1
|
Öztürk R. Expandable endoprostheses in skeletally immature patients: Where we are. World J Orthop 2024; 15:312-317. [PMID: 38680670 PMCID: PMC11045467 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i4.312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Approximately 45 percent of malignant bone tumors are seen under the age of 16 and one of the important results of growth plate sacrification in patients with immature skeletons is limb inequality. Until the early 1990s, the treatment options for these patients were rotationplasty or amputation. Multimodal approaches that combine imaging, chemotherapy, and surgical techniques have enabled the development of limb-preserving methods with satisfactory results. In order to overcome inequality problems, expandable prostheses have been developed in the 1980s. Extendable endoprosthesis replacements have been improved over the years and are now an established and safe alternative. Noninvasive prostheses appear to be advantageous compared to minimally invasive expandable prostheses that require multiple surgical procedures, but the complication rate remains high. Therefore, although expandable prostheses are not the definitive answer to the treatment of bone sarcomas in skeletally immature children, they are still a suitable interim choice until full adulthood is achieved. Due to reported high complication rates, the procedures require significant experience and are recommended for use only in specialized cancer centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Recep Öztürk
- Tumororthopädie und Sarkomchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen 45143, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kelly SP, Ramkumar DB, Crawford B, Lozano-Calderon SA, Gebhardt MC, Anderson ME. Management of limb length discrepancy after bone sarcoma resection about the knee in the skeletally immature. J Pediatr Orthop B 2023:01202412-990000000-00149. [PMID: 37712771 DOI: 10.1097/bpb.0000000000001124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
Patients with bone sarcomas increasingly choose limb salvage. This can lead to issues with limb length discrepancy (LLD) for the skeletally immature. We synthesize management options into an algorithm and report our results. Patients with bone sarcomas involving any location from the femoral diaphysis to the tibial diaphysis 12 years or younger were reviewed. Our clinical pathway prescribed patients with metadiaphyseal lesions to intercalary allograft reconstruction, epiphyseal lesions and less than 5 cm expected LLD to osteoarticular allograft and patients with more than 5 cm expected LLD to extendable prosthesis. Twenty patients met inclusion criteria: 11 with osteoarticular allografts, 5 with extendable prostheses and 4 with intercalary allografts; median age 11.5 years; median follow-up 8.2 years; and final median LLD 1.6 cm. Five patients had contralateral epiphysiodesis, two patients underwent contralateral femoral shortening and a median of 6 (range 4-8) lengthenings were performed for extendable prostheses. Four patients had residual LLD over 3 cm. There were 13 revisions in 8 patients and 2 amputations. Limb-salvage in paediatric bone sarcoma of the knee can be managed with multiple techniques producing satisfactory results in regards to LLD. Careful pre-operative planning and shared decision making is a requisite given the high rate of secondary procedures for both LLD and reconstructive failures. Level of evidence: Level III Retrospective Comparative Study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean P Kelly
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Dipak B Ramkumar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - Brooke Crawford
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida
| | | | - Mark C Gebhardt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Megan E Anderson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tibia Multiplanar Deformities and Growth Disturbance Following Expandable Endoprosthetic Distal Femur Replacement. