4 and BCOR-CCNB3 translocations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, several pre-treatment imaging features (tumor location, size, enhancement pattern, necrosis, flow voids, calcification, and FDG avidity) and the clinical course of patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

In 12 patients with CIC-DUX4 sarcomas (median age, 24 years; range, 12-75), sarcomas were located in the soft tissue (n = 10), bone (n = 1), and lungs (n = 1). On MRI, all 10 CIC-DUX4 sarcomas presented as a large necrotic mass (mean size 6.7 cm, range 2.3-11.3) with 100% demonstrating contrast enhancement, 60% showing flow voids, and 20% demonstrating fluid-fluid levels. On PET, the mean SUVmax was 13.2 (range, 8.5-18.1). Among 12 patients with follow-up, 3 died within a year of diagnosis. The most common site of metastases was the lungs (5/12). In 5 patients with BCOR-CCNB3 sarcomas (median age, 14 years; range, 2-17), sarcomas were located in the spine (n = 2), femur (n = 1), tibia (n = 1), and pelvis (n = 1). On radiograph or CT, 2 were lytic, 3 were sclerotic. Soft tissue calcifications occurred in 40% of BCOR-CCNB3 sarcomas. On MRI, all 3 BCOR-CCNB3 tumors enhanced with 33% demonstrating flow voids and 66% exhibiting necrosis. On PET, the mean SUVmax was 6.3 (range 5.7-6.9).

CONCLUSION

CIC-DUX4 sarcomas often present as necrotic and hypermetabolic soft tissue masses while sarcomas with BCOR-CCNB3 translocations are vascular bone lesions with necrosis at imaging. CIC-DUX4 sarcomas are clinically more aggressive than BCOR-CCNB3 sarcomas.

Managing axial bone sarcomas in childhood

Introduction: Axial osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma are rare, aggressive neoplasms with a worse prognosis than with tumors involving the extremities because they are more likely to be associated with larger tumor volumes, older age, primary metastases, and a poor histological response to chemotherapy. The 5-year OS rates are reportedly in the range of 18-41% for axial osteosarcoma, and 46-64% for Ewing sarcoma.Area covered: The treatment of axial bone tumors is the same as for extremity bone tumors, and includes chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiotherapy.Expert opinion: Local treatment of axial tumors is particularly difficult due to their proximity to neurological and vascular structures, which often makes extensive and en bloc resections impossible without causing significant morbidity. The incidence of local relapse is consequently high, and this is the main issue in the treatment of these tumors. Radiotherapy is an option in the case of surgical resections with close or positive margins, as well as for inoperable tumors. Delivering high doses of RT to the spinal cord can be dangerous. Given the complexity and rarity of these tumors, it is essential for this subset of patients to be treated at selected reference institutions with specific expertise and multidisciplinary skills.

Mithramycin A Radiosensitizes EWS:Fli1+ Ewing Sarcoma Cells by Inhibiting Double Strand Break Repair

PURPOSE

The oncogenic EWS:Fli1 fusion protein is a key transcriptional mediator of Ewing sarcoma initiation, progression, and therapeutic resistance. Mithramycin A (MithA) is a potent and specific inhibitor of transcription mediated by the EWS:Fli1. We tested the hypothesis that pretreatment with MithA could selectively radiosensitize EWS:Fli1⁺ tumor cells by altering the transcriptional response to radiation injury.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A panel of 4 EWS:Fli1⁺ and 3 EWS:Fli1^- Ewing sarcoma cell lines and 1 nontumor cell line were subjected to MithA dose-response viability assays to determine the relative potency of MithA in cells possessing or lacking the EWS:Fli1 fusion. Radiosensitization by MithA was evaluated by clonogenic survival assays in vitro and in a murine xenograft model. DNA damage was evaluated by comet assay and γ-H2Ax flow cytometry. Immunoblotting, flow cytometry, and reverse-transcription, polymerase chain reaction were used to evaluate DNA damage-induced signaling and repair processes and apoptosis.

RESULTS

We found that MithA alone could potently and selectively inhibit the growth of EWS:Fli1⁺ tumor cells, but not cells lacking this fusion. Pretreatment with MithA for 24 hours before irradiation significantly reduced clonogenic survival in vitro and delayed tumor regrowth in vivo, prolonging survival of EWS:Fli1⁺ tumor-bearing mice. Although MithA did not increase the level of DNA double-strand breaks, mechanistic studies revealed that MithA pretreatment selectively inhibited DNA double-strand break repair through downregulation of EWS:Fli1-mediated transcription, leading to tumor cell death by apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that MithA is an effective radiosensitizer of EWS:Fli1⁺ tumors and may achieve better local control at lower doses of radiation.

