Systematic review of economic evaluations investigating education, exercise, and dietary weight management to manage hip and knee osteoarthritis: protocol

Economic evaluations of musculoskeletal physiotherapy: protocol of a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Several economic evaluations of musculoskeletal physiotherapy have been published in the literature. We aim to provide an overview of these existing economic evaluations. This overview will be useful for healthcare funders in identifying studies matching their context. In addition, research gaps as well as literature extensive enough to be combined in a meta-analysis will be identified. This will support researchers in planning relevant research projects.

METHODS AND ANALYSES

We will search in PubMed, EconLit and NHS-EED for relevant literature. Full economic evaluations of musculoskeletal physiotherapy interventions will be included, regardless of type, and economic evaluation perspective. Initial searches were performed on 7th October 2021. Study selection, data extraction and the quality evaluation will be conducted initially by two independent researchers. If their agreement is sufficient, one reviewer will proceed with the respected process. From the included studies, we will extract information on the publication year, the country of origin, the type of economical evaluation analyses and the specific musculoskeletal condition. An overview will be provided, concerning the distributions of the included studies regarding the extracted information. Furthermore, an evaluation of the individual study quality will be offered.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethical approval will be required for this systematic review, since no human participants are involved. We aim to distribute the findings of this review in a peer-reviewed journal, on national and international conferences, as well as via social media.

Economic Effects of Occupational Therapy Services for Adults in Acute and Subacute Care Settings: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

Research supports the clinical effectiveness of hospital-based occupational therapy to improve functional outcomes, but no synthesis of economic evaluations of occupational therapy services provided in these settings has been published.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the economic value of occupational therapy services in acute and subacute care settings.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, EconLit, Embase, National Health Services Economic Evaluation Database, PsycINFO, ProQuest (Health and Medicine and Social Science subsets only), OTseeker, and gray literature. Study Selection and Data Collection: Eligible studies used trial-based or modeled economic analyses and included an adult population (ages ≥18 yr) and occupational therapy assessments or interventions provided in acute and subacute care. Two authors independently assessed abstracts and then full text. Articles were then appraised using the Evers Consensus on Health Economic Criteria.

FINDINGS

The authors identified 13,176 unique abstracts and assessed 190 full-text articles for eligibility. Ten studies were included in the systematic review; they varied in their primary objectives, methodology, costs, and outcomes. Studies examined the cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, or cost minimization of a range of occupational therapy services. Five studies suggested that occupational therapy services offer value for money (lower cost, higher benefit); 4 suggested that they offer higher cost and benefits. One study that investigated upper limb rehabilitation did not indicate value for money.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings suggest that occupational therapy for adults poststroke and post-traumatic brain injury, acute discharge planning, and pre- and post-hip replacement is cost-effective, but further research is needed to substantiate these findings. What This Article Adds: The findings provide preliminary evidence of the economic effectiveness of occupational therapy in acute and subacute care.