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11226734. [PMID: 36431210 PMCID: PMC9699560 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Expandable distal femur endoprosthesis (EDFE) is commonly used to compensate for the loss of the distal femoral epiphyseal plate in skeletally immature children who have undergone surgical resection of bone malignancies. However, the effect of the passive tibial component of the EDFE on tibial growth has not been extensively studied in the literature. This study aims to delineate the type, frequency, and associated risk factors of multiplanar proximal tibial deformities in skeletally immature children following the use of the expandable distal femur endoprosthesis (EDFE). Moreover, we plan to detect how these deformities influence the long-term functionality of the endoprosthesis in defining the need for subsequent implant revision or further surgical management. Patients and Methods: A total of 20 patients aged (7−12) years underwent expandable distal femur replacement. Two types of implants were used: Juvenile Tumor System (JTS) non-invasive prosthesis in 14 patients, and Modular Universal Tumor and Revision System (MUTARS)® Xpand Growing Prostheses in six patients. A scanogram and CT scan documented the measurements of longitudinal and multiplanar growth as leg length discrepancy (LLD), femur length discrepancy (FLD), tibia length discrepancy (TLD), and the yield values of rotational, sagittal, and coronal deformities of the tibia. The patients were followed up to assess the need for further management. Sex, age, size of tibial plate perforation, and type of implant used were studied for possible correlation with deformities or growth disturbance. Results: The patients were followed up for a mean of 3 (2−7) years. A total of 14 patients, (10 JTS, 4 implant cast) had a tibial deformity and/or growth disturbance. A single patient was found to have all deformities (growth, rotational, coronal, and sagittal). Fourteen patients were found to have an LLD ranging from 5.3 to 59 mm (median 21 mm), 12 had a TLD from 3 to 30 mm, (median 10 mm), and 11 patients showed evidence of malrotation from 6 to 32 degrees (median 11 degrees). TLD was found to contribute entirely to LLD in three patients, and >50% of LLDs in seven patients. All LLDs were treated conservatively, except in three patients; two received contralateral tibia epiphysiodesis and one received revision with a new implant. A single patient had a posterior tibia slope angle (PTSA) of −2.8 degrees, and three patients had a coronal deformity with a mean medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA) of 80.3 (77−83 degrees). Conclusions: Tibial growth disturbance and multiplanar deformities occur in the majority of patients following EDFE replacement, exacerbating LLD. Yet, these disturbances may be well tolerated, managed conservatively, and rarely mandate endoprosthetic revision or subsequent corrective surgery. Age at the time of surgery was found to be the only significant contributor to the development of tibia growth disturbance.
Collapse
|
4
|
Abu El Afieh J, Gray M, Seah M, Khan W. Endoprosthetic Reconstruction in Ewing's Sarcoma Patients: A Systematic Review of Postoperative Complications and Functional Outcomes. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11154612. [PMID: 35956228 PMCID: PMC9370018 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Ewing's sarcoma (ES) is a rare primary bone cancer managed by radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgical resection. The existing literature on limb salvage surgery with endoprostheses combines data for ES patients with osteosarcoma. This review aimed to evaluate surgical and functional outcomes of endoprosthetic reconstruction in exclusively Ewing's patients. We believe that this is the first comprehensive review to evaluate the outcomes of limb salvage surgery with endoprostheses exclusively in Ewing's sarcoma patients. Clinical data and outcomes were collected from PubMed, Embase, Medline and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were studies on limb salvage surgery in ES patients, where individual patient data was available. Seventeen studies with a total of 57 Ewing's patients were included in this review. Fifty-three of the ES patients preserved the limb after limb salvage with endoprostheses. The average five-year implant survivorship was 85.9% based on four studies in this review. Postoperative complications were categorised by Henderson's failure modes. Soft tissue failure was the most common, occurring in 35.1% of patients, followed by deep infection in 15.7% of patients. There was a suggestion of 'good' functional outcomes with limb salvage surgery. The salient limitation of this review is the variability and rarity of the patient population. Homogenous data in a larger population is necessary to provide more insight into outcomes of limb reconstruction in ES.
