Dutch guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of highly-resistant micro-organisms (HRMO) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs)

Cumulative incidence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium detection by patient characteristics or possible exposures: prioritization of patients for active screening culture

BACKGROUND

The target population for active surveillance culture (ASC) of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species (VRE) by stool or rectal swabs has not been fully determined during VRE outbreaks in healthcare settings in non-VRE endemic situation.

AIM

To evaluate cumulative incidences of VRE detection during a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium outbreak to determine reasonable target populations for ASC.

METHODS

Cases included inpatients whose first VRE-positive sample was obtained at Shizuoka General Hospital between February 2022 and January 2023, during which we conducted admission screening for possible high-risk patients, bi-weekly screening of all inpatients, admission and discharge screening in the high-care unit, and screening of contacts in each ward using stool or rectal samples. We calculated cumulative incidences of VRE detection for those screened by patient characteristics or possible exposure.

FINDINGS

Among 60 cases identified, 55 (92%) were by ASC. Cumulative incidence was higher for contacts (6.4%, 15/234) than for those identified by other screening methods (0.5%, 40/8565). Among the patients identified through admission screening, those previously hospitalized in areas of reported VRE outbreaks had the highest cumulative incidence (6.6%, 5/78) followed by patients requiring toilet assistance (3.7%, 6/161). A bundle approach including ASC and prompt contact precautions by the hospital infection control team, local public health centre, and local and national infection control experts helped terminate the outbreak in seven months.

CONCLUSION

Patients with contacts, prior hospitalization in areas with known VRE outbreaks, and who need toilet assistance appear to be high-risk populations for VRE detection and are candidates for ASC.

Phenotypic and Molecular Characteristics of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates from Bulgarian Intensive Care Unit Patients

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is designated as an urgent public health threat, both due to its remarkable multidrug resistance and propensity for clonal spread. This study aimed to explore the phenotypic and molecular characteristics of antimicrobial resistance in CRAB isolates (n = 73) from intensive care unit (ICU) patients in two university hospitals in Bulgaria (2018–2019). The methodology included antimicrobial susceptibility testing, PCR, whole-genome sequencing (WGS), and phylogenomic analysis. The resistance rates were as follows: imipenem, 100%; meropenem, 100%; amikacin, 98.6%; gentamicin, 89%; tobramycin, 86.3%; levofloxacin, 100%; trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, 75.3%; tigecycline, 86.3%; colistin, 0%; and ampicillin–sulbactam, 13.7%. All isolates harbored blaOXA-51-like genes. The frequencies of distribution of other antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) were: blaOXA-23-like, 98.6%; blaOXA-24/40-like, 2.7%; armA, 86.3%; and sul1, 75.3%. The WGS of selected extensively drug-resistant A. baumannii (XDR-AB) isolates (n = 3) revealed the presence of OXA-23 and OXA-66 carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamases in all isolates, and OXA-72 carbapenemase in one of them. Various insertion sequencies, such as ISAba24, ISAba31, ISAba125, ISVsa3, IS17, and IS6100, were also detected, providing increased ability for horizontal transfer of ARGs. The isolates belonged to the widespread high-risk sequence types ST2 (n = 2) and ST636 (n = 1) (Pasteur scheme). Our results show the presence of XDR-AB isolates, carrying a variety of ARGs, in Bulgarian ICU settings, which highlights the crucial need for nationwide surveillance, especially in the conditions of extensive antibiotic usage during COVID-19.

Occurrence of Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) by Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. Producing Extended-Spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) and/or Carbapenemases in Portuguese Long-Term Care Facilities

Extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)- and carbapenemase-producing bacteria are widespread in hospitals, but the extent of this problem in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) is poorly understood. We aimed to elucidate, in the Portuguese regional clinical context, the relevance of LTCFs as a reservoir of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. producing ESBL- and/or carbapenemases (Ec/Kp-ESBL/CARB). Fourteen LTCFs from Portugal, corresponding to units of convalescence (UC/n = 3), medium-term internment and rehabilitation (UMDR/ n = 5), or long-term internment and maintenance (ULDM/n = 6), were analyzed (2016–2019). All patients with Ec/Kp-ESBL/CARB infections acquired during LTCF stay were included, and detailed information was collected. Prevalence of patients with healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) by Ec/Kp-ESBL/CARB did not vary significantly over time (1.48% in 2016–2017, 1.89% in 2017–2018, and 1.90% in 2018–2019), but a statistically significant association with the LTCF typology (ULDM, UMDR) was observed. HAIs were caused by K. pneumoniae (n = 51/54.3%), E. coli (n = 41/43.6%), or both (n = 2/2.1%), producing ESBL (96%) or carbapenemases (4%). Prior colonization (n = 14/16%) corresponded to seven Kp-CARB and seven Ec/Kp-ESBL. The worrying prevalence of patients acquiring HAIs by Ec/Kp-ESBL/CARB, associated with the estimated rates of those already colonized at admission, highlights a relevant role for LTCFs as a reservoir of Ec/Kp-ESBL/CARB. Epidemiological surveillance should be extended to the national level, and colonization screening at LTCF admission implemented systematically.

Approaches to multidrug-resistant organism prevention and control in long-term care facilities for older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite clear evidence of benefits in acute-care hospitals, controversy over the effectiveness of IPC measures for MDROs is perceptible and evidence-based practice has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of IPC interventions on MDRO colonization and infections in LTCFs.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from inception to September 2020.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Original and peer-reviewed articles examining the post-intervention effects on MDRO colonization and infections in LTCFs.

INTERVENTIONS

(i) Horizontal interventions: administrative engagement, barrier precautions, education, environmental cleaning, hand hygiene, performance improvement, and source control; and (ii) vertical intervention: active surveillance plus decolonization.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

We employed a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled risk ratios (pRRs) for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization by intervention duration; and conducted subgroup analyses on different intervention components. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tools.

RESULTS

Of 3877 studies identified, 19 were eligible for inclusion (eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs)). Studies reported outcomes associated with MRSA (15 studies), vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) (four studies), Clostridium difficile (two studies), and Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) (two studies). Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pRRs were close to unity regardless of intervention duration (long: RR 0.81 [95% CI 0.60-1.10]; medium: RR 0.81 [95% CI 0.25-2.68]; short: RR 0.95 [95% CI 0.53-1.69]). Vertical interventions in studies with a small sample size showed significant reductions in MRSA colonization while horizontal interventions did not. All studies involving active administrative engagement reported reductions. The risk of bias was high in all but two studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis did not show any beneficial effects from IPC interventions on MRSA reductions in LTCFs. Our findings highlight that the effectiveness of interventions in these facilities is likely conditional on resource availability-particularly decolonization and barrier precautions, due to their potential adverse events and uncertain effectiveness. Hence, administrative engagement is crucial for all effective IPC programmes. LTCFs should consider a pragmatic approach to reinforce standard precautions as routine practice and implement barrier precautions and decolonization to outbreak responses only.

Acquisition of MDR-GNB in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on ESBL-E

INTRODUCTION

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) and other multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) have disseminated globally since their discovery in the late 20^th century. Various infection prevention and control measures are in place to prevent nosocomial transmission of these organisms, but their efficacy remains disputed. New literature has emerged in recent years providing further evidence which can be used to formulate effective strategies to tackle this issue in the future.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to characterize the prevalence of colonization of multi-drug-resistant organisms and subsequent acquisition of these organisms within hospital settings. A meta-analysis was performed to characterize the prevalence and acquisition of ESBL-E in Europe and North America.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Escherichia coli formed the main burden of MDR-GNB colonization worldwide. Patient-to-patient transmission of ESBL-E was found to be rare, but increased transmissibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae was described over E. coli. Within European and North American healthcare settings, a meta-analysis of eight studies identified a pooled prevalence of ESBL-E on admission to hospital of 7.91% and an acquisition rate of 3.73%.

DISCUSSION

Low prevalence at the point of hospital admission and insufficient evidence of patient-to-patient transmission suggests that infection prevention and control measures such as universal surveillance screening and single-room isolation are unlikely to be practical or effective interventions in reducing the overall burden of ESBL-E in hospitals, in line with current European guidelines. Instead, it is argued that efforts should be placed on controlling the spread of these organisms and other MDR-GNB in the community, predominantly long-term care facilities.