Seeking international consensus on approaches to primary tumour treatment in Ewing sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The local treatment of Ewing sarcoma of bone involves surgery, radiotherapy or both. The selection of treatment depends on the anatomical extent of the tumour, the effectiveness of the proposed treatment, its morbidity, and the expectation of cure. However, not only are there variations in the approach to local treatment between individual patients, but also between treatment centres and countries. Our aim was to explore variation in practice and develop consensus statements about local treatment.

METHODS

A three stage modified Delphi technique was used with international collaborators. This involved an expert panel to identify areas of controversy, an online survey of international collaborators and a consensus meeting in London, UK in June 2017. In the consensus meeting, teams of clinicians discussed the local management of selected cases and their responses were collected with electronic voting.

RESULTS

Areas of greater or less consensus were identified. The lack of evidence underpinning different approaches was noted and areas for collaborative research became apparent.

CONCLUSION

This has demonstrated that there is an international consensus around many aspects of the local treatment of Ewing sarcoma of bone, including the use of specialist MultiDisciplinary Team (MDT) meetings with access to all appropriate treatments. However, considerable variation remains including the use of different staging investigations, decision making, definitions of response, and radiotherapy doses and timing. Further collaborative work should be undertaken to determine the impact of these variations in order to define best practice.

Pelvic Ewing sarcoma: a retrospective outcome analysis of 104 patients who underwent pelvic tumor resection at a single supra-regional center

BACKGROUND

Local treatment in pelvic Ewing sarcoma (ES) consists of operation, radiation therapy, or a combination of both. Reported outcomes vary depending on the treatment modality performed. It is the objective of this study to analyze surgical outcome and complications as well as oncological outcome and complications of chemo- and radiation therapy in this patient cohort and evaluate prognostic factors.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 104 patients who underwent tumor resection for pelvic ES from 1988 to 2014.

RESULTS

All patients underwent pelvic resection and radiation therapy was administered in 77.9%. Margins were clear in 94.2%. The response to chemotherapy was good in 78.8%. Local recurrence occurred in 7.7%. The presence of distant metastases at the time of operation was the most important negative predictor for overall survival (p = 0.003). The cumulative 5- and 10-year survival rates were 82.7% and 80.1% for non-metastasized and 61.4% and 41.6% for metastasized pelvic ES at operation. In the presence of a single-distant metastatic site at operation compared to multiple metastatic sites, the cumulative survival rates were 64.3% versus 50% at five and 50.7% versus 16.7% at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined treatment approach of tumor resection and radiation therapy leads to a local control and overall survival rates comparable with those of extremity locations in this study's patient cohort with localized pelvic ES. Therefore, surgical tumor resection (combined with (neo-)adjuvant radiation therapy) in non-metastatic pelvic ES seems feasible. In metastatic patients, however, the significance of tumor resection as a part of local treatment remains less certain and improved outcomes of combined local treatment approaches need to be weighed against these patients' prognosis and quality of life.

Challenges in the management of localized Ewing sarcoma in a developing country

Survival in pediatric Ewing sarcoma (ES) lags in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study analyzed factors contributing to a lower outcome in an LMIC center. A retrospective case review of children with localized ES treated from January 2011 till December 2017 was performed. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with alternating cycles of vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide; and ifosfamide, etoposide was administered 3-weekly for 48 weeks. Reassessment was planned for week 12, followed by local therapy (surgery/radiotherapy or both) tailed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Forty-eight patients with mean age 8 years (range: 0.7-14) were evaluated. Extremity and central axis tumors were seen in 25 (52%) and 23 (48%) patients. Three patients died of neutropenic sepsis and five abandoned therapy. Local therapy included primary surgery, radiotherapy and a combination of surgery and radiotherapy in 7 (16%), 20 (45%) and 17 (39%) patients. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for the cohort were 47.7 ± 11% and 57.6 ± 11.2%. Time to local therapy >16 weeks was associated with inferior DFS vs. local therapy administered within 16 weeks [46.6 ± 12.4 vs. 63.9 ± 19.4, p=.046]. Older age, axial site, large size and incomplete surgical resection did not predict relapse/progression. Patients who received wide local excision, as local therapy, had 100% DFS. Coordinated efforts to ensure timely therapy can improve outcome in pediatric ES. Abandonment and treatment-related mortality (TRM) are additional challenges that need to be tackled in LMICs.