Collapse
|
5
|
Long-term outcomes of non-invasive expandable endoprostheses for primary malignant tumors around the knee in skeletally-immature patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142:927-936. [PMID: 33417027 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03712-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Expandable endoprostheses are used to restore limb function and compensate for the sacrifice physis involved in carcinologic resection. Long-term outcomes of the last generation of knee "non-invasive" expandable endoprostheses are required. Objectives were to report on oncologic results of bone sarcoma resection around the knee with expandable endoprosthesis reconstruction and to compare the surgical outcomes of the "non-invasive" expandable endoprostheses used in our department. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective study that included all children with bone sarcoma around the knee that underwent tumor resection reconstructed with non-invasive expandable prosthesis. Phenix-Repiphysis was used from 1994 to 2008 followed by Stanmore JTS non-invasive from 2008 to 2016. Survival and complications were recorded. Functional outcomes included Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, knee range of motion, lower limb discrepancy (LLD). RESULTS Forty children (Sex Ratio = 1) aged a mean 8.8 years (range, 5.6-13.8) at surgery were included in the study. There were 36 osteosarcoma and 4 Ewing sarcoma that involved 33 distal femur and 7 proximal tibia. Cohort (n = 40) consisted of 28 Phenix-Repiphysis and 12 Stanmore with a mean follow-up of 9.8 ± 5.8 years and 6.1 ± 3.1 years, respectively. Postoperative infection rate was 7.5% in the cohort (3 Repiphysis). Functional results were significantly better in the Stanmore group with a mean MSTS of 87.6 ± 5.4% and knee flexion of 112 ± 38°. At last follow-up, implant survival was 100% in Stanmore group, whereas all living Phenix-Repiphysis were explanted. Mechanical failure was the primary cause for revision of Phenix-Repiphysis. Limb length equality was noted in 79% patients with Phenix-Repiphysis and 84% with Stanmore at last follow-up. CONCLUSION Chemotherapy and limb-salvage surgery yield good oncologic outcomes. Expandable endoprostheses are effective in maintaining satisfactory function and lower limb equality. With improvements made in the last generation of "non-invasive" prostheses, implants' survival has been substantially lengthened.
Collapse
|
6
|
Free Vascularized Fibula Salvage of Failed CPH in Pediatric Sarcoma Patients. Sarcoma 2022; 2022:6240293. [PMID: 35586727 PMCID: PMC9110248 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6240293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Due to extended life expectancy and recent improvements in surgical techniques, limb salvage has replaced amputation as the gold standard and is now performed in 90–95% of upper extremity malignancies. However, many of these salvage procedures are associated with significant postsurgical complications. In particular, the clavicula pro humero (CPH) procedure is associated with high rates of nonunion. We present our experience with upper extremity salvage using the free vascularized fibular flap (VFF) after failure or nonunion of the original CPH procedure in the pediatric population. Methods Five patients under the age of 18 diagnosed with upper extremity sarcoma who underwent tumor resection with immediate CPH reconstruction complicated with nonunion, and subsequent revision with free VFF were included. Data on patient demographics, oncologic characteristics, surgical procedures, intraoperative details, postoperative complications, and time to graft union were recorded. Results Five patients (average age = 8.4 years; range = 5–10 years at surgery date) underwent secondary limb salvage procedure with free VFF reconstruction following failed CPH reconstruction for proximal humeral osteosarcoma (n = 4) or Ewing sarcoma (n = 1). The mean follow-up was 3.7 years. Complications occurred in five patients (100%), with three patients requiring reoperation (60%). Four patients achieved graft union (average union time = 3.7 months) and successful limb reconstruction. Four patients were alive with no local recurrence of the disease. One patient did not achieve union and was lost to follow-up. Conclusion Primary bone tumors in the pediatric population require wide surgical resection, and reconstruction often has high complication rates that can warrant further procedures. A free VFF is a viable option for upper extremity salvage after previously failed reconstructions because it provides vascularized tissue to a scarred tissue bed and allows for the replacement or augmentation of large bony defects.
