Impact of vancomycin use trend change due to the availability of alternative antibiotics on the prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced vancomycin susceptibility: a 14-year retrospective study

Risk factors for vancomycin treatment failure in heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

The incidence of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) infection is increasing and is associated with vancomycin treatment failures. However, studies investigating the risk factors for treatment failure in hVISA infection are limited. Patients with hVISA bacteremia treated with vancomycin over 7 days between August 2008 and June 2020 were enrolled in this study. Clinical and microbiological characteristics were compared between vancomycin treatment failure and success groups to identify the risk factors for vancomycin treatment failure. Among the 180 patients with hVISA bacteremia, 102 patients treated with vancomycin over 7 days were included. Vancomycin treatment failed in 80 (78%) patients. Patients in the vancomycin treatment failure group were older (P < 0.001) and more frequently had solid cancer (P = 0.04) than those in the vancomycin treatment success group. Solid organ transplantation (SOT) was more frequent (P < 0.001) in the vancomycin treatment success group. The Charlson comorbidity index (P = 0.01) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (P < 0.001) were higher in the vancomycin treatment failure group. In multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for vancomycin treatment failure were old age and severity of bacteremia. SOT and vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤ 1.0 mg/L using the broth microdilution (BMD) method were associated with successful vancomycin treatment. Old age and infection severity were independent risk factors for vancomycin treatment failure. Vancomycin MIC using the BMD method is an important risk factor for vancomycin treatment failure, and its use should be considered in hVISA bacteremia.IMPORTANCEIn this study, we assessed the clinical and microbiological characteristics of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediated Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) bacteremia and identified risk factors for vancomycin treatment failure. We found that advanced age and severity of infection were independent risk factors for vancomycin treatment failure. On the other hand, solid organ transplantation and a low vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration were associated with successful vancomycin treatment. This study highlights the importance of vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration in hVISA bacteremia.

Genetic alterations in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus associated with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration

BACKGROUND

There are many reports on gene mutations observed in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) showing reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. However, there are limited studies on the genetic alterations that contribute to high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). This study aimed to compare MSSA strains with high vancomycin MICs with those with low MICs, and to identify specific genetic alterations associated with increased vancomycin MICs.

METHODS

In total, 124 MSSA strains were analysed, with 62 having vancomycin MICs of 1-2 mg/L (MS-HV) and the remaining 62 having MICs <1 mg/L (MS-LV) as control. Polymerase chain reaction amplification and sequencing were conducted to identify point mutations and amino acid changes in the vraSR, graRS and walRK operons and rpoB gene. The number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and specific mutations in the indicated gene were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The MS-HV strains had a significantly higher median number of SNPs in studied genes than the MS-LV strains (5 vs 3; P < 0.0001), with higher frequency of SNPs in the graR and walK genes. The MS-HV strains also displayed a significantly higher prevalence of specific mutations in the graR gene (V135I, I136V and V136I) compared with the MS-LV strains. The odds of having a high vancomycin MIC was 5.54 times higher in strains with a mutation in the graR gene, and 5.32 times higher in strains with a mutation in the walK gene, compared with those without these mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Mutations in the graR and walK genes may contribute to reduced vancomycin susceptibility in MSSA. This study gives key insights into the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon.

Molecular and Clinical Features of Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in Tertiary Care Hospitals in South India

Objectives

This study aimed to detect heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) among methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolated from healthcare-associated infections and identify staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types.

Methods

This study was conducted from February 2019 to March 2020 and included patients admitted in 4 tertiary care hospitals in Karnataka, India. Isolation and identification of MRSA were done using standard bacteriological methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion; macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B phenotypes were identified using the D test. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin was determined using agar dilution. hVISA were confirmed by the modified population analysis profile-area under the curve test. SCCmec types and the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (pvl) gene were detected using multiplex polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Of 220 MRSA stains, 14 (6.4%) were hVISA. None of the MRSA isolates was vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant and all hVISA were susceptible to linezolid and teicoplanin. The macrolide-streptogramin B phenotype was present in 42.9% of hVISA; 92.9% of the hVISA strains had vancomycin MIC in the range of 1-2 μg/mL. Majority of the hVISA and vancomycin-susceptible MRSA were isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections. SCCmec III and IV were present in 50% and 35.7% of hVISA, respectively; 14.3% of the hVISA harboured SCCmec V.

Conclusion

The prevalence rate of hVISA among MRSA was 6.4%. Therefore, MRSA strains should be tested for hVISA before starting vancomycin treatment. None of the isolates was vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant and all the hVISA strains were susceptible to linezolid and teicoplanin. The majority of the hVISA were isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections and harboured SCCmec III and IV.

Heterogeneous Vancomycin Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients - A Hospital-Based Comparative Study

Purpose

To study the infections caused by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with emphasis on heterogeneous vancomycin intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) in diabetic and non-diabetic patients and their comparison.

Patients and Methods

S. aureus strains isolated from diabetic and non-diabetic patients admitted in four tertiary care hospitals in Coastal Karnataka, South India, were tested for methicillin resistance and included in the present study. Demographic and clinical data of the patients were collected using structured proforma. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method, and MLS_B phenotypes were identified using the D-test. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin was determined using agar dilution. MRSA isolates were tested for hVISA using vancomycin screen agar and population analysis profile - area under the curve (PAP-AUC) test. Statistical analysis of the results was done using the chi-square test. SPSS version 29.0 was used for this purpose.

Results

Out of 665 strains of S. aureus isolated, 220 (33.1%) were MRSA. Of these 220 MRSA strains, 122 (55.5%) and 98 (44.5%) were isolated from diabetic and non-diabetic patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in the antimicrobial resistance patterns of MRSA strains isolated from diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Foot infections and osteomyelitis caused by MRSA were significantly more among diabetic patients. Out of 220 strains of MRSA, 14 (6.4%) were hVISA. The rates of hVISA among MRSA isolated from diabetic and non-diabetic were 9.0% and 3.1%, respectively. This difference was statistically not significant.

Conclusion

The rate of hVISA among all MRSA isolates was 6.4%. The risk of hVISA infection was three times more in diabetic patients. The results emphasize the importance of the detection of hVISA among MRSA isolates especially from diabetic patients.