Survival by histology among patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma who undergo metastasectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Management of oligometastatic/metastatic sarcomas and place of local treatments with focus on modern radiotherapy approaches

Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous disease. For localized disease, treatment is based on surgery and radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy depending on risk factors. Upfront metastases are present in 7 to 20% of cases, and are localized to the lungs in most of cases. Disseminated disease is generally considered incurable but in selected cases, aggressive local treatment of metastases allowed long survival. Treatment of primary tumour is often debated. Our purpose is to evaluate the literature concerning the role of radiotherapy in the management of primary metastatic soft tissue sarcomas.

Clinical outcomes of brain metastasectomy from soft tissue and bone sarcomas: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis in sarcomas is associated with a poor prognosis. Data regarding prognostic factors and clinical outcomes of surgical resection of brain metastasis from sarcomas are limited. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate survival outcomes post-brain metastasectomy for patients with soft tissue and bone sarcomas.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted examining survival outcomes among adults and children with soft tissue and bone sarcoma undergoing brain metastasectomy, in the English language from inception up to May 31, 2021. Two reviewers independently evaluated and screened the literature, extracted the data, and graded the included studies. The body of evidence was evaluated and graded according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series. Results were synthesized using descriptive methods. A meta-analysis was not possible due to the low quality and heterogeneity of studies.

RESULTS

Ten studies published between 1994 and 2020 were included: three were retrospective cohort studies and seven were case series. 507 patients were included, of whom 269 underwent brain metastasectomy. The median follow-up period ranged between 14 and 29 months. The median survival period after metastasectomy ranged from 7 to 25 months. The most common prognostic factors associated with survival included presenting performance status, age, number of brain metastases, presence of lung metastases, and peri-operative radiation therapy administration.

DISCUSSION

Although the level of evidence is low, retrospective studies support that brain metastasectomy can be performed with reasonable post-operative survival in selected individuals.

Efficacy and Safety of Treating Refractory Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma with Anlotinib in Different Treatment Patterns

Methods

The medical data of 47 patients with refractory bone and soft tissue sarcoma, who received anlotinib from January 2019 to December 2020, were retrospectively collected. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated according to the solid tumor response evaluation version 1.1 standard. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse reactions were recorded.

Results

A total of 44 patients, including 13 with osteosarcoma and 31 with soft tissue sarcoma, were enrolled in this study. Among patients with osteosarcoma, no patients achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), while seven patients (54%) had stable disease (SD). Besides, the median PFS (m-PFS) was 4.4 months, and the median OS (m-OS) was 15.7 months. Among patients with soft tissue sarcoma, the ORR and DCR were 19% and 71%, respectively. The median m-PFS was 5.4 months, and m-OS was 17.9 months. Anlotinib plus chemotherapy had a higher ORR compared with anlotinib monotherapy (6% vs. 38%, P = 0.047). The most common grade 3/4 adverse reactions were pneumothorax (5%) and pleural effusion (5%), and no treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusions

Anlotinib alone showed encouraging efficacy and favorable tolerability in refractory bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Anlotinib plus chemotherapy did not show a significant clinical benefit compared with anlotinib alone. Anlotinib showed better tumor control when used as first-line drug treatment in refractory bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

Metastasectomy in Leiomyosarcoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Survival Analysis

Simple Summary

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is an aggressive soft tissue sarcoma with a poor prognosis. Approximately 40% of patients will develop metastatic disease. The optimal treatment for patients with metastatic LMS is not well established, and there are no randomized controlled trials regarding metastasectomy. This systematic review and pooled survival analysis aims to assess the survival in patients undergoing a metastasectomy for LMS and compare the outcomes based on the site of metastasectomy. We identified that patients with LMS metastases in the lungs, liver, spine, and brain can undergo metastasectomy with acceptable survival. Two studies have compared survival outcomes between patients treated and not treated with metastasectomy; despite their low quality, these studies support a survival benefit associated with metastasectomy.

Abstract

This study assesses the survival in patients undergoing metastasectomy for leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and compares the outcomes by the site of metastasectomy. We conducted a systematic review and pooled survival analysis of patients undergoing metastasectomy for LMS. Survival was compared between sites of metastasectomy. We identified 23 studies including 573 patients undergoing metastasectomy for LMS. The pooled median survival was 59.6 months (95% CI 33.3 to 66.0). The pooled median survival was longest for lung metastasectomy (72.8 months 95% CI 63.0 to 82.5), followed by liver (34.8 months 95% CI 22.3 to 47.2), spine (14.1 months 95% CI 8.6 to 19.7), and brain (14 months 95% CI 6.7 to 21.3). Two studies compared the survival outcomes between patients who did, versus who did not undergo metastasectomy; both demonstrated a significantly improved survival with metastasectomy. We conclude that surgery is currently being utilized for LMS metastases to the lung, liver, spine, and brain with acceptable survival. Although low quality, comparative studies support a survival benefit with metastasectomy. In the absence of randomized studies, it is impossible to determine whether the survival benefit associated with metastasectomy is due to careful patient selection rather than a surgical advantage; limited data were included about patient selection.