Collapse
|
7
|
Masrouha K, Abboud M, Saab R, Muwakkit SA, Khoury N, Haidar R, Saghieh S. Long-term follow-up of children treated with the Repiphysis expandable prosthesis for lower extremity bone sarcoma. J Pediatr Orthop B 2022; 31:e258-e263. [PMID: 34101677 DOI: 10.1097/bpb.0000000000000891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Expandable endoprostheses provide a limb salvage option for skeletally immature patients with bone sarcoma of the lower extremities. Initial reports of the Repiphysis prosthesis were encouraging; however, medium-term follow-up revealed high complication rates. We report on the long-term follow-up of a cohort of patients treated with the Repiphysis prosthesis. Eleven patients were included in the study. Data collected included sex, age at surgery, duration of follow-up, site of disease, histologic diagnosis, number of lengthening sessions, amount lengthened, postoperative complications, endoprosthetic failure, mode of endoprosthetic failure, duration from index surgery to failure and to revision, type of revision surgery and final limb-length discrepancy. The average duration of follow-up from the time of surgery was 180 months (range, 144-215 months). Fifteen Repiphysis implants were used in 11 patients. All implants failed with an average time from surgery to failure of 36 months (range, 3-72 months). Twenty-four complications were observed: one wound dehiscence, two deep infections, 18 mechanical failures, implant collapse with destruction of proximal tibia epiphysis in two and one periprosthetic proximal femur fracture with dislodgement of the stem. Despite being an option for limb salvage, the Repiphysis prosthesis has a high rate of mechanical failure and need for revision, similar to other expandable implants. The authors, therefore, recommend full disclosure of the potential short- and long-term complications and need for revision, as well as alternative treatment options if their use is considered. Level of evidence: IV (Therapeutic).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim Masrouha
- Divisions of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Miguel Abboud
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Children's Cancer Institute
| | - Raya Saab
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Children's Cancer Institute
| | - Samar A Muwakkit
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Children's Cancer Institute
| | | | - Rachid Haidar
- Division of Orthopedic surgery, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Said Saghieh
- Division of Orthopedic surgery, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lex JR, Adlan A, Tsoi K, Evans S, Stevenson JD. Frequency and reason for reoperation following non-invasive expandable endoprostheses: A systematic review. J Bone Oncol 2021; 31:100397. [PMID: 34712555 PMCID: PMC8529098 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Implant failure is the most common reason for revision of growing prostheses. Maximum prosthesis growth with a residual LLD is the most common mode of failure. Functional outcomes are good, but 1/ 5 patients have a persistent LLD over 2 cm.
Background Non-invasive expandable endoprostheses (NIEPR) utilize an external electromagnetic field to drive an innate mechanical gearbox. This lengthens the extremity following oncological resections in children with a predicted limb length discrepancy (LLD), facilitating limb-salvage. This review was conducted to assess NIEPR implant survival rates and identify modes of implant failure unique to these prostheses. Methods Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for all manuscripts evaluating implant survival of NIEPRs implanted into skeletally immature patients following resection of extremity sarcomas. Minimum follow-up of 12 months or implant failure was required for inclusion. Failures were classified using the latest ISOLS classification and exact implant-specific failure modality was also identified. Results 19 studies met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 10.0 years (7.7 – 11.4 years). The most common locations for NIEPR implantation were the distal femur (343, 76.7%) and proximal tibia (53, 119%). Mean follow-up was 65.3 months (19.4 – 163 months). The overall implant revision rate was 46.2% (0 – 100%); implant specific revisions included maximal prosthesis lengthening with persistent LLD (10.4%), failed extension mechanism (6.1%), implant fracture (7.7%), hinge fracture (1.4%) and bushing wear (0.9%). Persistent clinically significant (>20 mm) LLD at final follow-up was present in 19.2% (0 – 50%) of patients. The mean MSTS score was 85.1% (66.7–96.3%) at final follow-up. Conclusion Implant-related failures are the most common reason for NIEPR revision. Implant reliability appears to be improved with current designs. A sub-classification to the current classification system based on implant-specific failures for NIEPRs is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnathan R Lex
- The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Oncology Department, Birmingham, West Midlands B31 2AP, UK.,Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Amirul Adlan
- The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Oncology Department, Birmingham, West Midlands B31 2AP, UK
| | - Kim Tsoi
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,University Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Scott Evans
- The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Oncology Department, Birmingham, West Midlands B31 2AP, UK
| | - Jonathan D Stevenson
