Comparison between regional citrate anticoagulation and heparin for intermittent hemodialysis in ICU patients: a propensity score-matched cohort study

Protocolized Regional Citrate Anticoagulation during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Single Center Experience

Background

Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has emerged as a treatment modality that reduces bleeding risk and filter clotting. With initial experience of using RCA with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), we have formulated a working protocol based on published literature.

Objective

The study aimed to evaluate the protocol for routine use of RCA during CRRT requiring anticoagulation and evaluation of filter life.

Methodology

It is a single-center, open-label, prospective, non-randomized, non-interventional, single-arm, observational study conducted at a tertiary care hospital between September 2022 and July 2023. All adult patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) or hyperammonemia requiring CRRT and necessitating the use of anticoagulation were enrolled in the study. The study used Prisma Flex M100 AN 69 dialyzer on Prisma Flex (Baxter) CRRT machines during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). The targeted CRRT dose in all the study patients was 25-30 mL/kg/hour. Based on the published literature, we have developed a working protocol (Appendix 1) for managing patients on CRRT using RCA.

Results

A total of 159 patients were analyzed for the study. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] filter life using RCA was 30 (12-55) hours. Filter clotting was observed in 33.3% of patients. Citrate accumulation was present in 52.25% of patients, but no CRRT was discontinued as citrate accumulation resolved after following the corrective steps in the protocol. None of the patients had citrate toxicity. Chronic liver disease (CLD) (p ≤ 0.001) and those who were post-living donor liver transplant recipients (p = 0.004) had a statistically significant increase in citrate accumulation. Also, patients who had higher lactate at baseline (6 hours post-CRRT initiation), had a higher chance of citrate accumulation.

Conclusion

Our RCA protocol provides a safe approach to regional anticoagulation during CRRT in critically ill patients.

How to cite this article

Pachisia AV, Kumar GP, Harne R, Jagadeesh KN, Patel SJ, Pal D, et al. Protocolized Regional Citrate Anticoagulation during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Single Center Experience. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(9):859-865.

Deciphering simplified regional anticoagulation with citrate in intermittent hemodialysis: a clinical and computational study

Regional citrate anticoagulation use in intermittent hemodialysis is limited by the increased risk of metabolic complications due to faster solute exchanges than with continuous renal replacement therapies. Several simplifications have been proposed. The objective of this study was to validate a mathematical model of hemodialysis anticoagulated with citrate that was then used to evaluate different prescription scenarios on anticoagulant effectiveness (free calcium concentration in dialysis filter) and calcium balance. A study was conducted in hemodialyzed patients with a citrate infusion into the arterial line and a 1.25 mmol/L calcium dialysate. Calcium and citrate concentrations were measured upstream and downstream of the citrate infusion site and in the venous line. The values measured in the venous lines were compared with those predicted by the model using Bland and Altman diagrams. The model was then used with 22 patients to make simulations. The model can predict the concentration of free calcium, bound to citrate or albumin, accurately. Irrespective of the prescription scenario a decrease in free calcium below 0.4 mmol/L was obtained only in a fraction of the dialysis filter. A zero or slightly negative calcium balance was observed, and should be taken into account in case of prolonged use.

Anticoagulation in renal replacement therapies: Why heparin should be abandoned in critical ill patients?

Extracorporeal circuits used in renal replacement therapy (RRT) can develop thrombosis, leading to downtimes and reduced therapy efficiency. To prevent this, anticoagulation is used, but the optimal anticoagulant has not yet been identified. Heparin is the most widely used anticoagulant in RRT, but it has limitations, such as unpredictable pharmacokinetics, nonspecific binding to plasma proteins and cells, and the possibility of suboptimal anticoagulation or bleeding complications, specifically in critically ill patients with acute renal failure who are already at high risk of bleeding. Citrate anticoagulation is a better alternative, being considered a standard for continuous renal replacement therapy, since it is associated with a lower risk of bleeding complications and better efficacy, even in patients with acute renal failure or liver disease. The aim of this article is to provide an updated review of the different strategies of anticoagulation in renal replacement therapies that can be implemented in critical scenarios, focusing on the advantages and disadvantages of each one and the beneficial aspects of using citrate over heparin in critical ill patients.

Monocytes as Targets for Immunomodulation by Regional Citrate Anticoagulation

Immune alterations in end-stage renal patients receiving hemodialysis are complex and predispose patients to infections. Anticoagulation may also play an immunomodulatory role in addition to the accumulation of uremic toxins and the effects of the dialysis procedure. Accordingly, it has been recently shown that the infection rate increases in patients under regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) compared with systemic heparin anticoagulation (SHA). We hypothesized that RCA affects the immune status of hemodialysis patients by targeting monocytes. In a cohort of 38 end-stage renal patients undergoing hemodialysis, we demonstrated that whole blood monocytes of patients receiving RCA-but not SHA-failed to upregulate surface activation markers, like human leukocyte antigen class II (HLA-DR), after stressful insults, indicating a state of deactivation during and immediately after dialysis. Additionally, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data and gene set enrichment analysis of pre-dialysis monocytes evidenced a great and complex difference between the groups given that, in the RCA group, monocytes displayed a dramatic transcriptional change with increased expression of genes related to the cell cycle regulation, cellular metabolism, and cytokine signaling, compatible with the reprogramming of the immune response. Transcriptomic changes in pre-dialysis monocytes signalize the lasting nature of the RCA-related effects, suggesting that monocytes are affected even beyond the dialysis session. Furthermore, these findings demonstrate that RCA-but not SHA-impairs the response of monocytes to activation stimuli and alters the immune status of these patients with potential clinical implications.

Thromboelastography and Traditional Coagulation Testing in Non-ICU-Admitted Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: An Observational Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to elucidate the coagulation disorders in non-ICU patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and their contribution to clotting-related outcomes of intermittent kidney replacement therapy (KRT).

