Preoperative accelerated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy in a defined cohort of patients with high risk soft tissue sarcoma: a Scandinavian Sarcoma Group study

Novel Postoperative Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiation Dose-Painting Approach for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Purpose

Hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) offers benefits in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS), including exploitation of the lower α/β, patient convenience, and cost. This study evaluates the acute toxicity of a hypofractionated accelerated RT dose-painting (HARD) approach for postoperative treatment of STS.

Methods and Materials

This is a retrospective review of 53 consecutive patients with STS who underwent resection followed by postoperative RT. Standard postoperative RT dosing for R0/R1/gross disease with sequential boost (50 Gy + 14/16/20 Gy in 32-35 fractions) were replaced with dose-painting, which adapts dose based on risk of disease burden, to 50.4 and 63, 64.4, 70 Gy in 28 fractions, respectively. The first 10 patients were replanned with a sequential boost RT approach and dosimetric indices were compared. Time-to-event outcomes, including local control, regional control, distant control, and overall survival, were estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

Median follow-up was 25.2 months. Most patients had high-grade (59%) STS of the extremity (63%) who underwent resection with either R1 (40%) or close (36%) margins. Four patients experienced grade 3 acute dermatitis which resolved by the 3-month follow-up visit. The 2-year local control, regional control, distant control, and overall survival were 100%, 92%, 68%, and 86%, respectively. Compared with the sequential boost plan, HARD had a significantly lower field size (total V50 Gy; P = .002), bone V50 (P = .031), and maximum skin dose (P = .008). Overall treatment time was decreased by 4 to 7 fractions, which translated to a decrease in estimated average treatment cost of $3056 (range, $2651-$4335; P < .001).

Conclusions

In addition to benefits in cost, convenience, and improved biologic effect in STS, HARD regimen offers a safe treatment approach with dosimetric advantages compared with conventional sequential boost, which may translate to improved long-term toxicity.

Real-world evidence on perioperative chemotherapy in localized soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk wall; a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Data from the real-world setting on perioperative chemotherapy in high-risk, localized soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is limited. Real-world data (RWD) includes data derived from patients treated outside clinical trials and often captures long-term follow-up not recorded in clinical trials. The aim of this study was to provide population-based, real-world evidence on perioperative chemotherapy in localized STS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Adult patients with localized STS in the extremities or trunk wall treated at Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway from 1998 to 2017 were included in the study. Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database, supplemented by retrospective review of medical records.

RESULTS

The total study cohort included 806 patients, of whom 154 (19%) received perioperative chemotherapy. A regimen with anthracycline and ifosfamide was given in 141 of 154 cases (92%). During long-term follow-up two patients developed secondary malignancies, cardiac toxicity was registered in 11 patients (7%) and renal toxicity in 12 patients (8%). Seventy-one of 154 patients (46%) were treated outside of clinical trials and constituted the RWD cohort. The median age at surgery was slightly lower and there were more synovial sarcomas and fewer myxofibrosarcomas in the RWD cohort. No difference in chemotherapy dose intensity was observed. The estimated 5-year metastasis-free survival (MFS) in all patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy was 58%. In the RWD cohort 5-year MFS was 53% and in the clinical study cohort 61% (HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.77-2.00).

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcome after perioperative chemotherapy was comparable for patients treated in routine clinical practice to those in clinical trials. Secondary malignancy and cardiac toxicity were observed. The risk of serious late side effects should be included in the decision process on perioperative chemotherapy.