- The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Oncology Department, Birmingham, West Midlands B31 2AP, UK.,Aston University Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hopyan S. Reconstruction for bone tumours of the shoulder and humerus in children and adolescents. J Child Orthop 2021; 15:358-365. [PMID: 34476025 PMCID: PMC8381401 DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.210131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Reconstructions for paediatric bone tumours of the shoulder girdle and humerus are intended to optimize placement of the hand in space. Given the longevity of paediatric survivors of sarcoma, durability is an important planning consideration. Here, I review a subset of approaches based on anatomical site with an emphasis on function and longevity. Often, biological reconstructions that combine living bone with tendon repairs and transfers best address those goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sevan Hopyan
- Division of Orthopaedics and Program in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto,Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery and Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto,Correspondence should be sent to Sevan Hopyan, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
El Beaino M, Wang WL, Alaraj SF, Gugala Z, Lin PP. Osteofibrous dysplasia and adamantinoma: A summary of diagnostic challenges and surgical techniques. Surg Oncol 2021; 38:101626. [PMID: 34280695 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Osteofibrous dysplasia is an indolent benign fibro-osseous tumor, while adamantinoma is a locally aggressive biphasic malignancy with epithelial and fibro-osseous components. Predominantly arising in the tibial diaphysis of children and young adults, both tumors are resistant to chemotherapy and radiation. Wide surgical resection is regarded as the mainstay of therapy for adamantinoma, and limb-salvage reconstructive procedures can achieve good functional outcomes, albeit with non-negligible rates of complications. This review discusses emerging advances in the pathogenesis, histogenesis, and diagnosis of these entities and presents advantages and limitations of the most common surgical techniques used for their management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc El Beaino
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York, Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA; School of Public Health, State University of New York, Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology and Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sami F Alaraj
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Zbigniew Gugala
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Patrick P Lin
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Outcomes of Expandable Prostheses for Primary Bone Malignancies in Skeletally Immature Patients: A Systematic Review and Pooled Data Analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 2020; 40:e487-e497. [PMID: 32501921 DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000001459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteosarcoma and other primary bone malignancies are relatively common in skeletally immature patients. Current literature features case series with disparate complication rates, making it difficult for surgeons to educate patients on outcomes after limb salvage with expandable prostheses. This study aims to provide an update on complication rates, mortality, and functional outcomes in patients who undergo limb salvage with expandable prostheses for primary bone malignancies. METHODS A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An exhaustive PubMed/Medline and Cochrane search of peer-reviewed published literature from 1997 to 2017 was performed, yielding a total of 1350 studies. After multiple rounds of review for inclusion and exclusion criteria, 28 retrospective studies were included. All were level IV evidence of case series and retrospective studies. Overall, this included 634 total patients and 292 patients with individual patient data. The primary outcomes studied were complication rates, mortality, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional score. Secondary outcomes included complication rate subtypes, number of lengthening procedures, mean amount lengthened, and prevalence of limb length discrepancies. RESULTS A total of 292 patients with individual patient data averaged 10.1 years at the surgery and had a mean follow-up of 67 months. Two hundred sixteen patients (74%) had tumors of the distal femur. MSTS scores averaged 80.3 and overall mortality was 22%. Patients with distal femur tumors averaged 4.4 lengthening procedures and 43 mm lengthened. Leg length discrepancy (LLD) was 36% overall, which increased with longer periods of follow-up (P<0.001). Overall complication and revision rate was 43%, increasing to 59% in patients with 5 to 10 years of follow-up, and 89% in patients with >10 years of follow-up. Minimally invasive prostheses had lower rates of complications than noninvasive prostheses (P=0.024), specifically mechanical complications (P=0.028), mostly because of increased rates of lengthening and device failure in the noninvasive models (21% vs. 4%, P=0.0004). CONCLUSIONS Despite its limitations, which include entirely heterogenous and retrospective case series data, this systematic review provides clinicians with pooled summary data representing the largest summary of outcomes after reconstruction with expandable prostheses to date. This analysis can assist surgeons to better understand and educate their patients and their families on functional outcomes, mortality, and complication rates after limb-sparing reconstruction with expandable prostheses for primary bone malignancies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV-retrospective case series with pooled data.