METHODS

We included non-ICU-admitted patients with AKI requiring intermittent KRT, clinically having a risk of bleeding and against systemic anticoagulant use during KRT between April and December 2018. The premature termination of treatment due to circuit clotting was considered a poor outcome. We analyzed the characteristics of thromboelastography (TEG)-derived and traditional coagulation parameters and explored the potential-affecting factors.

RESULTS

In total, 64 patients were enrolled. Hypocoagulability was detected in 4.7%-15.6% of patients by a combination of the traditional parameters, i.e., prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio, activated partial PT, and fibrinogen. No patient had hypocoagulability observed on TEG-derived reaction time; only 2.1%, 3.1%, and 10.9% of patients had hypocoagulability on TEG-derived kinetic time (K-time), α-angle, and maximum amplitude (MA), respectively, which were also platelet-related coagulation parameters, despite 37.5% of the cohort having thrombocytopenia. In contrast, hypercoagulability was more prevalent, involving 12.5%, 43.8%, 21.9%, and 48.4% of patients on TEG K-time, α-angle, MA, and coagulation index (CI), respectively, although thrombocytosis was only in 1.5% of the cohort. Patients with thrombocytopenia showed lower fibrinogen level (2.6 vs. 4.0 g/L, p = 0.00), α-angle (63.5° vs. 73.3°, p = 0.00), MA (53.5 vs. 66.1 mm, p = 0.00), and CI (1.8 vs. 3.6, p = 0.00) but higher thrombin time (17.8 vs. 16.2 s, p = 0.00) and K-time (2.0 vs. 1.2 min, p = 0.00) than those with a platelet count over 100 × 109/L. 41 patients were treated with heparin-free protocol, and 23 were treated with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA). The premature termination rate was 41.5% on heparin-free patients, while 8.7% of patients underwent an RCA protocol (p = 0.006). Heparin-free protocol was the strongest adverse factor to poor outcomes. A heparin-free subgroup analysis found that the circuit clotting risk was increased by 61.7% with a 10 × 109/L elevation in platelet count (odds ratio [OR] = 1.617, p = 0.049) and decreased by 67.5% following a second increase of PT (OR = 0.325, p = 0.041). No significant correlation was found between TEG parameters and premature circuit clotting.

CONCLUSIONS

Most non-ICU-admitted patients with AKI had normal-to-enhanced hemostasis and activated platelet function based on TEG results, as well as a high rate of premature circuit clotting when receiving heparin-free protocol despite thrombocytopenia. Further studies are needed to better determine the use of TEG in respect to management of anticoagulation and bleeding complications in AKI patients with KRT.

Unapparent systemic effects of regional anticoagulation with citrate in continuous renal replacement therapy: a narrative review

The use of citrate, through reversible binding of calcium, has become the preferred choice for anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy in the critically ill patient. Though generally considered as very efficacious in acute kidney injury, this type of anticoagulation can cause acid-base disorders as well as citrate accumulation and overload, phenomena which have been well described. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an overview of some other, non-anticoagulation effects of citrate chelation during its use as anticoagulant. We highlight the effects seen on the calcium balance and hormonal status, phosphate and magnesium balance, as well as oxidative stress resulting from these unapparent effects. As most of these data on these non-anticoagulation effects have been obtained in small observational studies, new and larger studies documenting both short- and long-term effects should be undertaken. Subsequent future guidelines for citrate-based continuous renal replacement therapy should take not only the metabolic but also these unapparent effects into account.

Use of regional citrate anticoagulation with medium cut-off membrane: pilot report

Background

Regional citrate anticoagulation during hemodialysis provides an immediate and complete anticoagulant effect, which is limited to the extracorporeal circuit. Citrate has become the standard anticoagulant in acute renal replacement therapy and is widely used in various intermittent hemodialysis modalities, especially for patients with contraindications for heparin. With the increased adoption of medium cut-off membranes, experience with regional citrate anticoagulation is needed. To our knowledge, this is the first report to assess the feasibility of regional citrate anticoagulation in expanded hemodialysis.

Methods

We prospectively analyzed 5 expanded hemodialysis procedures in 5 patients in which a medium cut-off membrane (Theranova®) was used. We followed our standard citrate protocol developed and tested for high-flux membrane. Anticoagulation was performed with a continuous infusion of 8% trisodium citrate into the arterial line and supplementation of 1 M calcium chloride into the venous line. We monitored ionized calcium and magnesium, sodium and blood gas analysis. Anticoagulation effectiveness was assessed by post-filter ionized calcium and by visual inspection of the anticoagulation in the circuit.

Results

There were no prematurely terminated procedures due to anticoagulation-related complications. With a blood flow of 250 mL/min and a dialysate flow of 500 mL/min, we were able to maintain serum ionized calcium in the range of 0.89–1.29 mmol/L and serum sodium in the range of 136–144 mmol/L. The mean pre- and post-dialysis arterial circuit pH was 7.42 (± 0.04) and 7.53 (± 0.23), respectively. The mean pre- and post-dialysis serum ionized magnesium was 0.54 (± 0.04) mmol/L and 0.43 (± 0.03) mmol/L, respectively (measurements were done on a point-of-care ionometer with a lower normal range for ionized magnesium).

Conclusion

We have shown that our standard citrate protocol for high-flux hemodialysis membrane could be successfully adopted for use in expanded hemodialysis with a medium cut-off membrane. Overall, electrolyte and acid-base balances were relatively well-controlled and anticoagulation effectiveness was excellent.

Trial registration

This is a pilot report with results taken from a larger ongoing trial (registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on October 25, 2019 under number NCT04139525) comparing citrate and heparin anticoagulation during expanded hemodialysis.