How does feedback shared with interprofessional health care teams shape nursing performance improvement systems? A rapid realist review protocol

A Near-Peer Interprofessional Educational Fellowship Program for Training Pre-Clinical Medical Students in the Best Practices of Teaching and Learning

Medical school often has opportunities for students to engage in peer or near-peer teaching, however structured teacher training is rarely conducted. We present an Educational Fellowship for rising M2 students as teaching assistants for first year Physician Assistant students. In this near-peer interprofessional teaching model, the M2 students learn pedagogical theory and best practices for teaching and learning. The curriculum and experience may be used by any healthcare profession. Since many healthcare professions have classes during the summer, we present our program as a conceptual model for other institutions.

Feedback for Emergency Ambulance Staff: A National Review of Current Practice Informed by Realist Evaluation Methodology

Research suggests that feedback in Emergency Medical Services (EMS) positively affects quality of care and professional development. However, the mechanisms by which feedback achieves its effects still need to be better understood across healthcare settings. This study aimed to understand how United Kingdom (UK) ambulance services provide feedback for EMS professionals and develop a programme theory of how feedback works within EMS, using a mixed-methods, realist evaluation framework. A national cross-sectional survey was conducted to identify feedback initiatives in UK ambulance services, followed by four in-depth case studies involving qualitative interviews and documentary analysis. We used qualitative content analysis and descriptive statistics to analyse survey responses from 40 prehospital feedback initiatives, alongside retroductive analysis of 17 interviews and six documents from case study sites. Feedback initiatives mainly provided individual patient outcome feedback through "pull" initiatives triggered by staff requests. Challenges related to information governance were identified. Our programme theory of feedback to EMS professionals encompassed context (healthcare professional and organisational characteristics), mechanisms (feedback and implementation characteristics, psychological reasoning) and outcomes (implementation, staff and service outcomes). This study suggests that most UK ambulance services use a range of feedback initiatives and provides 24 empirically based testable hypotheses for future research.

How does nursing-sensitive indicator feedback with nursing or interprofessional teams work and shape nursing performance improvement systems? A rapid realist review

BACKGROUND

Care quality varies between organizations and even units within an organization. Inadequate care can have harmful financial and social consequences, e.g. nosocomial infection, lengthened hospital stays or death. Experts recommend the implementation of nursing performance improvement systems to assess team performance and monitor patient outcomes as well as service efficiency. In practice, these systems provide nursing or interprofessional teams with nursing-sensitive indicator feedback. Feedback is essential since it commits teams to improve their practice, although it appears somewhat haphazard and, at times, overlooked. Research findings suggest that contextual dynamics, initial system performance and feedback modes interact in unknown ways. This rapid review aims to produce a theorization to explain what works in which contexts, and how feedback to nursing or interprofessional teams shape nursing performance improvement systems.

METHODS

Based on theory-driven realist methodology, with reference to an innovative combination of Actor-Network Theory and Critical Realist philosophy principles, this realist rapid review entailed an iterative procedure: 8766 documents in French and English, published between 2010 and 2018, were identified via 5 databases, and 23 were selected and analysed. Two expert panels (scientific and clinical) were consulted to improve the synthesis and systemic modelling of an original feedback theorization.

RESULTS

We identified three hypotheses, subdivided into twelve generative configurations to explain how feedback mobilizes nursing or interprofessional teams. Empirically founded and actionable, these propositions are supported by expert panels. Each configuration specifies contextualized mechanisms that explain feedback and team outcomes. Socially mediated mechanisms are particularly generative of action and agency.

CONCLUSIONS

This rapid realist review provides an informative theoretical proposition to embrace the complexity of nursing-sensitive indicator feedback with nursing or interdisciplinary teams. Building on general explanations previously observed, this review provides insight into a deep explanation of feedback mechanisms.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Prospero CRD42018110128 .

Effect of a refined nursing model based on nursing quality feedback on the postoperative mental state of patients with laryngeal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact and effect of a refined nursing model based on nursing quality feedback on the postoperative mental state of patients with laryngeal cancer.

METHODS

According to the principle of a randomized controlled trial, 102 patients undergoing laryngeal cancer surgery were divided into two groups with 51 patients in each group. The control group received a conventional nursing model, and the research group received a refined nursing model based on nursing quality feedback. Patients' mental status, illness perception, finding of benefits, cancer-related fatigue, changes in quality of life before and 3 months after operation were observed, and postoperative complications and nursing satisfaction were collected.

RESULTS

The scores of the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), the Brief Illness perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), and Revised Piper Fatigue Scale in the research group were lower than those in the control group at 3 months after operation, and the scores of benefit finding, EORTC QLQ-C30, and La Monica-Oberst Patient Satisfaction Scale (LOPSS) were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05); and the complication rate of the research group (7.84%) was lower than that of the control group (23.53%) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For patients undergoing laryngeal cancer surgery, the use of the refined nursing model based on nursing quality feedback can reduce patients' negative emotions, increase the benefits found, reduce their negative perceptions and cancer-related fatigue, improve their quality of life, reduce complications, and enhance the nurse-patient relationship.