Collapse
|
12
|
Stitzlein RN, Wojcik J, Sebro RA, Balamuth NJ, Weber KL. Team Approach: Osteosarcoma of the Distal Part of the Femur in Adolescents. JBJS Rev 2019; 5:e5. [PMID: 29278618 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.17.00030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Russell N Stitzlein
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery (R.N.S. and K.L.W.), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (J.W.), Radiology (R.A.S.), and Pediatrics (N.J.B.), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John Wojcik
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery (R.N.S. and K.L.W.), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (J.W.), Radiology (R.A.S.), and Pediatrics (N.J.B.), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ronnie A Sebro
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery (R.N.S. and K.L.W.), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (J.W.), Radiology (R.A.S.), and Pediatrics (N.J.B.), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Naomi J Balamuth
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery (R.N.S. and K.L.W.), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (J.W.), Radiology (R.A.S.), and Pediatrics (N.J.B.), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Divisions of Oncology (N.J.B.) and Orthopaedics (K.L.W.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kristy L Weber
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery (R.N.S. and K.L.W.), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (J.W.), Radiology (R.A.S.), and Pediatrics (N.J.B.), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Divisions of Oncology (N.J.B.) and Orthopaedics (K.L.W.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Savvidou OD, Kaspiris A, Dimopoulos L, Georgopoulos G, Goumenos SD, Papadakis V, Papagelopoulos PJ. Functional and Surgical Outcomes After Endoprosthetic Reconstruction With Expandable Prostheses in Children: A Systematic Review. Orthopedics 2019; 42:184-190. [PMID: 31323102 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20190625-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Treatment of bone sarcomas in children is associated with wide tumor re-section and segmental reconstruction. The optimal surgical approach is still under debate in the literature. During the past decade, the application of expandable prostheses has gained remarkable attention because it improves patients' appearance and allows limb growth preventing leg length discrepancy. A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies focusing on the functional and surgical outcomes of the application of expandable endoprostheses. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(4):184-190.].
Collapse
|
14
|
Causes and Frequencies of Reoperations After Endoprosthetic Reconstructions for Extremity Tumor Surgery: A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477:894-902. [PMID: 30801278 PMCID: PMC6437378 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Excision of bone tumors and endoprosthetic reconstruction allow patients early weightbearing and a potential functional advantage compared with amputation. These reconstructions do not restore the limb to normal status, however, and patients are subject to complications that may result in revision or loss of the limb. Because better understanding of these complications based on current information might help the patient and surgeon in decision-making, we undertook a systematic review of studies published on this topic. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) What are the primary modes and proportion of failure of tumor endoprostheses in patients undergoing reconstruction after excision of primary extremity bone sarcomas? METHODS We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for all studies published from April 15, 1998, to April 15, 2018. Three reviewers independently reviewed studies reporting endoprosthetic reconstruction survival and events requiring revision for primary extremity bone tumors treated with endoprosthetic reconstruction for inclusion and performed independent data extraction. We excluded all studies with fewer than five patients, any systematic review/meta-analyses, and any study not reporting on primary extremity bone tumors. All discrepancies were resolved by the study's senior author. Data extracted from included studies were any reoperation event for wound dehiscence, any operative fixation for a pathologic fracture, and any revision of the primary endoprosthesis for implant wear or breakage, deep infection not amenable to prosthesis retention, or for local recurrence. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) approach with a higher MINORS score representative of a more methodologically rigorous study with a total possible score of 16 points for noncomparative and 24 points for comparative studies. Forty-nine studies met criteria for inclusion from an initial search return of 904 studies, of which no studies were randomized controlled trials. From a total patient population of 2721, there was a mean followup of 93 months (range, 1-516 months) with loss to followup or death occurring in 447 of 2118 (21%) patients with six studies not providing loss to followup data. The mean MINORS score was 14 for prospective studies and 11 for retrospective studies. RESULTS Overall, there were 1283 reoperations among the 2721 (47%) patients. Reoperation for mechanical endoprosthetic events (soft tissue dehiscence or periarticular soft tissue instability, aseptic loosening, or implant wear/fracture) occurred in 907 of 2721 (33%) patients. Aseptic loosening occurred at a mean of 75 months (range, 1-376 months) in 212 of 315 patients (67%). Deep infection requiring removal of the initial prosthesis occurred in 247 of 2721 (9%) patients with deep infection occurring at a mean of 24 months (range, 1-372 months) in the 190 infections (77%) with time to infection data available. Local recurrence rates requiring revision or amputation occurred in 129 (5%) of all patients. There was an overall primary endoprosthesis survival rate without any surgical reintervention of 63% among reporting studies at a mean of 79 months followup. CONCLUSIONS Failures of endoprosthetic reconstructions after extremity tumor surgery are common, most often resulting from implant wear or fracture, aseptic loosening, and infection. Importantly, the aggregated data are the first to attempt to quantify the time to specific complication types within this patient population. Deep infection not amenable to endoprosthesis retention appears to occur approximately 2 years postoperatively in most patients, with aseptic loosening occurring most commonly at 75 months. Although endoprosthetic reconstruction is one of the most common forms of reconstruction after bone tumor resection, the quality of published evidence regarding this procedure is of low quality with high loss to followup and data quality limiting interstudy analysis. The quality of the evidence is low with high loss to followup and inconsistent reporting of times to reintervention events. Although the most common modes of endoprosthetic failure in this population are well known, creation of quality prospective, collaborative databases would assist in clarifying and informing important elements of the followup process for these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, therapeutic study.
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Li Y, Xu H, Shan H, Sun Y, Huang Z, Niu X. [Application of proximal tibial hemiprosthesis replacement and second-stage revision for proximal tibial osteosarcoma in three children]. ZHONGGUO XIU FU CHONG JIAN WAI KE ZA ZHI = ZHONGGUO XIUFU CHONGJIAN WAIKE ZAZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF REPARATIVE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 2019; 33:131-137. [PMID: 30739403 DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201810022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Objective To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of proximal tibial hemiprosthesis replacement in the first stage and prosthesis revision in the second stage in reducing the risk of length discrepancy of limbs in children with proximal tibial osteosarcoma. Methods Between 2009 and 2013, 3 children with conventional osteosarcoma at the proximal tibia (stage ⅡB) were treated. There were 2 boys and 1 girl. They were 12, 13, and 13 years old, respectively. After 4 courses of preoperative chemotherapy, the proximal tumor segmental resection and proximal tibial hemiprosthesis replacement were performed. Then the patients underwent prosthetic revision in the second stage when they were 20, 17, and 17 years old, respectively. Results All patients successfully completed two stages of operations. The length discrepancy of lower limb after the second stage operation were 19, 7, and 21 mm, respectively. Three patients were followed up 13, 3, and 27 months after the second stage operation, and the lower extremities functions were satisfactory. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 26, 27, and 25, respectively. Conclusion The proximal tibial hemiprosthesis replacement in the first stage combined with prosthesis revision in the second stage for treating the proximal tibia osteosarcoma in children can keep the distal femur growth ability, reduce the length discreapancy of lower limb, and obtain satisfactory stability and good function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Li
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P.R.China
| | - Hairong Xu
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P.R.China
| | - Huachao Shan
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P.R.China
| | - Yang Sun
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P.R.China
| | - Zhen Huang
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P.R.China
| | - Xiaohui Niu
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital, Beijing, 100035,
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Abstract
Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignancy of bone in children and young adults. This tumor has a very heterogeneous genetic profile and lacks any consistent unifying event that leads to the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma. In this review, some of the important genetic events involved in osteosarcoma will be highlighted. Additionally, the clinical diagnosis of osteosarcoma will be discussed, as well as contemporary chemotherapeutic and surgical management of this tumor. Finally, the review will discuss some of the novel approaches to treating this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan A Durfee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Maryam Mohammed
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hue H Luu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|