Primary Extraosseous Ewing Sarcoma of the Thoracic Spine Presenting as Chest Pain Mimicking Spinal Schwannoma

BACKGROUND

Extraosseous Ewing sarcoma (EES) usually has a pseudocapsule and high vascularity, making it well circumscribed and focally dense with contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Consequently, it is difficult to diagnose and distinguish from other spinal tumors, based on pretreatment radiologic findings alone. Here, we present a case of EES involving the thoracic spinal column, which was suspected to be spinal schwannoma through pretreatment radiologic findings.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 54-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with upper back and left-sided chest pain. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the thoracolumbar spine showed a 17- × 12-mm-sized mass in the epidural region and left neural foramen at the T6-7 level. Our preliminary diagnosis was spinal schwannoma. The patient underwent T6 hemilaminectomy. Intraoperatively, the lesion appeared as gray-colored soft mass with high vascularity, which seemed to have originated from the left T6 nerve root. The tumor was excised with en bloc resection. Histopathologic examination of the lesion revealed classical Ewing sarcoma with high cellularity of small round cells. Immunohistochemistry revealed strong positivity for cluster of differentiation 99 and FLI-1. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy was performed. The patient did not receive chemotherapy. Five years after surgery, follow-up spinal MRI and positron emission tomography computed tomography scan revealed no recurrence of the tumor or new lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should consider EES in the differential diagnosis of other neural foraminal spinal tumors, such as schwannoma. If clinicians are confident that EES has been removed completely and there are no other lesions, radiotherapy is sufficient and additional chemotherapy may not be necessary.

Outcomes in different age groups with primary Ewing sarcoma of the spine: a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Ewing sarcoma (ES) is among the most prevalent of bone sarcomas in young people. Less often, it presents as a primary lesion of the spine (5%-15% of patients with ES).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed, querying several scientific databases per PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria specified all studies of patients with surgically treated ES located in the spine. Patient age was categorized into three groups: 0-13 years (age group 1), 14-20 years (age group 2), and > 21 (age group 3).

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included, yielding 28 patients with ES of the spine. Sixty-seven percent of patients experienced a favorable outcome, with laminectomies representing the most common (46%) of surgical interventions. One-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 82% (n = 23), 75% (n = 21), and 57% (n = 16), respectively. Patients in age group 2 experienced the greatest mortality rate (75%) compared to age group 1 (9%) and age group 3 (22%). The calculated relative risk score indicated patients in age group 2 were 7.5 times more likely to die than other age groups combined (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary ES of the spine is a rare, debilitating disease in which the role of surgery and its impact on one's quality of life and independence status has not been well described. This study found the majority of patients experienced a favorable outcome with respect to independence status following surgery and adjunctive treatment. An increased risk of recurrence and death was also present among the adolescent age group (14-20 years).

SCMCIE94: an intensified pilot treatment protocol known to be associated with cure in CD 56-negative non-pelvic isolated Ewing sarcoma (EWS) is also associated with no early relapses in non-metastatic extremity EWS

PURPOSE

We report the unexpected absence of early relapse (before 30 months) in 24 consecutive patients with isolated limb primary Ewing sarcoma treated with an intensified pilot protocol, SCMCIE94.

METHODS

Clinical data for the study were collected retrospectively from the patient files. The protocol included 6 courses of chemotherapy, split radiation, and limb salvage surgery. This SCMCIE94 protocol had been used in almost all the patients described in an earlier report, in whom those with non-pelvic isolated tumors and low/absent CD56 expression in Ewing sarcoma tumor cells were all long-term survivors.

RESULTS

The 5-year (10-year) event-free survival rate for the patients with isolated limb primary Ewing sarcoma was 78.95 ± 8.3% (68.6 ± 10.0%) and the overall survival rate was 90.7 ± 6.2% (71.1 ± 11.2%). There were no relapses before 30 months in any of these patients.

CONCLUSION

The intensified SCMCIE94 pilot protocol has been shown previously to cure patients with localized CD56-negative non-pelvic Ewing sarcoma. The present study shows that among all patients with localized extremity disease who were treated with this protocol, there were no cases of early relapse. Although our cohort was small, the difference in results from studies using other protocols is so striking, that it would seem reasonable to assume it is attributable to the changes made in the protocol itself rather than risk factors. Late relapses of isolated limb CD56-positive Ewing sarcoma suggest minimal residual disease warranting additional therapeutic approaches such as autologous stem cell rescue after Busulfan Melfelan.

Patient perspectives on a national multidisciplinary team meeting for a rare cancer

Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) provide a regular forum for cancer teams to convene and discuss the diagnostic and treatment aspects of patient care. For some rare cancers, MDTMs may also occur at national level to pool expertise and to ensure more consistent decision-making. One such national MDTM exists in the UK for patients with a diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma of the bone-the National Ewing's MDT (NEMDT). This study explored the patient perspective of this rare cancer national MDTM using focus group and survey methodology. Study participants used their experience to provide several recommendations: that their views should always inform the decision-making process, these views should be presented by someone who has met them such as a specialist nurse, MDT recommendations should be provided to them in plain English, and tools to improve patient choice and enhance communication should be implemented. These patient-centred recommendations will be used to improve the NEMDT but may be valid to inform quality improvement processes for other similar national panels.