Adherence to Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines for management of traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Correlation Between Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines and Published Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Research

Four editions of the Brain Trauma Foundation's (BTF) evidence-based guidelines have been published to guide clinical management after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and increase TBI research. We reviewed the association between published clinical severe TBI research and BTF guideline year of publication and guideline chapter topics. Using PubMed, we searched for peer-reviewed articles on severe TBI research published between 1975 and 2019. The frequency and study design of publications on chapter topics included in all 4 BTF guideline editions was collected and the relationship with published TBI research examined using linear regression and the coefficient of determination (r2). A total of 845 relevant articles were identified, with an average of 19 articles published per year. There was an increase in the overall number of publications (r2=0.72), with the largest increase occurring between the third and the fourth guideline editions (r2=0.70, 31 articles/y). Across all 4 guideline editions, 54% (n=460) of publications were retrospective studies, 27.2% (n=230) prospective studies, 12% (n=101) randomized controlled trials, and 7.6% (n=64) meta-analyses/systematic reviews. Publication of retrospective study numbers increased the most (r2=0.61), followed by prospective observational studies and meta-analyses/systematic reviews (r2=0.47 each), and randomized controlled trials (r2=0.39). The 3 most highly published guideline chapter topic areas were ventilator-associated pneumonia (r2=0.70), hyperosmolar therapy (r2=0.47), and decompressive craniectomy (r2=0.41). In summary, the TBI research output increased over time and was associated with BTF guideline release. However, the increase in published TBI research was not consistent between serial editions of the BTF guidelines, and many studies did not incorporate high-quality prospective research designs.

A Bibliometric Analysis of Neurosurgical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

In the last 20 yr, the rate of neurosurgical guideline publication has increased. However, despite the higher volume and increasing emphasis on quality there remains no reliable means of measuring the overall impact of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

OBJECTIVE

To utilize citation analysis to evaluate the dispersion of neurosurgical CPGs.

METHODS

A list of neurosurgical guidelines was compiled by performing electronic searches using the Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and National Guideline Clearinghouse databases. The Scopus database was queried to obtain current publication and citation data for all included documents and categorized based upon recognized neurosurgical specialties. The h-index, R-index, h2-index, i10-index, and dissemination index (D-Index) were manually calculated for each subspecialty.

RESULTS

After applying screening criteria the search yielded 372 neurosurgical CPGs, which were included for bibliometric analysis. The overall calculated h-index for neurosurgery was 56. When broken down by subspecialty trauma/critical care had the highest value at 35, followed by spine and peripheral nerve at 30, cerebrovascular at 28, tumor at 16, pediatrics at 14, miscellaneous at 11, and functional/stereotactic/pain at 6. Cerebrovascular neurosurgery was noted to have the highest D-Index at 3.4.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive framework is useful for guideline impact analysis. Bibliometric data provides a novel and adequate means of evaluating the successful dissemination of neurosurgical guidelines. There remains a paucity of data regarding implementation and clinical outcomes of individual guidelines.

Adherence to Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines for Management of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients and Its Effect on Outcomes: Systematic Review

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) management based on Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) guidelines is widely accepted and thought to improve outcome. The objectives of this study are to provide an overview of adherence to BTF guidelines and to explore which factors influence adherence. We conducted a search of relevant electronic bibliographic databases. Twenty articles met inclusion/exclusion criteria out of 666 articles screened. All were cohort studies. Wide variation in adherence to BTF guidelines was observed with a median of 66.2% (range 0-100%). The lowest median adherence was observed with surgical management (14%), whereas the highest was observed with oxygenation (100%), steroid (97.8%), and blood pressure recommendation (92.3%). Variability was primarily explained by the variation in the strength of evidence of each recommendation. Treating patients with higher severity of injury as well as treatment in a Level I trauma center positively influenced adherence. Overall, adherence to BTF guidelines varies. Further research is required to strengthen the current evidence and to identify factors related to adherence to guidelines from a professional prospective.

The use of antioxidants in the treatment of traumatic brain injury

AIMS

The aim of this study was to discuss secondary traumatic brain injury, the mitochondria and the use of antioxidants as a treatment.

BACKGROUND

One of the leading causes of death globally is traumatic brain injury, affecting individuals in all demographics. Traumatic brain injury is produced by an external blunt force or penetration resulting in alterations in brain function or pathology. Often, with a traumatic brain injury, secondary injury causes additional damage to the brain tissue that can have further impact on recovery and the quality of life. Secondary injury occurs when metabolic and physiologic processes alter after initial injury and includes increased release of toxic free radicals that cause damage to adjacent tissues and can eventually lead to neuronal necrosis. Although antioxidants in the tissues can reduce free radical damage, the magnitude of increased free radicals overwhelms the body's reduced defence mechanisms. Supplementing the body's natural supply of antioxidants, such as coenzyme Q10, can attenuate oxidative damage caused by reactive oxygen species.

DESIGN

Discussion paper.

DATA SOURCES

Research literature published from 2011-2016 in PubMed, CINAHL and Cochrane.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Prompt and accurate assessment of patients with traumatic brain injury by nurses is important to ensure optimal recovery and reduced lasting disability. Thus, it is imperative that nurses be knowledgeable about the secondary injury that occurs after a traumatic brain injury and aware of possible antioxidant treatments.

CONCLUSION

The use of antioxidants has potential to reduce the magnitude of secondary injury in patients who experience a traumatic brain injury.